一文盘点零撸DePin挂机挖矿项目

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2025-03-13Actualizado a 2025-03-13

Resumen

闲置电脑变“撸毛神器”，挂机就有代币拿。

原创 | Odaily星球日报（@OdailyChina）

作者 | Asher（@Asher_ 0210 ）

一文盘点零撸DePin挂机挖矿项目

当前加密货币市场行情冷淡，给人一种进入“熊市”的感觉。“炒币”节奏放慢下来了，除了日常交互“天王级”项目外，不妨同时参与这几个零撸、社区讨论度高的 DePin 项目，这类项目只需简单注册并完成基础配置，随后便可在后台“挂机”运行，占用精力极少，未来代币空投时或许能带来意外惊喜。

Grass

项目简介

一文盘点零撸DePin挂机挖矿项目

Grass 是部署在 Solana 上的第一个结合 AI、Depin 和 Solana 技术的项目，定位为 AI 的数据层。作为一个去中心化的网络，Grass 旨在通过访问公共网络，提供 AI 模型训练所需的数据。这使得 Grass 在扩展至清理和准备结构化数据集的过程中，成为 AI 数据层的重要组成部分，奠定了其在 AI 领域的基础地位。

根据 ROOTDATA 数据显示，目前，Grass 已完成三次融资，分别为：

  • 2023 年 7 月，Grass 宣布完成 100 万美元 Pre-Seed 轮融资，No Limit Holdings、Big Brain Holdings、Builder Capital、Cogitent Ventures、Kyle Samani、Neel Somani、Rahim Noorani 等参与投资；

  • 2023 年 12 月，Grass 宣布完成 350 万美元种子轮融资，Polychain Capital 和 Tribe Capital 领投，Bitscale、Big Brain、Advisors Anonymous、Typhon V 和 Mozaik 等参投。

  • 2024 年 9 月，Grass 宣布完成 A 轮融资，由 Hack VC 领投，Polychain Capital、Delphi Digital、Lattice 和 Brevan Howard Digital 参投，具体融资金额暂未披露。

目前，第二季正在进行中，用户仍可以通过挂机挖积分。

交互教程

若参与过第一季活动的用户直接继续“挂机挖草”即可，对于第一次参与的新用户，可进行简单配置，开始“挖草”。

STEP 1. 进入官网（链接：https://app.getgrass.io/register/）并通过谷歌邮箱注册账户，并根据提示安装拓展。

一文盘点零撸DePin挂机挖矿项目

STEP 2. 关闭 VPN 挖积分。

一文盘点零撸DePin挂机挖矿项目

DAWN

项目简介

一文盘点零撸DePin挂机挖矿项目

DAWN 属于物理资源网络中的去中心化自主无线网络。DAWN 利用最新的点对多点 (PtMP) 无线技术，使节点能够高效地直接与多个节点通信。从而允许在网络中的众多用户之间高密度分配带宽，将每个节点变成一个微型 ISP。它通过协议和硬件，使得用户可以在其周边地区购买和出售互联网容量，自己作为互联网提供商运营，通过 DAWN 节点获取收益。目前，DAWN 已获得 3300 万没有融资，两轮的融资领投机构均为 Dragonfly。此外，Solana 官推也多次提及该项目。

交互教程

STEP 1. 安装谷歌插件（链接：https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/dawn-validator-chrome-ext/fpdkjdnhkakefebpekbdhillbhonfjjp?hl=zh-CN&utm_source=ext_sidebar），安装好后点击“Continue”， 登录页面点击右下角的注册按钮 “Register”，邀请码可添写 avxu1nxt，注册成功后需要去填写的谷歌邮箱验证即可。

一文盘点零撸DePin挂机挖矿项目

STEP 2. 回到谷歌插件，登录账户，显示“Connected”即可，此外点击“Boost rewards”绑定社交账户获得积分。

一文盘点零撸DePin挂机挖矿项目

Gradient

项目简介

一文盘点零撸DePin挂机挖矿项目

Gradient 是 Solana 上的边缘计算开放层网络协议。目前获得 Multicoin、Pantera 以及红杉资本等机构的投资，具体融资金额未披露。

交互教程

STEP 1. 进入官网（链接：https://app.gradient.network/signup）通过谷歌邮箱进行账户注册，填写邀请码：LCR7EU，获得加成。

