新加坡加密货币出版链简报被PEXX收购

币界网Publicado a 2024-08-21Actualizado a 2024-08-21

币界网报道:

稳定币跨境支付专家PEXX收购了加密货币出版物Chain Debrief。

这家总部位于新加坡的媒体平台在2023年底停止发布新内容,在TNB Aura和Antler牵头的450万美元融资后,以未披露的金额被出售给PEXX。

PEXX计划利用Chain Debrief的内容库,增强其当前的用户体验,让他们轻松获取有关该行业的信息和资源。

该公司在一份公告中表示,此次收购也为PEXX提供了一个机会,以进一步建立其社区,特别是在东南亚,并支持PEXX鼓励加密货币投资和在整个地区采用的更广泛愿景。

PEXX首席执行官Marcus Lim表示:“通过整合Chain Debrief的丰富内容和社区见解,我们不仅增强了我们的平台,还为用户提供了在区块链和加密货币的复杂世界中导航所需的知识和工具。”。

“这一战略举措突显了我们致力于扩大影响力,促进在东南亚区块链生态系统中的更大参与,同时坚持我们的使命,即让所有人都能快速、负担得起、方便地进行跨境支付。”

Chain Debrief的创始人Jacky Yap强调,PEXX的跨境支付解决方案是Chain Debriev可以帮助扩大受众的一个领域。

“我们一直热衷于用最新的区块链和加密技术教育和赋权我们的社区,”Yap说。“现在,凭借PEXX对跨境支付的创新方法以及他们对扩大金融渠道的承诺,我们有机会将我们的内容和见解带给更广泛的受众。”

PEXX的平台简化了将Tether(USDT)和Circle(USDC)等稳定币直接转换为世界各地银行账户的过程。这消除了对中介机构或传统银行账户的需求,为个人和企业提供了更快、更高效的解决方案。

2022年1月,Chain Debrief在由天使投资者沈建红领投的种子轮融资中筹集了90万美元,并得到了机构投资者QCP Capital、Gecko Ventures、双峰集团和Coinhako的支持。

Defiance Capital、Xfers、Mintable和加密货币领域的其他个人投资者的高级管理人员也参与了这轮融资。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Continuous Net Outflows from ETFs, Are Institutions Exiting?

US spot Bitcoin ETFs have experienced approximately $6 billion in net outflows over the past six weeks, marking the longest consecutive weekly withdrawal streak since their launch in 2024. The iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) from BlackRock has been particularly affected, accounting for over 70% of recent outflows. On-chain analysis indicates that long-term Bitcoin holders (holding for over 155 days), who control about 83% of the circulating supply, remain steadfast. The selling pressure is primarily coming from allocators who entered through ETF brokerage accounts. This represents the first major collective capitulation since Bitcoin gained mainstream Wall Street recognition, driven more by risk-off portfolio adjustments than a fundamental rejection of the asset. Factors such as rising inflation, a hawkish shift in Federal Reserve policy, massive capital inflows into AI infrastructure, and attractive IPO opportunities have redirected speculative funds. Bitcoin, treated as a high-beta risk asset, was among the first to be sold. While the pace of outflows has slowed significantly—from $1.72 billion in early June to $226.8 million mid-month—the structural issue remains. IBIT's large size means its outflows alone exert substantial market pressure. With spot market volume thin, new capital inflows absent, and ETF buying muted, the market lacks sufficient buying support to absorb this selling. The coming sessions are critical. If IBIT outflows decelerate and Bitcoin reclaims $60,000, this phase could be seen as a healthy reset. However, if heavy IBIT redemptions resume and the price falls below $58,000, it would signal a more sustained institutional exit, requiring non-ETF buyers to shoulder the entire selling pressure alone. The ETF, while lowering entry barriers, has not removed Bitcoin's inherent volatility.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Continuous Net Outflows from ETFs, Are Institutions Exiting?

