Bankless Co-founder's Confession on Selling Off ETH: Ethereum Did the Right Thing, but 'ETH as Money' Has No Future

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2026-05-27Actualizado a 2026-05-27

Resumen

Bankless co-founder David Hoffman recently sold his remaining ETH holdings, sparking debate within the Ethereum community. In a detailed explanation, Hoffman clarifies that his decision was not based on bearish sentiment towards Ethereum itself, which he remains highly optimistic about, but rather on the conclusion that the "ETH is Money" narrative has largely run its course. Hoffman argues that for ETH to achieve its envisioned status as global money, Ethereum needed to execute flawlessly across multiple layers—governance, technology, and market dominance—in a highly coordinated manner. He acknowledges Ethereum's significant successes and current justified valuation but suggests the window for a major revaluation based on this monetary narrative is closing. The post examines several challenges: the strong correlation between L1 chain activity/fees and native token value; the perceived failure of the "strong version" of crypto (user-owned, egalitarian systems) versus the rise of a "weak version" (efficient ledger technology for traditional finance); and the possibility that ETH's momentum as money was uniquely tied to the distorted conditions of the 2020-2021 period. Crucially, Hoffman highlights a structural tension: Ethereum is architected as a "giver, not a taker," providing critical infrastructure like secure block space and tokenization at cost. This ethos benefits the broader ecosystem (applications, L2s) but doesn't prioritize extracting maximum value for ETH itself...

Original article by Bankless Co-founder David Hoffman

Compiled by / Odaily Planet Daily Qin Xiaofeng (@QinXiaofeng 888 )

Last week, David Hoffman, one of Ethereum's staunchest believers and a co-founder of Bankless, proactively published an article stating that he had "sold his last ETH," sparking intense debate within the Ethereum community (Recommended reading“Bankless Founder Sells All ETH, Collective Disillusionment in Ethereum Faith”).

On May 27th, David Hoffman posted a lengthy explanation on X detailing why he sold his ETH. He stated that selling ETH was not because he is bearish on ETH, but because he believes the narrative of 'ETH is Money' has largely played out. He hopes to reallocate his capital to other opportunities he sees in the market. At the same time, he expressed that he remains extremely optimistic about the Ethereum network and its entire ecosystem.

Below is the original text by David Hoffman, compiled by Odaily Planet Daily.

————————————————————

Money is a coordination game, and coordination is never easy.

The Ethereum project itself is a collection of coordination problems stacked layer upon layer across multiple levels, and the claim "ETH is Money" requires success at all these layers, and success with confidence.

ETH can only become money if, and only if, every layer of Ethereum's techno-social stack performs better than its competitors.

Given the ambitious scope of the Ethereum project, achieving its maximally successful version was always a monumental challenge. Despite shortcomings, the Ethereum project has performed admirably, and its current market capitalization is well-deserved.

Nonetheless, the window of opportunity for the market to re-evaluate Ethereum appears to be closing.

To some extent, ETH *is* money. But it is not the maximally successful version we collectively sought from the beginning.

Ethereum is a Coordination Game

A Turing-complete blockchain is such a powerful concept that Ethereum's maximum potential is to become the entire crypto world—all-encompassing and omnipresent. The only obstacle preventing Ethereum from achieving 100% absolute dominance is coordination.

Ethereum's leadership needs to be sufficiently decentralized; its governance requires "rough consensus" to create credible neutrality, thereby maximizing Ethereum's adoption at the highest level.

Simultaneously, Ethereum's leadership also needs to respond swiftly to market dynamics and operate like a startup facing an existential threat of being obsolete.

Meanwhile, Ethereum's Layer 2s (L2s) need to be able to act independently from the base layer, making their own market choices, yet they need to be economically tethered to, and constrained by, the broader Ethereum economy and the Ethereum brand.

Furthermore, Ethereum's roadmap needs to be executed in a specific order to maximize and maintain its development momentum and market dominance, thereby effectively quelling competition and maximizing confidence in Ethereum and ETH. Those mission-critical technologies need to be researched and engineered fast enough so that Ethereum can both prove its utility to the outside world and demonstrate its ability to stay ahead of competitors.

In summary, the core of the "ETH is Money" thesis is creating a revolutionary and powerful financial asset that, by virtue of its unique properties as the premier global store of value, attracts those who were previously indifferent.

Ethereum's brand and ETH's strength must be so powerful that traditional investors (baby boomers) not only feel safe but feel compelled to include ETH as a significant part of their retirement portfolios because the Ethereum project is so dominant.

