GT突破13.329USDT创历史新高，持有者尽享专属空投及挖矿等福利

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2024-12-05Actualizado a 2024-12-05

Resumen

GT 的历史新高不仅彰显了其强劲的市场表现，也展示了 Gate.io 生态持续创新和价值提升的潜力。

近期，加密货币市场延续强劲涨势，推动整体市值不断攀升。其中，GT 表现引人注目，开启一波显著的震荡上涨走势。昨日 GT 价格触及 13.329 USDT 的高点，显示出 GT 在市场上的强劲势头，同时价格也创下历史新高。

GT 生态多元化，应用场景广泛

GT 是 GateChain 原生主网资产, 为整个 GateChain 生态系统提供支持的加密货币，凭借独有的可逆交易机制、丰富的生态支持以及灵活多样的激励机制，推动需求不断增长。GT 作为 GateChain 上的 Utility Token 和 Gas Fee 支付通证，支撑了 GateChain 的底层转账体系。同时，GT 被广泛应用于包括币币交易、OTC 场外交易、杠杆交易、期货合约，以及各类衍生产品例如杠杆理财、法币借贷、理财业务等场景。

GT 持有者专享多重福利，驱动社区增长

相较于其他同类型币种，GT 更加注重用户体验和社区共建。通过 Startup 投资等方式，GT 为持有者提供了参与低门槛投资项目的机会。此外，GT 赋予用户更强的决策权，鼓励用户积极参与平台治理，共同推动平台发展。根据今年一月开盘价计算，GT 价格涨幅优于多数同类型币种，涨幅达 160.87% 。

持有 GT 享受一系列专属福利

Startup：提供新币专属空投，持有 GT 代币越多，可领取的专属免费空投越多。

新币挖矿：设立专有的新币挖矿池，支持一币多挖。

GT 挖矿：专为 GT 持有者所设计兼具便捷、安全的质押方案，让 GT 持有者轻松获取收益，上线后平均收益率达 8.1% ，目前年化收益约 7.15% ，上线至今共派发 147, 076.26 GT, 价值约 1, 398, 719.68 美元。

提升 VIP 等级：可享更多 Startup 认购份额，以及现货与合约费率折扣。

除了上述福利，持有 GT 还有更多福利活动参与权及应用场景。

GT突破13.329USDT创历史新高，持有者尽享专属空投及挖矿等福利

持续销毁，价值稳步提升

除了丰富的使用场景外，持续的销毁也在不断支撑 GT 内在价值的增加。自 2019 年起，GT 通过销毁已经将总量从最初的 3 亿枚缩减约 58.06% 。三年时间里，GT 每季度定期销毁，累计销毁数量达 31, 338, 915.10 枚，价值约 189, 839, 265.347 美元，达成了实际流通量缩减到 1 亿枚以内的初步目标，并计划在未来持续执行销毁策略。（详情：关于 2024 年第三季度 Gate Token（GT）的链上销毁公告）

GT突破13.329USDT创历史新高，持有者尽享专属空投及挖矿等福利

GT 的历史新高不仅彰显了其强劲的市场表现，也展示了 Gate.io 生态持续创新和价值提升的潜力。随着 GT 生态的不断扩展和销毁机制的执行，GT 未来将继续引领行业发展，为持有者创造更多机会。

免责声明：

本内容不构成任何要约、招揽、或建议。您在做出任何投资决定之前应始终寻求独立的专业建议。请注意，Gate.io 可能会限制或禁止来自受限制地区的所有或部分服务。请阅读用户协议了解更多信息，链接：https://www.gate.io/user-agreement。

Lecturas Relacionadas

How Much of the Subscription Fee You Pay to Claude Can Optical Module Companies Get?

How much of your $20 Claude Pro subscription actually goes to AI model companies like Anthropic? A viral breakdown image highlights the fundamental valuation challenge for AI applications versus traditional SaaS. Unlike SaaS with high software margins, AI subscriptions face variable "inference costs": every user query consumes GPU time, power, and cloud resources. This creates a tension between fixed subscription fees and usage-driven expenses. While the specific dollar splits are illustrative, the core question is whether AI revenue can achieve SaaS-like margins as usage scales. Currently, infrastructure providers (cloud platforms, GPU makers like Nvidia, HBM suppliers, power/data centers) capture more certain revenue from growing AI usage. Their financials reflect pricing power and faster earnings validation. The bullish case hinges on efficiency improvements: model optimization, caching, smaller models, and custom chips could lower per-token costs over time. The key debate is whether cost declines can outpace increases in user workload complexity and volume. Ultimately, for AI companies to command high SaaS-like valuations, they must demonstrate not just user growth but also improving gross margins after accounting for inference costs. Investors will scrutinize not just subscriber numbers, but usage patterns, enterprise pricing tiers, and real efficiency gains.

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

How Much of the Subscription Fee You Pay to Claude Can Optical Module Companies Get?

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

OpenAI's Hyperliquid Pre-IPO Pricing Venture: Why Did It Last Only Half a Year?