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Introduction to the Concept of World Models: A Story from Psychology to the Main Battlefield of AI

**World Models: From Psychology to AI's Core Concept** "World model" is a trending but often confusing term in AI, describing a system that allows machines to internally simulate, predict, and rehearse potential outcomes before taking real-world action—like a mental "sandbox." While definitions vary—Yann LeCun emphasizes physical understanding, OpenAI's Sora is a video-based "world simulator," Google DeepMind's Genie 3 creates interactive 3D environments, and companies like Alibaba and Tesla focus on practical applications—the core goal is consistent: reduce reliance on vast real-world data by creating an internal, predictive model for safer and more efficient AI. The concept has deep roots, tracing back to psychologist Kenneth Craik (1943). In AI, it was revitalized by researchers like David Ha and Jürgen Schmidhuber (2018). Major technical approaches include: 1) generative video models (e.g., Sora) for visual realism; 2) abstract predictive models (e.g., LeCun's JEPA) for efficiency and physical reasoning; and 3) explicit 3D simulators (e.g., NVIDIA Omniverse) for precision. Fei-Fei Li proposes a classification based on the AI action loop: renderers (output observations), simulators (output world states), and planners (output actions). The emerging "World Action Model" (WAM) paradigm aims to unify future prediction and action generation. An industry framework is forming: upstream (data, compute, sensors), midstream (general and vertical platforms), and downstream applications (autonomous driving, robotics, gaming, etc.). Autonomous driving is currently the most mature use case. The current lack of a unified definition reflects the field's early, dynamic stage, similar to past tech revolutions. Different approaches—focusing on pixels, physics, or behavior—represent parallel explorations of how best to compress and understand the world. This diversity, while seemingly chaotic, signals that world models have moved from an academic idea to a critical industrial battleground, ultimately aiming to give machines the ability to understand, imagine, and reason about the world.

marsbitHace 36 min(s)

Introduction to the Concept of World Models: A Story from Psychology to the Main Battlefield of AI

marsbitHace 36 min(s)

Building the Bright Path While Secretly Crossing Chencang: Is Walsh Paving the Way for a September "Rate Cut"?

The title "Building the Plank Road Openly While Secretly Crossing at Chencang: Is Walsh Paving the Way for a September 'Rate Cut'?" suggests Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Walsh's hawkish stance may be a deliberate smokescreen. Academy Securities analyst Peter Tchir argues in a report that markets, currently pricing a 75% chance of a September hike, are missing a potential path to a September rate cut that Walsh himself might be quietly preparing. Tchir posits that Walsh's hawkish rhetoric aims to suppress long-term yield risks (with the 10-year Treasury yield falling recently) while creating room for a narrative shift based on upcoming data. The potential political endgame, according to this view, could be rate cuts in September and October, ahead of the midterm elections. This hinges on a political logic where the Trump administration's preference for lower rates remains unchanged. A core part of Tchir's argument involves redefining inflation metrics. He contends the Fed under Walsh may deprioritize the PCE index, criticizing its lagging components like Owners' Equivalent Rent (OER). Instead, he points to alternative, more real-time indicators like the New Tenant Repeat Rent Index (NTRR) and the Truflation daily index, which shows core inflation around 1.45%. He suggests the Fed could shift its data narrative to justify policy easing. Furthermore, Tchir downplays AI-driven inflation fears. He argues that consumer price sensitivity, evidenced by negative market reactions to price hikes (e.g., Apple), contradicts persistent inflation narratives. He also separates AI/data center spending—which he sees as relatively rate-insensitive—from broader consumer affordability issues, implying rate hikes are misdirected. Based on this analysis, Tchir sees a re-pricing of rate cut expectations as likely, creating opportunities in short-duration Treasuries. He maintains a neutral-to-slightly-bullish view on the long end of the yield curve. For equities, he recommends a significant overweight in energy (especially global nuclear assets) and, within defense/security themes, an overweight in biotech/pharma versus an underweight in semiconductors, expressing caution on AI/data center valuations.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Building the Bright Path While Secretly Crossing Chencang: Is Walsh Paving the Way for a September "Rate Cut"?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片