一文盘点零撸DePin挂机挖矿项目

STEP 2. 连接自己的 X 账户。

一文盘点零撸DePin挂机挖矿项目

STEP 3. 下载谷歌插件。

一文盘点零撸DePin挂机挖矿项目

STEP 4. 查看节点运行情况（若标记为“unsupported”，需多切换 IP 网络尝试）

一文盘点零撸DePin挂机挖矿项目

NodeGo

项目简介

一文盘点零撸DePin挂机挖矿项目

NodeGo 是一个由节点驱动的去中心化网络。2025 年 2 月，NodeGo 宣布完成 800 万美元融资，Hash Capital 领投，新资金拟用于其构建网络，让用户和企业可以通过完成空间计算和其他计算为 AI 任务做贡献，同时允许参与者赚取奖励。

交互教程

STEP 1. 进入官网（链接：https://app.nodego.ai/register）通过谷歌邮箱进行账户注册。

一文盘点零撸DePin挂机挖矿项目

STEP 2. 谷歌插件下载（链接：https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/nodegoai-depin-connect/jbmdcnidiaknboflpljihfnbonjgegah）。

一文盘点零撸DePin挂机挖矿项目

STEP 3. 插件中点击按钮并显示成绿色即为连接成功。

一文盘点零撸DePin挂机挖矿项目

Lecturas Relacionadas

Why the UXLINK hacker’s 14,336 ETH transfers raise fresh questions for DeFi

Recent on-chain activity reveals the UXLINK exploiter is actively laundering stolen funds, complicating tracing efforts. The September 2025 hack, which exploited a 'delegateCall' vulnerability to steal roughly $4.5 million, involved converting illicit assets into DAI and Ethereum. Recently, the attacker swapped over 10 million DAI for approximately 6,000.8 ETH and has deposited a total of 14,336.6 ETH into the privacy mixer Tornado Cash in recent weeks, including over $8.1 million worth in a single move. Simultaneously, wallets connected to the defunct Mining Express Ponzi scheme have been converting long-held assets, swapping 5,004 ETH for 8.8 million DAI. Following a separate exploit of the Jaredfromsubway.eth MEV bot, about $5.1 million was also routed to Tornado Cash. These incidents underscore a critical vulnerability in DeFi: while enabling permissionless transfers, the ecosystem lacks effective mechanisms to halt or manage illicit funds once in motion, allowing them to be moved and concealed relatively easily. This highlights the need for strengthened cross-network coordination and real-time threat detection to better safeguard the space.

ambcryptoHace 10 min(s)

Why the UXLINK hacker’s 14,336 ETH transfers raise fresh questions for DeFi

ambcryptoHace 10 min(s)

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

In a new article, Dr. Fei-Fei Li addresses the widespread and often inconsistent use of the term "world model" in AI. She proposes a clear, functional taxonomy rooted in the classic Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) loop (agent → action → state → observation → agent). According to this framework, current systems called "world models" are different projections of this loop, categorized by their primary output: 1. **Renderers**: Output observations (pixels). Their goal is visual fidelity for human consumption (e.g., video generation models like Sora). They are the most commercially mature but are limited by a focus on appearance over physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output states (geometric, physical, dynamic representations). They provide a structurally accurate world for both human professionals (e.g., architects) and computational agents (e.g., robots for training). Li argues simulators are the crucial, underappreciated bridge, as they can underpin both rendering and planning. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they decide what an agent should do next (e.g., robotic action models). This area is highly promising but remains the least mature for real-world deployment. Li highlights a key trend: the boundaries between these three categories are beginning to blur, as they all rely on a shared underlying understanding of geometry, physics, and dynamics. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of switching between rendering, simulation, and planning based on downstream needs. This convergence, she concludes, is central to advancing spatial intelligence—enabling machines not just to talk about the world, but to truly understand, imagine, and interact with it.

