Holding The Line

insights.glassnodePublicado a 2025-10-01Actualizado a 2025-10-02

Excerpt

Bitcoin continues to defend key on-chain support at the short-term holder cost basis, while ETFs and cooling LTH supply offer stability. Options markets reset post-expiry, with OI rebuilding, volatility easing, and flows tilting toward cautious Q4 upside.

Executive Summary

  • Bitcoin repeatedly defended the short-term holder cost basis, underscoring its role as a key pivot between bullish continuation and bearish risk. Price faces strong resistance at the $118k supply cluster, where recent top buyers may look to exit.
  • Long-term holder distribution has cooled after months of steady selling, and ETF inflows have resumed, providing a stabilizing influence on market structure. Together, these dynamics point to healthier demand-side conditions.
  • The Fear & Greed Index has retreated from sustained Greed into Neutral and Fear territory, reflecting profit-taking and reduced risk appetite. RVT trends confirm this cooling backdrop, with fewer profits realized relative to network value.
  • Options open interest reset after last week’s record expiry, now rebuilding into Q4. This reset clears hedging-driven noise and leaves room for new positioning to guide price action.
  • Volatility signals are easing, with front-end IV declining and skew moving closer to neutral. The term structure remains in contango, with back-end IV holding firm in the 39–43% range.
  • Flows show cautious upside interest, with traders adding risk reversals and cheap convexity while selling puts. This positioning reflects measured optimism aligned with seasonal “Uptober” dynamics.
  • Dealer gamma exposure is balanced across both sides, muting hedging flows and helping dampen intraday volatility. With no large expiries ahead, the near-term backdrop remains stable and neutral.
💡
View all charts in this edition in The Week On-chain Dashboard.

Holding the Line

Bitcoin’s FOMC rally quickly reversed as profit-taking pushed prices down to $109k, slipping below the short-term holder cost basis at $111.6k. The decline was met with strong buy-side demand, driving a rebound toward $118.8k. This report explores key on-chain and options indicators to assess market dynamics and gauge prevailing expectations among speculative participants.

On-Chain Outlook

Holding the Line

Building on this rebound, the short-term holder cost basis has once again emerged as a critical pivot. Since May 2025, this level has acted as support on five separate occasions, underscoring its role as a defining boundary between bullish and bearish regimes.

Each successful defense reinforces investor conviction and highlights the sensitivity of short-term capital to this threshold. Sustaining above this cost basis improves the odds of further upside, while it does not guarantee continuation.

Live Chart

Supply Overhang

However, sustaining momentum requires clearing a significant hurdle. The recent bounce now faces a dense supply cluster accumulated between late August and the $114k–$118k range. Holders who bought near these highs may view the rebound as an opportunity to exit at break-even or modest profit, creating notable overhead resistance.

Overcoming this wave of sell pressure is crucial before the market can attempt another push toward new all-time highs. A decisive stabilization above $118k would signal that demand is absorbing the top-buyers’ supply, strengthening the case for further upside.

Live Chart

Cooling Payload

Despite price repeatedly finding support around the short-term holder cost basis, a longer-term trend is emerging beneath the surface. The Short-Term Holder Realized Value (RVT) ratio, which measures the economic value realized relative to the nominal value transferred, has steadily declined since May.

Elevated RVT values often indicate overheated markets, while contractions toward the “Full Market Detox” zone point to fading speculative excess.

At present, RVT is well below peak extremes, suggesting short-term holders are realizing fewer profits relative to overall network activity. Should RVT compress further and combine with capitulation signals, it could usher in an accumulation phase as investors wait for clearer market direction.

Live Chart

Fear or Disbelief?

As the broader backdrop of cooling speculative activity unfolds, sentiment has followed suit. The Bitcoin Fear & Greed Index has shifted sharply lower, sliding from sustained Greed earlier this year into Fear and Neutral territory. This shift signals profit-taking, reduced risk appetite, and a more cautious stance among participants.

While sentiment resets can weigh on momentum in the short term, they also tend to clear excessive optimism and create conditions for healthier bases of support. Current readings point to a consolidation phase, with the market waiting for renewed conviction before committing to a decisive directional move.

Live Chart

LTH Supply Shift

Alongside the overhead pressure from top buyers, the balance between Long-Term Holders (LTHs) and ETFs has shaped recent price action. Over the past several weeks, LTHs have acted as a core source of supply, locking in profits during rallies. However, the Long-Term Holders Net Position Change (3D) has now shifted toward neutral, signaling a slowdown in distribution after months of consistent selling. This cooling supply pressure suggests that the recent phase of long-term holder profit-taking may be easing, potentially leaving ETFs and new inflows as more decisive drivers of market direction.

Live Chart

ETF Flows Steadying

Complementing the slowdown in long-term holder distribution, US Spot Bitcoin ETFs remain a central force in market structure. Flows have been volatile in recent months, with mid-September’s strong inflows followed by a string of outflow sessions.

