Bankless Founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-27Actualizado a 2026-05-27

Resumen

Bankless founder David Hoffman explains his decision to sell all his ETH. He clarifies this is not due to bearishness on Ethereum itself, which he remains extremely optimistic about, but rather because he believes the core "ETH is Money" narrative he championed has already been priced in. Hoffman argues that for ETH to achieve status as a global reserve currency, Ethereum needed to execute perfectly across all layers—governance, technology, L2 coordination, and market dominance—faster than competitors. While Ethereum has performed admirably and earned its current valuation, the window for a fundamental revaluation of ETH upward has likely closed. Key factors include: the clear market correlation between L1 chain revenue/fees and native asset price (evident with SOL and NEAR); the failure of the "strong version" of crypto (ideological, self-sustaining) to maintain lasting mainstream appeal beyond a brief period; and the reality that Ethereum's architecture acts as a "giver," providing security and tokenization at cost, which benefits other monies (like stablecoins) as much as or more than ETH itself. He concludes that Ethereum's success will increasingly accrue to its applications and L2s (following a "fat app" theory), with ETH structurally positioned to capture only minimal value. Therefore, he sold to reallocate capital to other opportunities he finds more compelling.

Author: David Hoffman

Compiled by: Jia Huan, ChainCatcher

If you missed the news last week, I sold my ETH.

For someone who has built a career, community, identity, and business around Ethereum, this was not an easy decision.

The reasons behind the decision to sell require a more thorough explanation than scattered tweets on Twitter.

The "ETH is Money" thesis hasn't failed... it has simply been realized. Ethereum has gotten the ETH price it deserved, and I don't believe ETH as an asset will be revalued, either up or down.

"ETH is Money" is the core narrative proposed by author David Hoffman in 2019 and long promoted through Bankless, arguing that ETH should become a global store of value. It was once one of the most mainstream bullish logics for Ethereum.

P.S.: I am extremely bullish on Ethereum. I expect the Ethereum network to perform exceptionally well from now on. But I believe only a very small portion of that success will be reflected in ETH.

The full article is as follows:

ETH is Money Was Always an Aspiration

Money is a coordination game, and coordination is very difficult.

The Ethereum project itself is a series of coordination challenges stacked on multiple levels, and the "ETH is Money" thesis required success at all these levels, unequivocally.

ETH could become money if and only if every layer of Ethereum's techno-social stack outperformed its competitors.

Given the ambition of the Ethereum project, achieving its most successful version was always a massive challenge. Despite shortcomings, the Ethereum project has performed exceptionally well and fully deserves its existing market capitalization.

Nevertheless, the window of opportunity for the market to "revalue" $ETH appears to be closing.

In some sense, ETH is money. But it's not the maximally successful version we collectively aimed for.

Ethereum is a Coordination Game

Turing-complete blockchain is such a powerful idea that Ethereum's maximum potential is the entire crypto world. To encompass everything.

The only obstacle to Ethereum achieving 100% absolute dominance over all things is coordination.

Ethereum's leadership needs to be sufficiently decentralized, its governance needs "rough consensus" to create credible neutrality, maximizing Ethereum's adoption at the highest level.

Ethereum leadership needs to react swiftly to market dynamics, operating like a startup facing an existential threat of marginalization.

Ethereum L2s need to operate and make their own market choices independently of the base layer, but they also need to be economically bound and constrained by the broader Ethereum economy and brand.

Ethereum's roadmap needs to be executed in a specific sequence to maximize and maintain Ethereum's momentum and market dominance, fully quelling competition and maximizing confidence in Ethereum and ETH.

Key technology R&D and engineering implementation need to be fast enough so that Ethereum can both prove its utility to the outside world and stay ahead of competitors.

The "ETH is Money" thesis was about creating an exceptionally revolutionary and powerful financial asset, attracting otherwise indifferent individuals with its unique properties as the superior global store of value.

Ethereum's brand and ETH's strength need to be so powerful that major traditional capital not only feels safe but actively positions ETH as a significant allocation in their retirement portfolios because of the Ethereum project's dominance.

For "ETH is Money" to happen, everything upstream of ETH needed to function with extreme perfection.

Ethereum is not Bitcoin; it chose the hard path. Bitcoin stripped everything off its blockchain to elevate BTC.

