一文探讨Filecoin铸造机制及其对流通供应的影响

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2024-05-07Actualizado a 2024-05-07

Resumen

到2040年,进入流通的Filecoin数量将远远少于2B的理论最大代币供应量。

原文来源:Filecoin Network

一文探讨Filecoin铸造机制及其对流通供应的影响

要点 

  • 若保持历史最高加载率和更新率(一种激进的原始字节加载增长场景),到 2040 年进入流通的 Filecoin 预计总供应量为 1.27 BFIL。

  • 若加载量低于历史每日最高峰值,总供应量将会降低,这很有可能发生,毕竟在未来 16 年持续保持这一水平较为困难。例如,若当前的加载率保持不变,到 2040 年进入流通的 Filecoin 预计总供应量为 1.05 BFIL。

  • 综上所述,到 2040 年,进入流通的 Filecoin 数量将远远少于2B的理论最大代币供应量。

导言

Filecoin 采用混合铸造模型来鼓励持续且长期的存储供应。混合铸造模型结合了简单铸造和基线铸造,使区块奖励排放与存储目标保持一致。这使得 Filecoin 网络能够根据存储提供者向网络提供的效用(即存储能力)按比例进行激励。

在混合铸造模型中,一部分铸造奖励来自指数衰减(简单铸币),其余部分来自网络基线铸币。当原值算率(以下简称 RBP)高于基线时,基线铸币会呈指数衰减,但当低于基线时,会减慢至多项式衰减。当 RBP 达到或超过基线存储目标时,这种机制能让网络发放最大可能的奖励。基准存储容量的目标是每年将网络存储容量翻一番。

可视化自适应铸造

由于铸造是自适应的,因此直观了解已铸造的 Filecoin 量以及与可铸造上下限的比较情况,会很有帮助。若 RBP 达到或超过基线函数,则将达到上限;若仅进行简单铸造,则会达到下限。图 1 直观地展示了这些界限:

一文探讨Filecoin铸造机制及其对流通供应的影响

不同加载配置的铸币轨迹。粉色线表示若仅激活简单铸造,将开采的 FIL 数量(下限);深蓝色线表示若 RBP 与未来基线(理论上限)匹配,将开采的 FIL 总量;浅蓝色线表示若网络 RBP 加载率和更新率分别维持在历史最高值(约 62 PiB/天和 100% 更新率)(高增长率),将开采的 FIL 数量;散列红线表示在当前加载率和更新率保持不变(分别为 4 PiB/天和约 50% 的更新率)的情况下,将开采的 FIL 数量。

注意,由于铸造是自适应的,未来开采总量取决于一些假定加载行为(详见下文注释 1)。该网络计算器可用于探索未来加载和更新的不同场景,以及这将如何影响 Filecoin 网络预计铸造的 FIL 总量。您可以尝试以交互方式探索,了解 Filecoin 铸造的不同场景。

对 FDV 的影响

这意味着什么?我们可以看到,在分配的可开采 1.1 BFIL 代币中,到 2040 年,实际可开采的代币数量最多是 0.953 BFIL 代币。具体数量将取决于未来的加载行为,但上限为 0.953 B。目前 RBP 的加载量约为 4 PiB/天,SP 更新了约 50% 扇区。若保持这一轨迹,到 2040 年, 0.953 B 可开采代币中只有 62% 将被开采。另一种情况是,若加载量增长到历史最高值 62 PiB/天,SP 对其扇区进行了 100% 的更新,那么到 2040 年,将有 85% 的可开采代币被开采(详见下文注释 2)。如果将其与可供开采的 1.1 BFIL 代币总量相比,这种影响会更加明显。在这种情况下,若维持当前的加载轨迹,到 2040 年,分配用于开采的代币总量只有 54.3% 会被开采。若加载人数增长并维持历史最高值,到 2040 年, 1.1 B 代币总数中将有 73.9% 被开采。

我们也可以从总供应量角度来看这个问题。下表显示了三种情况下按日期预测的总供应量,其中所有未来铸造都是:①简单铸造,②基于当前加载和更新的持续性,③基于历史最高加载和更新的持续性。在此,我们将总供应量定义为:总供应量=铸币+续存-消耗。请注意与流通供应量的对比,流通供应量的定义为:流通供应量=总供应量-锁定量。

一文探讨Filecoin铸造机制及其对流通供应的影响

各种铸造场景下 Filecoin 的预测总供应量(以十亿 FIL 为单位)(截至 2024 年 4 月 10 日)。

这对 Filecoin 的流通供应意味着什么?Filecoin 最多可以铸造2B FIL,但实际流通的 FIL 数量将远低于此。若保持当前的加载轨迹不变,到 2040 年,最多将有 1.05 B 代币进入市场流通。若 RBP 的加载和更新增长到历史最大值并保持这一水平,那么到 2040 年,最多将有 1.27 BFil 代币进入流通(详见下文注释 3)。

