Tron Belief: Data Reveals TRX HODLers Jumped 237% In Past Year

bitcoinistPublicado a 2024-09-13Actualizado a 2024-09-13

Resumen

On-chain data shows that Tron long-term holders have increased by 237% in the past year, suggesting a rise in HODLing...

On-chain data shows that Tron long-term holders have increased by 237% in the past year, suggesting a rise in HODLing convictions on the network.

Tron HODLers Have Seen Their Count Go Up Recently

In a new post on X, the market intelligence platform IntoTheBlock shared an update about how the different segments of the Tron userbase are looking right now regarding the number of addresses they contain.

The cohorts in question have been divided based on holding time, and there are three main cohorts: Traders, cruisers, and HODLers. First, the Traders include the investors or addresses who acquired their coins within the past month.

Many of this cohort’s members would, therefore, be new entrants into the market. Another chunk of the group would be investors only interested in short-term trading or lacking the conviction to hold into the long term.

The second group, the Cruisers, contains the investors who have held beyond the 1 month mark, but are yet to hold for a full year. This class is a mixed bag, with fickle-minded and resolute hands coexisting.

Those who pass the test and hold past the 12-month mark get promoted into the HODLers or long-term holders. Statistically, the longer an investor holds their coins, the less likely they become to sell at any point, so the TRX addresses that fall in this range would be the most stubborn hands in the market.

Now, here is a chart that shows the distribution of the Tron addresses across these three groups:

Tron Addresses

Looks like the HODLers have been seeing rapid growth in recent years | Source: IntoTheBlock on X

As displayed in the above graph, the Tron HODLers have been growing quickly during the last couple of years. The HODLers earlier used to be fewer in number than the Cruisers, but last year, they changed the situation and have since gained a healthy gap at the top.

In the last year alone, the number of HODLers has grown by around 237%, which has taken their total address count to almost 90 million. In contrast, the number of cruisers is less than 50 million.

As for the Traders, they currently have just 8 million addresses, meaning that an overwhelming majority of TRX investors have held their coins for at least one month.

This shift towards HODLing naturally suggests that investors are becoming more confident about sitting on their Tron into the future, which could be bullish for the price.

TRX Price

While most of the cryptocurrency sector has witnessed notable positive returns over the past week, Tron has more or less moved sideways, as its price is still trading around $0.152.

The below chart shows what TRX’s trajectory has looked like over the past month.

Tron Price Chart

The price of the coin appears to have been stuck in consolidation recently | Source: TRXUSDT on TradingView
Featured image from Dall-E, IntoTheBlock.com, chart from TradingView.com
Keshav Verma

Keshav Verma

Keshav is a Physics graduate who has been employed as a writer with Bitcoinist since June 2021. He is passionate about writing and through the years, he has gained experience working in a variety of niches. Keshav holds an active interest in the cryptocurrency market, with on-chain analysis being an area he particularly likes to research and write about.

Criptos en tendencia

Lecturas Relacionadas

Continuous Net Outflows from ETFs, Are Institutions Exiting?

US spot Bitcoin ETFs have experienced approximately $6 billion in net outflows over the past six weeks, marking the longest consecutive weekly withdrawal streak since their launch in 2024. The iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) from BlackRock has been particularly affected, accounting for over 70% of recent outflows. On-chain analysis indicates that long-term Bitcoin holders (holding for over 155 days), who control about 83% of the circulating supply, remain steadfast. The selling pressure is primarily coming from allocators who entered through ETF brokerage accounts. This represents the first major collective capitulation since Bitcoin gained mainstream Wall Street recognition, driven more by risk-off portfolio adjustments than a fundamental rejection of the asset. Factors such as rising inflation, a hawkish shift in Federal Reserve policy, massive capital inflows into AI infrastructure, and attractive IPO opportunities have redirected speculative funds. Bitcoin, treated as a high-beta risk asset, was among the first to be sold. While the pace of outflows has slowed significantly—from $1.72 billion in early June to $226.8 million mid-month—the structural issue remains. IBIT's large size means its outflows alone exert substantial market pressure. With spot market volume thin, new capital inflows absent, and ETF buying muted, the market lacks sufficient buying support to absorb this selling. The coming sessions are critical. If IBIT outflows decelerate and Bitcoin reclaims $60,000, this phase could be seen as a healthy reset. However, if heavy IBIT redemptions resume and the price falls below $58,000, it would signal a more sustained institutional exit, requiring non-ETF buyers to shoulder the entire selling pressure alone. The ETF, while lowering entry barriers, has not removed Bitcoin's inherent volatility.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Continuous Net Outflows from ETFs, Are Institutions Exiting?