Thus, to achieve the goal of "ETH is Money," everything upstream of ETH must operate with highly effective synergy.

Ethereum is not Bitcoin. It chose the hard path.

Bitcoin chose to strip everything off its blockchain to elevate BTC. Ethereum chose to add everything to its blockchain to maximize the utility of its block space. Only by doing this optimally and before competitors can ETH attain its status as a global currency.

We made some progress, and Ethereum has earned the share of its maximum potential market cap it deserves. But I fear the window for playing this game has closed.

The Environment Perhaps Never Allowed It to Succeed

Looking back over the past few years, I see a host of environmental challenges Ethereum would have needed to overcome.

(1) L1 Assets are Inextricably Linked to Revenue

No matter how you view the difficulty of evaluating smart contract chains based on fees and revenue... fees and revenue are clearly the way smart contract L1 assets enhance their pricing power.

By 2026, we have ample data showing that all these factors are closely correlated: L1 activity, L1 fees, and the price appreciation of the L1 native asset.

In 2021, ETH's dominance occurred when its L1 revenue market share was highest.

In 2024, SOL's dominance occurred when its L1 revenue market share was uniquely growing relative to the rest of the industry.

In 2026, NEAR is experiencing a price revaluation concurrently with a fundamental increase in its L1 revenue and NEAR token burn.

You can also look at assets like BNB and TRX, which are perhaps the highest cumulative revenue projects in history. Their price charts look like what I would have expected ETH's to look like—if ETH could have maintained its higher market share in L1 fees longer than it did in 2022.

(2) The Strong Version of the Crypto Vision Failed to Materialize

0xMakesy made an excellent post on Twitter:

"The failure of Fantasy Top, FriendTech, and consumer crypto apps to cross the chasm absolutely kills me. The most ambitious form of crypto (ushering in a new era of user-owned software and infrastructure) has failed.

We optimistically tried to merge the roles of investors (people who allocate capital to production expecting more in return) and consumers (people willing to pay above operational cost for a product), and found we satisfied neither side's needs.

Where the strong version of crypto failed, the weak version of crypto (commoditized ledger/database technology for financial transactions) has succeeded beyond anyone's wildest expectations. The result is that crypto has been relegated to an adjunct of traditional finance—this is both more impactful than any normie expected, while simultaneously structurally disappointing for crypto OGs. As commoditized ledger/database tech, reducing global transaction costs reduces leakage from global GDP, but this is a marginal improvement on the status quo, and much of its value flows to existing intermediaries, lowering their overhead and increasing their margins.

Crypto was supposed to be the most egalitarian thing ever. Its ambition was insanely high. Had it succeeded, it could have genuinely changed the fabric of society.

But it didn't. Game over. We didn't find the right primitives, and more importantly, the right culture to realize the most ambitious version of crypto. Time to question everything again."

Ethereum represents the strong version of crypto—crypto for crypto's sake, self-sustaining, self-perpetuating. DeFi, NFTs, DAOs, etc. We are rebels building an alternative financial system by the people, for the people, injecting imagination into money.

There also exists a weak version of crypto: efficient ledger infrastructure for financial institution backends. The weak version was supposed to fuel the strong version, turning demand for an internet ledger into a torrent flowing into crypto, into Ethereum, and finally aggregating into ETH.

Perhaps, if Ethereum had executed better, faster, stronger, if crypto hadn't attracted so many grifters and looters, the industry would have earned the influence and respect I always thought it deserved. But the only period the public has held a positive view of crypto was from late 2020 to early 2022.

Outside that brief window, crypto's reputation is scams, fraud, get-rich-quick schemes, and uselessness to the average person.

(3) ETH as Money Relied on the Strong Version of Crypto

The times when ETH performed well as internet money coincided precisely when everyone was forced online. The world discovered crypto for the first time, and for that brief window, it was cool.

Money is a coordination game; a currency's Schelling point is held together by belief. In 2021, more people believed in ETH: it was cool, disruptive, and represented populism. Bitcoin possessed the same qualities and has retained them better post-2021 than ETH has.

This reality points to an uncomfortable possibility: the strong version of crypto may have never reached a stable equilibrium. COVID was an incredibly distorted monetary era, and ETH as money may have only been sustained because of that distortion. If so, then ETH becoming money always relied on the strong version of crypto performing better than it actually did.

(4) Ethereum's Utility Also Helps Other Currencies

Is Bitcoin money? Is the US dollar money? Is gold money? Irrelevant! Anything perceived as money will be tokenized on Ethereum.

