Losses from Hacks of Crypto Projects Exceed $1.3 Billion

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-07-27Actualizado a 2026-07-27

Resumen

According to a report by Onchain Lens, crypto project losses from hacks have exceeded $1.3 billion this year. The primary cause of damage was the compromise of access control mechanisms, where attackers obtained privileged rights or critical credentials. The biggest losers were Kelp DAO ($292M), Drift Protocol ($280M), Humanity Protocol ($31M), Step Finance ($30M), and Truebit ($26.5M). The second largest cause of loss was phishing and social engineering attacks, accounting for approximately $282 million. Attacks on oracles—services that feed external data into blockchains—also caused significant damage, with Ostium losing $24M, Blend Protocol $10.86M, and Bonzo $9M. The data indicates that the total damage stems from a limited number of highly effective attacks, rather than hundreds of small incidents. A shift in threat patterns is noted, with multi-million dollar losses increasingly resulting from compromised keys and access permissions rather than smart contract bugs. Security experts emphasize that the human factor remains a major industry risk, as phishing and social engineering remain as profitable as technical attacks. In a related incident, Blockaid reported a $24.15 million hack of the AFX Trade decentralized exchange's cross-chain bridge.

According to a report by Onchain Lens, the largest losses for crypto projects are related to the compromise of access control mechanisms. By obtaining privileged rights or access to critical credentials, attackers were able to carry out the most profitable attacks of the half-year. The greatest losses were incurred by:

  • Kelp DAO — $292 million;

  • Drift Protocol — $280 million;

  • Humanity Protocol — $31 million;

  • Step Finance — $30 million;

  • Truebit — $26.5 million.

The second largest cause of losses was phishing attacks and the use of social engineering methods. Approximately $282 million was stolen using this method. Another vulnerability turned out to be oracles—services that transmit external data to the blockchain. Due to attacks related to this infrastructure, the Ostium project lost $24 million, Blend Protocol — $10.86 million, and Bonzo — $9 million.

Onchain Lens statistics show: the total volume of damage was formed not by hundreds of separate incidents, but by a limited number of the most effective attacks. Simultaneously, the nature of threats is changing: increasingly, the cause of multi-million dollar losses is not errors in smart contracts, but the compromise of keys, permissions, and other access control mechanisms.

Security specialists stated that the human factor remains one of the main risks for the industry. Despite the development of protective measures, phishing and social engineering continue to bring attackers hundreds of millions of dollars, maintaining effectiveness on par with technical attacks.

Earlier, analysts from the company Blockaid reported a hack of the cross-chain bridge of the decentralized exchange AFX Trade. As a result of the attack, the attackers stole USDC stablecoins amounting to $24.15 million.

end-content

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the total reported damage from hacks to crypto projects in the first half of the year, according to Onchain Lens?

AThe total reported damage exceeded $1.3 billion.

QWhat was identified as the primary cause of the largest losses for crypto projects in the Onchain Lens report?

AThe primary cause was the compromise of access control mechanisms, where attackers gained privileged rights or access to critical credentials.

QWhich crypto project suffered the single largest loss mentioned in the article, and what was the amount?

AKelp DAO suffered the single largest loss mentioned, amounting to $292 million.

QBesides compromised access controls, what were the other two major categories of attacks leading to significant losses?

AThe other two major categories were phishing/social engineering attacks (resulting in about $282 million in losses) and attacks targeting oracle infrastructure.

QWhat trend in the nature of security threats does the Onchain Lens report highlight?

AThe report highlights a shift where multi-million dollar losses are increasingly caused not by smart contract bugs, but by the compromise of keys, permissions, and other access management mechanisms, alongside the persistent risk of human factors like phishing.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Will Changxin Technology Continue to Rise Today?

