SEC переносит решения по Dogecoin- и Hedera-ETF на ноябрь

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2025-04-09Actualizado a 2025-09-10

Комиссия по ценным бумагам и биржам США (SEC) перенесла принятие решений по заявкам на ETF от Bitwise для Dogecoin и Grayscale для Hedera до 12 ноября. Оба фонда остаются на рассмотрении регулятора в рамках растущего списка заявок на альткоин-ETF.

Вчера SEC перенесла крайний срок рассмотрения по предложению биржи NYSE Arca о листинге Dogecoin-ETF от Bitwise. Первоначальная заявка была подана еще в марте и опубликована в Федеральном реестре 17 марта, что запустило обязательный период рассмотрения.

В тот же день регулятор продлил проверку заявки Grayscale на Hedera-ETF, установив аналогичный ноябрьский дедлайн.

Grayscale готовит конвертацию старых трастов

Grayscale обновила документы по своим давно существующим трастам Litecoin и Bitcoin Cash, стремясь преобразовать их из трастов в ETF. Перевод на национальную биржу позволит ежедневно создавать и погашать акции, что поддержит цены ближе к чистой стоимости активов и сократит существенные премии и дисконты, наблюдаемые при внебиржевой торговле.

Компания создала прецедент в 2024 году, когда после судебной битвы с SEC конвертировала Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) в первый американский спотовый биткоин-ETF. Теперь она планирует применить ту же модель к Bitcoin Cash и Litecoin.

Неопределенность вокруг альткоин-ETF растет

Волна заявок на альткоин-ETF в 2025 году создала у SEC целую очередь нерассмотренных дел. К 31 июля в первой половине 2025 года регулятор получил минимум 31 заявку на спотовые альткоин-ETF, включая предложения для XRP, Dogecoin, Solana, Litecoin, Avalanche и BNB.

По состоянию на 29 августа минимум 92 связанных с криптовалютами ETF-продукта ожидали решений SEC. Особенно высок институциональный интерес к Solana (SOL) — восемь заявок, и XRP — семь заявок в очереди.

В большинстве случаев SEC предпочитает использовать периоды рассмотрения целиком, многократно продлевая сроки вместо вынесения досрочных одобрений или отказов, поддерживая напряженность и неопределенность.

Серия августовских переносов

В августе SEC отложила множество заявок на криптовалютные ETF. Truth Social Bitcoin и Ethereum-ETF от NYSE Arca перенесли на 8 октября, Solana-ETF от 21Shares и Bitwise — на 16 октября, 21Shares Core XRP Trust — на 19 октября.

25 августа регулятор продлил рассмотрение предложения Cboe BZX о листинге WisdomTree XRP Fund, назначив новый крайний срок на 24 октября. В тот же день перенесли решение по Canary PENGU ETF на 12 октября.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手Hace 4 hora(s)

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手Hace 4 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片