Ex-US defense secretary calls CLARITY Act a ‘national security bill’

cointelegraphPublicado a 2026-08-10Actualizado a 2026-08-10

Resumen

Former U.S. Secretary of Defense Mark Esper has called on the Senate to urgently pass the CLARITY Act, framing it as a critical national security bill. In a Financial Times op-ed, Esper argued that current weak digital asset regulations create vulnerabilities exploited by adversaries like China and North Korea. He stated China is developing state-directed payment systems to bypass U.S. oversight and erode the dollar's dominance, calling China the "greatest strategic threat." The Act would empower the U.S. Treasury to close crypto loopholes used by groups like North Korea's Lazarus to evade financial controls, including by extending special-measures authority. The Senate is expected to vote on the legislation on September 15.

A former US defense secretary has urged the Senate to pass the CLARITY Act, arguing that weak digital asset rules create openings for North Korea and China to undermine American financial power.

In an op-ed in the Financial Times on Saturday, former US Secretary of Defense Mark Esper said Beijing is already investing in state-directed payment systems to sidestep American supervision and erode the US dollar’s central role.

“I have long argued that China is the greatest strategic threat of our lifetime,” said Esper, who also serves as a member of the Coinbase Global Advisory Council.

He also said the act would give the US better tools to cut off crypto-specific loopholes that can be used by North Korean actors such as the Lazarus Group to avoid US financial controls.

“The Act also extends the Treasury’s potent special-measures authority under section 311 of the USA Patriot Act — one of our sharpest weapons against rogue actors,” he said.

The Senate is expected to vote on the CLARITY Act on Sept. 15. On Saturday, Senate Majority Leader John Thune filed cloture to bring the CLARITY Act to the Senate floor for consideration.

“This is why the Clarity Act, now before the Senate, is not merely a financial services bill. It is also a national security bill, and it should be understood as such and passed with urgency,” said Esper.

Related: CLARITY Act delay gives Asian financial hubs an opening: First Digital CEO

Criptos en tendencia

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Preguntas relacionadas

QWho is calling the CLARITY Act a 'national security bill' and urging the Senate to pass it?

AFormer US Secretary of Defense Mark Esper is calling the CLARITY Act a 'national security bill' and urging the Senate to pass it.

QAccording to the former defense secretary, which two countries are exploiting weak digital asset rules to undermine American financial power?

AAccording to Mark Esper, North Korea and China are exploiting weak digital asset rules to undermine American financial power.

QWhat specific action by China does Esper cite as an effort to erode the US dollar's central role?

AEsper cites that China is investing in state-directed payment systems to sidestep American supervision and erode the US dollar's central role.

QWhat is the expected date for the Senate to vote on the CLARITY Act?

AThe Senate is expected to vote on the CLARITY Act on September 15.

QWhich specific authority under the Patriot Act would the CLARITY Act extend to help combat rogue actors?

AThe CLARITY Act would extend the Treasury's special-measures authority under section 311 of the USA Patriot Act.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Hidden Landmines Beneath the AI Boom: Hints of the Next 'Subprime' Crisis

The article warns of a potential "AI subprime" crisis brewing beneath the rapid growth of AI infrastructure. Unlike the dot-com bubble fueled by equity, the current AI boom is largely debt-financed, resembling a real estate development cycle. Tech giants like OpenAI sign massive, multi-year "take-or-pay" contracts for computing power, which cloud providers then use as collateral to secure debt for building data centers. This creates a fragile chain reliant on continuous refinancing, as many AI labs are not yet profitable. The structure is dangerously similar to the 2008 financial crisis: long-term commitments ("shadow loans") are packaged into asset-backed securities, while underlying cash flows depend on unproven, future AI demand. Key players like Amazon and Google have seen free cash flow turn negative, shifting them toward debt-dependent financing models. The core risk is a mismatch: AI's rapid technological obsolescence and uncertain profitability are combined with the high leverage and cyclical risks of real estate. A slowdown in the growth *rate* (a negative second derivative) of AI demand could trigger a debt crisis, as lenders pull back when refinancing becomes unsustainable. The article concludes that while AI's long-term promise remains, its medium-term danger is a debt bubble inflated by capital expenditure outpacing genuine revenue.

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

Hidden Landmines Beneath the AI Boom: Hints of the Next 'Subprime' Crisis

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

Everyone Is Eyeing EUV Lithography Machines

The article "Everyone Has Their Eyes on EUV Lithography Machines" explores the ongoing expansion of EUV (Extreme Ultraviolet) lithography in semiconductor manufacturing. While EUV was once exclusive to giants like TSMC, Samsung, Intel, SK Hynix, and Micron, it's now appearing on the roadmaps of second-tier foundries like Nanya Technology and Winbond Electronics. This shift is driven by the diffusion of EUV into DRAM production, the economic boost from the AI boom making such investments viable, and the maturation of Low-NA EUV as a standard tool. Meanwhile, the "five-member club" of primary EUV users is seeing new entrants like Japan's Rapidus, a state-backed startup aiming for 2nm production. Concurrently, a wave of startups is challenging the traditional EUV model with alternative technologies. These challengers are categorized into four groups: those seeking to replace the light source (e.g., xLight's Free Electron Laser), those aiming to shorten the wavelength (e.g., Inversion Semiconductor, Substrate with BEUV/X-ray approaches), those promoting Nanoimprint Lithography (e.g., Canon), and those exploring maskless particle-based methods (e.g., Multibeam's multi-column e-beam, Lace's helium atom lithography). While these alternatives struggle with the throughput and stability required for high-volume manufacturing, they collectively signal a potential diversification of the future lithography landscape. The conclusion is that while EUV's technical and economic barriers remain high, its user base is broadening. The future may see a more competitive ecosystem, with Low-NA EUV serving mainstream needs, High-NA EUV for cutting-edge nodes, and novel technologies finding niches in specific applications.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Everyone Is Eyeing EUV Lithography Machines

