Пользователи аппаратного кошелька Ledger получают фишинговые уведомления об утечке данных

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2024-11-18Actualizado a 2024-12-18

По данным издания BleepingComputer, пользователи аппаратных кошельков Ledger подверглись новой фишинговой атаке, нацеленной на кражу закрытых ключей и фраз восстановления.

Мошенники выдают себя за службу поддержки компании Ledger, сообщают об утечке конфиденциальных данных и просят подтвердить фразу восстановления.

«Чтобы защитить ваши активы, мы настоятельно рекомендуем вам проверить безопасность вашей фразы восстановления с помощью нашего безопасного инструмента проверки», — говорится в сообщении злоумышленников.

Переход по прикрепленной ссылке перенаправляет пользователей на сайт Amazon AWS, а затем выводит на фишинговую страницу, замаскированную под официальный сервис Ledger.

При вводе каждого слова фишинговая страница проверяет, является ли оно одним из 2 048 допустимых слов, которые можно ввести как часть фразы восстановления. При этом какую бы фразу ни ввел пользователь, она всегда будет указывать на ее недействительность. Таким образом мошенники добиваются того, чтобы жертвы вводили фразу несколько раз и позволяли злоумышленникам убедится, что вводятся правильные слова.

В BleepingComputer напомнили, что Ledger никогда не просит владельцев криптокошельков назвать фразу для восстановления и ее не следует сообщать кому-либо еще.

Ранее для кражи криптоактивов мошенники пытались убедить пользователей аппаратного кошелька Ledger активировать функцию безопасности Ledger Clear Signing, якобы позволяющую автоматически перепроверять адреса смарт-контрактов, суммы и комиссии.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Aerodrome Finance: Can AERO target $0.65 after a 22% weekly rally?

Aerodrome Finance (AERO) has rallied strongly, gaining 22% in the past week. After holding support at $0.45, the altcoin reached $0.60 for the first time since January and was trading at $0.58 at the time of writing. Technical indicators show bullish momentum, with the RSI at 67 and the DMI Modified indicator rising sharply, suggesting a strengthening uptrend. This price movement is supported by significant market demand. Open Interest in derivatives surged 10% to $56 million in a day, and spot trading has shown a positive buy-sell delta over recent days, with net exchange flow turning negative, indicating accumulation. Analysts suggest that if bullish pressure continues, AERO could target $0.65. However, a failure to sustain above $0.60 could weaken the trend, potentially leading to a retest of the $0.46-$0.50 support zone.

ambcryptoHace 35 min(s)

Aerodrome Finance: Can AERO target $0.65 after a 22% weekly rally?

ambcryptoHace 35 min(s)

Why the UXLINK hacker’s 14,336 ETH transfers raise fresh questions for DeFi

Recent on-chain activity reveals the UXLINK exploiter is actively laundering stolen funds, complicating tracing efforts. The September 2025 hack, which exploited a 'delegateCall' vulnerability to steal roughly $4.5 million, involved converting illicit assets into DAI and Ethereum. Recently, the attacker swapped over 10 million DAI for approximately 6,000.8 ETH and has deposited a total of 14,336.6 ETH into the privacy mixer Tornado Cash in recent weeks, including over $8.1 million worth in a single move. Simultaneously, wallets connected to the defunct Mining Express Ponzi scheme have been converting long-held assets, swapping 5,004 ETH for 8.8 million DAI. Following a separate exploit of the Jaredfromsubway.eth MEV bot, about $5.1 million was also routed to Tornado Cash. These incidents underscore a critical vulnerability in DeFi: while enabling permissionless transfers, the ecosystem lacks effective mechanisms to halt or manage illicit funds once in motion, allowing them to be moved and concealed relatively easily. This highlights the need for strengthened cross-network coordination and real-time threat detection to better safeguard the space.

ambcryptoHace 2 hora(s)

Why the UXLINK hacker’s 14,336 ETH transfers raise fresh questions for DeFi

ambcryptoHace 2 hora(s)

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

In a new article, Dr. Fei-Fei Li addresses the widespread and often inconsistent use of the term "world model" in AI. She proposes a clear, functional taxonomy rooted in the classic Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) loop (agent → action → state → observation → agent). According to this framework, current systems called "world models" are different projections of this loop, categorized by their primary output: 1. **Renderers**: Output observations (pixels). Their goal is visual fidelity for human consumption (e.g., video generation models like Sora). They are the most commercially mature but are limited by a focus on appearance over physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output states (geometric, physical, dynamic representations). They provide a structurally accurate world for both human professionals (e.g., architects) and computational agents (e.g., robots for training). Li argues simulators are the crucial, underappreciated bridge, as they can underpin both rendering and planning. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they decide what an agent should do next (e.g., robotic action models). This area is highly promising but remains the least mature for real-world deployment. Li highlights a key trend: the boundaries between these three categories are beginning to blur, as they all rely on a shared underlying understanding of geometry, physics, and dynamics. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of switching between rendering, simulation, and planning based on downstream needs. This convergence, she concludes, is central to advancing spatial intelligence—enabling machines not just to talk about the world, but to truly understand, imagine, and interact with it.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature delves into the state of stablecoin-based cross-border payments, noting rapid growth but a key shortfall: while faster and more accessible, they are not yet cheaper. At a recent industry conference in Mexico City, optimism about technology, regulation, and volume was tempered by discussions with practitioners. The core issue is liquidity. Traditional FX brokers charge 60-70 basis points, and stablecoins promise to slash this to 2-5 basis points. However, this theoretical cost advantage cannot be realized until deep liquidity pools are established at scale, requiring significant institutional capital inflow. A major adoption barrier is trust. Businesses often rely on long-standing relationships with traditional brokers, valuing reliability over marginal cost savings. This shift will be gradual. Furthermore, successful companies in the space are not positioning themselves as replacements for legacy systems like SWIFT, but as complements. They leverage stablecoins for speed while using traditional rails for their standardization and reliability in ensuring accurate payment details—a critical factor for supplier payments to avoid customs issues. Companies like Caliza, experiencing high monthly growth, exemplify this hybrid approach. The industry anticipates consolidation, as long-term viability will depend on securing the essential trifecta: proper licensing, robust fiat on/off-ramps, and deep liquidity. Without these, firms risk being mere intermediaries rather than building sustainable businesses.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Forbes Feature: Cross-Border Payments with Stablecoins are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature on stablecoin cross-border payments highlights rapid industry growth but notes the cost advantage remains theoretical. While stablecoins offer faster, 24/7, and more accessible international transfers compared to traditional forex brokers (charging 60-70 bps), they have not yet achieved their promised lower costs of 2-5 bps. The primary hurdle is a lack of deep, scaled liquidity pools, according to Imran Ahmad of Bitso Business. He states costs will only drop significantly with large-scale institutional and banking participation. Adoption faces a deeper challenge: trust. Businesses often stick with traditional brokers based on long-standing personal relationships, not just fees. Ezra Kebrab of cross-border payment firm Caliza emphasizes that reliability in handling complex details like tax codes is as critical as speed and cost. Contrary to some narratives, successful companies like Caliza see stablecoins as complementing, not replacing, existing infrastructure like SWIFT, which excels at payment standardization. Caliza itself uses SWIFT for many transactions and has seen monthly growth exceeding 40%. Ahmad predicts a future industry consolidation, where success will hinge on three pillars: proper licensing, reliable fiat on/off-ramps, and robust liquidity.

链捕手Hace 3 hora(s)

Forbes Feature: Cross-Border Payments with Stablecoins are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

链捕手Hace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot