明天对埃隆·马斯克和唐纳德·特朗普的采访有什么期待

币界网Publicado a 2024-08-11Actualizado a 2024-08-11

币界网报道:

当拥有X(以前称为推特)的亿万富翁埃隆·马斯克与拒绝淡出政治舞台的共和党前总统唐纳德·特朗普坐下来时,我们即将见证一场自我冲突。

特朗普在自己的回声室Truth Social上透露了这件事,宣布他明天晚上将与埃隆谈论阳光下的一切。

无论是他无休止的2024年总统竞选,他和埃隆的相处方式,还是他们对主流媒体的共同蔑视,当然还有“激进左翼”,你可以打赌他们会报道这件事。

他们都是自己小世界的国王——特朗普在他的MAGA宇宙中,埃隆在他的书呆子乌托邦中——所以不要指望会有任何打击。

时机:期待混乱?

尽管大肆宣传,但我们实际上不知道这个马戏团什么时候开始。特朗普说它将在周一晚上举行,但像往常一样,细节很少。它是直播的吗?预先录制?它会像专辑一样在午夜掉落吗?

埃隆没有说太多,这意味着我们悬而未决,想知道我们是否会像等待闪购一样整晚刷新X。

What to expect from the Elon Musk-Donald Trump interview tomorrow

现在,如果你期待一场优雅的、坐下来的对话,你可能想调整你的期望。特朗普对说出他脑子里想说的话并不陌生,埃隆也不是克制的典范。

这次面试可以朝任何方向进行,这可能是我们唯一的保证。

它们可能涵盖的内容:一切和虚无

让我们谈谈话题。特朗普再次竞选总统,因为他当然是,他将在2024年的竞选活动中大放异彩。

他对国家的运作有很多话要说,你可以打赌,他会利用这个平台对从乔·拜登到他的共和党对手的每一个人遮遮掩掩。

特朗普喜欢同时扮演受害者和英雄,所以期待更多同样的“只有我能解决它”的言论。

另一方面,埃隆正在玩一场不同的游戏。自从特朗普决定恢复被杰克·多尔西暂停的推特账户是件好事以来,他一直在讨好特朗普。

What to expect from the Elon Musk-Donald Trump interview tomorrow

在宾夕法尼亚州的那次暗杀企图之后,埃隆支持特朗普已经不是什么秘密了。但是为什么呢?埃隆从中能得到什么?

他可能会在采访中透露一些信息,尽管他了解埃隆,但这些信息会被一堆神秘而即兴的言论所包围,让我们一直在猜测。

经济?是的,他们会触及这一点。毫无疑问,特朗普会吹嘘他过去的记录,并抨击现任政府今天的错误。

通货膨胀、就业、贸易——无论你说什么,他都会找到一种方法,让这一切听起来像一场只有他才能避免的灾难。See Trump认为,拜登政府讨厌的比特币可能会战胜通货膨胀。

说到加密货币,如果它也出现了,不要感到惊讶。但也许不会太深。就在最近,Elon告诉我们,他不太热衷于支持任何加密货币,除非这是一个笑话。但从来没有什么严重的事情。

现在特朗普过去常常谈论加密货币,但众所周知,他最近已经完全适应了加密货币。这位前总统在竞选捐款中接受加密货币,并出席了在纳什维尔举行的2024年比特币会议。

他还得到了业内几位顶级人士的支持,从Winklevoss双胞胎到Ripple的首席执行官Brad Garlinghouse。

外交政策可能会得到认可,但让我们说实话——特朗普将把它带回他通常的谈话要点。

乌克兰、中国、北约的战争——他会明确表示,在他的领导下,情况会有所不同(据他说,情况会更好)。

埃隆自诩为全球思想家,他可能会对太空探索或人工智能提出一些想法,但不要对任何太深的事情屏住呼吸。

明天的对话不会改变世界,但肯定会动摇2024年的选举。特朗普已经盯上了这个奖项,埃隆的支持对他来说意义重大。

唐纳德·特朗普与泰勒和Cameron Winklevoss

这向保守派选民发出了一个信号,即科技界并不完全反对他们,这也将埃隆定位为某种意义上的造王者。

但不要以为这只是关于特朗普。无论他是否承认,埃隆都有自己的政治抱负。

他已经涉足这些领域一段时间了,支持特朗普可能是他在政治桌上获得席位的一种方式。

这次采访可能是他巩固自己作为共和党主要参与者的角色的机会,或者至少是作为一个可以影响其方向的人。

Lecturas Relacionadas

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片