SEC Files New Crypto Lawsuit Against Unicoin Over Alleged $100M Fraud

bitcoinistPublicado a 2025-05-22Actualizado a 2025-05-22

Resumen

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged New York-based crypto investment Unicoin and three top executives for allegedly...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged New York-based crypto investment Unicoin and three top executives for allegedly misleading investors and defrauding over $100 million from customers.

Crypto Company Hit With SEC Lawsuit

On Tuesday, the SEC announced it had filed a lawsuit in the US District Court For The Southern District of New York against crypto company Unicoin, its CEO and Board Chairman Alex Konanykhin, its former president Silvina Moschini, and its former CIO Alex Dominguez.

The regulatory agency accused the Defendants of making false and misleading statements related to the Unicoin token and the offering of the company’s common stock, charging Unicoin, Konanykhin, Moschini, and Dominguez with violations of the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws.

crypto

SEC's complaint against Unicoin and its top executives. Source: SEC

It also charged Konanykhin and Unicoin with violating the registration provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, and Konanykhin as a control person for certain of the company’s antifraud violations.

Additionally, it accused Richard Devlin, Unicoin’s general counsel, of violating federal securities laws by making similar false statements in private placement memos the company used to offer and sell rights certificates and Unicoin common stock.

According to Mark Cave, Associate Director in the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, Unicoin and the executives “exploited thousands of investors with fictitious promises that its tokens, when issued, would be backed by real-world assets including an international portfolio of valuable real estate holdings.”

However, “the real estate assets were worth a mere fraction of what the company claimed, and the majority of the company’s sales of rights certificates were illusory. Unicoin’s most senior executives are alleged to have perpetuated the fraud, and today’s action seeks accountability for their conduct,” Cave explained.

Unicoin To ‘Fight Back’ Allegations In Court

The SEC’s complaint affirms that, since February 2022, Unicoin and Konanykhin violated the federal securities laws by engaging in unregistered offers and sales of rights certificates, with Konanykhin offering and selling over 37.9 million of his rights certificates “to offer better pricing and target investors the company had prohibited from participating in the offering to avoid jeopardizing its exemption to registration requirements.”

The executive trio is accused of convincing over 5,000 investors to purchase rights certificates “through false and misleading statements that portrayed them as investments in safe, stable, and profitable ‘next generation’ crypto assets,” including claiming that the tokens had sold more than $3 billion in rights certificates, when it seemingly raised just $110 million.

crypto

 SEC's complaint accuses the Defendants of false and misleading statements. Source: SEC

The SEC also alleges that the crypto company falsely claimed the right certificates and Unicoin tokens were “SEC-registered” or “US-registered,” and made extensive promotional efforts to market the right certificates to the public, including advertisements in major airports, New York taxis, on television, and on social media.

As such, the complaint seeks permanent injunctive relief, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and civil penalties against the Defendants. Additionally, it seeks officer-and-director bars against Konanykhin, Moschini, and Dominguez.

In an April interview with crypto journalist and podcast host Eleanor Terret, Unicoin’s CEO revealed the company planned to fight the SEC’s allegations in court as news of a potential lawsuit emerged.

Following the financial watchdog’s complaint, Konanykhin told Terret they lament the SEC’s actions, affirming they are persecuting “the most compliant cryptocurrency company in the country using blatantly false charges.”

bitcoin, btc, btcusdt, crypto

Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $107,291 in the one-week chart. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView
Featured Image from Unsplash.com, Chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Rubmar is a crypto enthusiast who likes learning and improving constantly. She enjoys reporting on the latest news and developments in the crypto industry. Rubmar also enjoys scrapbooking, crafting, simulation games, and watching football.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Fall of Zapper: An Act of God or a Human Error?

The Fall of Zapper: A Post-Mortem of a DeFi Pioneer In July 2026, Zapper, a once-dominant DeFi portfolio tracker, announced its shutdown. Born in 2020 from a merger, Zapper capitalized on the DeFi Summer boom, reaching 2 million monthly users and processing over $13B in transactions, backed by $16.5M in funding from investors like Framework Ventures and Coinbase Ventures. Its core "Zap" feature simplified complex multi-step DeFi operations. Despite its early success, Zapper failed to build a sustainable business model. Revenue from DEX aggregation was minimal due to fierce competition, while maintaining its multi-chain data infrastructure was costly. Furthermore, the DeFi landscape shifted: capital consolidated around top protocols, reducing the need for complex portfolio tracking across numerous platforms. Zapper's user base and core demand eroded. The company attempted multiple pivots, including an NFT-based points system, a social app (Chainchat), and plans for a ZAP token protocol. However, these initiatives—often focused on creating new, speculative C端需求 rather than solving existing pain points—ultimately failed. Critics argue Zapper remained trapped in a "blockchain purist" mindset, prioritizing costly, non-revenue-generating features over its competitive DEX aggregator. Unlike competitor DeBank, which successfully pivoted to its Rabby Wallet, Zapper lacked a diversified revenue stream. Its closure highlights the peril for tooling projects that fail to adapt to market shifts and monetize effectively, serving as a cautionary tale for the industry.

Foresight NewsHace 18 min(s)

The Fall of Zapper: An Act of God or a Human Error?

Foresight NewsHace 18 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片