今晚TGE,速览Monad官方首日提及的生态项目

marsbitPublicado a 2025-11-23Actualizado a 2025-11-24

RareBetSports:预测市场板块

RareBetSports

RareBetSports 是一个体育板块预测市场平台,用户可以预测个别运动员的表现,例如球员的得分,而不仅仅是预测哪支球队会赢得比赛。在 RareBetSports 平台,用户可以创建一种名为「RareLink」的彩票,具体方法如下:

· 选择运动员:用户不用押注某个队伍获胜,而是对特定球员进行下注;

· 做出预测:判断下注球员的比分大于或是小于目标得分;

· 「串」多个球员:用户可以选择 2 到 7 个不同球员的得分数据来创建一张彩票。

此外,RareBetSports 官方表示 Alpha 版也将在今日上线。

Levr.Bet:预测市场板块

RareBetSports

Levr.Bet 是体育板块的预测市场平台,允许玩家对比赛进行高额杠杆投注(例如,最高可将投注额放大 5 倍)。目前,它为用户提供了一个独特的「成为庄家」的机会。用户无需下注,而是可以存入资金来支持投注池,从而获得平台的部分手续费和利润分成,平台参与方法如下:

· 准备筹码:钱包中准备 USDC,注册或登录 LEVR.Bet 账户;

· 找到主金库:进入 Vault Rush,MVP Vault(主金库)用于支付赢家奖金,同时承担输掉的赌注;

· 存入资金:输入要存入的 USDC,批准后点击存入,将资金注入金库,从平台活动中获取收益。

Curvance:DeFi 板块

RareBetSports

Curvance 允许用户将 MON、LST、稳定币及其他生息资产通过一次交易转换为杠杆敞口。其界面简化了传统的循环操作,无需重复存入、借出或补充资产。

Curvance 注重资本效率,提供 DeFi 头部项目的贷款价值比(LTV),并支持多种抵押品类型,包括 LST、生息稳定币、收益衍生品和金库代币。同时,未来还将支持更多小众或复杂资产。

该协议采用可扩展的清算机制,通过批量清算提升效率,并利用拍卖式结算优化回收,同时设有积分奖励计划,激励存款人和进行循环贷操作的用户。

TownSquare:DeFi 板块

RareBetSports

TownSquare 采用模块化设计,适合偏好主动管理仓位的用户:可独立控制风险、混合不同抵押品类型,并自定义每笔借贷。用户在同一账户下即可开设多个独立贷款,每笔贷款拥有独立的抵押品和借贷资产,所有操作均可在同一钱包内完成,无需在多个界面切换。典型使用场景包括:

· 用流动质押代币(LST)作为抵押借入稳定币

· 用稳定币借入 MON

· 混合 LST 和稳定币以实现多样化敞口

TownSquare 采用统一流动性池,出借人共享同一存款基础,而借款人可构建个性化仓位。相关资产如 MON 与 MON-LST 可启用「效率模式」,为希望加大方向性敞口的交易者提供更高的贷款价值比(LTV)。

Lumiterra:链游板块

RareBetSports

Lumiterra 是一款开放世界多人在线角色扮演游戏(MMORPG),玩家将在游戏中探索和生存,并与智能 AI 伙伴并肩作战,AI 伙伴会学习玩家的游戏风格,帮助玩家更快地获取资源并赢得战斗。

Lumiterra「生存赛季」将于今晚 Monad 主网上线后启动,玩家可以通过参与活动赢取 LVMON 代币奖励,并且这些奖励也将延续到未来的游戏生态系统中(相关介绍可查看官方文档:https://lumiterra.notion.site/survival-season)。

LootGO:链游板块

RareBetSports

LootGo 将日常散步变成现实世界的寻宝游戏,是一款免费的手机应用,利用手机的 GPS 功能,通过奖励用户实际步数来发放数字「宝箱」,宝箱内包含数字货币、宝石和门票等奖品。目前用户可以从苹果应用商店或谷歌应用商店下载 LootGo 并开启手机定位服务即可。