Ethereum chose to add everything to its blockchain to maximize the utility of its block space. Only by doing this in the best possible way before competitors could ETH achieve its status as global money.

We have come a long way, and Ethereum has already achieved the maximum potential market share it deserves.

I fear the window to play this game has closed.

The Macro Environment May Never Allow It to Happen

Looking back over the past few years, I see a large set of macro headwinds that Ethereum needed to overcome.

1. L1 Assets Are Inextricably Linked to Revenue

Say what you will about how difficult it is to evaluate smart contract chains based on fees and revenue, but fees and revenue are clearly how smart contract L1 assets increase their pricing power.

By 2026, we have ample data showing all these factors are closely correlated: L1 activity, L1 fees, and price appreciation of the L1 native asset.

In 2021, when ETH had the highest share of L1 revenue, it dominated.

In 2024, when SOL's share of L1 revenue broke out industry-wide, it dominated.

In 2026, NEAR is undergoing price revaluation while simultaneously seeing fundamental growth in its L1 revenue and NEAR burn.

You can also look at assets like BNB and TRX, which are perhaps the highest cumulative revenue projects of all time. Their price charts look exactly like what I once expected ETH's to look like—if only ETH could have maintained its L1 fee dominance longer than just that stretch in 2022.

2. The Strong Version of Crypto Didn't Work

@0xMakesy put it well:

Ethereum represented the strong version of crypto, crypto for crypto's sake, self-sustaining and self-perpetuating. DeFi, NFTs, DAOs, we were the rebels, building a financial system of the people, by the people, plugging imagination into the money system.

Then there was the weak version: efficient ledger infrastructure for the backends of financial institutions. The weak version would fuel the strong version, channeling demand for an internet ledger into inward flowing capital, into crypto, into Ethereum, and finally into ETH.

Maybe if Ethereum executed better, faster, stronger, if crypto hadn't attracted such a large cohort of speculative hustlers and value extractors, the industry could have won the influence and respect I always thought it deserved.

But the only period where crypto maintained a positive brand image with the public was from late 2020 to early 2022. Outside this narrow window, crypto's reputation has been fraud, scams, get-rich-quick schemes, and uselessness to ordinary people.

ETH is Money Relied on "Strong Crypto"

It was at that moment when everyone was forced online that ETH emerged as the internet's money. The world discovered crypto for the first time, and for a brief window, it was very cool.

Money is a coordination game, and the Schelling Point of a money is held together by belief. In 2021, a broad public believed in ETH: it was cool, disruptive, and populist. Bitcoin shared these properties and has retained them better than ETH post-2021.

This raises a disconcerting possibility: the strong version of crypto may never have been a stable equilibrium. Covid was an extremely distortive time for money, and maybe "ETH as money" was only supported because of that distortion.

If so, ETH becoming money always depended on the strong version of crypto working better than it ever did in reality.

3. Ethereum's Utility Benefits Other Moneys Just as Much

Is Bitcoin money? Is the dollar money? Is gold money? It doesn't matter—whatever is money will be tokenized on Ethereum.

In 2020, Nic Carter argued on Bankless that stablecoins would likely parasitize ETH as Ethereum's native unit. Back then, Ethereum had $3B in stablecoins. Today, that number is $163B, a 54x increase.

The utility provided by Ethereum is helping expand the monetary network of whatever is truly money, which is why the US is so bullish on using crypto to proliferate stablecoins. Ethereum is helping America maintain dollar hegemony, and leveraging this fact is explicit government policy.

Clearly, the positive spillover for $ETH as money is far less powerful than what the US government sees in the Ethereum stablecoin ecosystem.

Ethereum is a Giver, Not a Taker

At its core, Ethereum is a giver, not a taker.

It provides the world's most secure block space to L2s at cost.

It tokenizes all the world's assets at cost.

It secures billions in DeFi at cost.

Ethereum charges no markup on anything it does.

This is the nature of open-source software and the power of Ethereum. Ethereum offers its full suite of incredibly important value to the world at cost.

Ethereum is noble. Ethereum is excellent.

Ethereum is the world's most successful non-profit.

Naturally, massive adoption will occur on Ethereum. It was and will continue to be the most impactful open-source software project ever built by humans, and being a "non-profit protocol" is one of its core characteristics.