In 2020, Nic Carter proposed on the Bankless podcast that stablecoins might be parasitic to ETH as Ethereum's native unit. At the time, the stablecoin supply on Ethereum was $3B. Today, that number is $163B, a 54x increase.

The utility Ethereum provides is helping anything that *is* money expand its monetary network. This is why the US is so bullish on crypto for stablecoin applications. Ethereum is helping America maintain dollar hegemony, and leveraging this fact is explicit government policy.

The positive spillover effect of this utility for $ETH as money is clearly not as strong as what the US government sees from Ethereum's stablecoin ecosystem.

Ethereum is a Giver, Not a Taker

At its core, Ethereum is a giver, not a taker.

It provides the world's most secure block space to L2s at cost.
It tokenizes the world's assets at cost.
It secures billions of dollars in DeFi at cost.

Ethereum does not charge any markup for anything it does. This is the nature of open-source software, and this is Ethereum's strength. Ethereum offers its full suite of incredibly valuable services to the world at cost.

Ethereum is virtuous. Ethereum is good. Ethereum is the world's most successful non-profit.

Of course, a massive amount of application usage will occur on Ethereum. It is, and will continue to be, one of the most impactful open-source software projects ever built by humanity, and being a "non-profit protocol" is a core characteristic.

This is why the path for ETH to become money relied on a very high and sustained market dominance.

Ultimately, as block space commoditizes, fees will trend towards zero. As long as it's Ethereum commoditizing and not a competitor, then Ethereum can maintain its margin and dominance.

Ultimately, the Fat Protocol Theory gives way to the Fat Application Theory, and applications consume the remaining profit margins. As long as they are applications on Ethereum and not on a competitor, this is fine for ETH.

"ETH is Money" and "Ethereum is a giver, not a taker" are difficult to reconcile. Ethereum's architecture is intentionally designed to return all value to its ecosystem, charging only the minimum necessary to sustain the network.

Architecturally, ETH is not prioritized within Ethereum, and this is a feature, not a bug. ETH can only become money if Ethereum wins a war it is architecturally refusing to fight.

This vision could have been realized if Ethereum could have maintained an incredibly dominant market position.

The "ETH is Money" Thesis Makes Extremely High Demands of Ethereum

"ETH is Money" demands perfection across the board from Ethereum. Its margin for error was smaller than I originally thought. Ethereum's momentum in 2021 and 2022 made ETH becoming money seem like the default path.

In hindsight, Solana's rise in 2021, accompanied by rising anti-Ethereum sentiment, was the first major sign that this coordination game for Ethereum and ETH was not proceeding as planned.

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) needed to decentralize and allow alternative power structures to emerge. But it also needed to respond to market forces with the urgency and drive of a startup facing an existential threat.

L2 teams needed the freedom for autonomous decision-making but also needed to operate under the larger brand umbrella of Ethereum and ETH. The technical synchronization integration between Ethereum and its L2s needed to be executed more swiftly.

The value of smart contract chains is determined by fees, and to escape this paradigm, Ethereum needed to rewrite the rules through the sheer power of its success.

However, the "ETH is Money" thesis has not failed.

It just hasn't realized its full potential.

Ethereum did the noble thing, choosing for its future the hardest, most ambitious, most ideologically pure path. It won some incredible victories and also failed to pass some challenges. It has earned the market capitalization it deserves.

I am extremely bullish on the Ethereum network and its ecosystem: Ethereum is architecturally designed to maximize the success of its applications, L2s, and ecosystem. The Fat Application Theory means Ethereum's apps will capture all the fees, and the Rollup-centric roadmap means L2s will take 97% of the profit margin.

As for the ETH asset itself, I find it increasingly difficult to see a structural case for an upward or downward revaluation of ETH.

The reason I sold my ETH is not that I am bearish on ETH per se, but that I believe the "ETH is Money" thesis has played out, and I want to reallocate my capital today to other opportunities I see in the market.

Lecturas Relacionadas

PhotonPay Upgrades Embedded Wallet API: Building an "Invisible Yet Indispensable" Stablecoin Payment Infrastructure Foundation

PhotonPay announces a major upgrade to its Embedded Wallet API, enabling traditional businesses to integrate stablecoin payments rapidly without managing private keys or complex compliance burdens. This "hands-off" infrastructure aims to make blockchain settlement invisible to both enterprises and end-users, offering a structural alternative to costly and slow traditional cross-border payments, which average 6.36% in fees. Key features include rapid developer integration, built-in regulatory compliance (AML/CFT, KYC), high-security key management, and seamless interoperability between fiat and stablecoins. The company argues that in an era of increasing regulatory clarity (e.g., MiCA) and mature institutional infrastructure (Visa, Stripe), "compliance-first" design is a competitive moat. PhotonPay's solution targets platform businesses like B2B marketplaces and SaaS providers, helping them tap into the growing $28 trillion (adjusted) stablecoin transaction volume driven by global demand for efficient settlements.

