FTX和Alameda的哪些高管将入狱,何时入狱?

币界网Publicado a 2024-08-09Actualizado a 2024-08-09

币界网报道:

近两年前,CoinDesk报道称,Alameda高管将FTX用作交易活动的存钱罐,FTX和Alameda Research的滑稽行为摧毁了加密货币生态系统。

在过去的两年里,这些高管中的几位被指控犯有各种罪行,其中一些已经被判处监禁,其中包括前FTX首席执行官兼Alameda创始人Sam Bankman Fried。

萨姆·班克曼·弗里德

Bankman Fried被同行陪审团裁定犯有共谋电信欺诈、电信欺诈、共谋证券欺诈、共谋商品欺诈和共谋洗钱罪。

他之前被指控犯有其他已被驳回的罪名,包括共谋经营无牌汇款业务、共谋欺诈联邦选举委员会(FEC)、共谋违反《反海外腐败法》的反贿赂规定、共谋实施银行欺诈、共谋实施与衍生品相关的欺诈以及其他指控。

Bankman Fried已被判处25年监禁,根据监狱局网站,他目前被关押在布鲁克林争取民主变革运动。

阅读更多:币安创始人赵被判处4个月有期徒刑

Ryan Salame

总部位于巴哈马的实体FTX DM的前首席执行官Ryan Salame对共谋经营未经许可的汇款业务和共谋进行非法政治捐款的指控表示认罪。

萨拉梅原本打算在8月29日投降,但在他的脸被狗袭击受伤后,他被延长了45天,将投降时间推迟到10月13日。

自认罪以来,Salame多次在X(前推特)上试图宣布自己无罪、律师有罪,并打算违背律师的建议披露新信息;到目前为止,他还没有提供他声称可以免除他认罪罪行的信息。

卡罗琳·埃利森

Caroline Ellison是Alameda Research的联合首席执行官,也是Bankman Fried的断断续续的性伴侣和浪漫伴侣。她配合了对Bankman Fried的调查,并承认犯有共谋电信欺诈、电信欺诈、共谋商品欺诈、共谋证券欺诈和共谋洗钱罪。

她还一直在配合正在进行的破产案,提供信息和证词,为占有债务人提起的各种诉讼做出了贡献。

埃里森的证词对检方来说是最重要的证词之一,有助于提供Bankman Fried了解问题和法律不当行为的证据。

她的判决尚未安排。

阅读更多:CZ在狱中是否关注过Solana的新闻报道?

王光伟

王子晓是Bankman Fried的密友,也是FTX的联合创始人兼首席技术官。

他一直在配合对Bankman Fried的起诉,并承认共谋实施电汇欺诈、电汇欺诈、共谋实施商品欺诈和共谋实施证券欺诈。

王作证说,早在2019年,Alameda Research就在FTX上获得了特权,并指出这些特权使其几乎立即在交易所出现负余额。

他的宣判定于11月20日。

尼沙德·辛格

Nishad Singh是FTX的联合创始人兼工程总监。

他一直在配合Bankman Fried的起诉,并承认犯有共谋电信欺诈、电信欺诈、共谋商品欺诈、共谋证券欺诈、共谋洗钱和共谋非法政治捐款罪。

辛格就各种贷款和捐款的结构作证,其中包括一笔名义上属于他的贷款,但从未进入他的银行账户。

他的宣判定于10月30日。

尚未被起诉

到目前为止,与FTX和Alameda关系密切的几名个人和高管都避免了被起诉。

其中包括Bankman Fried的父母Joshua Bankman和Barbara Fried,他们在证词和拥有FTX的债务人提起的诉讼中涉及了公司运营的各个方面。据称,他们收到了大笔付款、豪华房地产和与名人的会面。