The article discusses the rise and fall of Pre-IPO pricing markets on the Hyperliquid blockchain. Trade.xyz, an anonymous team, successfully built the largest pre-market for SpaceX (SPCX) by launching a contract with a clear anchor: the eventual Nasdaq listing price. This provided inherent price stability and validation. In contrast, Ventuals, a team backed by Paradigm, failed despite holding exclusive contracts for highly sought-after companies like OpenAI and Anthropic. Its key mistake was its pricing mechanism. For companies with no near-term IPO date, Ventuals' oracle relied partly on opaque private market transactions and, critically, partly on its own contract's moving average price. This created a self-referential feedback loop where prices were artificially propped up and detached from genuine supply and demand, leading to illiquid markets. Ventuals shut down after nine months, settling positions at final prices of $1,341.80 for OpenAI and $1,618.90 for Anthropic. Ironically, some employees and late-stage investors of these very companies reportedly used these flawed Ventuals prices for valuation reference, highlighting the acute demand for any price signal in illiquid private markets. The article concludes that while demand for pre-IPO trading is real and growing, with players like Coinbase now entering the space, the fundamental challenge remains: without a public listing to provide a definitive price anchor, these markets struggle to establish truly accurate and liquid pricing. The need for a transparent, self-correcting market is the critical lesson from Ventuals' failure.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

OpenAI's Hyperliquid Pre-IPO Pricing Venture: Why Did It Last Only Half a Year?

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

OpenAI Audited Financial Report: $38.5 Billion Loss in 2025, $19.2 Billion Burned on R&D, Microsoft Takes $17.2 Billion in a Year

OpenAI's audited financials reveal staggering losses. In 2025, the company reported a net loss attributable to OpenAI of $38.53 billion, a dramatic increase from a $5.1 billion loss in 2024. While revenue grew from $3.7 billion in 2024 to $13.07 billion in 2025, costs skyrocketed to $34 billion. A massive $41.55 billion loss from the fair value change of convertible equity and warrant liabilities, tied to its shift to a for-profit structure, significantly contributed to the 2025 result. Research and development spending reached $19.18 billion in 2025. The filings also show OpenAI paid Microsoft approximately $17.2 billion in 2025 for services, including $10.59 billion categorized under "research and development," likely for model training costs. Other major payments included $867 million from SoftBank and $303 million from Microsoft to OpenAI. The report raises serious concerns about the AI company's path to sustainability and profitability, highlighting financial figures far exceeding external expectations.

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

OpenAI Audited Financial Report: $38.5 Billion Loss in 2025, $19.2 Billion Burned on R&D, Microsoft Takes $17.2 Billion in a Year

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

With Daily Active Users Reaching 3-4 Times That of the Industry's Second Place, Which Crack in the Office Agent Market Has Tencent's WorkBuddy Torn Open?

Tencent's AI office assistant, WorkBuddy, has achieved daily active users (DAU) 3-4 times that of the industry's second-place product, primarily driven by non-technical users like HR, operations, and administrative staff. Its rapid growth, starting with a public beta in March 2026, highlights a key strategic divergence from competitors like OpenAI's Codex and Anthropic's Claude Code. Unlike those tools, which originated as developer-focused assistants (in command lines or IDEs) and are now expanding towards office scenarios, WorkBuddy was built from the ground up for non-technical office workers. Its development was user-driven, initiated after腾讯云's team observed non-technical employees using their CodeBuddy coding tool for general tasks. WorkBuddy's design is defined by three core decisions aimed at lowering barriers: 1) Using natural language instead of technical concepts, so users describe their goal without needing to understand prompts or agents. 2) Providing pre-packaged "Skill" templates for common office tasks like data processing, content creation, and research. 3) Natively integrating into existing腾讯 ecosystems like腾讯 Docs and WeChat, making the agent a seamless part of the user's workflow rather than a separate tool. This "scenario encapsulation" approach, prioritizing the shortest path for users to get work done, contrasts with the "underlying capability" focus of Codex and Claude, which offer more flexibility but require more technical setup. Analysts confirm WorkBuddy's leading market position in China by mid-2026, with massive user and request growth following its launch. Recognizing the same trend of surging non-technical adoption, OpenAI and Anthropic are now pivoting their products with features like role-based plugins (Codex) and a simplified desktop interface (Claude Cowork). However, adapting tools built for developers requires significant changes to interaction models and integrations. WorkBuddy currently holds an estimated six-month lead in delivering a complete solution for non-technical office users. Its recently launched enterprise version aims to solidify this advantage. The competition underscores two valid paths: embedding agent capabilities directly into familiar work environments versus building powerful, general-purpose agents that users must learn to access. WorkBuddy's early success demonstrates the effectiveness of the former strategy for mainstream office adoption.

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

With Daily Active Users Reaching 3-4 Times That of the Industry's Second Place, Which Crack in the Office Agent Market Has Tencent's WorkBuddy Torn Open?

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

Bitcoin Mining Farm Transforms into AI Data Center: Sangha's 'Sell-Out' Decision

"Sangha, a cryptocurrency mining company, is considering selling its recently operational Genesis bitcoin mining facility in Texas. Despite being profitable due to low-cost power (approximately $32/MWh), the company is exploring a sale, joint venture, or strategic partnership, advised by Marathon Capital. The core value of the 19.9MW site lies not in the mining hardware but in its established, scalable power infrastructure—a direct connection to a 180MW solar farm with plans to expand to 110.4MW. This makes it an attractive, ready-to-use asset for AI or high-performance computing (HPC) companies seeking to avoid lengthy permitting and grid connection processes. Sangha's move reflects a broader industry trend where mining operators are pivoting towards higher-value AI compute opportunities. The decision represents a strategic shift from building a long-term 'win-win-win' mining model to capitalizing on the current premium demand for AI-ready power and data center infrastructure."

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

Bitcoin Mining Farm Transforms into AI Data Center: Sangha's 'Sell-Out' Decision

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar GT

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Gatechain (GT) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Gatechain (GT) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Gatechain (GT)Después de comprar tu Gatechain (GT), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Gatechain (GT)Tradear fácilmente con Gatechain (GT) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

115 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.12Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de GT (GT).