交易所垄断、华尔街收割与散户绝望的现状

深潮Publicado a 2025-10-12Actualizado a 2025-10-13

加密行业三国杀。

撰文:Haotian

说实在的,1011 这次黑天鹅事件,让我一个原本乐观的行业观察者,感受到了一丝绝望气息。

原本看明白了,加密行业目前的 「三国杀」 局面,想着神仙打架,散户跟着吃点肉,但经历这次血洗,抽丝剥茧其底层逻辑,发现并不是这回事。

说白了,原本以为技术派在搞创新,交易所在做流量,华尔街在布局资金,三方各玩各的,我们散户只要看准时机,技术创新的时候跟一波,热点来了蹭一下,资金进场就冲,总能分到点汤喝。

但,经历 1011 这次血洗,我突然意识到,这三方或许根本不是在有序竞争,而是在最后收割场内的一切流动性?

第一股势力:交易所垄断流,手握流量和流动池的吸血鬼。

说实话,之前一直以为,交易所就是想做大平台,做大流量,做大生态,赚铲子的钱,但 USDe 做跨保证金被连环清算这事,暴露了散户在交易所平台规则定义下的无力,平台为了提升产品服务体验提升的杠杆水平和暗处不明不白的风控能力,对散户而言其实都是坑。

各种返佣活动,Alpha、MEME 发射台子、各种理财循环贷、以及高倍杠杆合约玩法层出不穷。看似让散户多了很多赚钱机会,但一旦交易所兜不住链上 DeFi 连环清算的风险,散户也会被连带着一起遭殃,人生呐。

细思极恐的是,前 10 家交易所 Q2 交易量 21.6 万亿美元,但市场整体流动性还在下降。钱去哪了?除了手续费,还有就是各种清算。流动性到底被谁抽走了?

第二股势力:华尔街资本系,披着合规外衣进场圈地

本来特别期待华尔街能进场,觉得机构资金能给市场带来更大稳定性,毕竟机构都是长线玩家,能带来场内注入增量,我们跟着坐享 Crypto 融合 TradFi 的行业红利。

但本次暴跌前又看到有巨鲸精准做空获利的消息,暴跌前有多笔疑似华尔街结构的钱包开启巨额空投头寸,获利数亿。类似的消息很多,读起来像内幕,但发生在这种恐慌时刻,让人不得不怀疑,机构为啥总能在黑天鹅发生前获得 「前置交易」 的优势?

这些 TradFi 的机构,打着合规、带来资金的旗号进场,实际上在干什么?用稳定币公链捆绑 DeFi 生态,用 ETF 通道控制资金流向,用各种金融工具一步步蚕食这个市场的话语权?表面上说是为了行业发展,实际上呢?太多关于川普家族捞金的阴谋论就不多说了。

第三股势力:技术原生派 + 散户开发者,被夹击的炮灰。

我想这才是大部分场内散户、开发者,所谓的 builder 真正绝望的地方,从去年以来就说很多山寨币被打趴下了,但这次直接击穿归零,让人不得不看清事实,很多山寨币的流动性几乎枯竭了。

关键是,infra 技术债一堆,应用落地不及预期,开发者苦哈哈地 Build,结果呢?市场根本不买账。

所以,我看不清接下来山寨市场究竟如何东山再起,看不懂这些山寨项目方要如何从交易所手里抢流动性,要如何和华尔街机构比拼拉盘实力?如果市场不买单讲故事的叙事,如果市场仅剩所谓的 MEME 赌博,对于山寨币市场就是一次决绝的出清和洗牌,开发者逃离,场内从业者结构化洗牌,市场莫非要一切归于虚无?哎,太难了!

所以.....

说太多,都是泪。如果加密行业三国杀的局面持续下去,交易所垄断抽血、华尔街精准收割、散户技术派被双杀,这绝对是对过去 Crypto 周期性的玩法的灭顶之灾。

长此以往,市场只留下短期的少数赢家和长期的全部输家。

Lecturas Relacionadas

When Hyperliquid Steals Solana's 'Internet Capital Market' Script

The article "When Hyperliquid Steals Solana's 'Internet Capital Markets' Playbook" discusses Solana's struggles to maintain its "internet capital markets" narrative by 2026. Despite its initial success as a high-performance "Ethereum killer," SOL's price has underperformed, dropping significantly compared to other major cryptocurrencies. Solana's vision of a global, on-chain trading network for all assets is being challenged not primarily by Ethereum, but by Hyperliquid. Hyperliquid, evolving from a perpetual contracts platform into a dedicated financial infrastructure Layer 1, has become a major beneficiary of the shift of derivatives trading from centralized exchanges to on-chain. The article argues that for high-frequency financial trading, a specialized, performance-focused chain like Hyperliquid may be more suitable than a general-purpose ecosystem like Solana. Further compounding Solana's issues was a major $200+ million exploit on its key perpetual protocol, Drift, in April, which damaged market confidence. In response, Solana founder Anatoly Yakovenko heavily promoted the protocol Phoenix as a replacement, boosting its visibility but not its trading volume, which remains far behind leading platforms. Solana supporters have launched a public critique of Hyperliquid's decentralization, pointing to its limited validators and closed-source code. Critics, however, note Solana's own declining validator count and centralization metrics. This strategy has also caused internal friction, with developers of other Solana protocols expressing discontent over the foundation's perceived favoritism towards Phoenix. The conclusion is that Hyperliquid's rise represents a challenge to the "general-purpose blockchain" narrative, proving that the core of a capital market might be a specialized trading engine rather than a broad ecosystem. If Solana cannot regain dominance in derivatives, it risks remaining a "meme coin paradise" while its grand "internet capital markets" ambition slips away.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

When Hyperliquid Steals Solana's 'Internet Capital Market' Script

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

When Hyperliquid Steals Solana's 'Internet Capital Markets' Playbook

The article discusses how Solana's grand vision of becoming an "Internet Capital Markets" platform is facing significant challenges in 2026, primarily from the unexpected rise of Hyperliquid. Solana's performance has weakened, with its token SOL experiencing the largest price decline among major cryptocurrencies. Its core narrative of building a global, chain-based marketplace for all assets is under pressure both internally and externally. Hyperliquid, originally a perpetual futures exchange, has evolved into a dedicated Layer 1 financial infrastructure network. Its focused, trading-centric approach is attracting capital and challenging the assumption that a "general-purpose" ecosystem like Solana is necessary for a capital market. Hyperliquid's success suggests that for high-frequency trading, superior performance, liquidity, and user experience may be more critical than a broad application ecosystem. Internally, Solana's strategy suffered a blow from a major hack on the Drift Protocol in April, resulting in over $200 million in losses. In response, Solana founder Anatoly Yakovenko has heavily promoted Phoenix as a new decentralized perpetual futures platform on Solana. While this boosted Phoenix's visibility, its trading volume remains far behind leading platforms. Solana's community has launched a rhetorical attack against Hyperliquid, questioning its decentralization due to its limited validator set and closed-source code. Critics, however, point out Solana's own decreasing validator count and increasing centralization of stake. This focus on "decentralization metrics" has also caused internal friction, with other Solana ecosystem developers expressing discontent over the foundation's perceived favoritism towards Phoenix. The article concludes that the rise of Hyperliquid represents a challenge to the "general-purpose blockchain" narrative, proving that an efficient trading engine might be more central to a capital market than a vast ecosystem. If Solana cannot regain dominance in the derivatives space, it risks remaining a "meme coin paradise" rather than achieving its ambition of hosting global assets.

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

When Hyperliquid Steals Solana's 'Internet Capital Markets' Playbook

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片