This is why the path for ETH to become money depended on maintaining sustained, incredibly high market dominance.

Eventually, as block space commoditizes, fees trend to zero. That's fine for Ethereum as long as it's Ethereum, not a competitor, that achieves commoditization and maintains its margins and dominance.

Eventually, Fat Protocol Theory gives way to Fat Application Theory, and applications swallow remaining profits.

That's fine for ETH as long as they're Ethereum's applications, not a competitor's.

It's hard to reconcile "ETH is Money" with "Ethereum is a giver, not a taker." Ethereum's architecture is intentionally designed to give everything back to its ecosystem and take only the bare minimum required to keep the network running.

Architecturally, ETH is not prioritized within Ethereum; this is a feature, not a bug. ETH could only become money if Ethereum won a battle it architecturally refuses to fight.

This could have worked if Ethereum had maintained incredible market dominance.

The Thesis Asks Too Much of Ethereum

"ETH is Money" required everything to go right for Ethereum. The margin for error was far smaller than I originally believed. Ethereum's momentum in 2021 and 2022 made it feel like "ETH is Money" was the default path.

In hindsight, Solana's 2021 rise alongside rising anti-Ethereum sentiment was the first major sign that Ethereum and ETH's coordination game wasn't going according to plan.

The Ethereum Foundation needed to decentralize and allow alternative power structures to emerge. But it also needed to respond to market forces with the urgency and drive of a startup facing existential elimination.

L2 teams needed freedom of self-determination but also needed to operate under the larger umbrella brand of Ethereum and ETH. Technical sync integrations between Ethereum and its L2s needed to be executed much faster.

Smart contract chains are valued by fees, and to break out of that pattern, Ethereum needed to rewrite the rules with overwhelming success.

My Reason for Selling

It just didn't achieve its maximum potential either.

Ethereum did the noble thing, choosing the hardest, most ambitious, most ideologically pure path for its future.

It achieved some incredible victories and failed to win some challenges.

Ethereum has earned the market cap it deserves.

I am very bullish on the Ethereum network and its ecosystem—Ethereum is architected to maximize the success of its applications, L2s, and ecosystem. Fat Application Theory means Ethereum's apps take all the fees, and the rollup-centric roadmap means L2s take 97% of the profits.

As for the ETH asset, I struggle to see how it gets structurally revalued, either up or down.

So, my reason for selling ETH isn't bearish on ETH; it's that I believe the "ETH is Money" thesis has been realized, and I wish to allocate capital to other opportunities in the market that I am bullish on.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Samsung Relies on Technology Cycles, SK Hynix on HBM, How Did Micron Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

Micron Technology, the third-largest memory chip maker alongside Samsung and SK Hynix, recently saw its market cap surpass $1 trillion. Founded in 1978 in Boise, Idaho, Micron survived brutal industry cycles while American peers and Japan's memory sector faltered. Its survival is attributed to a dual strategy: leveraging political and legal avenues for critical breathing room, coupled with relentless manufacturing cost control. Historically, Micron sought U.S. government intervention three times. In 1985, it filed an anti-dumping complaint against Japanese firms, leading to the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. Ironically, this created an opening for Samsung, which later became its toughest competitor. In 2002, Micron turned "whistleblower" in a DRAM price-fixing investigation, escaping penalties while rivals were fined. In 2017, it sued China's Fujian Jinhua, contributing to its placement on a U.S. entity list, stifling a nascent competitor. However, a major strategic misstep occurred in 2013 with the acquisition of bankrupt Japanese firm Elpida. Integrating Elpida's mobile-DRAM-focused technology diverted resources, causing Micron to miss the critical early decade of development for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)—the high-performance memory essential for AI chips like NVIDIA GPUs. By the time AI demand exploded in 2022, SK Hynix, which launched the first HBM in 2013, held about 85% of the HBM3 market, leaving Micron with roughly 3%. Micron now faces a triple squeeze. In the high-end HBM market, it lags significantly behind SK Hynix and Samsung. In the mid-to-low end DRAM market, it faces aggressive price competition from China's CXMT. Furthermore, a 2023 Chinese cybersecurity ban on its products slashed its revenue from China, a once-core market, from over 10% to just 7.1% by FY2025, causing it to exit China's data center server business. Beneath its political maneuvering lies Micron's core strength: exceptional manufacturing efficiency and cost control. Decades of engineering have yielded DRAM chips with a smaller cell area than rivals, meaning more chips per wafer and lower unit costs. This efficiency, not subsidies, has allowed it to withstand price wars. While political leverage bought time, Micron is now paying a "time debt" in the HBM race. It is racing to ramp up HBM3E production and develop HBM4, but catching up to competitors who started a decade earlier is a monumental challenge. Its future hinges on whether its expertise in cost control and political strategy can compensate for the lost time in a technology race where early-mover advantage is decisive.

