TON单日飙涨23%,一文梳理Telegram最新动向

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2025-05-30Actualizado a 2025-05-30

Resumen

拟发行15亿美元债券,将集成马斯克旗下xAI并获得股份和订阅分成。

综编:Felix, PANews

5 月 29 日,据知情人士透露,即时通讯应用 Telegram 将通过发行债券筹集至少 15 亿美元。此外,Telegram 创始人宣布已与马斯克的 xAI 达成 3 亿美元的交易(尚未最终签署)。

在接连利好消息的推动下,Telegram 旗下 The Open Network 的原生代币 TON 价格短时飙升。据 CoinGecko 数据, Toncoin(TON)一度飙升至约 3.7 美元,涨幅约达 23% ,现报 3.32 美元。尽管马斯克随后澄清,尚未正式签署协议,币价有所回落,但 24 小时涨幅仍达 11.2% 。

TON单日飙涨23%,一文梳理Telegram最新动向

拟发行债券筹集 15 亿美元

知情人士透露,Telegram 将以 9% 的收益率发行五年期债券。该公司计划用这笔债券回购其 2021 年发行的剩余债券,这些债券将于明年 3 月到期。该公司此前曾用现金回购了约 4 亿美元的此类债券。

投资者包括现有的 Telegram 债券持有人,如美国资产管理公司贝莱德和阿布扎比国有投资公司 Mubadala。预计新投资者将包括对冲基金公司 Citadel 等。

与 Telegram 先前发行的债券一样,如果该公司决定上市,新债券的投资者可以选择以折扣价将其债务转换为股票。不过,鉴于创始人 Pavel Durov 面临的法律不确定性和市场波动,该公司短期内不太可能进行 IPO。

与 xAI 达成合作意向,可获得股份和订阅分成

除拟发行 15 亿美元债券外,Pavel Durov 在 X 平台表示,Telegram 还将获得一个新的收入来源:一份为期一年的协议,分销马斯克 xAI 的人工智能模型 Grok(将 Grok 聊天机器人集成到 Telegram 中)。作为回报,Telegram 将获得 3 亿美元现金和该人工智能公司的股权,以及通过 Telegram 出售的 xAI 订阅收入的 50% 。

此外,Pavel Durov 还强调了隐私性。有用户表示:“希望用户数据能够保持安全”。对此,Pavel Durov 回复道:“用户隐私至关重要。需要明确的是,xAI 只会访问 Telegram 用户通过直接交互明确与 Grok 共享的数据。”

值得一提的是,在当天晚些时候,马斯克否认了这一声明,回复称“尚未签署任何协议”。消息传出后,TON 代币价格应声下跌。对此,Pavel Durov 回应道:“没错,原则上同意,但正式程序尚待完成。”

创始人深陷调查但营收势头良好

Pavel Durov 出生于俄罗斯,拥有俄罗斯、阿联酋和法国国籍。2024 年 8 月,Pavel Durov 在法国被捕,因未能帮助警方打击犯罪,正在法国接受调查。虽然 Pavel Durov 已获保释,但在调查期间,未经许可不能离开法国。

Pavel Durov 曾于 5 月 12 日申请特别豁免,以便前往美国与投资者进行谈判,但法国检察官表示,该请求被拒绝,原因是其行程原因“既不令人信服也不合理”。目前尚不清楚 Pavel Durov 将被滞留在法国多久。

值得一提的是。尽管创始人 Pavel Durov 面临法律风险,但 Telegram 的发展并未受多少影响。

据知情人士透露,Telegram 已告知投资者,其 2024 年的营收为 14 亿美元,利润约为 5.4 亿美元,较前一年的低迷表现大幅反弹。Telegram 于 2023 年的营收为 3.42 亿美元,亏损 1.73 亿美元。

此外,Telegram 高管称,截至 2025 年 3 月,Telegram 拥有 10 亿活跃用户,付费用户超过 1500 万,在过去一年中翻了一番。预计 2025 年的营收将达到 20 亿美元,利润将超 7 亿美元。

原文链接

Lecturas Relacionadas

2028: The Arrival of Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI)

**AI Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI): The Countdown to 2028 Begins** AI is no longer just a trained tool but is starting to rewrite its own evolutionary pace. According to Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark, there is a 60% probability that by the end of 2028, Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) will become a reality. This means AI could autonomously design and build a more capable next-generation version of itself without any human researcher involvement—Claude 10 creating Claude 11, for instance. Supporting this timeline, Google DeepMind's CEO Demis Hassabis confirms that all leading AI labs are intensely focused on RSI, making it an industry-wide priority. He expresses profound concern, stating this potential is what keeps him awake at night. Concrete data underscores this acceleration: - METR evaluations show current top models like Claude are solving tasks up to the 16-hour limit of existing test frameworks. - In Epoch AI's challenging MirrorCode benchmark, Claude Opus 4.7 recreated complex software in hours for a fraction of the human cost. In one extreme test, AI autonomously coded for 19 days straight. - Anthropic reports over 80% of its codebase is now written by Claude, and researcher productivity has increased up to 8-fold since 2024. - OpenAI's policy blueprint highlights RSI as a major upcoming governance challenge. CEO Sam Altman reportedly hinted RSI might arrive within six months, potentially delaying OpenAI's massive IPO. The implication is an impending "intelligence explosion," where AI-driven progress outpaces human control. The central question is no longer if it will happen, but whether humanity is ready.

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

2028: The Arrival of Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI)

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

World Models, Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing?

Title: World Models, the Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing? The article clarifies that concepts like the metaverse, Web3, simulation platforms, digital twins, and Physical AI are not the same thing but are all part of the broader trend of blurring the lines between the digital and physical worlds. It positions "world models" as the foundational "cognitive layer" or "operating system" that enables AI to understand and simulate the world. Key distinctions are made: - The **Metaverse** is a destination for immersive social and economic experiences. World models could act as its "engine," generating interactive 3D content efficiently. - **Web3** focuses on decentralized ownership and economics (rules layer), operating on a different technical level than world models. - **Simulation Data Platforms** (e.g., for autonomous vehicles) are a 1.0 version, relying on manual design. World models represent a 2.0 version, using AI to generate realistic, varied scenarios autonomously. - **Digital Twins** create high-fidelity, real-time mirrors of physical systems (e.g., a factory). World models go a step further by enabling predictive simulation of future states. - **Physical AI** (robots, AVs) refers to AI that acts in the physical world. World models are a core component, providing the understanding and prediction needed for planning. A proposed hierarchy places world models at the cognitive layer, supported by infrastructure (compute, data) and supporting application tools (simulation, digital twins), action systems (Physical AI), user experiences (metaverse), and rules (Web3). In conclusion, while distinct, many of these previously hyped concepts may ultimately rely on advances in world model technology to fulfill their promises, as world models provide the essential cognitive foundation for simulating and interacting with complex environments.

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

World Models, Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing?

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片