Coinbase开设卢森堡MiCA中心 欧盟加密市场进入监管新时代

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-06-25Actualizado a 2026-06-25

Resumen

加密货币交易所Coinbase于卢森堡正式设立其欧洲加密枢纽,此举基于欧盟《加密资产市场法规》(MiCA)框架。该枢纽在Coinbase于2025年6月获得卢森堡金融监管机构CSSF颁发的MiCA许可证后启动,时间早于法规最终期限一年多。凭借此授权,Coinbase得以向欧洲市场超过4.5亿人提供其加密产品与服务,其卢森堡实体也已列入欧洲证券和市场管理局的MiCA授权参与者名册。 Coinbase选择卢森堡,看重其作为欧洲金融中心的声誉、对创新的支持以及明确的监管框架。卢森堡已颁布多项区块链相关法律,为数字资产生态系统提供了稳定环境。公司认为此举不仅强化了其合规能力,也将促进欧洲加密市场的创新与区域经济发展。 这一进展凸显了MiCA作为欧洲数字资产监管体系的重要性,标志着欧盟加密市场进入新的监管时代。与此同时,全球监管趋势持续,例如韩国正对40家未注册加密运营商进行整顿。

根据欧盟的《加密资产市场法规》,Coinbase正式在卢森堡启动了其欧洲加密中心。此前,Coinbase已于2025年6月获得了卢森堡金融监管机构颁发的MiCA许可证。卢森堡金融业监督委员会在截止日期前一年多授予了该许可证。

这意味着Coinbase可以向整个欧洲市场超过4.5亿人提供其加密产品和服务。Coinbase卢森堡有限公司的名称已列入欧洲证券和市场管理局的MiCA授权参与者登记册。即使在获得MiCA授权之前,Coinbase已经在多个欧洲国家拥有监管许可证。

Coinbase运营的欧洲国家包括德国、法国、爱尔兰、意大利、西班牙和荷兰。该公司于2021年在纳斯达克公开股票市场上市,这意味着监管机构已经可以查阅该公司的运营和合规记录。

卢森堡巩固其加密创新中心地位

选择卢森堡,是基于其欧洲金融服务市场的声誉和监管环境。卢森堡一贯支持创新,但也始终为金融市场保持清晰的监管规范。卢森堡对区块链技术和分布式账本技术创新项目采取了综合方法。卢森堡议会已颁布了四项支持国家数字资产生态系统的区块链相关法律。

Coinbase强调,卢森堡为加密货币提供了清晰的监管,并理解加密公司的需求。该公司认为该司法管辖区是其在欧洲长期发展的坚实基础。

MiCA为欧洲加密市场提供新机遇

这一新发展显示了MiCA作为欧洲数字资产监管制度的重要性日益增加。加密市场的参与者正在关注企业如何在这一新框架下利用许可证。

据Coinbase表示,这一成就提升了其合规能力,并有助于推动欧洲加密市场的创新。该公司还表示,将致力于帮助该地区的经济发展。

重点加密新闻

韩国在监管打击行动中将目标对准40家未注册加密运营商

Tags区块链加密市场欧盟欧洲欧洲许可证欧洲联盟卢森堡MiCA

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QCoinbase 为何选择在卢森堡建立其欧洲加密资产中心?

ACoinbase 选择卢森堡主要是基于其在欧洲金融服务市场的声誉、明确的监管规范,以及对区块链和分布式账本技术创新的支持。卢森堡议会已颁布了四项有利于数字资产生态系统的区块链法律,为加密公司提供了清晰的法律环境。

Q获得 MiCA 许可后,Coinbase 能为欧洲市场提供什么服务?

A获得 MiCA 许可后,Coinbase 可以合法地向整个欧洲市场超过 4.5 亿人口提供其加密产品和服务。

Q除了 MiCA 许可,Coinbase 在欧洲还有哪些国家的运营资质?