链捕手Hace 19 min(s)

PhotonPay Upgrades Embedded Wallet API: Building an "Invisible Yet Indispensable" Stablecoin Payment Infrastructure Foundation

链捕手Hace 19 min(s)

Samsung Relies on Technology Cycles, SK Hynix on HBM, How Did Micron Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

Micron Technology, the third-largest memory chip maker alongside Samsung and SK Hynix, recently saw its market cap surpass $1 trillion. Founded in 1978 in Boise, Idaho, Micron survived brutal industry cycles while American peers and Japan's memory sector faltered. Its survival is attributed to a dual strategy: leveraging political and legal avenues for critical breathing room, coupled with relentless manufacturing cost control. Historically, Micron sought U.S. government intervention three times. In 1985, it filed an anti-dumping complaint against Japanese firms, leading to the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. Ironically, this created an opening for Samsung, which later became its toughest competitor. In 2002, Micron turned "whistleblower" in a DRAM price-fixing investigation, escaping penalties while rivals were fined. In 2017, it sued China's Fujian Jinhua, contributing to its placement on a U.S. entity list, stifling a nascent competitor. However, a major strategic misstep occurred in 2013 with the acquisition of bankrupt Japanese firm Elpida. Integrating Elpida's mobile-DRAM-focused technology diverted resources, causing Micron to miss the critical early decade of development for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)—the high-performance memory essential for AI chips like NVIDIA GPUs. By the time AI demand exploded in 2022, SK Hynix, which launched the first HBM in 2013, held about 85% of the HBM3 market, leaving Micron with roughly 3%. Micron now faces a triple squeeze. In the high-end HBM market, it lags significantly behind SK Hynix and Samsung. In the mid-to-low end DRAM market, it faces aggressive price competition from China's CXMT. Furthermore, a 2023 Chinese cybersecurity ban on its products slashed its revenue from China, a once-core market, from over 10% to just 7.1% by FY2025, causing it to exit China's data center server business. Beneath its political maneuvering lies Micron's core strength: exceptional manufacturing efficiency and cost control. Decades of engineering have yielded DRAM chips with a smaller cell area than rivals, meaning more chips per wafer and lower unit costs. This efficiency, not subsidies, has allowed it to withstand price wars. While political leverage bought time, Micron is now paying a "time debt" in the HBM race. It is racing to ramp up HBM3E production and develop HBM4, but catching up to competitors who started a decade earlier is a monumental challenge. Its future hinges on whether its expertise in cost control and political strategy can compensate for the lost time in a technology race where early-mover advantage is decisive.

链捕手Hace 24 min(s)

Samsung Relies on Technology Cycles, SK Hynix on HBM, How Did Micron Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

链捕手Hace 24 min(s)

New AMD Paper Overturns Conventional Wisdom: FP4 Training Instability's Cause Is Not Insufficient Randomness

AMD's new research challenges the conventional understanding of FP4 training instability. While reducing precision from FP8 to FP4 promises doubled computational throughput and is supported by new hardware like NVIDIA Blackwell and AMD MI350 series, training large language models natively with FP4 has been notoriously unstable, often attributed to insufficient stochasticity. The paper "Pretraining large language models with MXFP4 on Native FP4 Hardware" demonstrates successful end-to-end FP4 pre-training of Llama 3.1-8B on AMD MI355X GPUs using the MXFP4 format, achieving a 9-10% overall speedup over FP8. Crucially, it identifies the root cause of instability: not randomness, but the accumulation of *structural micro-scaling errors* along the sensitive weight gradient (Wgrad) path. Through controlled experiments, researchers found that quantizing the Wgrad operation to FP4 caused significant convergence degradation. Counterintuitively, common stochasticity-based mitigation techniques like stochastic rounding and randomized Hadamard transforms worsened performance. In contrast, applying a *deterministic* Hadamard transform successfully stabilized training by ensuring consistent error patterns, reducing the extra token cost from 26-27% to just 8-9%. This work has significant implications: 1) It provides a clear diagnostic for low-precision training instability, steering focus towards structural errors. 2) It pushes FP4 from a primarily inference-focused format into the realm of viable training. 3) It leverages the open OCP Microscaling (MX) standard, promoting cross-vendor compatibility. The research marks a critical step towards more economical large model training by further pushing the boundaries of low-precision computation.

marsbitHace 44 min(s)

New AMD Paper Overturns Conventional Wisdom: FP4 Training Instability's Cause Is Not Insufficient Randomness

marsbitHace 44 min(s)

Will ONDO's 'Tokenization Narrative' Change After Its CEO's Unexpected Passing?