链捕手Hace 25 min(s)

Samsung Relies on Technology Cycles, SK Hynix on HBM, How Did Micron Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

链捕手Hace 25 min(s)

New AMD Paper Overturns Conventional Wisdom: FP4 Training Instability's Cause Is Not Insufficient Randomness

AMD's new research challenges the conventional understanding of FP4 training instability. While reducing precision from FP8 to FP4 promises doubled computational throughput and is supported by new hardware like NVIDIA Blackwell and AMD MI350 series, training large language models natively with FP4 has been notoriously unstable, often attributed to insufficient stochasticity. The paper "Pretraining large language models with MXFP4 on Native FP4 Hardware" demonstrates successful end-to-end FP4 pre-training of Llama 3.1-8B on AMD MI355X GPUs using the MXFP4 format, achieving a 9-10% overall speedup over FP8. Crucially, it identifies the root cause of instability: not randomness, but the accumulation of *structural micro-scaling errors* along the sensitive weight gradient (Wgrad) path. Through controlled experiments, researchers found that quantizing the Wgrad operation to FP4 caused significant convergence degradation. Counterintuitively, common stochasticity-based mitigation techniques like stochastic rounding and randomized Hadamard transforms worsened performance. In contrast, applying a *deterministic* Hadamard transform successfully stabilized training by ensuring consistent error patterns, reducing the extra token cost from 26-27% to just 8-9%. This work has significant implications: 1) It provides a clear diagnostic for low-precision training instability, steering focus towards structural errors. 2) It pushes FP4 from a primarily inference-focused format into the realm of viable training. 3) It leverages the open OCP Microscaling (MX) standard, promoting cross-vendor compatibility. The research marks a critical step towards more economical large model training by further pushing the boundaries of low-precision computation.

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

New AMD Paper Overturns Conventional Wisdom: FP4 Training Instability's Cause Is Not Insufficient Randomness

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Will ONDO's 'Tokenization Narrative' Change After Its CEO's Unexpected Passing?

Ondo Finance founder and CEO Nathan Allman has passed away unexpectedly. Allman, a Brown University graduate with a background in private credit and Goldman Sachs' digital asset team, was a key architect of Ondo's pivot from DeFi structured yield products to becoming a leading Real-World Asset (RWA) protocol. He drove the strategy to tokenize traditional financial assets like US Treasuries (OUSG), yield-generating dollar assets (USDY), and US stocks/ETFs (Ondo Global Markets) for on-chain accessibility. The company announced that President Ian De Bode, a former McKinsey partner with a strong institutional strategy and operations background, will succeed Allman as CEO. While Allman's sudden departure presents a near-term challenge, testing market confidence and Ondo's continuity, the project is seen as more than a founder-driven narrative. It has an established product suite and a management team with deep traditional finance experience. The long-term impact hinges on the new leadership's ability to execute. De Bode's expertise in compliance, distribution, and institutional partnerships aligns with RWA's next phase of scaling infrastructure. The core question is whether Ondo can maintain its product momentum and institutional relationships. Ondo's native ONDO token represents governance and RWA narrative value, not direct revenue from the underlying assets. Its future as a "top tokenization play" will depend on the team's continued delivery of product growth, asset scale, and real-world demand, moving beyond the initial emotional shock.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Will ONDO's 'Tokenization Narrative' Change After Its CEO's Unexpected Passing?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Bankless Co-founder's Confession on Selling Off ETH: Ethereum Did the Right Thing, but 'ETH as Money' Has No Future

