Власти Узбекистана рассказали о способах легализации токенов Hamster Kombat

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2024-04-30Actualizado a 2024-09-30

НАПП Узбекистана выпустило разъяснение касательно аирдропа Hamster Kombat и проведения легальных операций с токенами HMSTR.

Граждане смогут приобретать или продавать монеты только через национальных провайдеров услуг в сфере оборота криптоактивов (биржи и обменники), которые добавят их в листинг.

Регулятор предупредил о высокой волатильности подобного рода активов и потенциальном обесценивании «ввиду отсутствия полезной функциональности».

«Просим сограждан не доверять информации по проекту Hamster Kombat, полученной через неофициальные источники, а также лицам, предлагающим свои услуги по купле/продаже данных токенов, чтобы не стать жертвой мошеннических схем», — отметили в НАПП.

Агентство напомнило об ответственности за нарушение законодательства в сфере оборота криптоактивов. В стране запрещены их незаконное приобретение, сбыт или обмен. Такая деятельность наказывается административным арестом на срок до 15 суток или штрафом в размере от 20 до 30 БРВ.

Аирдроп и листинг токена Hamster Kombat состоялся 26 сентября. В раздаче приняли участие 131 млн пользователей, среди которых разработчики распределили 75 млрд монет.

В статье для Forbes партнер Digital & Analogue Partners Юрий Брисов сравнил лежащую в основе Hamster Kombat модель Play-to-Earn с финансовой пирамидой, поскольку проект предлагает доход за привлечение новых участников. По его словам, главными проблемами «тапалок» остаются недостатки токеномики, зависимость от постоянного притока новых пользователей и отсутствие юридической защиты для игроков.

Эксперты сравнили механику игр-кликеров со схемой Понци

Напомним, в июне в Узбекистане 24-летнего студента арестовали на 10 суток за продажу токена NOT игрового Web3-проекта Notcoin. Суд также постановил уничтожить смартфон Galaxy A30 и банковскую пластиковую карту, использовавшиеся для осуществления операций.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Why Did Codex and ChatGPT Merge? What's Next for Codex? OpenAI Core Leader Answers Everything

In 2026, OpenAI's Codex saw explosive growth, with weekly active users surging over 5x to 5 million since January, driven largely by the February launch of its desktop app. Codex desktop lead Andrew Ambrosino explains key shifts behind its evolution. A core change is the inversion of development costs: implementation is now cheap, while curation and taste—judging which of many AI-generated prototypes is valuable—have become the new scarcities. Ambrosino defines taste as a blend of aesthetics, systems thinking, direction, and semantic coherence in interaction. He notes AI still struggles with design because evaluating it requires human cultural context and abstract reasoning about how components relate—capabilities beyond current models. Timing is critical: the same Codex app would have failed months earlier; success hinges on the model's capabilities at launch. Roles are blurring within his team, with engineers, designers, and PMs overlapping significantly. However, Ambrosino cautions against eliminating specialized roles entirely, as each field retains deep expertise. On AI-assisted development, the focus has shifted from measuring code written by AI to distinguishing between supervised and unsupervised generation. A current challenge is teaching models to simplify code, not just add complexity. The merger of Codex and ChatGPT stems from observed user behavior: non-developers adopted Codex for general knowledge work despite its developer-centric interface. This revealed a collapsing boundary between specialized tools and universal assistants. The vision is a "home base" that orchestrates tasks across external professional tools (like Excel or Premiere Pro) via connectors, rather than rebuilding everything internally. An internal example showed Codex helping edit video by interacting with Premiere Pro's files and even writing a plugin for it. The future direction is a unified, extensible platform that serves as a central hub for automating and managing work across any specialized tool the user employs.