Changxin Technology made a historic debut on the stock market, with its share price soaring 465.82% to close at 49 yuan. Its market capitalization reached 3.28 trillion yuan, surpassing Industrial and Commercial Bank of China to become the largest company by market cap on the A-share market. Daily trading volume exceeded 140 billion yuan, a first in A-share history. This created a moment of realization for 7.7 million investors who won the lottery for its shares. On the first day, investor strategies varied: some sold immediately and later regretted missing intraday highs, others secured profits to avoid future volatility, while a third group held or even bought more shares, betting on long-term growth. The staggering IPO, massive public enthusiasm, and debut during a peak industry cycle led some to compare Changxin to PetroChina's 2007 listing, which was followed by a long decline. Key similarities noted include comparable fundraising scales (approx. 666 billion yuan for Changxin vs. 668 billion for PetroChina) and both companies listing at a perceived high point in their respective commodity cycles (oil then, memory chips now). However, analysts caution against over-simplifying the comparison. They highlight core differences: Changxin operates in the high-growth semiconductor sector with strong "domestic substitution" tailwinds. Brokerages like Huaxi Securities project significant revenue and profit growth from 2026 to 2028, driven by DDR5 adoption, product mix optimization, and economies of scale. Nomura Securities issued a "buy" rating with a 116 yuan target price, citing AI-driven demand for DRAM, tight supply as major players shift to HBM production, and Changxin's vast room for market share growth. Some analysts position the current memory cycle, fueled by AI, as just beginning, contrasting with the mature energy cycle PetroChina entered. The article concludes that for investors, monitoring the memory cycle's progression and Changxin's breakthroughs in high-end technologies like HBM will be crucial, rather than relying on superficial historical parallels.

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

Will Changxin Technology Continue to Rise Today?

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

Claude Designer Lags Behind Engineers, Fires Back by Creating a Million-User Tool

The article tells the story of Nate Parrott, a designer at Anthropic who created Claude Design as a side project to keep pace with his engineering teammates. When Anthropic released Opus 4.5 in November 2025, the two engineers on Parrott's Claude Code team significantly increased their output using the new AI capabilities. Parrott, the sole designer, found himself struggling to match their speed, becoming a bottleneck in the workflow. To catch up, he began experimenting in his spare time. He initially tried prompting Claude to generate designs from text descriptions and screenshots, with limited success. His breakthrough came when he shifted focus from asking Claude to "design" to asking it to generate HTML. He realized HTML could be a rich visual canvas for creating everything from slides and interactive prototypes to full web pages. He built a simple interface with a chat panel on the left and a live HTML preview on the right. The key to making the output useful was incorporating Anthropic's brand system—fonts, colors, assets, and design principles—into the prompts. This ensured generated designs were immediately on-brand. He shared an internal prototype with his team, and other product designers quickly adopted it for creating clickable prototypes, a task traditionally requiring manually drawing every state. The project's "official" turning point came during an Anthropic Labs offsite, where Parrott noticed many attendees were using his tool to build presentation slides on the fly, sometimes right before their turn to speak. This organic adoption convinced the Labs team to formally staff the project, turning the side project into a real product. Claude Design is positioned as a "pre-production" tool for visual communication and exploration—handling slides, landing pages, PDFs, emails, and social media graphics. It integrates with tools like Canva, Adobe, and Vercel. Its core value is accelerating the early stages of design: exploring directions, building consensus, and establishing systems. For actual production code, Anthropic still recommends Claude Code. The story highlights how AI disrupts workflows unevenly and how individuals can respond by building new tools to create their own advantages. Parrott's tool, born from necessity, eventually gained over a million users in its first week.

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

Claude Designer Lags Behind Engineers, Fires Back by Creating a Million-User Tool

