2025: The Great Historical Shift of Web3

marsbitPublicado a 2025-12-30Actualizado a 2025-12-30

Resumen

By 2025, Web3 has transitioned from an infrastructure-focused era to an application-driven one, marking the end of its "adolescence." Key enablers include significantly improved blockchain performance (3400+ TPS), near-zero transaction costs, and clearer regulatory frameworks in regions like the U.S. and Hong Kong. This shift allows real economic value to move from network layers to applications, with three core use cases emerging: 1) **Assets**: Stablecoins, RWA, and on-chain payments form the largest adoption gateway, enabling fast global settlements and real-yield distribution. 2) **Markets**: Platforms like Hyperliquid and Solana now drive 53% of transactional volume, fueling liquidity and infrastructure optimization. 3) **Compute & Coordination**: Blockchain empowers AI through decentralized computation, model verification, and data traceability, positioning crypto as an AI coordination layer. Industry experts (a16z, IOSG, 1kx) confirm that constraints have lifted, allowing product value and real-world business models to take center stage. The application era of Web3 has begun.

Author: K,Researcher at Web3Caff Research

Cover: Photo by Motion Lady on Unsplash

In 2025, the entire industry has finally crossed a watershed moment that no one can pretend not to see: from a decade dominated by infrastructure to a decade driven by applications. You can understand this as the "end of adolescence" for Web3—the era of rapid growth, rebellion, competing forcomputing power, competing for TPS, competing for cross-chain, and competing for ZK has passed; the products that can truly make ordinary users willing to pay, stay, and participate are just beginning.

This shift is not just rhetoric; the underlying conditions have truly matured for the first time. a16z made this clear in "State of Crypto 2025": the processing capacity of mainstream chains has increased from "a few TPS" a few years ago to 3400+ TPS today, with fees dropping from twenty dollars to a few cents or even less than a penny. [1] In other words, the chain is no longer the bottleneck, technology no longer a barrier for entrepreneurs, and it no longer blocks users. In other words, the infrastructure of the public chain era is sufficiently mature, and the next decade is truly worth investing in application implementation, public goods, open source tools, and structured financing.

One of the important backgrounds supporting the industry's gradual entry into the application exploration phase is the relative clarity of the policy environment at a certain stage. For example, as the United States and Hong Kong, China, gradually form clearer policy paths on key issues such as crypto asset regulation, stablecoin frameworks, and compliant custody, institutions, developers, and infrastructure providers have begun to reassess the long-term feasibility of blockchain applications. This clarity does not come from a single policy shift but is reflected in a series of institutional discussions, regulatory practices, and legislative processes, reaching a stage of consensus on "the space for innovation under compliant conditions." In such an environment, capital allocation rhythms have begun to warm up, and basic modules such as compliant stablecoins, payment rails, custody, and clearing are gradually meeting the conditions for large-scale implementation, also providing realistic soil for richer application forms.

The author specifically reminds: Stablecoins are virtual currencies (Tokens), and please be aware that issuing and participating in the investment of Tokens has different and often stringent regulatory requirements and restrictions in different countries and regions. Especially in Mainland China, issuing Tokens may constitute "illegal securities issuance," and providing Token trading matching and other cryptocurrency-related trading activities also fall under "illegal financial activities" (Readers from Mainland China are strongly advised to read "Summary and Key Points of Laws and Regulations Related to Blockchain and Virtual Currency in Mainland China"). Therefore, please do not use this information for related decision-making, and please strictly comply with the laws and regulations of your country and region, and do not participate in any illegal financial activities.

When the policy environment no longer constitutes a major source of uncertainty and the performance constraints of infrastructure continue to decrease, changes within the industry also become apparent, and the real change occurs: revenue begins to shift from the network layer to the application layer. a16z clearly marked this trend with the concept of "Real Economic Value"—measuring the success of a chain no longer depends on its ecosystem story but on whether users are willing to engage in real economic activities on it. [1]

Against this background, we finally see the three core uses of the Web3 industry in 2025 fully blossoming (Editor's note: Blockchain technology has a wide range of applications and can be applied to many real-world fields, with the core being to solve trust, collaboration, and rights confirmation issues, mainly including: finance and payment (cross-border settlement, clearing and settlement), assets and property rights (real estate, equity, intellectual property rights confirmation and transfer), supply chain and manufacturing (traceability, anti-counterfeiting, process transparency), government and public services (electronic certificates, data sharing, voting), healthcare and education (trusted storage of medical records and academic qualifications), content and cultural creation (copyright registration, revenue sharing), and energy and Internet of Things (device collaboration, carbon data and energy trading). Therefore, the purpose of this report is only to analyze representative cases in the Web3 industry under the market changes of 2025 and is not comprehensive.):

  • First, as assets. Stablecoins, DAT, RWA, on-chain payments, and other "real asset layers" are becoming the largest entry points for规模化应用 (Adoption). Stablecoins form the world's fastest dollar clearing network, on-chain payments are being reinvented, and RWA introduces traditional yields into the blockchain, making the chain a layer for "distributing real yields";

  • Second, as markets. Hyperliquid and Solana now account for 53% of the全网收入性交易量 (revenue-generating transaction volume across the network), indicating that high-frequency trading, contracts, and prediction markets are becoming new economic engines. Price discovery markets are not by-products but core forces driving liquidity, promoting infrastructure optimization, and cultivating user culture;

  • Third, as a computation and coordination network. Blockchain is finally beginning to empower AI, rather than waiting for AI to empower Web3. From verifying computations, model ownership, data traceability to decentralized inference networks, on-chain assets are taking shape as an "AI coordination layer." Previously, we discussed "what the chain can do"; now we discuss "what AI can do on the chain."