据迈克尔·刘易斯在其著作《走向无限》中称,FTX前首席运营官康斯坦斯·王同意配合对班克斯曼·弗里德的起诉。王在2022年11月9日告诉Ryne Miller“我还不想停止尝试”,即使在资金明显短缺之后,他也表示愿意努力保持FTX的运行。此后,王加入了FTX投资的基金Sino Global Capital,该基金后来更名为Ryze Labs。

Claire Watanabe与Singh有着浪漫的关系,也是FTX业务发展部门的高级管理人员。Watanabe和Singh与Bankman Fried、Wang和Ellison住在一套公寓里,是进行大量政治捐款的高管之一,最大限度地增加了她对金融欺诈者和可能的庞氏骗局策划者George Santos的捐款。

Ramnik Arora曾是FTX的产品主管。阿罗拉也是做出大量政治捐款的高管之一,与渡边一起向桑托斯做出了最大的捐款。此后,阿罗拉创立了风险投资基金Original capital。

阿拉米达研究公司前联合首席执行官萨姆·特拉布科在倒闭前几个月辞职,他大多保持低调。他短暂地把头伸到水面上,写了一封信来支持他的密友萨拉姆,但除此之外,他大部分时间都是独自一人。

包括Daniel Friedberg和Can Sun在内的前律师被各种高管和诉讼称可能知道或与这些实体的一些犯罪活动有关。Friedberg一直是FTX债务人诉讼的目标,这些债务人声称他帮助偿还了举报人,批准了对高管的贷款,并帮助创建了North Dimension和North Wireless Dimension。

Friedberg坚称,他不知道导致FTX崩溃的问题,而Law360报道称,他正在配合对Bankman Fried的起诉。

曾在芬威克与Friedberg共事的FTX律师Can Sun作证说,Bankman Fried向他歪曲了FTX的财务状况。据说,Bankman Fried要求孙提供“法律理由”来解释为什么数十亿客户资金丢失,孙的回应是提供了各种理论解释,这些解释本可以解释,但实际上并没有解释。

孙在获得豁免权后作证,据称他与孙正义和特隆合作,试图收购TrueUSD。

他的领英(LinkedIn)表示,他现在为前阿拉米达开发商阿玛尼·费兰特(Armani Ferrante)创立的钱包Backpack从事法律和合规工作。

Salame将他的一些不满集中在Backpack上,声称“他们选择了一位律师,而这位律师是导致大量客户资金被盗的绝对核心”,并大声质疑“Backpack有多少高管因为律师建议他们这样做而不是卖掉自己的加密货币而获得公司间贷款。当然是假设性的问题。”

阅读更多:Ryan Salame正在粉饰他在FTX和Alameda的角色

前FTX开发商、Bankman Fried的朋友Adam Yedidia在Bankman Fride的审判中作证说,他在FTX宣布破产前几个月就意识到了数十亿美元的缺口。他在豁免令的保护下作证。

两名高管已被判处监禁,另外两名高管的刑期已定,另一名高管认罪,许多其他高管仍在寻找机会挽救自己的职业生涯和声誉。

有消息吗?给我们发电子邮件或ProtonMail。如需了解更多信息,请在X、Instagram、Bluesky和谷歌新闻上关注我们,或订阅我们的YouTube频道。

