PEPE币市值超越UNI位居十九位 爆炸性飙升铸就其成为金狗

金色财经Publicado a 2024-07-08Actualizado a 2024-07-08

目前加密市场一个伟大的Meme(模因币)每天都在抢走聚光灯—PEPE(佩佩币)。作为一种基于以太坊的代币,PEPE以其爆炸性的增长和令人印象深刻的市场表现吸引了加密货币世界!

15bf596da3ad4f57937912b8093f6028~tplv-tt-shrink:640:0.image?lk3s=06827d14&traceid=202405271448417C14627D7B100317B3A8&x-expires=2147483647&x-signature=CpIKt6A5bLrMU7wTsoTAuyb%2Bf9I%3D

据CMC数据显示,Meme代币PEPE市值目前已达70.32亿美元,已超越 Uniswap(UNI)的 67.3 亿市值,排名上升至第 19 位!

SEC批准ETH现货ETF助长PEPE的飙升

这种冲动举动的催化剂可归因于围绕美国证券交易委员会批准以太坊现货交易所交易基金 (ETF) 的看涨情绪。作为 ERC-20 代币,PEPE 已经驾驭了这个基于 ETH 的新闻的兴奋浪潮。投资者对以太坊潜力的信心大大提高了PEPE的吸引力。

aa2d422a63634ccdb84572f0edbd99b2~tplv-tt-shrink:640:0.image?lk3s=06827d14&traceid=202405271448417C14627D7B100317B3A8&x-expires=2147483647&x-signature=Z5G9249tKcwXwGlFtMRw3K1x4yc%3D

在过去的 24 小时内,PEPE 上涨了8%左右,目前为0.0000167美元左右,过去一周内飙升了74%左右,过去一个月内上涨了150%。其市值超过 70亿美元,市值现报70.32亿美元!

什么是PEPE:佩佩币?

建立在以太坊区块链上的最受欢迎的模因币之一是 Pepe Coin ($PEPE)。到 2023 年 4 月,Pepe Coin 已经获得了极大的人气,很快成为交易量最大的加密货币之一。

ffeca822f529468095c4b7d3b202a21e~tplv-tt-shrink:640:0.image?lk3s=06827d14&traceid=202405271448417C14627D7B100317B3A8&x-expires=2147483647&x-signature=HBAva0CpcTHuE91c3zyRgiC%2B014%3D

狗狗币 (DOGE) 花了大约四年时间才达到 10 亿美元的市值。然而,Pepe Coin 在创建后仅三周就超过了这一点。尽管它的价格波动很大,但$PEPE仍然有相当多的人持有它;例如,重复效果。根据 Pepe Meme Coin 的官方网站,$PEPE本身没有任何价值或投资回报承诺。不过,非正式地,许多人在币安和相关加密货币交易所兑换了超过 100,000 美元的$PEPE

解释PEPE:佩佩币的含义

Pepe Coin 的创始人利用 Pepe the Frog 互联网模因在加密社区中快速获得品牌知名度。与其他类似项目一样,这种货币的增长高度依赖于社交媒体等不同平台的使用。

在马特·弗瑞(Matt Furie)2005年的漫画书《男孩俱乐部》(Boy's Club)中,他制作了一个名为“青蛙佩佩”(Pepe the Frog)的东西。那幅漫画中的这个青蛙角色是如此善良和温柔,以至于人们非常喜欢他,以至于他们开始在不同的网站上到处发布同一只青蛙的照片,包括但不限于 脸书 或 ins。

在 2016 年美国大选期间,不同的在线社区控制了这个角色,并在许多模因中使用它来传达仇恨、种族隔离和其他歧视性内容的信息。Hecne, Furie 与 ADL 合作,通过包括“拯救 pepe”在内的各种方式以积极的方式展示角色的原创性。

