六月AI板块迎来重大利好 INJ、GMX、Manta、PYTH、ARB值得重点留意

金色财经Publicado a 2024-07-08Actualizado a 2024-07-08

六月是AI的月份,好消息不断。我们应该在AI板块埋伏,静待时机。不要暴涨就说革命来了,跌了就说骗局没信仰,保持理性,策略分析至关重要。

美联储利率决定对山寨币的影响

在上一个市场周期中,山寨币和比特币在2019年6月美联储降息之前暴跌。

目前的市场走势看起来与那时相似。如果历史重演的话,在6月12日美联储决定利率之前,山寨币可能会先经历一波大洗盘。

然而,上周公布的美国就业数据对加密货币和股市都造成了影响,这也可能意味着美联储不会调整利率。

根据最新数据,美联储在2024年6月维持利率不变的可能性非常高。据CME“美联储观察”数据显示,这一概率为99.4%,而降息25个基点的可能性仅为0.6%。

至于8月份,美联储维持利率不变的概率同样很高,为91.1%。在8月份,降息25个基点的概率为8.8%,降息50个基点的概率为0.1%。

这些数据反映了市场对美联储未来货币政策的预期。高概率的利率保持不变可能表明市场预期当前的经济状况不需要美联储进行利率调整。然而,这些只是基于当前信息的预测,实际的政策决定可能会受到未来经济数据和全球经济形势的影响。

大多数人都在担心,因为周三即将发布的CPI数据将决定美联储是继续降息还是开始加息。

许多人不明白为什么降息对加密货币圈有利。实际上,降息意味着更多的资金流入市场,更多的人将资金从银行转移到投资中,这将增加市场的流动性。如果美联储不降息,可能会导致更高的失业率,形成恶性循环,因此降息几乎是必然的选择。

总的来说,无论美联储决定如何,市场总体上仍然是向好的。当前仍处于牛市中期,山寨币后期的潜力至少可以翻十倍。

苹果WWDC大会宣布与OpenAI合作

在2024年度全球开发者大会(WWDC)上,苹果公司宣布了一项重要合作:未来将与OpenAI合作,在Siri中整合ChatGPT技术。

图片

苹果公司正在积极整合人工智能(AI)功能,以赶超微软、谷歌等竞争对手。通过与OpenAI公司的合作,苹果不仅为用户带来更智能的AI体验,还拓展了其AI领域的版图。

在今天的推特上,山姆·阿尔特曼(Sam Altman)发布了一条推文:“非常高兴能够与苹果合作,ChatGPT 将于今年晚些时候整合到苹果设备中!我相信你一定会喜欢它。”

图片

在与OpenAI合作的同时,苹果公司还宣布了一系列新的人工智能功能,并称之为“苹果智能”(Apple Intelligence)。除了在 Siri 中加入 ChatGPT 外,OpenAI 的技术还被用于在苹果操作系统中支持人工智能写作摘要。

苹果公司与OpenAI的合作必将带来AI板块的重大利好,拭目以待!

FET、AGIX、OCEAN即将合并

FET、AGIX、OCEAN即将合并为超级人工智能ASI,这一AI概念备受关注。预计于6月13日发行的ASI代币将统一这三大币,代号超级人工智能。

尽管三大币合并引发了市场的喜忧参半,但目前尚不清楚具体的供应量和需求量,也未知道如何界定流通市值。虽然ASI将增加供应,但这与发行新供应是不同的,不会稀释价值。

根据现有的三币流通市值计算,FET为14.2亿美元、AGIX为9.3亿美元、OCEAN为4.58亿美元,即总流通市值为28亿美元。与一些其他项目相比,这一流通市值还不如一些项目的一半,因此币价未来有望上涨。

在这次牛市结束前,依然对在此次合并中创下最后一个历史新高保持信心。长期来看,FET等人工智能代币正处于一个复杂的调整阶段。在这个阶段,大多数人都会失去耐心,但当所有的散户割肉之后,人工智能或许正迎来它的黄金时代。

