Ambrus Studio 完成由 The spartan group 领投的数百万美元融资，并将上线首款 telegram 游戏

marsbitPublicado a 2024-09-17Actualizado a 2024-09-18

Ambrus Studio 于近期完成了数百万美元的A轮融资，由Spartan Group领投，IVC, SUI Foundation, Knight Capital，Goodwater Capital, ZeePrime Capital等顶级投资机构跟投，并将于9月16日上线首款telegram游戏 E4C: Demon Hunter。据悉，Ambrus Studio将推出web3游戏孵化平台E4C，并将投身于开发，孵化基于区块链技术的高质量游戏，并通过长期稳定的发展策略，同时满足web2和web3游戏玩家的需求。Demon Hunter作为E4C推出的首款telegram mini-app游戏，对于Ambrus Studio的长期发展具备重要的战略意义。

About Ambrus Studio

Ambrus Studio由前Riot Games亚太区首席执行官Johnson Yeh于2021年12月成立，打造一个让Web2玩家能够有更好的游戏体验的游戏生态，从而使得web3技术在游戏行业能够变得主流。Johnson Yeh表示：“即使在三年前我们创立工作室时，我们就不相信纯粹的‘play-to-earn’模式。我们一直专注于如何利用区块链技术和Web3元素来提升玩家体验，并解决游戏行业中的问题。我们决定通过Web3技术让免费游戏在新兴市场中的工作室变得有利可图。我们希望成为首个专注于为南亚、新兴中东和非洲等未被充分服务的市场提供有趣游戏体验的工作室。”

Ambrus Studio的团队的成员大多具备游戏大厂的经验，例如Riot Games, 腾讯，米哈游等，并已经与多个如 Nazara, TapTap, and Rockville Games 这类知名的游戏平台达成合作。在web3领域，Ambrus Studio 更是与最近爆火的Sui生态深度绑定，想要了解更多，请访问 ambrus.studio.

E4C: Demon hunter

Demon Hunter 是一款由Ambrus Studio研发的鸟瞰视角动作射击游戏，游戏的主角为女佣兵Sehk。Sekh使用她的手弩猎杀各种恶魔与怪物。游戏操作简单，停止移动便会自动攻击。游戏的主要技巧是通过移动躲避袭来的各种弹幕与敌人，并且在移动间隙通过攻击消灭它们。玩家也可以通过邀请好友观看广告的方式获取额外奖励。玩家在游戏内的成长最终都会转化为“战斗力”数值，而战斗力数值将会与未来的E4C空投相关。

Demon Hunter 这款游戏有别于目前在Telegram上红遍半边天的Tap-To-Earn游戏，它本身有很高的游戏可玩性，同时游戏的深度也相对深很多，玩家需要透过技术闯关，才能够达到更高的战斗力，也更考验玩家的技巧，让技巧高的玩家在游戏内的成长可以变得更快。同时Demon Hunter 还预计推出玩家对战模式，让玩家的游戏体验更加丰富。

游戏内将会有两种资产：Gold coin和Bits。玩家可以通过邀请好友，观看广告等方式获得Bits，使玩家可以容易的通过游戏关卡，获得游戏内的奖励，具体包括升级武器的材料和Gold coin。Gold coin可以帮助玩家合成道具或购买用于提升战斗力的符文。

E4C platform

E4C不仅仅是一个游戏发行平台，Ambrus Studio希望将E4C打造成一个兼具游戏孵化，游戏发行，游戏社群，游戏任务中心等功能的综合游戏平台。Ambrus Studio 将会在不久的将来公布更多关于E4C Platform 的重磅消息。


Lecturas Relacionadas

Why the UXLINK hacker’s 14,336 ETH transfers raise fresh questions for DeFi

Recent on-chain activity reveals the UXLINK exploiter is actively laundering stolen funds, complicating tracing efforts. The September 2025 hack, which exploited a 'delegateCall' vulnerability to steal roughly $4.5 million, involved converting illicit assets into DAI and Ethereum. Recently, the attacker swapped over 10 million DAI for approximately 6,000.8 ETH and has deposited a total of 14,336.6 ETH into the privacy mixer Tornado Cash in recent weeks, including over $8.1 million worth in a single move. Simultaneously, wallets connected to the defunct Mining Express Ponzi scheme have been converting long-held assets, swapping 5,004 ETH for 8.8 million DAI. Following a separate exploit of the Jaredfromsubway.eth MEV bot, about $5.1 million was also routed to Tornado Cash. These incidents underscore a critical vulnerability in DeFi: while enabling permissionless transfers, the ecosystem lacks effective mechanisms to halt or manage illicit funds once in motion, allowing them to be moved and concealed relatively easily. This highlights the need for strengthened cross-network coordination and real-time threat detection to better safeguard the space.

ambcryptoHace 1 hora(s)

Why the UXLINK hacker’s 14,336 ETH transfers raise fresh questions for DeFi

ambcryptoHace 1 hora(s)

