Биткоин отстает по динамике роста от индекса Nasdaq — K33 Research

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2025-09-26Actualizado a 2025-11-27

В течение последнего месяца биткоин отставал по динамике роста от индекса Nasdaq, отражающего акции технологических компаний в 70% сессий. Подобная ситуация наблюдалась только несколько раз с 2020 года, заявил глава отдела исследований K33 Research Ветле Лунде (Vetle Lunde).

По данным эксперта, сейчас первая криптовалюта по динамике роста примерно на 30% слабее по отношению к биржевому индексу, чем в начале октября.

«Криптовалюта тесно связана с движением акций, но показывает более резкое падение в дни спада и слабый отскок в периоды роста. Эта тенденция отражает устойчивое давление со стороны продавцов в общей среде инвесторов, где не принято рисковать. Текущая относительная цена биткоина по отношению к другим рискованным активам существенно расходится с фундаментальными показателями», — пояснил Лунде.

Он подчеркнул, что в последние недели усилилось расхождение между краткосрочными и долгосрочными держателями. Спекулятивный капитал продолжает покидать рынок на фоне неопределенности в макроэкономике, тогда как крупные инвесторы сохраняют накопленные объемы биткоина и не демонстрируют признаков паники.

Это создает ситуацию, когда краткосрочные колебания становятся резче, а восстановление цены происходит значительно медленнее, чем ожидалось. Для изменения динамики рынку необходим четкий внешний сигнал — либо значительный приток ликвидности, либо снижение давления со стороны продавцов.

Только в этом случае биткоин сможет сократить разрыв в корреляции с технологическими акциями, и вернуться к траектории более сильного движения, заключил специалист.

Ранее эксперты компании XWIN Research заявили, что в этом году крипторынок находится в фазе «Zebra Market», когда цены цифровых активов двигаются резкими чередующимися импульсами вверх и вниз, подобно черным и белым полосам.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Nearly a Hundred Players Rush into Embodied Data: With 4.47 Billion Yuan in Financing in One Year, Who Can Really Make Money by 'Selling Data'?

The domestic embodied AI data industry has attracted nearly 100 players, with 70 focused on data collection and 27 on data infrastructure. In the past year, 15 independent embodied data service providers raised approximately 4.47 billion yuan. Despite this growth, the sector remains early-stage, fragmented, and faces significant challenges. Data collection methods are diverse, categorized into four main routes: teleoperation of real robots, human demonstration without a robot (using motion capture, exoskeletons, etc.), simulation synthesis, and distillation from internet videos. Most companies (43%) adopt hybrid approaches, combining multiple routes, as no single method can meet all training needs. Teleoperation alone is pursued by 31% of players, often by state-owned platforms and robot companies, while newer firms favor asset-light, no-hardware human demonstration. Independent data service providers now form the largest player group (40%), indicating the emergence of a distinct industry segment rather than just a subsidiary function for robot makers. Two-thirds of all players are "embodied-native" startups, while one-third are companies that pivoted from fields like AI data annotation, which are more prevalent in the data infrastructure layer. Current annual industry capacity is estimated at 1.6-1.8 million hours plus 70-80 million data points, with a short-term goal to increase this 15-20 fold within 1-3 years. Data collection factories are spread across 20 provinces in China, concentrated in the Yangtze River Delta, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, and Pearl River Delta regions. Financially, the 4.47 billion yuan raised in the past year pales compared to the 43.8 billion yuan raised by the broader embodied intelligence sector in just the first half of 2026, highlighting that data remains a less "sexy" bet for investors. The 15 funded independent providers show clear stratification: a top tier led by a unicorn (Lightwheel Intelligence, 3.1 billion yuan), a middle tier of 11 firms raising tens to hundreds of millions, and an early-stage tier of 3 companies. Sixty-nine investment institutions have participated, but none have made concentrated bets, reflecting uncertainty about viable business models. Over half of these funded companies are less than a year old, most are at pre-A or A rounds, and profitability remains largely unproven. In summary, the embodied data industry has become an independent track creating jobs and local economic activity. However, it is still nascent, with unformed consensus, unsolved problems, and unproven business models. The coming 1-2 years will be a critical validation window to see if companies can build sustainable, profitable businesses purely by "selling data."

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Nearly a Hundred Players Rush into Embodied Data: With 4.47 Billion Yuan in Financing in One Year, Who Can Really Make Money by 'Selling Data'?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Dialogue with Multicoin Partner: The Crypto Market Has Bottomed Out, Favoring Three Cryptocurrencies in This Cycle

In a recent interview, Multicoin Capital managing partner Tushar Jain shared his views on the crypto market. He believes the market has bottomed and is at an inflection point, citing that negative news no longer causes significant price declines and application adoption continues to grow. Jain remains highly bullish on Solana, viewing it as the correct architectural choice for internet capital markets, particularly for spot and tokenized security trading. He is also positive on Hyperliquid, noting its leadership in decentralized derivatives trading. His investment approach focuses on concentrating capital in top convictions rather than equal allocation. A distinct opportunity he highlights is Zcash (ZEC), which he sees as a return to the industry's cypherpunk ethos and a potential top-five asset by market cap. For assets like Zcash without cash flows, his valuation framework is based on relative market cap ranking. Regarding investment strategy, Jain employs a "three-part" entry method to avoid timing pitfalls and emphasizes long-term "active management" over "active trading." He outlines four sources of investment edge: informational, analytical, behavioral/psychological, and structural. On portfolio management, the fund uses Bitcoin as its "cash," selling assets into Bitcoin during market euphoria to reduce beta risk and using Bitcoin to buy dips. Sales occur only if a better opportunity arises, the investment thesis breaks, or valuations become excessively overheated. While respectful of Ethereum's resilience, he questions its unclear scaling roadmap. Finally, Jain reaffirms his commitment to the thesis that blockchains will form the foundational architecture for future capital markets.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Dialogue with Multicoin Partner: The Crypto Market Has Bottomed Out, Favoring Three Cryptocurrencies in This Cycle

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片