Bankless co-founder David Hoffman recently sold his remaining ETH holdings, sparking debate within the Ethereum community. In a detailed explanation, Hoffman clarifies that his decision was not based on bearish sentiment towards Ethereum itself, which he remains highly optimistic about, but rather on the conclusion that the "ETH is Money" narrative has largely run its course. Hoffman argues that for ETH to achieve its envisioned status as global money, Ethereum needed to execute flawlessly across multiple layers—governance, technology, and market dominance—in a highly coordinated manner. He acknowledges Ethereum's significant successes and current justified valuation but suggests the window for a major revaluation based on this monetary narrative is closing. The post examines several challenges: the strong correlation between L1 chain activity/fees and native token value; the perceived failure of the "strong version" of crypto (user-owned, egalitarian systems) versus the rise of a "weak version" (efficient ledger technology for traditional finance); and the possibility that ETH's momentum as money was uniquely tied to the distorted conditions of the 2020-2021 period. Crucially, Hoffman highlights a structural tension: Ethereum is architected as a "giver, not a taker," providing critical infrastructure like secure block space and tokenization at cost. This ethos benefits the broader ecosystem (applications, L2s) but doesn't prioritize extracting maximum value for ETH itself. The "ETH is Money" thesis required Ethereum to win a war of overwhelming market dominance—a war its design philosophy refuses to explicitly fight. Therefore, while he sees continued immense success for the Ethereum network and its ecosystem (following a "fat application" theory where value accrues to apps and L2s), Hoffman finds it increasingly difficult to foresee a structural upward revaluation for the ETH asset based on the monetary narrative. His capital reallocation reflects a belief that this particular investment thesis has played out.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Bankless Co-founder's Confession on Selling Off ETH: Ethereum Did the Right Thing, but 'ETH as Money' Has No Future