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

In a new article, Dr. Fei-Fei Li addresses the widespread and often inconsistent use of the term "world model" in AI. She proposes a clear, functional taxonomy rooted in the classic Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) loop (agent → action → state → observation → agent). According to this framework, current systems called "world models" are different projections of this loop, categorized by their primary output: 1. **Renderers**: Output observations (pixels). Their goal is visual fidelity for human consumption (e.g., video generation models like Sora). They are the most commercially mature but are limited by a focus on appearance over physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output states (geometric, physical, dynamic representations). They provide a structurally accurate world for both human professionals (e.g., architects) and computational agents (e.g., robots for training). Li argues simulators are the crucial, underappreciated bridge, as they can underpin both rendering and planning. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they decide what an agent should do next (e.g., robotic action models). This area is highly promising but remains the least mature for real-world deployment. Li highlights a key trend: the boundaries between these three categories are beginning to blur, as they all rely on a shared underlying understanding of geometry, physics, and dynamics. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of switching between rendering, simulation, and planning based on downstream needs. This convergence, she concludes, is central to advancing spatial intelligence—enabling machines not just to talk about the world, but to truly understand, imagine, and interact with it.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature delves into the state of stablecoin-based cross-border payments, noting rapid growth but a key shortfall: while faster and more accessible, they are not yet cheaper. At a recent industry conference in Mexico City, optimism about technology, regulation, and volume was tempered by discussions with practitioners. The core issue is liquidity. Traditional FX brokers charge 60-70 basis points, and stablecoins promise to slash this to 2-5 basis points. However, this theoretical cost advantage cannot be realized until deep liquidity pools are established at scale, requiring significant institutional capital inflow. A major adoption barrier is trust. Businesses often rely on long-standing relationships with traditional brokers, valuing reliability over marginal cost savings. This shift will be gradual. Furthermore, successful companies in the space are not positioning themselves as replacements for legacy systems like SWIFT, but as complements. They leverage stablecoins for speed while using traditional rails for their standardization and reliability in ensuring accurate payment details—a critical factor for supplier payments to avoid customs issues. Companies like Caliza, experiencing high monthly growth, exemplify this hybrid approach. The industry anticipates consolidation, as long-term viability will depend on securing the essential trifecta: proper licensing, robust fiat on/off-ramps, and deep liquidity. Without these, firms risk being mere intermediaries rather than building sustainable businesses.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Forbes Feature: Cross-Border Payments with Stablecoins are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature on stablecoin cross-border payments highlights rapid industry growth but notes the cost advantage remains theoretical. While stablecoins offer faster, 24/7, and more accessible international transfers compared to traditional forex brokers (charging 60-70 bps), they have not yet achieved their promised lower costs of 2-5 bps. The primary hurdle is a lack of deep, scaled liquidity pools, according to Imran Ahmad of Bitso Business. He states costs will only drop significantly with large-scale institutional and banking participation. Adoption faces a deeper challenge: trust. Businesses often stick with traditional brokers based on long-standing personal relationships, not just fees. Ezra Kebrab of cross-border payment firm Caliza emphasizes that reliability in handling complex details like tax codes is as critical as speed and cost. Contrary to some narratives, successful companies like Caliza see stablecoins as complementing, not replacing, existing infrastructure like SWIFT, which excels at payment standardization. Caliza itself uses SWIFT for many transactions and has seen monthly growth exceeding 40%. Ahmad predicts a future industry consolidation, where success will hinge on three pillars: proper licensing, reliable fiat on/off-ramps, and robust liquidity.

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Forbes Feature: Cross-Border Payments with Stablecoins are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Li Feifei's Latest Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Claim to Have 'World Models,' We Need a Taxonomy

"World Model" has become a widely used yet ambiguous term in AI. Drawing from the classic POMDP framework (agent → action → state → observation), this article proposes a functional taxonomy to clarify the concept. It identifies three distinct types, categorized by their output in the perception-action loop: 1. **Renderers**: Output visual observations (pixels). These models, like advanced video generators, prioritize visual fidelity but often lack underlying physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output the state of the world (geometry, physics, dynamics). They provide a structurally accurate representation for professionals (e.g., architects) and serve as training environments for robots and AI agents. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they determine what an agent should do next, closing the perception-action loop (e.g., vision-language-action models). While renderers are currently the most commercially mature and planners are the most aspirational, the article argues that **simulators are the crucial, underappreciated hub**. By working at the level of geometry and physics, a simulator can project upwards to create visuals for humans and downwards to predict action consequences for agents. The future lies in the convergence of these three functions. Emerging research and products, like World Labs' Marble model which outputs both visual splats and physical collision meshes, are beginning to blur these boundaries. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of rendering, simulating, and planning based on a shared understanding of spatial and temporal structures—ultimately enabling machines to understand, imagine, and interact with the physical world.

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Li Feifei's Latest Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Claim to Have 'World Models,' We Need a Taxonomy

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片