结论

综上,我们探讨了 Filecoin 铸造机制及其对流通供应的影响。通过使用一些界限作为比较点,我们发现到 2040 年,FIL 代币流通总量的实际上限可能在 1.05 B 到 1.27 BFIL 之间,低于规范中规定的2B FIL。这意味着到 2040 年,在“维持现状”和“保持激进”原始字节增长的情景下,代币总供应量分别比理论上限少 47.5% 到 36.5% 。

相关注释

1.无论网络算力高于还是低于基线,在无限遥远的未来,开采总量将渐近达到 1.1 B。然而,当低于基线时,达到该渐近值的速度要慢得多。因此,选择未来某个有限时间作为目标会更有参考价值,例如我们示例中的 2040 年,这两个预测值差异很大。关于聚焦有限未来时间的重要性的更多详细信息,请参阅此说明

2.到 2040 年可开采的代币数量可能约为 0.953 B 代币。这低于规范中规定的 1.1 B 代币,因为基线铸造机制已经在网络 RBP 小于基线的时间段内生效。

3.这些预测考虑了 Gas 消耗,并在模拟窗口中进行了线性推断。未来 gas 消耗趋势的潜在变化或协议变化将改变这些预测。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Stablecoin Salaries: Why Are They Becoming the First Choice for Cross-Border Workers?

Stablecoin Salaries: Why They're Becoming the Top Choice for Global Remote Workers The traditional global salary system carries hidden exchange rate risks for freelancers in countries like India, Argentina, and Turkey who earn in USD but spend in local currencies. When salaries are instantly converted to local currency, workers lose purchasing power if that currency depreciates against the dollar. For instance, an Indian designer converting a $2000 monthly salary to rupees lost over 10% in purchasing power last year due to the rupee's decline. Holding even a portion of income in USD or USD-pegged stablecoins can preserve value. Stablecoins offer a solution by breaking down barriers to holding dollars. Opening foreign USD bank accounts is difficult, and international wire transfers incur high fees (averaging 6.5%) and delays. In contrast, stablecoin transfers are fast and low-cost. Furthermore, many countries with high inflation and depreciating currencies restrict citizens' access to foreign currency. Self-custody stablecoin wallets enable workers to hold dollar-equivalent assets without needing bank approval, bypassing these limits. These wallets integrate multiple functions: they allow users to convert only what's needed for daily expenses into local currency, keep the remainder in stablecoins, connect to on-chain lending or yield products, and even link to payment cards for direct spending. While challenges remain—such as the lack of deposit insurance and evolving regulatory frameworks—the trend is clear. Reports indicate a growing preference for USD or stablecoin payments among freelancers in high-inflation countries. This shift represents a fundamental restructuring of salary functions: payment currency, asset storage, yield generation, spending, and cross-border flow. It offers the freedom and flexibility that are core to money's purpose, signaling a profound change in the global financial landscape.

Foresight NewsHace 2 min(s)

Stablecoin Salaries: Why Are They Becoming the First Choice for Cross-Border Workers?

Foresight NewsHace 2 min(s)

Don't Just Focus on Layoffs, The New Structure of the Ethereum Foundation is More Worthy of Appreciation

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has undergone a significant organizational restructuring, with the most notable change being a strategic refocusing of its priorities rather than just a 20% staff reduction (approximately 54 people). The new structure clearly prioritizes the Protocol and Access layers, which now comprise the largest teams (57 and 34 people, respectively). This signals EF's intent to concentrate its core resources on fundamental, hard-to-outsource aspects of Ethereum: protocol evolution, security, privacy, client development, and the foundational access layer. Key areas within the Protocol layer, led by an architecture group including Vitalik Buterin and Justin Drake, receive heightened emphasis. These include post-quantum security, zkEVM, formal verification, and long-term roadmap development ("Strawmap"). This reflects a shift towards tackling complex, interdependent challenges like scalability, privacy, and future-proofing the protocol, potentially moving from a pure "redundant security" multi-client model towards more specialized clients aided by AI-assisted formal verification. Financially, EF's budget is being reduced by approximately 40%. The goal is to transition from spending about 15% of its remaining funds annually to a more sustainable 5% rate, akin to a long-term endowment, ensuring its longevity. Concurrently, the restructuring involves pushing certain responsibilities—such as application development, adoption, and ecosystem coordination—to external organizations like EthLabs, the Ethereum Apps Guild, and others. This "multi-node" model aims to increase ecosystem resilience by decentralizing functions beyond the EF, though it introduces new coordination challenges. In essence, the reorganization represents EF consciously narrowing its scope to focus on the hardest, most critical protocol-level problems while fostering a more distributed and sustainable ecosystem structure for Ethereum's future growth.