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Qué es ETH 2.0

ETH 2.0: Una Nueva Era para Ethereum Introducción ETH 2.0, conocido ampliamente como Ethereum 2.0, marca una actualización monumental para la blockchain de Ethereum. Esta transición no es solo una mejora superficial; busca mejorar fundamentalmente la escalabilidad, seguridad y sostenibilidad de la red. Con un cambio del mecanismo de consenso intensivo en energía Prueba de Trabajo (PoW) a una Prueba de Participación (PoS) más eficiente, ETH 2.0 promete un enfoque transformador para el ecosistema blockchain. ¿Qué es ETH 2.0? ETH 2.0 es un conjunto de actualizaciones interconectadas y distintivas centradas en optimizar las capacidades y el rendimiento de Ethereum. La reestructuración está diseñada para abordar desafíos críticos que el mecanismo actual de Ethereum ha enfrentado, particularmente en lo que respecta a la velocidad de transacción y la congestión de la red. Objetivos de ETH 2.0 Los objetivos principales de ETH 2.0 giran en torno a mejorar tres aspectos clave: Escalabilidad: Con el objetivo de aumentar significativamente el número de transacciones que la red puede manejar por segundo, ETH 2.0 busca superar la limitación actual de aproximadamente 15 transacciones por segundo, potencialmente alcanzando miles. Seguridad: Las medidas de seguridad mejoradas son fundamentales para ETH 2.0, particularmente a través de una mejor resistencia contra ciberataques y la preservación del ethos descentralizado de Ethereum. Sostenibilidad: El nuevo mecanismo PoS está diseñado no solo para mejorar la eficiencia, sino también para reducir drásticamente el consumo de energía, alineando el marco operativo de Ethereum con consideraciones ambientales. ¿Quién es el Creador de ETH 2.0? La creación de ETH 2.0 se puede atribuir a la Fundación Ethereum. Esta organización sin fines de lucro, que desempeña un papel crucial en el apoyo al desarrollo de Ethereum, es liderada por el notable cofundador Vitalik Buterin. Su visión de un Ethereum más escalable y sostenible ha sido la fuerza motriz detrás de esta actualización, involucrando contribuciones de una comunidad global de desarrolladores y entusiastas dedicados a mejorar el protocolo. ¿Quiénes son los Inversores de ETH 2.0? Si bien los detalles sobre los inversores de ETH 2.0 no se han hecho públicos, se sabe que la Fundación Ethereum recibe apoyo de varias organizaciones e individuos en el ámbito de blockchain y tecnología. Estos socios incluyen firmas de capital de riesgo, compañías tecnológicas y organizaciones filantrópicas que comparten un interés mutuo en apoyar el desarrollo de tecnologías descentralizadas e infraestructura blockchain. ¿Cómo Funciona ETH 2.0? ETH 2.0 se distingue por introducir una serie de características clave que lo diferencian de su predecesor. Prueba de Participación (PoS) La transición a un mecanismo de consenso PoS es uno de los cambios más destacados de ETH 2.0. A diferencia de PoW, que se basa en la minería intensiva en energía para la verificación de transacciones, PoS permite a los usuarios validar transacciones y crear nuevos bloques de acuerdo con la cantidad de ETH que apuestan en la red. Esto conduce a una mayor eficiencia energética, reduciendo el consumo en aproximadamente un 99.95%, convirtiendo a Ethereum 2.0 en una alternativa considerablemente más verde. Cadenas Shard Las cadenas shard son otra innovación crítica de ETH 2.0. Estas cadenas más pequeñas operan en paralelo con la cadena principal de Ethereum, lo que permite que múltiples transacciones sean procesadas simultáneamente. Este enfoque mejora la capacidad general de la red, abordando las preocupaciones de escalabilidad que han afectado a Ethereum. Cadena Beacon En el núcleo de ETH 2.0 se encuentra la Cadena Beacon, que coordina la red y gestiona el protocolo PoS. Funciona como un organizador de cierta manera: supervisa a los validadores, asegura que los shards permanezcan conectados a la red y monitorea la salud general del ecosistema blockchain. Cronología de ETH 2.0 El viaje de ETH 2.0 ha estado marcado por varios hitos clave que trazan la evolución de esta importante actualización: Diciembre 2020: El lanzamiento de la Cadena Beacon marcó la introducción de PoS, preparándose para la migración hacia ETH 2.0. Septiembre 2022: La finalización de “La Fusión” representa un momento crucial en el que la red Ethereum se trasladó exitosamente de un marco PoW a uno PoS, anunciando una nueva era para Ethereum. 2023: El lanzamiento esperado de cadenas shard tiene como objetivo mejorar aún más la escalabilidad de la red Ethereum, consolidando a ETH 2.0 como una plataforma robusta para aplicaciones y servicios descentralizados. Características Clave y Beneficios Escalabilidad Mejorada Una de las ventajas más significativas de ETH 2.0 es su escalabilidad mejorada. La combinación de PoS y cadenas shard permite que la red expanda su capacidad, permitiendo acomodar un volumen mucho mayor de transacciones en comparación con el sistema heredado. Eficiencia Energética La implementación de PoS representa un gran paso hacia la eficiencia energética en la tecnología blockchain. Al reducir drásticamente el consumo de energía, ETH 2.0 no solo disminuye los costos operativos, sino que también se alinea más estrechamente con los objetivos de sostenibilidad global. Seguridad Mejorada Los mecanismos actualizados de ETH 2.0 contribuyen a mejorar la seguridad en toda la red. El despliegue de PoS, junto con las medidas de control innovadoras establecidas a través de cadenas shard y la Cadena Beacon, asegura un mayor grado de protección contra posibles amenazas. Costos Más Bajos para los Usuarios A medida que la escalabilidad mejora, los efectos sobre los costos de transacción también serán evidentes. Se espera que una mayor capacidad y una menor congestión se traduzcan en tarifas más bajas para los usuarios, haciendo que Ethereum sea más accesible para transacciones cotidianas. Conclusión ETH 2.0 marca una evolución significativa en el ecosistema blockchain de Ethereum. A medida que aborda problemas fundamentales como la escalabilidad, el consumo de energía, la eficiencia en las transacciones y la seguridad general, la importancia de esta actualización no puede ser subestimada. La transición a la Prueba de Participación, la introducción de cadenas shard y el trabajo fundamental de la Cadena Beacon son indicativos de un futuro donde Ethereum puede satisfacer las crecientes demandas del mercado descentralizado. En una industria impulsada por la innovación y el progreso, ETH 2.0 se erige como un testimonio de las capacidades de la tecnología blockchain para allanar el camino hacia una economía digital más sostenible y eficiente.