marsbitHace 49 min(s)

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

marsbitHace 49 min(s)

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature delves into the state of stablecoin-based cross-border payments, noting rapid growth but a key shortfall: while faster and more accessible, they are not yet cheaper. At a recent industry conference in Mexico City, optimism about technology, regulation, and volume was tempered by discussions with practitioners. The core issue is liquidity. Traditional FX brokers charge 60-70 basis points, and stablecoins promise to slash this to 2-5 basis points. However, this theoretical cost advantage cannot be realized until deep liquidity pools are established at scale, requiring significant institutional capital inflow. A major adoption barrier is trust. Businesses often rely on long-standing relationships with traditional brokers, valuing reliability over marginal cost savings. This shift will be gradual. Furthermore, successful companies in the space are not positioning themselves as replacements for legacy systems like SWIFT, but as complements. They leverage stablecoins for speed while using traditional rails for their standardization and reliability in ensuring accurate payment details—a critical factor for supplier payments to avoid customs issues. Companies like Caliza, experiencing high monthly growth, exemplify this hybrid approach. The industry anticipates consolidation, as long-term viability will depend on securing the essential trifecta: proper licensing, robust fiat on/off-ramps, and deep liquidity. Without these, firms risk being mere intermediaries rather than building sustainable businesses.

marsbitHace 50 min(s)

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

marsbitHace 50 min(s)

Forbes Feature: Cross-Border Payments with Stablecoins are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature on stablecoin cross-border payments highlights rapid industry growth but notes the cost advantage remains theoretical. While stablecoins offer faster, 24/7, and more accessible international transfers compared to traditional forex brokers (charging 60-70 bps), they have not yet achieved their promised lower costs of 2-5 bps. The primary hurdle is a lack of deep, scaled liquidity pools, according to Imran Ahmad of Bitso Business. He states costs will only drop significantly with large-scale institutional and banking participation. Adoption faces a deeper challenge: trust. Businesses often stick with traditional brokers based on long-standing personal relationships, not just fees. Ezra Kebrab of cross-border payment firm Caliza emphasizes that reliability in handling complex details like tax codes is as critical as speed and cost. Contrary to some narratives, successful companies like Caliza see stablecoins as complementing, not replacing, existing infrastructure like SWIFT, which excels at payment standardization. Caliza itself uses SWIFT for many transactions and has seen monthly growth exceeding 40%. Ahmad predicts a future industry consolidation, where success will hinge on three pillars: proper licensing, reliable fiat on/off-ramps, and robust liquidity.

链捕手Hace 54 min(s)

Forbes Feature: Cross-Border Payments with Stablecoins are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

链捕手Hace 54 min(s)

Li Feifei's Latest Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Claim to Have 'World Models,' We Need a Taxonomy

"World Model" has become a widely used yet ambiguous term in AI. Drawing from the classic POMDP framework (agent → action → state → observation), this article proposes a functional taxonomy to clarify the concept. It identifies three distinct types, categorized by their output in the perception-action loop: 1. **Renderers**: Output visual observations (pixels). These models, like advanced video generators, prioritize visual fidelity but often lack underlying physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output the state of the world (geometry, physics, dynamics). They provide a structurally accurate representation for professionals (e.g., architects) and serve as training environments for robots and AI agents. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they determine what an agent should do next, closing the perception-action loop (e.g., vision-language-action models). While renderers are currently the most commercially mature and planners are the most aspirational, the article argues that **simulators are the crucial, underappreciated hub**. By working at the level of geometry and physics, a simulator can project upwards to create visuals for humans and downwards to predict action consequences for agents. The future lies in the convergence of these three functions. Emerging research and products, like World Labs' Marble model which outputs both visual splats and physical collision meshes, are beginning to blur these boundaries. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of rendering, simulating, and planning based on a shared understanding of spatial and temporal structures—ultimately enabling machines to understand, imagine, and interact with the physical world.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Li Feifei's Latest Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Claim to Have 'World Models,' We Need a Taxonomy

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片