Ondo Finance founder and CEO Nathan Allman has passed away unexpectedly. Allman, a Brown University graduate with a background in private credit and Goldman Sachs' digital asset team, was a key architect of Ondo's pivot from DeFi structured yield products to becoming a leading Real-World Asset (RWA) protocol. He drove the strategy to tokenize traditional financial assets like US Treasuries (OUSG), yield-generating dollar assets (USDY), and US stocks/ETFs (Ondo Global Markets) for on-chain accessibility. The company announced that President Ian De Bode, a former McKinsey partner with a strong institutional strategy and operations background, will succeed Allman as CEO. While Allman's sudden departure presents a near-term challenge, testing market confidence and Ondo's continuity, the project is seen as more than a founder-driven narrative. It has an established product suite and a management team with deep traditional finance experience. The long-term impact hinges on the new leadership's ability to execute. De Bode's expertise in compliance, distribution, and institutional partnerships aligns with RWA's next phase of scaling infrastructure. The core question is whether Ondo can maintain its product momentum and institutional relationships. Ondo's native ONDO token represents governance and RWA narrative value, not direct revenue from the underlying assets. Its future as a "top tokenization play" will depend on the team's continued delivery of product growth, asset scale, and real-world demand, moving beyond the initial emotional shock.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Will ONDO's 'Tokenization Narrative' Change After Its CEO's Unexpected Passing?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Bitcoin Signals Are Pointing To The One Month Everything Will Change

Bitcoin's price cycle analysis indicates that October 2026 may mark the next major turning point, signaling the end of the current bear phase. As of late May 2026, Bitcoin trades around $76,640, down 39% from its October 2025 all-time high of $126,000, with market sentiment turning fearful. Technical analysis combining cycle timing, HODL wave behavior, on-chain indicators, and historical drawdown patterns suggests the final market bottom has not yet been confirmed. The projected structure, based on the average 12-month length of past bear market corrections from all-time highs, points to a potential bottom formation around mid-October 2026. While Bitcoin may need to form a lower low or remain in consolidation before this window, the convergence of multiple signals highlights October as a critical period for a potential transition into the next bull rally.

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Bitcoin Signals Are Pointing To The One Month Everything Will Change