166 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.04.04Actualizado en 2024.12.03

Qué es ETH 2.0

Qué es ETH 3.0

ETH3.0 y $eth 3.0: Un Examen Profundo del Futuro de Ethereum Introducción En el paisaje en rápida evolución de las criptomonedas y la tecnología blockchain, ETH3.0, a menudo denotado como $eth 3.0, ha surgido como un tema de considerable interés y especulación. El término abarca dos conceptos principales que merecen aclaración: Ethereum 3.0: Esto representa una posible actualización futura destinada a aumentar las capacidades de la blockchain existente de Ethereum, enfocándose particularmente en mejorar la escalabilidad y el rendimiento. ETH3.0 Meme Token: Este proyecto de criptomoneda distinto busca aprovechar la blockchain de Ethereum para crear un ecosistema centrado en memes, promoviendo la participación dentro de la comunidad de criptomonedas. Comprender estos aspectos de ETH3.0 es esencial no solo para los entusiastas de las criptomonedas, sino también para aquellos que observan tendencias tecnológicas más amplias en el espacio digital. ¿Qué es ETH3.0? Ethereum 3.0 Ethereum 3.0 se presenta como una actualización propuesta para la red de Ethereum ya establecida, que ha sido la columna vertebral de muchas aplicaciones descentralizadas (dApps) y contratos inteligentes desde su inicio. Las mejoras previstas se concentran principalmente en la escalabilidad, integrando tecnologías avanzadas como sharding y pruebas de conocimiento cero (zk-proofs). Estas innovaciones tecnológicas tienen como objetivo facilitar un número sin precedentes de transacciones por segundo (TPS), potencialmente alcanzando millones, abordando así una de las limitaciones más significativas que enfrenta la tecnología blockchain actual. La mejora no es meramente técnica, sino también estratégica; está destinada a preparar la red de Ethereum para su adopción generalizada y utilidad en un futuro marcado por una mayor demanda de soluciones descentralizadas. ETH3.0 Meme Token En contraste con Ethereum 3.0, el ETH3.0 Meme Token se aventura en un ámbito más ligero y juguetón al combinar la cultura de memes de internet con la dinámica de las criptomonedas. Este proyecto permite a los usuarios comprar, vender e intercambiar memes en la blockchain de Ethereum, proporcionando una plataforma que fomenta la participación comunitaria a través de la creatividad y los intereses compartidos. El ETH3.0 Meme Token tiene como objetivo demostrar cómo la tecnología blockchain puede intersectarse con la cultura digital, creando casos de uso que son tanto entretenidos como financieramente viables. ¿Quién es el Creador de ETH3.0? Ethereum 3.0 La iniciativa hacia Ethereum 3.0 es impulsada principalmente por un consorcio de desarrolladores e investigadores dentro de la comunidad de Ethereum, incluyendo notablemente a Justin Drake. Conocido por sus ideas y contribuciones a la evolución de Ethereum, Drake ha sido una figura prominente en las discusiones sobre la transición de Ethereum a una nueva capa de consenso, denominada “Beam Chain.” Este enfoque colaborativo para el desarrollo significa que Ethereum 3.0 no es el producto de un creador singular, sino más bien una manifestación de ingenio colectivo centrado en avanzar la tecnología blockchain. ETH3.0 Meme Token Los detalles sobre el creador del ETH3.0 Meme Token son actualmente inidentificables. La naturaleza de los tokens de memes a menudo conduce a una estructura más descentralizada y dirigida por la comunidad, lo que podría explicar la falta de atribución específica. Esto se alinea con la ética de la comunidad cripto más amplia, donde la innovación a menudo surge de esfuerzos colaborativos en lugar de individuales. ¿Quiénes son los Inversores de ETH3.0? Ethereum 3.0 El apoyo a Ethereum 3.0 proviene principalmente de la Fundación Ethereum junto con una entusiasta comunidad de desarrolladores e inversores. Esta asociación fundamental proporciona un grado significativo de legitimidad y mejora la perspectiva de una implementación exitosa, ya que aprovecha la confianza y credibilidad construidas a lo largo de años de operaciones en la red. En el clima cambiando rápidamente de las criptomonedas, el apoyo de la comunidad juega un papel crucial en impulsar el desarrollo y la adopción, posicionando a Ethereum 3.0 como un contendiente serio para futuros avances en blockchain. ETH3.0 Meme Token Si bien las fuentes actualmente disponibles no