Kamala Harris的加密货币立场:民主党参议员承诺“明智的立法”

币界网Publicado a 2024-08-15Actualizado a 2024-08-15

币界网报道:
    舒默在哈里斯的竞选活动中倡导两党支持加密立法。哈里斯在以加密货币为重点的Polymarket预测中获得了对特朗普的吸引力。

与Galaxy Digital研究主管Alex Thorn最近对副总统Kamala Harris在加密货币问题上的强硬立场表示的担忧形成鲜明对比的是,民主党参议员Chuck Schumer出人意料地成为了该行业的倡导者。

舒默支持哈里斯

美国参议院多数党领袖舒默在Crypto4Harris市政厅发表讲话,强调了在美国拥抱加密货币创新的紧迫性。

他说,

“我们不能继续袖手旁观,因为那样我们就有可能将加密货币推向海外,进入根本没有监管的最低共同标准国家。”

加密货币采用率的上升

正如预期的那样,舒默认识到加密货币在过去十年中的显著增长和影响,暗示哈里斯政府可能并不完全反对加密货币。

他还表示,他致力于在美国推动支持加密货币的立法,如果哈里斯成为总统,目标是在年底前实现这一目标。

“我想把参议院过道两边的成员聚集在一起,创造势头,这样我们就可以通过明智的立法,帮助美国保持其作为世界上最具创新性国家的地位。”

迄今为止在美国处理的加密货币

这让我们回到了拜登政府对加密货币的处理,这已经将其变成了一个党派问题,特别是在通过重要的SAB 121法案期间。

然而,值得注意的是,尽管有Crypto4Harris活动,副总统哈里斯尚未完全阐明她对支持加密货币政策的立场。

相比之下,前总统唐纳德·特朗普在整个竞选过程中积极拥抱加密货币,从比特币主题的运动鞋到NFT晚宴,以及在比特币大会等主要加密货币活动中的亮相。

然而,哈里斯仅凭一场比赛就获得了巨大的吸引力。

哈里斯荣登Polymarket榜首

Crypto4Harris计划将她推向了Polymarket预测市场的顶端,她最初与特朗普的获胜几率为49%。

在这一事件之后,哈里斯开始超过特朗普,最近的更新显示她以54%的机会领先,而特朗普的支持率从72%下降到45%。

话虽如此,亿万富翁投资者Mark Cuban也借此机会在Crypto4Harris活动期间批评特朗普和共和党,他说:,

“共和党人根本不在乎。他们只是想看到比特币的最大值变得更富有。”

还有什么?

然而,根据舒默的话,很明显,

“国会有责任为加密货币提供常识和健全的监管。”

很明显,这并不意味着舒默支持特朗普。事实上,他明确表示支持哈里斯,他说:,

“我们今天在这里是因为我们都支持副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯成为我们的下一任总统,我们都相信加密货币的未来。”

Lecturas Relacionadas

STRC 跌破面值,比特币财库实验进入下半场

The price of STRC, Strategy's dividend-paying preferred stock, has fallen below its $100 face value, triggering a re-evaluation of the "bitcoin treasury" corporate model. This highlights a critical tension: the company's asset base consists of high-volatility, non-cash-flow-generating Bitcoin, while its capital structure requires continuous cash payouts for dividends and interest. The decline of STRC signals that market pressure is shifting from asset price volatility to the pricing of the company's financing tools. Strategy's core model involves a three-step conversion: turning equity into Bitcoin exposure, converting Bitcoin holdings into capital market credit, and packaging non-yielding BTC into cash-paying securities like STRC. While Strategy holds a massive 847,363 BTC, the focus is now on cash flow mismatches. The company faces annual preferred stock dividend obligations of approximately $1.7 billion, far exceeding the cash flow from its legacy software business. Its ability to meet these obligations relies on continued access to capital markets. The market is now scrutinizing which of three potential costs becomes untenable first: rising dividend costs to attract investors, dilution costs from issuing more common stock, or the reputational cost of selling BTC—a move contrary to its "hodl" narrative. For the broader crypto market, a constrained Strategy means the potential loss of a predictable, narrative-driven marginal buyer for Bitcoin. The STRC discount serves as a reminder that the longevity of such models depends not just on Bitcoin's price, but also on financing windows, cash reserves, and investor willingness to pay a "trust premium" for the structure.

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

STRC 跌破面值,比特币财库实验进入下半场

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

Standard Chartered Bank has issued an optimistic research report predicting that the AAVE token could surge 50-fold to $3,500 by 2030. This forecast is based on the projection that the total value locked (TVL) in DeFi will grow 37x to approximately $2.7 trillion, driven by stablecoin expansion and the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA). The bank's model links Aave's potential valuation directly to its protocol revenue, which is primarily driven by net interest margins. The report highlights Aave's current dominant position, noting it captures over 80% of the net earnings ("protocol retained earnings") in the lending sector while holding only about half of its TVL. It also points to the recent launch of the Aave V4 architecture and a healthy revenue stream of $142 million in 2025 as positive fundamentals. Grayscale's separate analysis, applying traditional valuation metrics like DCF, concluded AAVE is currently undervalued. However, the article notes significant challenges. Aave's peer-to-pool lending model suffers from inherent capital inefficiency, with an estimated $52 million annual "deadweight loss" due to idle funds needed for liquidity buffers. This structural flaw was exposed during the April KelpDAO exploit, which locked a WETH pool at 100% utilization for days. Emerging protocols like Morpho, with more efficient point-to-point models, are cited as growing competitive threats. In summary, while institutional forecasts paint a macro picture of massive growth fueled by RWA adoption, Aave's path forward hinges on addressing its core structural limitations and competitive pressures within the evolving DeFi lending landscape.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

Tidal Investment remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market narrative has changed. While recent large-scale IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and major fundraising plans by tech giants like Alphabet and Meta have caused some nervousness, this isn't a sign of an AI peak. The focus has moved from the initial question of AI's viability to the sustainability of massive investment cycles. The key players—primarily the major cloud providers—are not slowing down; their capital expenditure (Capex) guidance for 2026 has been increased across the board (e.g., Alphabet to $180B, Amazon to $200B). This investment cycle is proving resilient and difficult to stop. Unlike traditional hardware cycles, current AI Capex is distributed across multiple physical layers—computing, memory, networking, and critically, power infrastructure. Bottlenecks are shifting from chips to elements like electricity, transformers, and cooling systems, which have much longer lead times and cannot be easily pre-built like fiber optics during the dot-com bubble. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's 240% YoY data center orders) confirms this broad-based, project-driven expansion. Market concerns are acknowledged but viewed differently. First, while Capex growth currently outpaces revenue growth, raising ROI questions, this mirrors the early scaling phase of cloud computing itself. A change in view would require concrete signals like downward Capex revisions or missed AI product targets, which haven't materialized by mid-2026. Second, comparisons to the 2000 dot-com bust are flawed. That crash was driven by a massive, parallel oversupply of cheap capacity (fiber). The current cycle faces *supply constraints* in critical, capital-intensive physical infrastructure that cannot be overbuilt as easily. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the next, more complex act of the AI story. Physical bottlenecks and sustained high Capex plans suggest this is not the finale but an ongoing, capital-intensive build-out phase. The script has changed, but the play is far from over.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片