This also explains why Jiawei Zhu of IOSG said: "The glorious era of infrastructure is over, and we have undoubtedly entered the application era." [2] Peter Pan of 1kx also gave the same judgment: the application layer investment cycle was immature in the past seven years, but the next seven years will be completely different because, against the backdrop of continuously improving technical capabilities and gradually clarifying regulatory environments, the external constraints facing application innovation are significantly easing. [3]

So the key in 2025 is not "whether applications will come," but "applications finally have the soil to be born." The chains are fast enough, the fees are low enough, regulations have been loosened, and users' attention has returned. The past decade was preparation for today; the next decade will be the era when various real business models truly run on the chain. Infrastructure will not disappear, but it will no longer be the narrative center; from now on, everything must return to the product value itself.

The application era of Web3 is not coming; it has already begun.

This content is excerpted from the research report published by Web3Caff Research: "Web3 2025 Annual 40,000-Word Report (Part 1): Facing the Historical Convergence of Finance × Computing × Internet Order, Is the Great Industry Shift About to Begin? A Panoramic Analysis of Its Structural Changes, Value Potential, Risk Boundaries, and Future Prospects"

This research report (now open for free reading) was written by Web3Caff Research researcher K, systematically梳理 (sorting out) the core logic of the development stage changes of Web3 in 2025, focusing on discussing why application exploration and system collaboration are gradually becoming new focuses against the backdrop of the continuous evolution of底层 (underlying) and regulatory capabilities. The key points include:

  1. Background of Stage Evolution: The internal reasons for the change in industry focus after the completion of infrastructure construction;

  2. Key Mechanism Changes: The impact of gradually clearer rule frameworks and on-chain mechanisms on system operation methods;

  3. Main Application Directions: Exploration paths围绕 (centered around) payment settlement, real-world scenario mapping, and programmable collaboration;

  4. Future Development Directions: Discussing the evolution trend of Web3 in 2026 and beyond.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat major shift is the Web3 industry experiencing in 2025 according to the article?

AThe industry is shifting from an infrastructure-dominated era to an application-driven era, marking the end of its 'adolescence' where the focus was on raw performance like computing power and TPS.

QWhat key reason does a16z's 'State of Crypto 2025' report give for this shift being possible?

AMainstream blockchains have significantly improved, with processing capacity increasing from a few TPS to over 3400 TPS, and transaction fees dropping from dollars to fractions of a cent, removing technical barriers for builders and users.

QWhat are the three core uses of Web3 that are now fully blossoming in 2025?

A1. As an asset layer (stablecoins, DAT, RWA, on-chain payments). 2. As a market (high-frequency trading, contracts, prediction markets). 3. As a computation and coordination network (empowering AI with verification, model ownership, data traceability).

QHow has the policy environment contributed to this new phase of Web3 development?

APolicies in regions like the US and Hong Kong have provided clearer regulatory paths for crypto assets, stablecoins, and compliant custody, creating a consensus on 'innovation within compliance' and reducing uncertainty for institutions and developers.

QWhat is the new primary measure of a blockchain's success, as indicated by the concept of 'Real Economic Value'?

ASuccess is no longer measured by its ecosystem narrative, but by whether users are willing to engage in real economic activities on it, signifying a move of revenue from the network layer to the application layer.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

Michael Burry, the famed "Big Short" investor, has once again captured Wall Street's attention with a series of short positions against major tech and semiconductor stocks, most notably Nvidia. In late June and July, through his "Cassandra Unchained" newsletter, Burry disclosed short bets against Nvidia, Tesla, Applied Materials, Caterpillar, the SOXX semiconductor ETF, and later, Micron Technology. His core thesis revolves around potential distortions in the AI infrastructure boom, specifically questioning whether extended depreciation schedules (e.g., 6 years vs. a realistic 2-3 years for AI chips) by cloud giants like Microsoft and Google artificially inflate profits. He also raises concerns about possible "off-balance-sheet circular financing," where chip demand might be propped up by vendor-backed funding to clients. Nvidia's stock experienced volatility following these disclosures, briefly dipping but largely holding near Burry's reported entry points, leaving his positions roughly flat or slightly underwater as of late July. This move is part of a pattern for Burry, whose track record since his legendary 2008 bet is mixed. He has faced notable losses, such as on Tesla in 2021, while scoring on broader market turns like the 2020 pandemic crash. His methodology focuses intensely on free cash flow and scrutinizing original financial documents to spot overvaluation and structural risks, but it often struggles with timing the market. The article contrasts Burry's stance with other prominent investors. Steve Eisman, another "Big Short" figure, is not shorting Nvidia, citing strong fundamentals but expressing nervousness about sustainability. Jim Chanos agrees with the broad "accounting mismatch" concern—comparing it to the dot-com bubble—but targets financial leverage in private equity firms rather than the chip stocks themselves. While Nvidia's short interest remains relatively low at 1.3-1.4% of float, the massive stock size means absolute short losses have been significant, exceeding $5 billion earlier this year. The piece concludes that for ordinary investors, the key takeaway is not replicating specific short bets but learning from the critical frameworks these investors use: questioning rosy accounting, identifying structural vulnerabilities, and maintaining skepticism during market euphoria, even if pinpointing the exact catalyst for a downturn remains elusive.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