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

Fields Medalist Warns: AI Could Kill Mathematics

The 2026 Fields Medal award was followed by a startling announcement: laureate Jacob Tsimerman joined OpenAI to pursue AI safety research, predicting AI would surpass humans in all mathematical proof areas within two years. Soon after, Fields Medalists Terence Tao and Timothy Gowers expressed deep concern at ICM 2026. Gorges warned that AI might "kill" mathematics not through stagnation, but through an overwhelming surplus of proofs, likening it to a lake dying from eutrophication. This concern is echoed in the "Leiden Declaration," signed by over 3,000 mathematicians including Tao, Peter Scholze, and Kevin Buzzard, advocating for mathematics as a profoundly human endeavor. However, Gowers, who did not sign, fears a future where AI-generated mathematics proliferates while human expertise and the shared intuition vital to the field vanish, turning math into an unvisited "cemetery of thought." Gowers' perspective shifted dramatically after testing ChatGPT 5.5 Pro. The AI solved a doctoral-level number theory problem and later produced a counterexample for the "unit distance problem," achievements Gorges considered publishable in top journals. He now concedes that large language models can handle advanced research, a realization that left him feeling the "rug pulled out from under" him when AI solved problems he personally contemplated. The debate extends to the nature of mathematical discovery. As noted by Peter Woit, AI agents have no interest in the "credit game" of academia. If theorems cease to be attributed to individual mathematicians, truth may simply return to its impersonal state in the universe. The central question remains: in an age of potentially limitless AI-generated discovery, what is the role and purpose of the human mind in mathematics?

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

Fields Medalist Warns: AI Could Kill Mathematics

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

NVIDIA's 20-Year CUDA Moat Collapsed Over a Weekend, Claude Single-Handedly Got AMD's New GPU Running

In a single weekend, Claude, an AI agent from Anthropic, successfully ported and optimized its cutting-edge model to run on a brand-new AMD MI355X server rack without any manual code intervention. This feat demonstrates a potential breakthrough in overcoming NVIDIA's long-established CUDA software ecosystem dominance, built over two decades. Anthropic's team simply instructed Claude to get the AMD machine running. By Monday, it not only worked but was showing a continuously improving performance curve. The achievement impressed AMD CEO Lisa Su and accelerated a major deployment partnership: Anthropic plans to deploy up to 2GW of AMD Instinct GPUs starting in 2027. The key enabler is AMD's new ROCm.AI platform, a toolbox designed specifically for AI agents like Claude. It provides AI-readable documentation, including chip instruction sets (ISA), and tools like the Hyperloom service that allows agents to autonomously profile performance, identify bottlenecks, test configurations, and generate optimized kernels. In a demo, Hyperloom boosted the output speed of a model by 38%. This represents a fundamental shift. While CUDA's strength lies in its vast, human-expert-driven ecosystem of tools and tacit knowledge, AMD's strategy is to make its hardware and software stack directly accessible and optimizable by AI agents. An agent can parallelize tasks—debugging, profiling, coding—that would take human engineers years to master, compressing the traditional software adaptation timeline from years to tasks. The competition is no longer just about peak hardware specs but also about how well AI can read, utilize, and tune a platform.

marsbitHace 44 min(s)

NVIDIA's 20-Year CUDA Moat Collapsed Over a Weekend, Claude Single-Handedly Got AMD's New GPU Running

marsbitHace 44 min(s)

Just Now, Peking University Alumna Lilian Weng Announces Resignation: The Best 'Alignment' in the AI Era Is Taking Care of Yourself

Lilian Weng, a Peking University alumnus and former OpenAI executive, has announced her departure from Thinking Machines Lab, the AI startup she co-founded with ex-OpenAI CTO Mira Murati 20 months ago. Her resignation comes shortly after the company released its first open-source model, Inkling. In her farewell message, Weng cited health reasons as the primary factor, stating that the past seven months involved more illness than any other period in her life. The intense pressure and guilt of being unable to work during critical periods, like the Inkling launch, became unsustainable. She expressed that she could not continue in a role where she felt unable to give her full effort. Weng joined OpenAI in 2018, contributing to projects like the Dactyl robotic hand and later building the Safety Systems team from scratch. She is also widely known for her influential technical blog, Lil'Log. Her departure follows a period of high expectations and challenges for Thinking Machines, which secured a record $20 billion seed round at a $120 billion valuation in 2025 but has since seen fluctuations in its valuation and the departure of other key co-founders. Weng emphasized that she remains passionate about AI but needs a more predictable and defined role without the relentless pressure of a co-founder. Her exit highlights the immense personal toll and speed of competition in the AI industry, where the drive for progress often clashes with human limits. Her decision underscores that stepping back to prioritize well-being can be an act of courage.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Just Now, Peking University Alumna Lilian Weng Announces Resignation: The Best 'Alignment' in the AI Era Is Taking Care of Yourself

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片