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

Why Did Codex and ChatGPT Merge? What's Next for Codex? OpenAI Core Leader Answers Everything

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

Bitcoin ETFs add $222M, but BlackRock sees outflows – Why it matters

On July 2nd, Bitcoin spot ETFs saw a net inflow of $222 million, ending a 10-day outflow streak that totaled $2.709 billion. Fidelity's FBTC led with $166 million in inflows, while BlackRock's typically dominant IBIT recorded $40.4 million in outflows. Despite the fresh inflows, Bitcoin's price, which had fallen below $60k during the outflow period, only rebounded to around $62,713, failing to reclaim the $65k level. Ethereum ETFs followed a similar pattern, with nine days of outflows before turning positive on July 1st and 2nd. In contrast, other altcoin ETFs like those for Solana and XRP saw significant net inflows during the same period. Overall, total assets under management for U.S. crypto ETFs have declined to levels last seen in November 2024.

ambcryptoHace 37 min(s)

Bitcoin ETFs add $222M, but BlackRock sees outflows – Why it matters

ambcryptoHace 37 min(s)

How Celestia’s network upgrade triggered TIA’s 102% volume surge

Celestia's network upgrade on July 1st successfully triggered a significant market response. The price of TIA increased by over 10%, and its daily trading volume surged by 102% to $59.5 million. This rally was primarily driven by renewed spot market participation. However, a divergence emerged: while spot buying was strong, futures market data indicated persistent selling pressure and cautious sentiment among derivatives traders. Despite this, bullish leverage remained in place with positive funding rates. Technically, TIA approached a key resistance level at $0.4045, with a potential breakout above it targeting the next resistance at $0.5000. The market structure showed a contrast between optimistic spot activity and skeptical futures positioning.

ambcryptoHace 1 hora(s)

How Celestia’s network upgrade triggered TIA’s 102% volume surge

ambcryptoHace 1 hora(s)

CLARITY Act Countdown: How Will the Crypto Market Fare If It Doesn't Pass Before the August Recess?

The CLARITY Act, a major US crypto market structure bill, faces a tight deadline before the Senate's August 10 recess. It must overcome final hurdles—negotiations on ethics provisions and law enforcement concerns—to secure the 60 votes needed for passage. Analysts warn that missing this window significantly lowers its chances in 2026, with prediction markets giving only a 40% probability of success this year. If the act fails to pass by the recess, the market is expected to react not with a crash but with continued "slow bleeding," particularly in premium products like ETFs. June saw record net outflows from US Bitcoin spot ETFs, partly attributed to this legislative uncertainty. Assets like XRP, which would receive permanent commodity classification under the act, stand to lose a "regulatory premium" on further delays. Bitcoin and Ethereum, already classified as commodities by regulators, face less direct impact, but DeFi innovation and institutional capital inflows would remain stifled by regulatory ambiguity. The path forward includes passing before the recess (a major catalyst), postponement to 2027 (prolonging uncertainty), or failure, requiring the bill to be reintroduced in the next Congress. Despite the stalled negotiations, the bill's advancement this far signals the US is closer than ever to resolving crypto regulatory clarity.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

CLARITY Act Countdown: How Will the Crypto Market Fare If It Doesn't Pass Before the August Recess?

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

The Impact of OUSD on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Landscape

OUSD's Impact on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: A Nuanced Competitive Reshuffle The launch of OUSD, a new stablecoin initiative, has complex implications for the stablecoin market. For Circle (CRCL), the initial 15-20% stock drop reflects legitimate competitive concerns but is not a "death sentence." Circle retains deep liquidity, existing integrations, and first-mover advantages. A potential restructuring or termination of its Coinbase partnership could even double its net revenue in the short term, providing more competitive freedom. However, OUSD, backed by Stripe's engineering and product strengths, could become the default stablecoin within the Stripe ecosystem for new adopters, challenging USDC's position. OUSD does not solve the core barrier for corporate adoption: it remains a credit exposure to its issuer (likely a Bridge-related entity), which, like Circle, is not an investment-grade entity. Large banks and asset managers could still capture the most lucrative enterprise use cases. Circle must accelerate its payment/fintech product development and consider defensive M&A. For Tether, OUSD targets a different market segment. Tether will continue focusing on distribution channels not prioritized by Stripe or Circle. Its market share may decline over time, but within a significantly growing total market. Paxos faces the greatest pressure. OUSD undermines the key selling points of its USDG stablecoin, and Paxos's regulatory advantages may diminish as frameworks mature. This poses a more existential challenge, explaining Paxos's recent shift back to its brokerage-as-a-service business.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

The Impact of OUSD on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Landscape

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot