South Korea Targets 40 Unregistered Crypto Operators in Regulatory Crackdown

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-06-24Actualizado a 2026-06-24

Resumen

South Korea's Financial Intelligence Unit has referred around 40 unregistered virtual asset service providers to the police as part of a regulatory crackdown. Under local law, all crypto exchanges must obtain ISMS certification and FIU registration before operating, yet only 28 entities are currently registered. The FIU identified methods used by offshore platforms to attract Korean users, including advertising on local messaging apps and using private money changers to convert stablecoins. Officials stressed that unregistered platforms are not protected by Korean law. This action aligns with South Korea's push for stricter global crypto compliance through FATF measures. FIU Director Lee Hyung-joo recently urged FATF members to remove transaction thresholds for the "Travel Rule," as South Korea plans to mandate identity checks for all crypto transactions starting in August, expanding from the current 1 million won (≈$730) minimum. Regulatory enforcement has intensified in 2026, with authorities pursuing criminal cases against market manipulation schemes and enhancing cooperation with financial institutions to curb cross-border illegal transactions.

The Financial Intelligence Unit of South Korea recently referred approximately 40 unregistered virtual asset service providers to the police authority. It reflects Seoul’s increasing attempts to regulate the cryptocurrency firms that operate in South Korea. According to South Korean law, all crypto exchanges are mandated to get the ISMS Certification and FIU registration prior to operating.

As per The Chosun Daily, only 28 entities are currently registered in accordance with the established rules and norms. A platform offering its services to local clients without proper certification acts illegally in terms of the country’s legislation. In the course of its research, the FIU revealed that there were several ways employed by offshore exchanges to lure local clients. For example, some exchanges advertised their services in Korea via Telegram and KakaoTalk while continuing to function abroad.

Additionally, there were private money changers who exchanged stablecoins into Korean currency for tourists, students, and foreigners working in Korea. Moreover, content creators got paid to promote cryptocurrency exchanges from abroad in Korea. The FIU stressed that any non-registered platforms do not fall under the protection provided by the country’s laws.

Tough Global Crypto Compliance Standards from South Korea

This move is part of South Korea’s wider campaign to increase global compliance standards for cryptocurrencies through FATF measures. Lee Hyung-joo, the FIU Director, recently attended the thirty-fourth plenary of the FATF in Paris. At the conference, Lee called on the FATF member states to abolish the transaction thresholds used under the crypto Travel Rule. South Korea intends to implement identity checks for all crypto transactions from August.

Identity checks are currently mandatory for transactions amounting to more than one million won, which translates to about $730. This means that all the transactions that will be carried out by participating exchanges would have to meet these compliance standards. Lee contends that inconsistent licensing standards lead to regulatory arbitrage, thus weakening the implementation of anti-money laundering regulations.

Regulatory Enforcement is Growing Further

In South Korea, cryptocurrency regulatory actions have been expanding during 2026 in various regulatory areas. In previous cases, the authorities initiated criminal proceedings regarding an individual who was engaged in running cryptocurrency pump and dump operations. Moreover, government entities also enhanced their collaboration with financial organizations and credit card organizations to prevent any illegal transactions between countries.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Legacy Polygon Royalties Contract Exploit Drains $261K Through Reward Logic Flaw

TagsBlockchainCryptoCryptocurrencyKoreaSouth Korea

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QHow many unregistered virtual asset service providers did South Korea's FIU recently refer to the police?

AApproximately 40.

QWhat are the two key requirements for crypto exchanges to legally operate in South Korea?

ACrypto exchanges must obtain the ISMS Certification and complete FIU registration.

QAccording to the article, what is South Korea's intention regarding crypto transaction identity checks starting from August?

ASouth Korea intends to implement identity checks for all crypto transactions, removing the current one million won (about $730) threshold.

QName one method mentioned that offshore exchanges used to attract local clients in South Korea.

ASome offshore exchanges advertised their services in Korea through platforms like Telegram and KakaoTalk.

QWhat was the main argument made by FIU Director Lee Hyung-joo at the FATF plenary regarding crypto regulation?

ALee Hyung-joo argued that inconsistent licensing standards lead to regulatory arbitrage, weakening anti-money laundering efforts, and called for the abolition of transaction thresholds under the crypto Travel Rule.

Lecturas Relacionadas

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

As Bitcoin falls below $60,000, the author reflects on the relationship between AI and Bitcoin, seeing them as two sides of the same coin. In the AI era, the cost of generating content has plummeted, making fake text, images, and videos increasingly easy and cheap to produce. This has led to a fundamental shift: while AI dramatically lowers the cost of information production, it also undermines trust and authenticity online. What becomes truly valuable is not more content, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This perspective offers a new lens for Bitcoin. Its massive energy consumption, often criticized as wasteful, is reinterpreted. While AI burns energy to enhance "capability" and efficiency, Bitcoin burns energy to produce "verifiability." Its purpose is not to be trusted but to enable a system where no trust in intermediaries—banks, platforms, or developers—is needed. Every transaction and the entire ledger's history is secured by cryptography and a decentralized network of nodes, making it independently verifiable. AI cannot forge a transaction on the Bitcoin network because the system is designed for proof, not generation. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance: the printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce. Today, AI is the new printing press, reducing content creation costs to near zero. Blockchain, and Bitcoin as its pioneer, may be the modern equivalent of double-entry bookkeeping—a foundational technology for verifying digital asset ownership and historical records without centralized authorities. Thus, AI and blockchain are not competitors. AI lowers the cost of creation; blockchain lowers the cost of verification. In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may lie not in more content, but in independently verifiable facts. Whether the market will reprice Bitcoin accordingly remains uncertain, but its core value proposition as a "machine for producing verifiability" becomes strikingly relevant.

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

Author: Sevclub, Seven Research Amid Bitcoin's recent drop below $60k, the author reflects on a growing sense that AI and Bitcoin are two sides of the same coin. Today, encountering any content triggers a new default question: "Was this made by AI?" The cost of generating convincing text, images, and video is now negligible. While the internet lowered information *distribution* costs, AI is crashing information *production* costs to near zero. The consequence is a flood of content where truth and falsehood are increasingly indistinguishable. In this environment, what becomes truly valuable is not more information, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This reframes the common criticism that Bitcoin "wastes electricity." AI consumes power to produce "capability" (e.g., more powerful models). Bitcoin consumes power to produce something else: "verifiability." Bitcoin's core purpose isn't about belief or trust in any institution, developer, or even its creator. It's about enabling independent verification. Every bitcoin's origin, every transaction, and the integrity of the entire ledger are secured by mathematics, cryptography, and a global network of nodes. AI can fabricate convincing media, but it cannot falsify a transaction on the Bitcoin network. The expended energy makes篡改历史 (tampering with history) prohibitively expensive, purchasing a globally verifiable ledger. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance. The printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce—one enabled creation, the other verification. Today, AI is the new printing press, driving content production costs toward zero. The question becomes: what is this era's "double-entry bookkeeping"? Blockchain appears to be the leading candidate. It doesn't verify which news is true or which image is real, but it provides a foundational layer for independently verifying asset ownership and historical records in the digital realm without centralized authorities. Therefore, AI and blockchain are not in competition. AI lowers the cost of *generation*. Blockchain (and Bitcoin as a prime example) lowers the cost of *verification*. One creates, the other proves. Whether Bitcoin ultimately succeeds remains uncertain, facing potential challenges from quantum computing, regulation, and technical evolution. However, the author now sees it less as a "machine for making bitcoin" and more as a "machine for making verifiability." In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may no longer be "more content," but "more independently verifiable facts." Whether the market will price this accordingly is a separate question.

链捕手Hace 48 min(s)

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

链捕手Hace 48 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar 4

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar 4 (4) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar 4 (4) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu 4 (4)Después de comprar tu 4 (4), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear 4 (4)Tradear fácilmente con 4 (4) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

779 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.10.20Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar 4

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de 4 (4).

活动图片