LootGO 的 Monad 主网版寻宝活动将在几周后开始,用户可以提前做好准备,领取 LootGO 指南针,在活动开始前叠加增益效果。

bro.fun:链游板块

RareBetSports

bro.fun 是一款派对游戏「啤酒乒乓」的数字化版本,用户可以用代币下注,有机会赢取倍增奖金。它采用「公平引擎」确保每次投掷都随机且透明,为用户提供了一种有趣且防作弊的方式来测试自己的运气和投掷技巧,基础游戏玩法如下:

· 下注:连接钱包后,在投注面板设置赌注,确认后点击「开始游戏」;

· 投球:目标是将球投进杯子,每击中一组杯子都有对应倍率,击中越多,潜在奖金越高;

· 小心「死亡杯」:落入死亡杯本轮立即结束,赌注全失,可选择在任意轮次兑现奖金;

· 获取奖励:无论输赢,玩家都可获得 Bro Points 并升级,解锁返现和即时、日、周、月奖励。

TeleMafia:链游板块

RareBetSports

TeleMafia 是一款 Telegram 上社交角色扮演游戏,可将任何群聊变成黑手党战争的战场。用户只需使用 /fight 和 /slap 等简单的聊天命令,即可与其他玩家战斗、建立自己的家族,并在排行榜上争夺声望。游戏由人工智能机器人 Valentina 管理,负责钱包创建和奖励发放,让玩家无需离开 Telegram 即可轻松赚取真实奖励,参与方法如下:

· 开始黑帮生涯:在 Telegram 搜索 TeleMafia 机器人,输入 /start 启动小游戏,完成教程即可开始首个任务和战斗,系统会自动创建钱包;

· 加入或创建家族:加入已有家族或创建新家族,通过 Telegram 群组招募成员,家族越强,收益越高;

· 获取声望与战斗:使用 /fight 等指令与其他玩家对战,完成任务获取经验和资源,声望会在排行榜上显示;

· 建设家族金库:家族金库随玩法活动增长,根据 NFT 等级返现 5%–15%,AI 管理每日和每周分配,活跃家族金库增长更快并在排行榜上体现家族实力。

Lecturas Relacionadas

In Just 11 Days, Claude Rewrote Millions of Lines of Code, an Epic AI Engineering Feat Sparks Fury

In just 11 days, Bun's founder Jarred Sumner used Anthropic's Claude AI models to rewrite its million lines of code from Zig to Rust. This move sparked significant controversy, particularly from Zig's creator, Andrew Kelley, who publicly criticized Sumner's engineering practices and the decision to use AI for such a massive rewrite. Bun, a high-performance JavaScript/TypeScript runtime and rival to Node.js, was originally written in Zig. After Anthropic acquired Bun, the team encountered persistent stability and memory safety bugs in the Zig codebase. These issues, combined with Zig's strict policy against LLM-generated code, led to the decision to rewrite in Rust. The rewrite was executed using Claude AI tools at an estimated API cost of $165,000, dramatically reducing the expected time and financial cost. Andrew Kelley's response was scathing. He blamed the original bugs on poor engineering habits, calling Bun's Zig code a collection of "hacks on top of hacks." He expressed relief that Bun was no longer associated with Zig, fearing it would misrepresent the language and attract low-quality, AI-generated contributions. The tech community is divided; some view Kelley's critique as unprofessional, while others see it as a defense of engineering integrity. A major concern about the AI-driven rewrite is the resulting code quality. The translation from Zig left approximately 27,000 lines of unsafe Rust code, raising fears about long-term maintainability and technical debt. The debate centers on whether this project is a milestone in AI-assisted development or a future maintenance nightmare.