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Introduction to the Concept of World Models: A Story from Psychology to the Main Battlefield of AI

**World Models: From Psychology to AI's Core Concept** "World model" is a trending but often confusing term in AI, describing a system that allows machines to internally simulate, predict, and rehearse potential outcomes before taking real-world action—like a mental "sandbox." While definitions vary—Yann LeCun emphasizes physical understanding, OpenAI's Sora is a video-based "world simulator," Google DeepMind's Genie 3 creates interactive 3D environments, and companies like Alibaba and Tesla focus on practical applications—the core goal is consistent: reduce reliance on vast real-world data by creating an internal, predictive model for safer and more efficient AI. The concept has deep roots, tracing back to psychologist Kenneth Craik (1943). In AI, it was revitalized by researchers like David Ha and Jürgen Schmidhuber (2018). Major technical approaches include: 1) generative video models (e.g., Sora) for visual realism; 2) abstract predictive models (e.g., LeCun's JEPA) for efficiency and physical reasoning; and 3) explicit 3D simulators (e.g., NVIDIA Omniverse) for precision. Fei-Fei Li proposes a classification based on the AI action loop: renderers (output observations), simulators (output world states), and planners (output actions). The emerging "World Action Model" (WAM) paradigm aims to unify future prediction and action generation. An industry framework is forming: upstream (data, compute, sensors), midstream (general and vertical platforms), and downstream applications (autonomous driving, robotics, gaming, etc.). Autonomous driving is currently the most mature use case. The current lack of a unified definition reflects the field's early, dynamic stage, similar to past tech revolutions. Different approaches—focusing on pixels, physics, or behavior—represent parallel explorations of how best to compress and understand the world. This diversity, while seemingly chaotic, signals that world models have moved from an academic idea to a critical industrial battleground, ultimately aiming to give machines the ability to understand, imagine, and reason about the world.

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

Introduction to the Concept of World Models: A Story from Psychology to the Main Battlefield of AI

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

Building the Bright Path While Secretly Crossing Chencang: Is Walsh Paving the Way for a September "Rate Cut"?

The title "Building the Plank Road Openly While Secretly Crossing at Chencang: Is Walsh Paving the Way for a September 'Rate Cut'?" suggests Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Walsh's hawkish stance may be a deliberate smokescreen. Academy Securities analyst Peter Tchir argues in a report that markets, currently pricing a 75% chance of a September hike, are missing a potential path to a September rate cut that Walsh himself might be quietly preparing. Tchir posits that Walsh's hawkish rhetoric aims to suppress long-term yield risks (with the 10-year Treasury yield falling recently) while creating room for a narrative shift based on upcoming data. The potential political endgame, according to this view, could be rate cuts in September and October, ahead of the midterm elections. This hinges on a political logic where the Trump administration's preference for lower rates remains unchanged. A core part of Tchir's argument involves redefining inflation metrics. He contends the Fed under Walsh may deprioritize the PCE index, criticizing its lagging components like Owners' Equivalent Rent (OER). Instead, he points to alternative, more real-time indicators like the New Tenant Repeat Rent Index (NTRR) and the Truflation daily index, which shows core inflation around 1.45%. He suggests the Fed could shift its data narrative to justify policy easing. Furthermore, Tchir downplays AI-driven inflation fears. He argues that consumer price sensitivity, evidenced by negative market reactions to price hikes (e.g., Apple), contradicts persistent inflation narratives. He also separates AI/data center spending—which he sees as relatively rate-insensitive—from broader consumer affordability issues, implying rate hikes are misdirected. Based on this analysis, Tchir sees a re-pricing of rate cut expectations as likely, creating opportunities in short-duration Treasuries. He maintains a neutral-to-slightly-bullish view on the long end of the yield curve. For equities, he recommends a significant overweight in energy (especially global nuclear assets) and, within defense/security themes, an overweight in biotech/pharma versus an underweight in semiconductors, expressing caution on AI/data center valuations.

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

Building the Bright Path While Secretly Crossing Chencang: Is Walsh Paving the Way for a September "Rate Cut"?

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar TRX

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar TRON (TRX) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar TRON (TRX) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu TRON (TRX)Después de comprar tu TRON (TRX), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear TRON (TRX)Tradear fácilmente con TRON (TRX) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

1.8k Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.10Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar TRX

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de TRX (TRX).

活动图片