尽管马特·富里(Matt Furie)拥有起诉其创作的任何商业用途的合法权利,但他目前并没有追究Pepe Coin的创作者侵犯版权。

Pepe Coin 的工作原理

一旦货币投放市场,其总供应量永远不会超过 420.69万亿枚PEPE。该项目的几乎所有代币最初都存放在流动性池中,占代币发行时分配的 93.1%;此后,这些样本被存放在其他地方,例如6.9%到托管地址或多重签名中。

最初,Pepe Coin 是用一种表示形式构建的,它在每次市场活动中都会销毁一定比例的代币。目标是创造限制,并在一段时间后提高剩余硬币的价格。

当该项目被引入时,该团队还建立了一种机制,通过该机制,每次 Pepe 加密货币销售中的一些资金都会分配给已经拥有一些代币的个人。这是一个属性,旨在鼓励消费者忠诚度和促进保持投资。

与此同时,该项目先前已进行过编辑,导致其未来状态与再分配框架的可持续性存在不确定性。

Pepe生态系统

“就像所有其他模因币项目一样,要弄清楚Pepe Coin系统下有什么样的社交媒体渠道进行真正的沟通并不容易。”

除了 TikTok、Telegram 和 Discord 之外,Pepe Coin 社区成员还在 Twitter、Facebook 和 Reddit 中保持着持续的存在。但问题在于,许多非官方社区提供不准确的信息,并倡导危险的投资决策。

Pepe的未来

通常,Pepe Coin 的声誉迅速攀升是由于公开的高退出购买吸引了社交媒体平台上的加密货币开发社会。

路线图分为 3 个阶段:

第一部分可能会意识到推出硬币并通过 Twitter 进行推广。

第 2 部分可能会识别社区合作伙伴关系,并在 1 级中心化加密货币交易所 (CEX) 上建立索引。

0.33 细分市场将建立一个 Pepe 学院并销售 Pepe 商品。

PEPE能否在五月达到1美元?

虽然 PEPE 背后的看涨势头仍在继续,但 5 月份达到 1 美元似乎非常雄心勃勃。尽管 PEPE 持有者的数量越来越多,并且指标指向强劲的购买狂潮,但现实情况是,对于流通供应量如此之高的模因币来说,飙升至 1 美元将是前所未有的。

4d7aa689f36248c29614bc7474c8e814~tplv-tt-shrink:640:0.image?lk3s=06827d14&traceid=202405271448417C14627D7B100317B3A8&x-expires=2147483647&x-signature=uaxx7IlzEIJX6iNbP%2BUUZRfSxT8%3D

由于流通的硬币有 420.69 万亿枚,实现 1 美元的价格目标将导致市值超过所有国家的 GDP 总和,这给加密市场带来了重大挑战。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Trillion-Dollar Pension Fund Entry? Franklin Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETF Comes with a Built-in Selling Pressure Ceiling

Franklin Templeton has filed to launch two ETFs that embed a "default configuration" logic into Bitcoin investment, aiming to tap into massive pension fund flows. These "Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment Index ETFs" will initially hold 95% equities and 5% Bitcoin, automatically reinvesting stock dividends to buy Bitcoin. However, a quarterly rebalancing rule forces selling of Bitcoin if its allocation exceeds 5%, capping its maximum holding at 20%. While the product cleverly circumvents advisor reluctance and compliance hurdles by labeling itself as a U.S. equity product, its actual Bitcoin buying power is minimal. Given low dividend yields (e.g., ~1% for broad market indices), annual Bitcoin purchases from a fund the size of Franklin's existing Bitcoin ETF would be a mere $3.6 million—negligible against Bitcoin's daily trading volume. Crucially, during bull markets, the fund becomes a programmed, passive *seller* of Bitcoin, potentially creating sustained sell pressure if many similar funds emerge. The strategy leverages investor inertia and automatic enrollment, similar to the success of target-date funds in 401(k) plans. It also uses an offshore Cayman subsidiary for holding Bitcoin and raises a tax complication where investors must pay taxes on dividends they never receive as cash. Although recent U.S. regulatory changes allow crypto in retirement plans, widespread adoption as a default option faces legal hurdles. The core premise remains: the system doesn't need to convince anyone to buy Bitcoin actively; it simply relies on people doing nothing.

