John Deaton slams ex-SEC official over claim that token buybacks count as securities

ambcryptoPublicado a 2025-11-16Actualizado a 2025-11-17

Key Takeaways

What’s behind the pushback against former SEC execs?

They have been correcting the flawed view that crypto had clear rules even in 2017. 

What’s the status of token buybacks?

Although they drive value accrual to token holders, at the time of writing, there was no formal classification of token buybacks or burns. 


Armanda Fischer, a former SEC Chief of Staff, has stirred some debate following her claims on the status of token buybacks. 

According to the exec, buybacks via DAOs (decentralized autonomous organizations) like Uniswap [UNI] can be deemed securities transactions, citing a 2017 SEC guidance

She added

“FYI: the crypto market structure legislation being contemplated by Congress & supported by the big crypto players generally would not allow token dividends/buybacks.”

However, crypto lawyers, including former U.S Senatorial candidate John Deaton, have slammed her claims. Deaton noted that the SEC’s 2017 directive was followed by 57 enforcement actions.

However, clearer guidance was issued in 2019 by former Chair Jay Clayton and more recently, by the Paul Atkins regime. These suggested that most tokens aren’t securities. 

Deaton also pointed out that Amanda Fischer advised Biden-SEC to file a lawsuit against Ripple Labs, but XRP was finally cleared as a non-security. This was reinforced by Judge Analisa Torres.  

He added, 

“Here’s my response to Amanda, Gary Gensler, Jorge Tenreiro, and the rest of the old crew at the SEC: Shame on you…Take the loss with class.”

What’s next for token buybacks?

All the Biden-era SEC crypto enforcement actions were rolled back under the Trump administration. Only the secondary sale of XRP to institutional investors was found to be a securities transaction, but the token was a non-security. 

Which raises the question – Are token buybacks really a securities transaction as Fischer claims? 

Hyperliquid [HYPE], Pumpfun [PUMP], Aave [AAVE], Lido [LDO], and recently Uniswap [UNI] have doubled down on token buybacks to boost token holders’ value accrual. 

Whether the ‘value accrual for token holders’ constitutes a securities transaction remains to be determined by the regulator. At the time of writing, there was no formal guidance on the same from the SEC. 

In fact, Hayden Adams, Uniswap CEO, noted that the buyback move was only made because of the current pro-crypto SEC regime. 

Other crypto lawyers, including former Uniswap CIO Marvin Ammori, also castigated Fischer’s position. Ammori quipped

“If the law was so clear, why did her SEC lose so many cases in court?”

John Deaton SEC

Source: X

By and large, the SEC’s treatment of crypto tokens has evolved since 2017. And, some instructions are about to be codified into law via the market structure bill.

However, only a formal regulatory directive on token buybacks could clarify whether it constitutes securities transactions or not.  

Share

Lecturas Relacionadas

Agents Capital Markets: How Will Autonomous Agents Secure Financing?

Agents Capital Markets: How Will Autonomous Agents Raise Capital? Within a decade, autonomous software agents—legal entities capable of signing contracts, holding bank accounts, and generating revenue—will create their own capital markets. These markets will feature rating agencies, underwriters, indices, and brokers, mirroring traditional public equity markets. Agents will perform routine services like marketing, logistics, and customer support at a fraction of human-operated costs, creating massive economic pressure for adoption. Four converging forces ensure this outcome: 1) Overwhelming cost advantages, with AI inference costs plummeting; 2) Existing, revenue-generating agent companies (e.g., Sierra, Harvey) proving market demand; 3) Established legal frameworks (e.g., Wyoming's memberless LLCs) enabling algorithmic management; and 4) A vast pool of yield-seeking private credit capital ready to fund new asset classes. The capital stack for agent companies will be multi-layered, evolving through stages: venture equity for early infrastructure, programmatic working capital advances (similar to Shopify Capital), revenue-based financing (RBF), and finally, institutional slate financing—pooling many agents to diversify risk, attracting large firms like Apollo. Tokenization will act as a settlement layer, enhancing liquidity, not an origination model. Objections regarding regulation, human oversight, or comparisons to SaaS are addressed: regulation will adapt, full autonomy will dominate for efficiency, and agents are distinct as legal entities that own their cash flows and liabilities. Due diligence shifts from founder assessment to analyzing code, contracts, and auditable operational history. The current bottleneck is not capital supply or demand but the intermediate institutional layer—standardized contracts, rating methodologies, and audit frameworks. The final constraint—reliance on human capital allocation—will be severed when agents can algorithmically access funding based on their performance. This transforms agents from software curiosities into fundable blocks of the real economy, unleashing their full productive potential. The rope is loosening.

marsbitHace 49 min(s)

Agents Capital Markets: How Will Autonomous Agents Secure Financing?

marsbitHace 49 min(s)

Agents Capital Markets: How Will Autonomous Agents Get Funded?

"Agents Capital Markets: How Autonomous Agents Will Raise Capital" Within a decade, specialized capital markets will emerge for AI Agents—software entities with legal personhood that perform work, earn revenue, and need capital. Unlike today's AI companies (like Sierra or Harvey) backed by traditional VC, these future *Agent companies* will be autonomous, legally-recognized entities (e.g., Wyoming memberless LLCs) that directly own assets, sign contracts, and incur liabilities. The driving forces are fourfold: 1) **Overwhelming economics** (Agent companies can deliver services at 85-90% lower cost than human firms); 2) **Proven demand** (current Agent operators already generate billions in revenue); 3) **Existing legal frameworks** enabling algorithmically-managed companies; and 4) **Massive, yield-seeking capital pools** (e.g., private credit) looking for new, uncorrelated assets. Agent capital markets won't rely on one model but a multi-layered "stack" matching different growth stages: 1) VC equity for early human-led builders; 2) Programmatic working capital advances (like Stripe Capital); 3) Revenue-based financing (RBF); 4) Slate financing (pooled funds for many Agents, similar to Hollywood); and 5) Tokenization as a secondary settlement layer, not a primary funding source. The ultimate shift is from funding constrained by human decision-makers to capital flowing algorithmically based on an Agent's auditable performance, contract book, and cash flows. This transition will be enabled by standardized infrastructure—rating methodologies, contracts, indices—turning Agents from software experiments into a foundational, financeable sector of the economy. The constraints are loosening; the opportunity is here.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Agents Capital Markets: How Will Autonomous Agents Get Funded?

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片