Lecturas Relacionadas

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

NVIDIA is set to launch its new Vera AI data center CPU in China as early as August, with high pricing. While this move offers a new option, it highlights China's continued dependence on foreign-controlled Arm architecture. In response, the Chinese semiconductor industry is increasingly turning to RISC-V as a strategic alternative for achieving high-performance computing autonomy. The article explores the concept of the "impossible triangle" in CPU development—balancing prosperity, control, and autonomy—and posits that RISC-V's open-source, modular nature offers a unique path to achieving all three. While RISC-V is already dominant in embedded systems, the focus is now shifting to data centers and AI workloads. China has become a global hotspot for RISC-V development, driven by AI-driven compute demand, supply chain concerns from export controls, cost benefits of open-source, and strong policy support. Multiple Chinese companies have reportedly crossed the key performance threshold of 15 SPECint per GHz, a benchmark for entering the high-performance CPU club. Progress extends beyond single-core benchmarks. Companies are developing complete computing subsystems, including commercial-grade coherent network-on-chip (NoC) technology and server processors with up to 40 cores that strictly adhere to the RVA23 standard to ensure software compatibility. Real-world applications are emerging in areas like video transcoding and edge AI. However, significant challenges remain. The RISC-V ecosystem faces fragmentation, immature toolchains and verification processes, and gaps in single-core performance and energy efficiency compared to mature x86 and Arm architectures. The formidable software moat, epitomized by NVIDIA's CUDA, is a long-term hurdle. In conclusion, while RISC-V cannot immediately replace offerings like NVIDIA's Vera, it represents a viable long-term path for China to develop a self-sufficient, high-performance CPU ecosystem. The journey is acknowledged to be long and arduous, requiring sustained effort to overcome technical and ecosystem challenges.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

The author built a custom monitoring dashboard for Polymarket, a prediction market platform, and tested it with $1,600, achieving over 30% returns. However, the core argument is that Polymarket is not a good venue for traditional arbitrage. The dashboard has two main sections: a "Portfolio Dashboard" for tracking active positions with key metrics like total capital, P&L, and a risk-control module using a tier system (T1, T2, T3), and an "Opportunity Watchlist" for monitoring markets. The article details a critical structural trap in binary markets: a bet with a high perceived probability of success still carries a 100% loss risk if wrong. The author's T1/T2/T3 system is designed to manage this by limiting position sizes based on conviction and time horizon, emphasizing that high confidence should not equal high concentration. A key insight is the danger of "pseudo-diversification"—betting on different markets driven by the same underlying variable. The author concludes that Polymarket offers few true low-risk, arbitrage opportunities. It is instead a high-risk environment where wins can create a false sense of mastery, leading to large losses. The platform is better viewed as a training ground for honing judgment through disciplined, framework-driven betting rather than a reliable income source. The tools help transform intuition into structured, rule-based decisions to mitigate the risk of catastrophic errors.

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

**"WeChat AI Card" Practical Test Guide: Has the Era of AI Shopping Arrived?** WeChat has officially launched the "AI Exclusive Card," a feature integrated into its Workbuddy AI assistant. This card is designed to handle payments for AI-initiated purchases. Our hands-on test reveals it's not yet a tool for fully autonomous AI shopping, but rather a controlled payment layer for AI agents. The AI Card functions as an isolated sub-wallet within WeChat Pay. Users must bind the card and transfer funds into it from their main wallet. Crucially, every transaction requires explicit user confirmation via smartphone scan; AI cannot spend autonomously. Currently accessible through the Workbuddy agent, the card targets specific digital consumption scenarios: purchasing paid content (reports, data), calling paid APIs/tools, and subscribing to services. Its design prioritizes security and control by separating funds and mandating approval for each payment. We tested a real-world scenario: ordering bubble tea via Workbuddy using a "Meituan Life Assistant" skill. The process encountered multiple hurdles: high "skill" usage costs (exceeding daily free credits), and most importantly, while a payment was successfully initiated, the AI purchased an incorrect product (a mismatched group-buy coupon instead of the desired drink). This highlights the current limitation: the **AI Card only solves the payment step**. The broader challenge lies in the **AI agent's execution chain**—accurately understanding intent, navigating third-party platforms, selecting the right product, and ensuring proper fulfillment. The payment succeeded, but the purchase failed to meet the user's need. In conclusion, the WeChat AI Exclusive Card is a cautious, early-step experiment in AI commerce. It provides a secure, user-controlled payment method for agent interactions but is not yet capable of reliable, end-to-end complex purchases. For now, it's best used for low-value, low-risk digital services with careful user verification at each step. The vision of AI handling complete shopping tasks remains a work in progress.

marsbitHace 9 hora(s)

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

marsbitHace 9 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片