图片

以下五种加密货币值得密切关注:

  1. Arbitrum (ARB): ARB近期有所下跌,但对于长期投资者来说,这可能是一个好的机会。最近的更新和扩展,包括推出Alien X池和AI技术,预示着它可能会有增长。

  2. Manta Network (Manta): Manta Network在2024年初表现不错,提供快速交易和低费用,适合搭建去中心化应用程序(dApps)。他们最近推出的CDY结合了CI和DeFi,引人注目。目前价格远低于历史最高,值得关注。

  3. Pyth Network (PYTH): Pyth Network是一个预言机解决方案,与Chainlink有竞争关系。尽管目前尚未引起广泛关注,但价格较低,是投资的良机。

  4. Injective (INJ): 近期人们都在关注与人工智能和大数据相关的项目,Injective就是其中之一。价格有所回升,市场活跃度高,可能即将受到关注。现在投资可能会带来收益,不容错过。

  5. GMX (GMX): GMX是一个去中心化交易所(DEX),可以交易永续加密货币期货,并提供50倍杠杆交易。最近价格上涨迅速,上个月涨幅达55%,市值也突破了37亿美元,前景看好。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Trillion-Dollar Pension Fund Entry? Franklin Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETF Comes with a Built-in Selling Pressure Ceiling

Franklin Templeton has filed to launch two ETFs that embed a "default configuration" logic into Bitcoin investment, aiming to tap into massive pension fund flows. These "Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment Index ETFs" will initially hold 95% equities and 5% Bitcoin, automatically reinvesting stock dividends to buy Bitcoin. However, a quarterly rebalancing rule forces selling of Bitcoin if its allocation exceeds 5%, capping its maximum holding at 20%. While the product cleverly circumvents advisor reluctance and compliance hurdles by labeling itself as a U.S. equity product, its actual Bitcoin buying power is minimal. Given low dividend yields (e.g., ~1% for broad market indices), annual Bitcoin purchases from a fund the size of Franklin's existing Bitcoin ETF would be a mere $3.6 million—negligible against Bitcoin's daily trading volume. Crucially, during bull markets, the fund becomes a programmed, passive *seller* of Bitcoin, potentially creating sustained sell pressure if many similar funds emerge. The strategy leverages investor inertia and automatic enrollment, similar to the success of target-date funds in 401(k) plans. It also uses an offshore Cayman subsidiary for holding Bitcoin and raises a tax complication where investors must pay taxes on dividends they never receive as cash. Although recent U.S. regulatory changes allow crypto in retirement plans, widespread adoption as a default option faces legal hurdles. The core premise remains: the system doesn't need to convince anyone to buy Bitcoin actively; it simply relies on people doing nothing.

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

Trillion-Dollar Pension Fund Entry? Franklin Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETF Comes with a Built-in Selling Pressure Ceiling

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Largest Bull Suffers $15 Billion Paper Loss

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Major Bull Loses $15 Billion On June 25th, Bitcoin fell below $60,000, hitting a low of $58,030—its lowest level since October 2024. The sell-off triggered over $1 billion in leveraged liquidations in 24 hours, with longs accounting for $788 million. This marks a more than 53% decline from the October 2025 all-time high of $126,198. A critical factor in the downturn is the weakening position of MicroStrategy, the largest corporate Bitcoin holder. With 847,363 BTC at an average cost of $75,651, the company now faces over $14.6 billion in unrealized losses. Its core financing flywheel—raising capital to buy Bitcoin—is stalling. Its variable-rate preferred shares (STRC), a key fundraising tool, have fallen 25% below their $100 target. This raises doubts about its ability to continue providing steady institutional demand for Bitcoin. Simultaneously, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs are experiencing significant outflows, with a single-day net outflow of $469 million on June 24th. This represents the most severe sustained capital flight since their launch. The macroeconomic backdrop remains restrictive, with persistent inflation delaying expected Fed rate cuts. Analysts note a shift in capital allocation, with institutional funds moving away from crypto towards AI infrastructure stocks. Immediate pressure comes from approximately $10 billion worth of Bitcoin options expiring on June 26th, which could increase market volatility. The combined effect of these factors—eroding core demand pillars, macro headwinds, and capital rotation—has decisively broken the $60,000 support level.