PANews Weekly Digest: Market Turmoil, Tech Breakthroughs, and Crypto Developments. The week saw significant volatility across global markets. South Korea's KOSPI index experienced extreme turbulence, including multiple trading halts, largely driven by sharp declines in AI hardware stocks like SK Hynix. In contrast, China's Changxin Xinqiao (CXC) achieved a landmark IPO with a market cap surpassing 4 trillion yuan, marking a major success for the domestic DRAM industry after a decade of losses. In the crypto and Web3 space, several key narratives emerged. AI is driving demand for new infrastructure, with projects like AI agent wallets and programmable payments gaining traction, attracting interest from firms like Coinbase. The Bitcoin mining sector is pivoting, with companies like MARA focusing on energy management as electricity becomes a core AI-era asset. Meanwhile, the RWA (Real World Assets) sector faces a "utilization puzzle," with hundreds of billions in on-chain assets remaining dormant. Notable market movements included a historic single-day surge of over 17% for the KOSPI index and a significant migration of $16.5 billion in staked ETH within the Lido ecosystem. Michael Saylor announced a target to re-peg the STRC stablecoin around September 8th. Other highlights include discussions on Ethereum's ambitious 2030 roadmap for scaling and privacy, analysis showing high protocol revenues not always translating to token price gains, and warnings from Citi about potential extreme commodity price shocks by late 2026.

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

In late July 2026, five major US tech giants—Alphabet, Intel, Microsoft, Meta, and Apple—released their Q2 earnings reports. While all companies exceeded revenue and profit expectations, driven by strong AI-related business growth, investor reactions diverged sharply due to concerns over escalating AI capital expenditures (capex) and their impact on free cash flow. Alphabet reported strong revenue growth and a surging cloud business, but its stock fell after announcing a doubled year-on-year capex and negative quarterly free cash flow for the first time. Intel posted its strongest revenue growth in over 15 years, but its stock experienced volatile trading after significantly raising its full-year capex guidance. Microsoft saw its stock surge after beating estimates and, crucially, lowering its capex forecast while projecting positive free cash flow. Meta faced the most severe sell-off as its profits declined despite revenue beats, with free cash flow plunging over 90% and its capex guidance raised. Apple reported record June-quarter results, but its stock plummeted after providing Q4 revenue guidance that fell short of expectations, citing supply chain constraints and forex headwinds. The overall takeaway is that the market's focus has shifted from validating AI demand to scrutinizing the timeline for returns on massive AI investments. Companies demonstrating a clearer path to managing capex and preserving free cash flow, like Microsoft, were rewarded, while those signaling continued aggressive spending faced investor skepticism.

Odaily星球日报Hace 36 min(s)

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

Odaily星球日报Hace 36 min(s)

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

This article, "From Companies to DAOs: How DUNA Could Become the Next Organizational Form," traces the 500-year evolution of business collaboration. It begins with medieval structures like the *commenda* and Florentine *compagnia*, which exposed partners to personal risk. The modern corporation, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), was a revolutionary leap, enabling large-scale, capital-intensive ventures by offering limited liability and reducing coordination costs. However, corporations introduced new challenges like principal-agent problems and bureaucratic overhead. The piece argues that software and internet-native protocols are now reducing these traditional overheads. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerged as a new model for coordination without centralized management. Yet, DAOs face a significant legal vacuum: they lack legal recognition, leaving members exposed to unlimited personal liability, and their tokens are vulnerable to being classified as securities under unclear regulations (e.g., the Howey Test). This has forced projects into suboptimal workarounds like offshore foundations. The article identifies the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) as a potential solution. Recently legalized in states like Wyoming, the DUNA provides a legal wrapper for decentralized networks. It grants key protections—legal personality, limited liability, and perpetual existence—to a group without imposing a traditional hierarchical management structure. This allows token-holder communities to govern, hold assets, and contract as a single legal entity, aligning with their decentralized nature. While DUNA doesn't solve all governance challenges or magically resolve securities law questions, it represents a crucial step. It fills the legal recognition gap, offering a native legal form for internet-scale, decentralized collaboration and extending the separation of personal risk from organizational venture into a new domain.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片