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros

Artículos destacados

Qué es $S$

Entendiendo SPERO: Una Visión General Completa Introducción a SPERO A medida que el panorama de la innovación continúa evolucionando, la aparición de tecnologías web3 y proyectos de criptomonedas juega un papel fundamental en la configuración del futuro digital. Un proyecto que ha atraído la atención en este campo dinámico es SPERO, denotado como SPERO,$$s$. Este artículo tiene como objetivo reunir y presentar información detallada sobre SPERO, para ayudar a entusiastas e inversores a comprender sus fundamentos, objetivos e innovaciones dentro de los dominios web3 y cripto. ¿Qué es SPERO,$$s$? SPERO,$$s$ es un proyecto único dentro del espacio cripto que busca aprovechar los principios de descentralización y tecnología blockchain para crear un ecosistema que promueva la participación, la utilidad y la inclusión financiera. El proyecto está diseñado para facilitar interacciones de igual a igual de nuevas maneras, proporcionando a los usuarios soluciones y servicios financieros innovadores. En su esencia, SPERO,$$s$ tiene como objetivo empoderar a los individuos al proporcionar herramientas y plataformas que mejoren la experiencia del usuario en el espacio de las criptomonedas. Esto incluye habilitar métodos de transacción más flexibles, fomentar iniciativas impulsadas por la comunidad y crear caminos para oportunidades financieras a través de aplicaciones descentralizadas (dApps). La visión subyacente de SPERO,$$s$ gira en torno a la inclusividad, buscando cerrar brechas dentro de las finanzas tradicionales mientras aprovecha los beneficios de la tecnología blockchain. ¿Quién es el Creador de SPERO,$$s$? La identidad del creador de SPERO,$$s$ sigue siendo algo oscura, ya que hay recursos públicos limitados que proporcionan información de fondo detallada sobre su(s) fundador(es). Esta falta de transparencia puede derivarse del compromiso del proyecto con la descentralización, una ética que muchos proyectos web3 comparten, priorizando las contribuciones colectivas sobre el reconocimiento individual. Al centrar las discusiones en torno a la comunidad y sus objetivos colectivos, SPERO,$$s$ encarna la esencia del empoderamiento sin señalar a individuos específicos. Como tal, comprender la ética y la misión de SPERO sigue siendo más importante que identificar a un creador singular. ¿Quiénes son los Inversores de SPERO,$$s$? SPERO,$$s$ cuenta con el apoyo de una diversa gama de inversores que van desde capitalistas de riesgo hasta inversores ángeles dedicados a fomentar la innovación en el sector cripto. El enfoque de estos inversores generalmente se alinea con la misión de SPERO, priorizando proyectos que prometen avances tecnológicos sociales, inclusión financiera y gobernanza descentralizada. Estas fundaciones de inversores suelen estar interesadas en proyectos que no solo ofrecen productos innovadores, sino que también contribuyen positivamente a la comunidad blockchain y sus ecosistemas. El respaldo de estos inversores refuerza a SPERO,$$s$ como un contendiente notable en el dominio de proyectos cripto que evoluciona rápidamente. ¿Cómo Funciona SPERO,$$s$? SPERO,$$s$ emplea un marco multifacético que lo distingue de los proyectos de criptomonedas convencionales. Aquí hay algunas de las características clave que subrayan su singularidad e innovación: Gobernanza Descentralizada: SPERO,$$s$ integra modelos de gobernanza descentralizada, empoderando a los usuarios para participar activamente en los procesos de toma de decisiones sobre el futuro del proyecto. Este enfoque fomenta un sentido de propiedad y responsabilidad entre los miembros de la comunidad. Utilidad del Token: SPERO,$$s$ utiliza su propio token de criptomoneda, diseñado para servir diversas funciones dentro del ecosistema. Estos tokens permiten transacciones, recompensas y la facilitación de servicios ofrecidos en la plataforma, mejorando la participación y la utilidad general. Arquitectura en Capas: La arquitectura técnica de SPERO,$$s$ apoya la modularidad y escalabilidad, permitiendo la integración fluida de características y aplicaciones adicionales a medida que el proyecto evoluciona. Esta adaptabilidad es fundamental para mantener la relevancia en el cambiante paisaje cripto. Participación de la Comunidad: El proyecto enfatiza iniciativas impulsadas por la comunidad, empleando mecanismos que incentivan la colaboración y la retroalimentación. Al nutrir una comunidad sólida, SPERO,$$s$ puede abordar mejor las necesidades de los usuarios y adaptarse a las tendencias del mercado. Enfoque en la Inclusión: Al ofrecer tarifas de transacción bajas e interfaces amigables para el usuario, SPERO,$$s$ busca atraer a una base de usuarios diversa, incluyendo a individuos que anteriormente pueden no haber participado en el espacio cripto. Este compromiso con la inclusión se alinea con su misión general de empoderamiento a través de la accesibilidad. Cronología de SPERO,$$s$ Entender la historia de un proyecto proporciona información crucial sobre su trayectoria de desarrollo y hitos. A continuación se presenta una cronología sugerida que mapea eventos significativos en la evolución de SPERO,$$s$: Fase de Conceptualización e Ideación: Las ideas iniciales que forman la base de SPERO,$$s$ fueron concebidas, alineándose estrechamente con los principios de descentralización y enfoque comunitario dentro de la industria blockchain. Lanzamiento del Whitepaper del Proyecto: Tras la fase conceptual, se lanzó un whitepaper completo que detalla la visión, los objetivos y la infraestructura tecnológica de SPERO,$$s$ para generar interés y retroalimentación de la comunidad. Construcción de Comunidad y Primeras Interacciones: Se realizaron esfuerzos de divulgación activa para construir una comunidad de primeros adoptantes y posibles inversores, facilitando discusiones en torno a los objetivos del proyecto y obteniendo apoyo. Evento de Generación de Tokens: SPERO,$$s$ llevó a cabo un evento de generación de tokens (TGE) para distribuir sus tokens nativos a los primeros seguidores y establecer liquidez inicial dentro del ecosistema. Lanzamiento de la dApp Inicial: La primera aplicación descentralizada (dApp) asociada con SPERO,$$s$ se puso en marcha, permitiendo a los usuarios interactuar con las funcionalidades centrales de la plataforma. Desarrollo Continuo y Alianzas: Actualizaciones y mejoras continuas a las ofertas del proyecto, incluyendo alianzas estratégicas con otros actores en el espacio blockchain, han moldeado a SPERO,$$s$ en un jugador competitivo y en evolución en el mercado cripto. Conclusión SPERO,$$s$ se erige como un testimonio del potencial de web3 y las criptomonedas para revolucionar los sistemas financieros y empoderar a los individuos. Con un compromiso con la gobernanza descentralizada, la participación comunitaria y funcionalidades diseñadas de manera innovadora, allana el camino hacia un paisaje financiero más inclusivo. Como con cualquier inversión en el espacio cripto que evoluciona rápidamente, se anima a los posibles inversores y usuarios a investigar a fondo y participar de manera reflexiva con los desarrollos en curso dentro de SPERO,$$s$. El proyecto muestra el espíritu innovador de la industria cripto, invitando a una mayor exploración de sus innumerables posibilidades. Mientras el viaje de SPERO,$$s$ aún se desarrolla, sus principios fundamentales pueden, de hecho, influir en el futuro de cómo interactuamos con la tecnología, las finanzas y entre nosotros en ecosistemas digitales interconectados.