A在获得 MiCA 许可之前,Coinbase 已经在多个欧洲国家拥有监管许可,包括德国、法国、爱尔兰、意大利、西班牙和荷兰。

Q文章中提到 Coinbase 在卢森堡的 MiCA 许可是何时获得的?

ACoinbase 于 2025 年 6 月获得了卢森堡金融监管机构(CSSF)颁发的 MiCA 许可证,这比规定的截止日期提前了一年多。

Q根据文章,MiCA 的推出对欧洲加密市场意味着什么?

AMiCA 作为一种新的监管制度,为欧洲数字资产市场提供了新的可能性。它提高了市场的规范性和确定性,企业可以通过获取此类许可来增强合规能力并推动市场创新。

Lecturas Relacionadas

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

In May, Meta imposed internal restrictions on its engineers regarding the use of Claude Code and Codex, two widely used AI programming tools. Despite being a major client, Meta's guidelines, still in effect, prohibit these external models from being used for specific tasks to prevent potential "escalations with partners." The core concern is "distillation"—the risk that outputs from Claude or Codex could inadvertently contaminate the training data and evaluation processes for Meta's in-house AI coding assistant, MetaCode. If MetaCode is trained or evaluated using data generated by these external models, it risks learning their capabilities rather than developing its own, blurring the line of intellectual origin. The restrictions are precise: engineers cannot use the external models to generate test questions, debug source code, or suggest test cases. AI-generated content is also barred from environments accessible to MetaCode. However, AI can still assist with peripheral tasks like workflow setup and code organization, provided all outputs are manually reviewed. This caution reflects a broader industry dilemma. While distillation is a common technique, using a competitor's model output for training raises legal and ethical questions about the ownership of derived capabilities. Contractual terms from companies like OpenAI and Anthropic explicitly forbid using their outputs to build competing products, putting enforcement power in the hands of rivals. The move is also financially motivated, as Meta seeks to reduce its hefty internal AI spending, estimated in the billions this year. Meta's policy illustrates the delicate balance companies must strike: leveraging powerful external AI tools while safeguarding the integrity and independence of their own AI development. As AI systems increasingly help build other AIs, distinguishing the origin of capabilities becomes a fundamental challenge for the entire industry.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

The article "Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?" explores the complex and often contentious integration of AI into the cultural and creative industries, particularly film and television. It begins with the cancellation of Amazon's AI-generated animation "Punky Duck," highlighting the ethical debates surrounding AI content. AI's rapid advancement is transforming video production, enabling cost-effective, full-length AI films (e.g., "RAPHAEL," "Dreams of Violets") while sparking industry resistance over issues like "synthetic actors." The core debate has shifted from whether to use AI to how to use it responsibly. The article analyzes why AI's entry into film is uniquely unsettling. It distinguishes between "cultural fast food" (short-form, fast-paced content like micro-dramas) and "cultural main courses" (traditional, long-form film/TV). AI currently excels at the former, matching its fragmented narratives, shallow emotional needs, and free-to-consumer models. However, venturing into the latter challenges the human-centric essence of storytelling—creativity, emotional depth, and the unique value of human labor and experience. While AI can generate massive volumes of content and lower costs, it risks devaluing human creativity, leading to homogenized output, and creating unfair competition through potential intellectual property infringement. Its efficiency also amplifies content safety risks, making preemptive governance crucial. To counter these risks, the article proposes establishing clear boundaries guided by a human-centered AI content perspective. It outlines four principles: 1) Amplify, rather than displace, human creative space; 2) Respect and protect human creative output; 3) Ensure human creative control and responsibility remain paramount; and 4) Guarantee transparency and traceability in AI creation. The conclusion emphasizes that humans must act as the "helmsmen" of technology, steering AI development to enhance, not replace, the core human values at the heart of cultural expression.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar ERA

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Caldera (ERA) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Caldera (ERA) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Caldera (ERA)Después de comprar tu Caldera (ERA), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Caldera (ERA)Tradear fácilmente con Caldera (ERA) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

409 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.07.17Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar ERA

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de ERA (ERA).

活动图片