The most recent data, however, point to a return of net inflows, underscoring that institutional appetite remains intact despite ongoing profit rotation. Should this renewed demand align with reduced LTH selling, ETFs could provide a stabilizing force, offering a more constructive foundation for price resilience and supporting the conditions needed for a sustainable advance.

Live Chart

Options Market Outlook

Next, our focus shifts from on-chain signals to the options market for deeper context. Following last week’s record expiry, open interest has sharply reset and is now rebuilding into Q4. In this report, we examine positioning, volatility, and flows to evaluate how options traders are shaping expectations for Bitcoin’s next phase.

Post-Expiry Reset

As of 08:00 UTC, Wednesday 1 October, Bitcoin has digested its largest options expiry on record, triggering a sharp reduction in open interest across expiries and strikes. This mechanical reset removes hedging-driven noise and leaves the market clearer for new positioning into Q4. Historically, major expiries often underpin price action, with the subsequent rebuild in OI reflecting more deliberate views on direction and volatility.

The current phase, therefore, marks a cleaner ground for assessing how traders are positioning into the next leg of the cycle.

Live Chart

Volatility Landscape

Following the reset in open interest, attention shifts to the volatility surface, where short-dated premiums have eased. One-week at-the-money implied volatility fell by nearly 5%points from last week’s highs, while the two-week tenor declined by about 2%. In contrast, longer-dated maturities held steady or edged slightly higher, leaving the curve steeper overall. This structure reflects a market where near-term stress has faded, yet caution persists further out the curve.

Despite the front-end retreat, implied volatility remains elevated relative to realized, keeping carry trades positive, though less compelling than a week earlier. The term structure remains in contango, with short-dated contracts anchored around 30% IV, while three-month and longer maturities hold between 39% and 43%. The steepening highlights a shift from short-term risk hedging to more measured, longer-dated caution.

Live Chart

Skew Nears Neutral

Building on the softer front-end volatility, option skew has also moderated. The 25-Delta Risk Reversal in one-week contracts fell sharply from roughly 18.5 vol points to around 6 vol points, marking a significant move away from downside protection toward balance. Longer maturities have also flattened, drifting closer to neutral territory. This adjustment reflects cooling demand for puts as immediate downside stress eases, while call premiums begin to catch up. Together, the shift signals a more balanced risk outlook, where traders are less focused on hedging tail risk and more willing to express directional upside.

Live Chart

Flows: Upside Interest Returns

With skew moving toward neutral, positioning has shifted toward the call side. Traders have been lifting upside calls in line with the typical Q4 seasonal bias, with net call premium concentrated in the $136k–$145k range. Higher strikes, however, saw call selling, suggesting the market is not chasing extreme upside but instead using structure to capture cheap convexity.

Flows also show a preference for strategies that monetize skew while retaining optionality into year-end catalysts. Put selling has picked up as well, consistent with the skew compression noted earlier. Overall, traders appear to have used last week’s pullback to add risk reversals—selling puts and buying calls—positioning for Q4 optionality and the seasonal “Uptober” narrative.

Live Chart

Dealer Gamma: Neutral Backdrop

Dealer positioning remains quiet following the record expiry. With open interest normalized back to average levels, the calendar shows no major expiries in the near term. Since gamma effects are most pronounced at-the-money and close to maturity, the absence of large clusters reduces the likelihood of significant dealer-driven hedging flows.

Current positioning is broadly long gamma on both downside and upside strikes, which helps dampen intraday volatility and stabilize spot around prevailing levels. However, these exposures are modest and remain far from any meaningful expiry points, leaving the options market in a neutral state until new positioning builds closer to upcoming dates.

Conclusion

On-chain dynamics continue to highlight the pivotal role of the short-term holder cost basis, which has served as reliable support since May 2025. Price remains challenged by the dense supply cluster between $114k and $118k, yet the easing in long-term holder distribution and the return of ETF inflows suggest stabilizing demand. Sentiment, as measured by RVT and the Fear & Greed Index, points to a cooling phase, with conditions shifting toward consolidation rather than capitulation.

In the options market, the record expiry has reset positioning, with open interest now rebuilding into Q4. Volatility has softened, skew is drifting toward neutral, and the curve remains in contango with a firmer back end. Flows show measured upside interest, while dealer gamma remains broadly balanced, muting hedging flows. Together, these signals suggest a market resetting into a more neutral, constructive backdrop, awaiting conviction for the next decisive move.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