72 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.17Actualizado en 2024.12.17

Qué es AGENT S

Agent S: El Futuro de la Interacción Autónoma en Web3 Introducción En el paisaje en constante evolución de Web3 y las criptomonedas, las innovaciones están redefiniendo constantemente cómo los individuos interactúan con las plataformas digitales. Uno de estos proyectos pioneros, Agent S, promete revolucionar la interacción humano-computadora a través de su marco agente abierto. Al allanar el camino para interacciones autónomas, Agent S busca simplificar tareas complejas, ofreciendo aplicaciones transformadoras en inteligencia artificial (IA). Esta exploración detallada profundizará en las complejidades del proyecto, sus características únicas y las implicaciones para el dominio de las criptomonedas. ¿Qué es Agent S? Agent S se presenta como un marco agente abierto innovador, diseñado específicamente para abordar tres desafíos fundamentales en la automatización de tareas informáticas: Adquisición de Conocimiento Específico del Dominio: El marco aprende inteligentemente de diversas fuentes de conocimiento externas y experiencias internas. Este enfoque dual le permite construir un rico repositorio de conocimiento específico del dominio, mejorando su rendimiento en la ejecución de tareas. Planificación a Largo Plazo de Tareas: Agent S emplea planificación jerárquica aumentada por la experiencia, un enfoque estratégico que facilita la descomposición y ejecución eficiente de tareas complejas. Esta característica mejora significativamente su capacidad para gestionar múltiples subtareas de manera eficiente y efectiva. Manejo de Interfaces Dinámicas y No Uniformes: El proyecto introduce la Interfaz Agente-Computadora (ACI), una solución innovadora que mejora la interacción entre agentes y usuarios. Utilizando Modelos de Lenguaje Multimodal de Gran Escala (MLLMs), Agent S puede navegar y manipular diversas interfaces gráficas de usuario sin problemas. A través de estas características pioneras, Agent S proporciona un marco robusto que aborda las complejidades involucradas en la automatización de la interacción humana con las máquinas, preparando el terreno para una multitud de aplicaciones en IA y más allá. ¿Quién es el Creador de Agent S? Si bien el concepto de Agent S es fundamentalmente innovador, la información específica sobre su creador sigue siendo elusiva. El creador es actualmente desconocido, lo que resalta ya sea la etapa incipiente del proyecto o la elección estratégica de mantener a los miembros fundadores en el anonimato. Independientemente de la anonimidad, el enfoque sigue siendo en las capacidades y el potencial del marco. ¿Quiénes son los Inversores de Agent S? Dado que Agent S es relativamente nuevo en el ecosistema criptográfico, la información detallada sobre sus inversores y patrocinadores financieros no está documentada explícitamente. La falta de información disponible públicamente sobre las bases de inversión u organizaciones que apoyan el proyecto plantea preguntas sobre su estructura de financiamiento y hoja de ruta de desarrollo. Comprender el respaldo es crucial para evaluar la sostenibilidad del proyecto y su posible impacto en el mercado. ¿Cómo Funciona Agent S? En el núcleo de Agent S se encuentra una tecnología de vanguardia que le permite funcionar de manera efectiva en diversos entornos. Su modelo operativo se basa en varias características clave: Interacción Humano-Computadora Similar a la Humana: El marco ofrece planificación avanzada de IA, esforzándose por hacer que las interacciones con las computadoras sean más intuitivas. Al imitar el comportamiento humano en la ejecución de tareas, promete elevar las experiencias de los usuarios. Memoria Narrativa: Empleada para aprovechar experiencias de alto nivel, Agent S utiliza memoria narrativa para hacer un seguimiento de las historias de tareas, mejorando así sus procesos de toma de decisiones. Memoria Episódica: Esta característica proporciona a los usuarios una guía paso a paso, permitiendo que el marco ofrezca apoyo contextual a medida que se desarrollan las tareas. Soporte para OpenACI: Con la capacidad de ejecutarse localmente, Agent S permite a los usuarios mantener el control sobre sus interacciones y flujos de