proporcionan información explícita sobre las fundaciones o organizaciones de inversión que respaldan el ETH3.0 Meme Token, es indicativo del modelo de financiamiento típico para tokens de memes, que a menudo depende del apoyo de base y la participación comunitaria. Los inversores en tales proyectos suelen consistir en individuos motivados por el potencial de innovación impulsada por la comunidad y el espíritu de cooperación que se encuentra dentro de la comunidad cripto. ¿Cómo Funciona ETH3.0? Ethereum 3.0 Las características distintivas de Ethereum 3.0 radican en su implementación propuesta de sharding y tecnología zk-proof. Sharding es un método de particionamiento de la blockchain en piezas más pequeñas y manejables o “shards,” que pueden procesar transacciones de manera concurrente en lugar de secuencial. Esta descentralización del procesamiento ayuda a prevenir la congestión y asegura que la red permanezca receptiva incluso bajo una carga pesada. La tecnología de prueba de conocimiento cero (zk-proof) contribuye con otra capa de sofisticación al permitir la validación de transacciones sin revelar los datos subyacentes involucrados. Este aspecto no solo mejora la privacidad, sino que también aumenta la eficiencia general de la red. También se habla de incorporar una Máquina Virtual de Ethereum de conocimiento cero (zkEVM) en esta actualización, amplificando aún más las capacidades y utilidad de la red. ETH3.0 Meme Token El ETH3.0 Meme Token se distingue al capitalizar la popularidad de la cultura de memes. Establece un mercado para que los usuarios participen en el comercio de memes, no solo por entretenimiento sino también por el posible beneficio económico. Al integrar características como staking, provisión de liquidez y mecanismos de gobernanza, el proyecto fomenta un entorno que incentiva la interacción y participación de la comunidad. Al ofrecer una mezcla única de entretenimiento y oportunidad económica, el ETH3.0 Meme Token tiene como objetivo atraer a una audiencia diversa, que abarca desde entusiastas de las criptomonedas hasta conocedores casuales de memes. Línea de Tiempo de ETH3.0 Ethereum 3.0 11 de noviembre de 2024: Justin Drake insinúa la próxima actualización de ETH 3.0, centrada en mejoras de escalabilidad. Este anuncio significa el comienzo de las discusiones formales sobre la futura arquitectura de Ethereum. 12 de noviembre de 2024: Se espera que la propuesta anticipada para Ethereum 3.0 se desvele en Devcon en Bangkok, preparando el escenario para una mayor retroalimentación de la comunidad y posibles próximos pasos en el desarrollo. ETH3.0 Meme Token 21 de marzo de 2024: El ETH3.0 Meme Token se lista oficialmente en CoinMarketCap, marcando su incursión en el dominio público de las criptomonedas y mejorando la visibilidad de su ecosistema basado en memes. Puntos Clave En conclusión, Ethereum 3.0 representa una evolución significativa dentro de la red de Ethereum, enfocándose en superar las limitaciones en términos de escalabilidad y rendimiento a través de tecnologías avanzadas. Sus actualizaciones propuestas reflejan un enfoque proactivo hacia las demandas y la usabilidad futura. Por otro lado, el ETH3.0 Meme Token encapsula la esencia de la cultura impulsada por la comunidad en el espacio de las criptomonedas, aprovechando la cultura de memes para crear plataformas atractivas que fomentan la creatividad y participación del usuario. Comprender los distintos propósitos y funcionalidades de ETH3.0 y $eth 3.0 es fundamental para cualquiera interesado en los desarrollos en curso dentro del espacio cripto. Con ambas iniciativas abriendo caminos únicos, subrayan colectivamente la naturaleza dinámica y multifacética de la innovación en blockchain.

178 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.04.04Actualizado en 2024.12.03

Qué es ETH 3.0

Cómo comprar ETH

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Ethereum (ETH) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Ethereum (ETH) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Ethereum (ETH)Después de comprar tu Ethereum (ETH), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Ethereum (ETH)Tradear fácilmente con Ethereum (ETH) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

4.1k Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.10Actualizado en 2025.03.21

Cómo comprar ETH

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de ETH (ETH).

活动图片