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

Trillion-Dollar Pension Fund Entry? Franklin Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETF Comes with a Built-in Selling Pressure Ceiling

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Largest Bull Suffers $15 Billion Paper Loss

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Major Bull Loses $15 Billion On June 25th, Bitcoin fell below $60,000, hitting a low of $58,030—its lowest level since October 2024. The sell-off triggered over $1 billion in leveraged liquidations in 24 hours, with longs accounting for $788 million. This marks a more than 53% decline from the October 2025 all-time high of $126,198. A critical factor in the downturn is the weakening position of MicroStrategy, the largest corporate Bitcoin holder. With 847,363 BTC at an average cost of $75,651, the company now faces over $14.6 billion in unrealized losses. Its core financing flywheel—raising capital to buy Bitcoin—is stalling. Its variable-rate preferred shares (STRC), a key fundraising tool, have fallen 25% below their $100 target. This raises doubts about its ability to continue providing steady institutional demand for Bitcoin. Simultaneously, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs are experiencing significant outflows, with a single-day net outflow of $469 million on June 24th. This represents the most severe sustained capital flight since their launch. The macroeconomic backdrop remains restrictive, with persistent inflation delaying expected Fed rate cuts. Analysts note a shift in capital allocation, with institutional funds moving away from crypto towards AI infrastructure stocks. Immediate pressure comes from approximately $10 billion worth of Bitcoin options expiring on June 26th, which could increase market volatility. The combined effect of these factors—eroding core demand pillars, macro headwinds, and capital rotation—has decisively broken the $60,000 support level.

Foresight NewsHace 10 min(s)

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Largest Bull Suffers $15 Billion Paper Loss

Foresight NewsHace 10 min(s)

STRC Falls Below $80, Can Conservative Investors Still Buy the Dip?

The article analyzes whether the STRC (a perpetual preferred stock issued by MicroStrategy) presents a buying opportunity after its price fell below its $100 par value to around $80, offering a seemingly high yield of 13-15%. The core argument is that STRC's discount reflects market skepticism about the sustainability of MicroStrategy's capital structure model, not just temporary panic. This model relies on issuing securities (like STRC) to raise funds to buy more Bitcoin, a "flywheel" that works in a bull market. The recent small sale of BTC to fund dividends, while minor, broke the psychological "never sell" anchor and signaled potential strain. Key risks identified are not a traditional Ponzi collapse but a potential breakdown in the financing narrative: 1) If Bitcoin enters a deep bear market, crushing MicroStrategy's stock premium (mNAV), its ability to raise cheap capital weakens. 2) If STRC remains deeply discounted, it signifies permanently higher funding costs. 3) The high cash dividend yield represents a significant ongoing expense. 4) If selling BTC to pay dividends becomes routine, the bullish narrative reverses. The conclusion is that STRC is not a risk-free high-yield asset. It is a high-coupon bet on whether MicroStrategy's BTC treasury financing model can withstand a bear market. Buying it is a wager that the market will continue to believe in and fund this structure at acceptable costs. The current price asks if this cycle's "casualty" might be a BTC treasury company's融资 model itself.

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

STRC Falls Below $80, Can Conservative Investors Still Buy the Dip?

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Their Names?

**Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Names?** In the crypto world, changing a project's name is common—over 16% of projects have done so, including major ones like Polygon (formerly Matic Network). This contrasts sharply with traditional businesses, which fiercely protect brand equity. The core reason is that in crypto, brand loyalty is often weak. Users are frequently investors, airdrop hunters, or yield seekers, not traditional consumers. A name associated with price crashes, hacks, or failed narratives becomes a liability, not an asset. Renaming can be a strategic reset to shed this baggage. Name changes serve as a potent marketing tool. They can signal a genuine pivot in strategy or scope (e.g., EthSign dropping "Eth" as it expanded). However, they are often used to "narrative surf," rebranding to align with hot trends like AI, RWA, or the metaverse (e.g., Elrond → MultiversX). Critically, renaming is also a PR tactic to distance a project from past failures like security breaches (e.g., Anyswap → Multichain). The most significant risk emerges when a name change is coupled with a token migration or swap. This process can allow projects to reset exchange price charts, erase visible historical downtrends, and create an illusion of a fresh start. It often facilitates liquidity resets, where low float can be exploited for pumps. More alarmingly, migrations sometimes mask overhauls to tokenomics, introducing substantial new token supply through "ecosystem funds" or "node rewards," effectively diluting existing holders. The fundamental issue isn't renaming itself, which can be valid for strategic evolution. The problem is when it functions as an escape from history—a way to avoid accountability for past mistakes, failed promises, and poor performance. When a project announces a rebrand, the critical questions are: What tangible new capability or strategy does it represent? Has the tokenomics changed? And what part of its past is it most trying to make users forget?

marsbitHace 32 min(s)

Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Their Names?

marsbitHace 32 min(s)

A Trillion-Dollar Entry Point for Pension Funds? Franklin's Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETFs Come with a Built-In Selling Pressure Ceiling

Franklin Templeton filed for two ETFs on June 18 that embed a "default option" logic into Bitcoin investing. These funds—the Franklin US Equity Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment Index ETF and the Franklin US Innovative Equity Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment Index ETF—aim to automatically allocate a portion of investor dividends to Bitcoin, initially with a 95% stock and 5% Bitcoin allocation. The mechanism is designed for financial advisors, not retail investors. By packaging Bitcoin exposure within a standard equity fund label, advisors can bypass internal compliance restrictions against direct cryptocurrency allocation for their clients. Dividends from the stock holdings are automatically used to buy Bitcoin via spot ETFs, futures, or options. However, the structure imposes strict rebalancing rules: if Bitcoin's allocation exceeds 5%, it is trimmed back to 4.5% quarterly, with a hard cap of 20%. This means the fund becomes a systematic seller during Bitcoin price rallies. Realistically, the potential buying pressure is minimal. Based on dividend yields (approximately 1.05% for broad market, 0.52% for innovative equity), the annual inflow into Bitcoin would be a tiny fraction of the fund's assets. For comparison, Franklin's existing Bitcoin ETF ($359 million AUM) would generate only about $3.6 million in annual Bitcoin purchases—negligible against Bitcoin's daily trading volume. The innovative equity fund, heavily weighted in low-dividend stocks like Nvidia, would have even weaker buying power. The product utilizes an offshore Cayman subsidiary to hold Bitcoin, a common compliance tactic for commodity exposure in mutual funds. A key drawback for investors is the tax liability: they must pay taxes on dividends that are automatically converted into Bitcoin, requiring out-of-pocket cash for a gain they never directly receive. For the strategy to scale significantly, such funds would need to become a default or near-default option in retirement plans like 401(k)s. Recent regulatory moves, including a Trump executive order and a Department of Labor proposal offering fiduciary safe harbors for including crypto assets, could pave the way. However, widespread employer adoption likely awaits further legal clarity. Ultimately, the fund's model leverages investor inertia and automated systems, rather than convincing anyone to actively choose Bitcoin. While it creates a new, albeit small, structural buyer, its rebalancing rules also establish a built-in "selling ceiling" that could dampen price upside if similar products proliferate.

Foresight NewsHace 33 min(s)

A Trillion-Dollar Entry Point for Pension Funds? Franklin's Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETFs Come with a Built-In Selling Pressure Ceiling

Foresight NewsHace 33 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片