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

In Just 11 Days, Claude Rewrote Millions of Lines of Code, an Epic AI Engineering Feat Sparks Fury

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin to AI Engines: An Analysis of Cango's 'What Not to Do' Strategy

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin and Now AI: Cango's "What Not to Do" Strategy Cango, a Chinese auto finance platform that went public on the NYSE in 2018, is undergoing its third major transformation. After selling its entire auto business in 2024, it pivoted to become a large-scale Bitcoin miner, acquiring 50 exahash of mining rigs from Bitmain. However, its true goal was never Bitcoin, but owning and controlling energy infrastructure. Now, Cango is pivoting again. While most listed Bitcoin miners are leasing power to giant hyperscalers for AI training clusters, Cango is taking the opposite path. It has launched an AI inference subsidiary called EcoHash, focusing not on training but on distributed inference. The company's strategy hinges on the insight that over 70% of mining industry power is controlled by small, independent sites (10-50 MW), which are too small for hyperscalers but ideal for low-latency AI inference. Cango aims to partner with these small operators, providing the AI technology, customers, and financing through its EcoLink software layer, which can distribute workloads across sites for reliability. Cango maintains a hybrid model, running roughly 31.7 EH/s of Bitcoin mining for cash flow while aggressively cleaning its balance sheet—slashing long-term debt by 94.5% to $30.6 million and raising $75 million for its AI venture. Its first AI deployment will be at a 50 MW site in Georgia. The strategy faces skepticism, given the high costs of converting mining sites and the potential for an AI bubble. However, Cango's leadership believes discipline around "what not to do"—avoiding direct competition with hyperscalers in training—positions it to capture the long-tail demand for distributed AI inference power.

Foresight NewsHace 48 min(s)

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin to AI Engines: An Analysis of Cango's 'What Not to Do' Strategy

Foresight NewsHace 48 min(s)

Strategy's Bitcoin Sales Cap Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion: A Detail the Market Overlooked

The article discusses how MicroStrategy's potential Bitcoin sales go far beyond the announced $1.25 billion "reserve-building capacity." It clarifies a key distinction in the company's "BTC Monetization Program": selling Bitcoin to *build* a new dollar reserve (the $1.25B cap) versus selling to *replenish* the existing USD Reserve after it's used for expenses like preferred share dividends. The recent $216M BTC sale for dividend payments was a "replenishment," leaving the headline $1.25B building quota untouched. The plan actually outlines three potential funding pools from BTC sales: 1) Building the reserve ($1.25B cap), 2) Covering preferred share/ debt costs (no specified cap), and 3) Funding buyback programs (up to $20B). This means the structured sales potential exceeds $30 billion, not including uncapped replenishment sales. The piece argues this marks MicroStrategy's shift from a passive "buy-and-hold" Bitcoin proxy to an actively managed entity using BTC as a balance-sheet tool to manage its complex capital structure (common stock, preferred shares, debt, reserve). This creates new dynamics and potential conflicts, as actions benefiting one part (e.g., selling BTC to pay dividends) may pressure another (e.g., undermining the "never sell" narrative). Investors must now parse the company's specific terminology ("build" vs. "replenish") to understand the true scope of future BTC sales, which is significantly larger than the market initially perceived.

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

Strategy's Bitcoin Sales Cap Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion: A Detail the Market Overlooked

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

Goldman Sachs Report Deconstructs the Competitive Landscape of China's AI Large Models: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winner?

Goldman Sachs analyzes China's AI large language model (LLM) landscape, identifying key players and a strategic shift towards efficiency and global expansion. The report highlights that Chinese open-source/open-weight models are closing the performance gap with top global proprietary models at significantly lower cost, driven by architectural innovations like MoE. This enables a "two-tier" market: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with pricing at ~$1 per million tokens, and a low-end, price-sensitive global segment. Open-source strategies aid adoption but limit monetization, as deployments via third-party platforms (e.g., AWS Bedrock, Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue for model creators. The industry is thus moving towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing to improve unit economics. Internationally, the focus is shifting from "token maximization" to ROI-driven enterprise adoption, particularly in non-U.S. markets. Major cloud platforms are integrating Chinese models (e.g., DeepSeek, MiniMax). Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman Sachs identifies **Zhipu AI** and **DeepSeek** as leaders in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** (with Seedance) leading in multimodal/video generation. **MiniMax** and **Kuaishou** are also rated favorably. The firm forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue growing from ~RMB 35bn (2026E) to RMB 879bn by 2030.

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

Goldman Sachs Report Deconstructs the Competitive Landscape of China's AI Large Models: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winner?

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片