Foresight NewsHace 30 min(s)

Don't Just Focus on Layoffs, The New Structure of the Ethereum Foundation is More Worthy of Appreciation

Foresight NewsHace 30 min(s)

Report Analysis: What Is Coherent Planning as CPO Booms?

Title: Report Interpretation: What Moves Is Coherent Making Amid the CPO Boom? Summary: JP Morgan analyst Samik Chatterjee reiterates an Overweight rating on Coherent (COHR), citing undervalued growth potential across three core areas: data center optical transceivers, co-packaged optics (CPO) chips, and industrial lasers/thermal management. COHR's 1.6T data center transceivers are in high demand, with pricing remaining firm. The rise of CPO is seen not as a threat but as a catalyst, creating higher demand for sophisticated optical components, an area where COHR holds a competitive edge with its comprehensive portfolio (lasers, isolators, VCSELs, thermoelectric coolers). Each CPO chip offers significantly greater revenue potential than traditional transceivers. Furthermore, its Optical Circuit Switch (OCS) technology targets a potential $4B market with reliability and power advantages. The company is expanding its InP (Indium Phosphide) device capacity fourfold within two years, securing substrate supply and transitioning to more cost-effective 6-inch wafers. As one of only two major suppliers of high-quality pump lasers—currently in severe shortage—COHR can now move up the value chain from components to complete line cards/systems, boosting ASP over tenfold. Gross margin targets (>42%) may be revised upward due to high-end product premiums, cost improvements from the wafer transition, and contributions from new high-margin products like CPO and OCS. Its efficient thermadite thermal material also offers long-term growth. Industrial segment revenue grows at a steady 5-10%, supported by semiconductor equipment orders. Changes in Apple's Face ID protocol present a re-competition opportunity for 3D sensing. Overall, Coherent is positioned as a key infrastructure provider, with AI-driven compute demand fueling the need for high-speed optical interconnectivity. Growth from CPO/OCS, stable industrial performance, and margin improvement support the bullish thesis. *Disclaimer: This summary interprets a third-party analyst report from JP Morgan. It does not constitute investment advice.*

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

Report Analysis: What Is Coherent Planning as CPO Booms?

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

Dan Koe's New Article: Escape the Fate of the Wage Slave, How to Survive in the Tide of AI Replacement?

Dan Koe's article argues that the real threat in the AI era is not technology itself, but financial dependency on employers. He critiques the "wage slavery" of unfulfilling work and identifies five core skills for resilience: agency, taste, persuasion, persistence, and iteration. These are developed not by consuming content, but by starting your own venture. The key to escaping the "employee mindset" is a radical identity shift. This requires: 1) Drastically changing your environment and daily inputs, 2) Choosing a creative medium (like content or code) that provides real-world feedback through trial and error, and 3) Using that feedback to learn and adapt. Koe strongly advocates for content creation over coding for beginners, as it builds irreplaceable subjective taste and audience connection. The practical starting point is a 15-minute self-inquiry to define your "life's work." Answer: What do you know deeply? What innate abilities do you have? What childhood interests were suppressed? Then, identify your contrarian beliefs—what does the mainstream get wrong in your area? The overlap is your unique direction. The final, non-negotiable step is to publish your first piece of content tomorrow. Embrace that it will be bad; the goal is to enter the feedback loop of creation, learning, and iteration, which is the true path to independence.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Dan Koe's New Article: Escape the Fate of the Wage Slave, How to Survive in the Tide of AI Replacement?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

After Laying Off 20% of Staff, What Are the Key Points of EF's New Structure?

Following the completion of a months-long organizational restructuring, the Ethereum Foundation (EF) announced a 20% workforce reduction (approximately 54 employees) on June 23rd. It reorganized its teams into five new core clusters: Protocol, Access, User, Community, and Institutional (plus Operations/Management support units). Officially, this move implements the EF's 2026 Mandate and 2025 Treasury Management Policy, aiming to create a more focused and "self-sovereign" organization. The restructuring prioritizes the CROPS principles—Censorship Resistance, Openness & Freedom, Privacy, and Security—as foundational organizational tenets. The Protocol cluster will focus on core protocol R&D, including MEV reduction and zkEVM. The Access cluster emphasizes preserving user "zero option" for non-custodial, permissionless interaction. The User, Community, and Institutional clusters will manage external engagement, with the latter handling institutional and regulatory matters. While offering enhanced severance and transition support for affected employees, the EF did not disclose budget allocations or specific KPIs for the new clusters. This has led to market uncertainty about the impact on project funding and development priorities. Analysts note the announcement's positive tone of mission focus contrasts with a backdrop of recent EF leadership changes and broader ecosystem pressures. The true impact—whether this signifies strategic realignment or reactive contraction—will become clearer as the new structure's resource allocation and project prioritization are revealed in the coming months.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

After Laying Off 20% of Staff, What Are the Key Points of EF's New Structure?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片