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Chip Stocks 'Hit a Wall,' But the Market Has Not

Chip stocks face volatility, driven by the blowup of an AI hedge fund (Situational Awareness), which briefly dragged the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index down 29%. However, the market has defied concerns, treating the sell-off as a buying signal. Investors injected over $11 billion into semiconductor ETFs in two days, fueling strong rallies in leveraged and non-leveraged funds. This dynamic is part of a broader surge in risk appetite: the S&P 500 hit a record high, high-yield bond funds saw their largest weekly inflow in two years, and Bitcoin ETFs attracted significant capital. Bank of America's Bull & Bear Index has risen to its highest level since 2021. Market strategists note the momentum-driven "tsunami" in buying, though concentration remains in mega-cap tech stocks. Despite the optimism, a key risk persists: elevated Treasury yields, with the 30-year yield near two-decade highs, pose a headwind. A weak July jobs report, however, eased near-term Fed hike fears and supported markets. Analysts suggest the economic backdrop remains solid, with AI infrastructure demand underpinning growth, though potential bottlenecks like power supply could emerge. The prevailing investor psychology is that recent pullbacks have been brief, reinforcing confidence to buy dips, as evidenced by a sharp drop in semiconductor volatility. The overarching narrative is one of resilient money flows toward risk assets despite a lengthening list of worries.

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Chip Stocks 'Hit a Wall,' But the Market Has Not

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Divergence in Regulated Token Protocol Standards: Issuance, Compliance, and Integration Each Assume Their Roles

Regulated token standards on EVM chains are diverging not towards a single unified standard, but into a modular, complementary architecture by function. Key examples include ERC-1450 (centered on a Registered Transfer Agent), ERC-3643 (a modular stack for policy), and ERC-7943 (a minimal integration layer). This reflects a broader industry trend: instead of bundling all regulatory functions into one standard, the ecosystem is separating **recurring, universal execution functions** (pre-transfer checks, freezing, forced transfers) from **product/jurisdiction-specific policies** (KYC providers, holding limits). Beyond EVM, other chains integrate comparable features at different architectural levels. Solana's Token Extensions provide hooks and controls at the program library level. Stellar and XRPL embed authorization and freezing natively in the ledger. Sui and Aptos place common controls in their Move frameworks. Networks like Canton and Avalanche L1 extend functionality to market operations and validator-level compliance. The competitive edge for regulated token standards will likely depend on **flexibility to adapt to regulatory changes** and the clarity of embedded controls for external integrators, rather than the sheer number of features. The future points towards a **compliance stack**: a base layer of standardized execution functions supporting interchangeable modules for identity, jurisdictional rules, and product-specific policies. This approach balances operational consistency with the necessary flexibility for diverse regulatory requirements across assets and regions.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Divergence in Regulated Token Protocol Standards: Issuance, Compliance, and Integration Each Assume Their Roles

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

$1.8 Million? Even Amazon Can't Afford to Burn Claude Anymore

Amazon was reportedly hit with a $1.8 million bill—860% over budget—after a five-month attempt to use Claude Sonnet AI to generate author information for its site. The project, which ultimately failed to deploy, consumed an estimated 6000 billion tokens, equivalent to twice GPT-3's training data. This incident highlights the hidden and often unpredictable costs of AI, even for tech giants. Despite such setbacks, Amazon is aggressively investing in automation, planning a record $2200 billion capital expenditure in 2026, primarily for AWS, AI chips, and infrastructure. This push is paying off: AWS saw a 37% revenue jump and contributes 60% of operating profit. Concurrently, Amazon aims to automate 75% of warehouse operations by around 2033, potentially reducing hundreds of thousands of jobs. Amazon's cost overrun is not isolated. Companies like Meta and Uber have faced similar AI spending spirals, leading to internal "token usage" rankings and, eventually, strict budgets and spending caps. Meta, for instance, once faced a potential monthly bill of $221 million before implementing limits. OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman noted that AI cost control, ignored earlier, has now become a major concern. The risks of unchecked automation echo past disasters like Knight Capital's 2012 $440 million loss from a faulty automated trading system. While automation promises efficiency, its failures can be amplified at the same scale and speed. For Amazon and others, managing these costs and risks is a critical, ongoing lesson.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

$1.8 Million? Even Amazon Can't Afford to Burn Claude Anymore

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar BILL

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Billions Network (BILL) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Billions Network (BILL) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Billions Network (BILL)Después de comprar tu Billions Network (BILL), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Billions Network (BILL)Tradear fácilmente con Billions Network (BILL) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

460 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2026.05.07Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de BILL (BILL).