trabajo, alineándose con la ética descentralizada de Web3. Fácil Integración con APIs Externas: Su versatilidad y compatibilidad con varias plataformas de IA aseguran que Agent S pueda encajar sin problemas en ecosistemas tecnológicos existentes, convirtiéndolo en una opción atractiva para desarrolladores y organizaciones. Estas funcionalidades contribuyen colectivamente a la posición única de Agent S dentro del espacio cripto, ya que automatiza tareas complejas y de múltiples pasos con una intervención humana mínima. A medida que el proyecto evoluciona, sus posibles aplicaciones en Web3 podrían redefinir cómo se desarrollan las interacciones digitales. Cronología de Agent S El desarrollo y los hitos de Agent S pueden encapsularse en una cronología que resalta sus eventos significativos: 27 de septiembre de 2024: El concepto de Agent S fue lanzado en un documento de investigación integral titulado “Un Marco Agente Abierto que Usa Computadoras Como un Humano”, mostrando las bases del proyecto. 10 de octubre de 2024: El documento de investigación fue puesto a disposición del público en arXiv, ofreciendo una exploración profunda del marco y su evaluación de rendimiento basada en el benchmark OSWorld. 12 de octubre de 2024: Se lanzó una presentación en video, proporcionando una visión visual de las capacidades y características de Agent S, involucrando aún más a posibles usuarios e inversores. Estos marcadores en la cronología no solo ilustran el progreso de Agent S, sino que también indican su compromiso con la transparencia y la participación comunitaria. Puntos Clave Sobre Agent S A medida que el marco Agent S continúa evolucionando, varios atributos clave destacan, subrayando su naturaleza innovadora y potencial: Marco Innovador: Diseñado para proporcionar un uso intuitivo de las computadoras similar a la interacción humana, Agent S aporta un enfoque novedoso a la automatización de tareas. Interacción Autónoma: La capacidad de interactuar de manera autónoma con las computadoras a través de GUI significa un salto hacia soluciones informáticas más inteligentes y eficientes. Automatización de Tareas Complejas: Con su metodología robusta, puede automatizar tareas complejas y de múltiples pasos, haciendo que los procesos sean más rápidos y menos propensos a errores. Mejora Continua: Los mecanismos de aprendizaje permiten a Agent S mejorar a partir de experiencias pasadas, mejorando continuamente su rendimiento y eficacia. Versatilidad: Su adaptabilidad en diferentes entornos operativos como OSWorld y WindowsAgentArena asegura que pueda servir a una amplia gama de aplicaciones. A medida que Agent S se posiciona en el paisaje de Web3 y criptomonedas, su potencial para mejorar las capacidades de interacción y automatizar procesos significa un avance significativo en las tecnologías de IA. A través de su marco innovador, Agent S ejemplifica el futuro de las interacciones digitales, prometiendo una experiencia más fluida y eficiente para los usuarios en diversas industrias. Conclusión Agent S representa un audaz avance en la unión de la IA y Web3, con la capacidad de redefinir cómo interactuamos con la tecnología. Aunque aún se encuentra en sus primeras etapas, las posibilidades para su aplicación son vastas y atractivas. A través de su marco integral que aborda desafíos críticos, Agent S busca llevar las interacciones autónomas al primer plano de la experiencia digital. A medida que nos adentramos más en los reinos de las criptomonedas y la descentralización, proyectos como Agent S sin duda desempeñarán un papel crucial en la configuración del futuro de la tecnología y la colaboración humano-computadora.

457 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.01.14Actualizado en 2025.01.14

Cómo comprar S

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Sonic (S) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Sonic (S) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Sonic (S)Después de comprar tu Sonic (S), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Sonic (S)Tradear fácilmente con Sonic (S) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

872 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.01.15Actualizado en 2025.03.21

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de S (S).