Foresight NewsHace 24 min(s)

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Largest Bull Suffers $15 Billion Paper Loss

Foresight NewsHace 24 min(s)

STRC Falls Below $80, Can Conservative Investors Still Buy the Dip?

The article analyzes whether the STRC (a perpetual preferred stock issued by MicroStrategy) presents a buying opportunity after its price fell below its $100 par value to around $80, offering a seemingly high yield of 13-15%. The core argument is that STRC's discount reflects market skepticism about the sustainability of MicroStrategy's capital structure model, not just temporary panic. This model relies on issuing securities (like STRC) to raise funds to buy more Bitcoin, a "flywheel" that works in a bull market. The recent small sale of BTC to fund dividends, while minor, broke the psychological "never sell" anchor and signaled potential strain. Key risks identified are not a traditional Ponzi collapse but a potential breakdown in the financing narrative: 1) If Bitcoin enters a deep bear market, crushing MicroStrategy's stock premium (mNAV), its ability to raise cheap capital weakens. 2) If STRC remains deeply discounted, it signifies permanently higher funding costs. 3) The high cash dividend yield represents a significant ongoing expense. 4) If selling BTC to pay dividends becomes routine, the bullish narrative reverses. The conclusion is that STRC is not a risk-free high-yield asset. It is a high-coupon bet on whether MicroStrategy's BTC treasury financing model can withstand a bear market. Buying it is a wager that the market will continue to believe in and fund this structure at acceptable costs. The current price asks if this cycle's "casualty" might be a BTC treasury company's融资 model itself.

marsbitHace 40 min(s)

STRC Falls Below $80, Can Conservative Investors Still Buy the Dip?

marsbitHace 40 min(s)

Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Their Names?

**Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Names?** In the crypto world, changing a project's name is common—over 16% of projects have done so, including major ones like Polygon (formerly Matic Network). This contrasts sharply with traditional businesses, which fiercely protect brand equity. The core reason is that in crypto, brand loyalty is often weak. Users are frequently investors, airdrop hunters, or yield seekers, not traditional consumers. A name associated with price crashes, hacks, or failed narratives becomes a liability, not an asset. Renaming can be a strategic reset to shed this baggage. Name changes serve as a potent marketing tool. They can signal a genuine pivot in strategy or scope (e.g., EthSign dropping "Eth" as it expanded). However, they are often used to "narrative surf," rebranding to align with hot trends like AI, RWA, or the metaverse (e.g., Elrond → MultiversX). Critically, renaming is also a PR tactic to distance a project from past failures like security breaches (e.g., Anyswap → Multichain). The most significant risk emerges when a name change is coupled with a token migration or swap. This process can allow projects to reset exchange price charts, erase visible historical downtrends, and create an illusion of a fresh start. It often facilitates liquidity resets, where low float can be exploited for pumps. More alarmingly, migrations sometimes mask overhauls to tokenomics, introducing substantial new token supply through "ecosystem funds" or "node rewards," effectively diluting existing holders. The fundamental issue isn't renaming itself, which can be valid for strategic evolution. The problem is when it functions as an escape from history—a way to avoid accountability for past mistakes, failed promises, and poor performance. When a project announces a rebrand, the critical questions are: What tangible new capability or strategy does it represent? Has the tokenomics changed? And what part of its past is it most trying to make users forget?

marsbitHace 46 min(s)

Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Their Names?

marsbitHace 46 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片