In June 2026, the Bank of Japan raised its policy rate to 1%, marking its first hike to this level since 1995. While this rate remains low compared to global peers like the US and Europe, the move signals a profound shift for a nation that has been a global source of ultra-cheap funding for decades. Japan's long-standing near-zero or negative interest rates had facilitated massive "yen carry trades," where international investors borrowed low-cost yen to invest in higher-yielding assets worldwide, such as US tech stocks and emerging market bonds. This made Japan a critical, often overlooked, source of global liquidity. Japan's ultra-loose policy stemmed from structural challenges post-1990s asset bubble: aging demographics, chronic low inflation/deflation, and high public debt. Recent shifts, including sustained wage growth (exceeding 5% in recent years) and inflation consistently above the 2% target, have created a "wage-price spiral" possibility, prompting the policy normalization. The global market's concern lies not in the absolute rate but in the potential unwinding of the yen carry trade. As Japanese borrowing costs rise, the economics of these leveraged global investments change, potentially triggering deleveraging and capital outflows from risk assets. Market anxiety focuses on the end of a thirty-year consensus that Japan would perpetually provide cheap funding. Ultimately, the global impact will depend on the interplay with US monetary policy. While Japan is tightening, the significant interest rate differential with the US remains. The key future dynamic is whether simultaneous Japanese hikes and eventual US rate cuts will narrow this gap, forcing a major recalibration of global capital flows and asset pricing built on an era of abundant, cheap yen liquidity.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

Report Recap: MRVL Optical AI Boom - Why High Valuation Led Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst to Stay Neutral? Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore maintained an "Equal-weight" (Neutral) rating on Marvell Technology (MRVL) on May 28, raising the price target from $172 to $195, below the trading price. This stance comes despite Marvell reporting a record quarter and significantly raising its full-year outlook (FY27 revenue ~$11.5B, up ~40%). Moore's neutral view is based on valuation. The $195 target implies ~40x CY2027 P/E. He contrasts MRVL with NVDA: both trade near ~$200, but Nvidia's forward EPS is more than double Marvell's. For MRVL's valuation to hold, it needs consistent earnings upgrades, proof of networking market share gains, or certainty on large-scale custom AI chip shipments—none of which are confirmed yet. Growth is driven by two pillars: **1) Optical Interconnect** (the faster runner): Moore raised FY27 growth expectations to >70%, with the optical module product line nearing a $1B annualized run rate. **2) Custom AI Chips** (the climber): Confidence in FY28 is growing, but a major new customer project only ramps in FY28, with no current revenue visibility. Key risks are the underperforming Storage, Enterprise, and legacy Networking segments. Moore acknowledges the real AI opportunity but believes the current price already reflects it. For the stock to work from here, investors need to see the optical business hit its targets, custom chips ramp as planned, and a recovery in the weaker business units.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

**Summary: Retrospective and Outlook on the AI Computing Wave - A Framework for Capital Rotation** Based on a presentation by investor qinbaFrank, this analysis reviews the AI computing market trajectory since 2023 and outlines a forward-looking framework. **Key Phases and Market Debates:** The AI bull market progressed through three major debates: 1) The necessity of massive capital expenditure (late 2023). 2) The sustainability of tech giants' spending (early 2024-early 2025). 3) Potential overestimation of compute needs (early 2025). Consensus solidified in late 2025 as model capabilities and utility demonstrably improved. **Core Thesis: Penetration Rate Drives Commercialization.** Unlike the 2000 dot-com bubble, the current AI wave benefits from mature digital infrastructure, enabling faster adoption. The critical threshold is 10% penetration; surpassing it (with recent enterprise intent surveys showing ~18%) indicates entry into a rapid growth "golden period" where user scale and willingness to pay increase simultaneously. **AI vs. Internet: A Fundamental Difference.** While the internet enhanced connection efficiency, AI directly substitutes human cognition and labor. Once AI performance exceeds the "societal average" human level, its commercial value scales exponentially as payment shifts from human labor costs to AI service fees. **Investment Logic Evolution in the Compute Chain.** The focus has expanded from GPUs to a systemic re-rating of the entire hardware stack: storage/HBM, CPUs, interconnects, power, and advanced packaging. The framework is: **short-term "scarcity pricing," mid-term "upgrade pricing" (e.g., optical interconnects, power networks), and long-term "Physical AI" pricing** (edge computing, robotics). **Market Focus Shift and Adjustment Framework.** The market is transitioning from "hardware scarcity" to "commercialization validation." The ultimate anchor for the narrative is sustained high growth in model providers' Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) and cloud business revenue, which justifies continued capital expenditure. Adjustments are categorized into three levels: * **L1 (Minor):** Driven by valuation compression or macro noise (e.g., single CPI print). Fundamentals intact. * **L2 (Moderate):** Triggered by significant macro events requiring risk repricing. Requires new data for confidence restoration. * **L3 (Major):** Involves a reset of the core industrial narrative or macro regime (e.g., AI commercialization growth stalling). The **crucial dividing line** is whether AI commercialization growth slows. Without a slowdown, pullbacks are likely L1/L2 "repricing" events. A genuine growth deceleration would signal an L2/L3 narrative reset. **Conclusion: A Foundational Civilizational Leap.** AI represents a foundational upgrade to "intelligence" itself—akin to humanity mastering fire—rather than a single-point industrial revolution. This底层能力跃迁 (underlying capability leap) will spawn successive waves of innovation (Agent, robotics, industry workflow重构). The journey will be波浪式的 (wavelike), driven by cycles of scarcity, technological upgrades, and远期兑现 (long-term realization).

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片