SignalPlus宏观分析特别版：势不可挡

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2024-02-29Actualizado a 2024-02-29

Resumen

正当人们开始担心当前的风险反弹可能会泡沫化时，Bitcoin 在24小时内从5.7万美元急升至6.4万美元左右，2月预计将成为BTC自2020年12月以来表现最佳的月份，涨幅超过40%。

正当人们开始担心当前的风险反弹可能会泡沫化时，Bitcoin 在 24 小时内从 5.7 万美元急升至 6.4 万美元左右， 2 月预计将成为 BTC 自 2020 年 12 月以来表现最佳的月份，涨幅超过 40% ，而随著 FOMO 热潮蔓延，现货 ETF 的交易量也激增至 76.9 亿美元，远远超过首个交易日 46.6 亿美元的纪录。

SignalPlus宏观分析特别版：势不可挡

美国的散户交易活动非常活跃，以至于 Coinbase 网站一度出现事故，客户余额显示为 0 ，并导致价格在几分钟内从 6.4 万左右突然暴跌 5% + 至约 5.9 万美元。Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong 在 X 上承认了这次平台事故，并重申投资者余额是安全的，他们还没准备好应对流量突然增加 10 倍以上，导致大范围的交易中断。

SignalPlus宏观分析特别版：势不可挡

Bitcoin 的抛物线走势促使一些宏观观察家对当前宽松的金融形势发表意见，并质疑美联储当前倾向宽松背后的理由。值得注意的是，许多其他资产类别也都出现了类似的历史新高，因此当前“财富效应”并不仅限于加密货币。

SignalPlus宏观分析特别版：势不可挡

在市场弥漫著风险偏好情绪之际，花旗提出了一个有趣的问题：“钱”是从哪里来的？传统的 M 2 流动性指标仍保持在 2023 年的水平，而全球量化紧缩 (QT) 持续不减，央行资产负债表预计到年底将从 7, 600 亿美元的峰值缩减至约 5, 600 亿美元，因此，与过去十年的零利率政策/量化宽松时代不同，当前资产价格的上涨并不是由宽松的央行货币政策所推动的。

SignalPlus宏观分析特别版：势不可挡

此外，有些令人意外的是，尽管市场风险情绪高涨，货币市场帐户持有的现金量却突破了 6 万亿美元，创下历史新高，且每月的资产管理规模也持续上升。如果所有的一切都在上涨，包括股票、信贷、加密货币甚至是现金，那么新的资金究竟是从哪里来的？

SignalPlus宏观分析特别版：势不可挡

股票市场不是零和游戏，财富效应可以通过 GDP 产出或技术生产力（AI）的扩张来创造，但股票价格以如此快的速度上涨、且几乎没有回撤的情况仍属罕见。自 10 月低点以来，SPX 上涨了超过 20% （年化超过 40% ！），且实际波动率 (RV) 处于历史低点，这与 Bitcoin 从 4 万上涨至 6.3 万美元时显著增加的波动率形成了鲜明对比。

SignalPlus宏观分析特别版：势不可挡

正如花旗在其报告中所得出的结论，唯一可以看到流动性被撤出的地方是逆回购余额的下降（导致美联储开始讨论量化紧缩的放缓），以及美国政府不断扩大的财政赤字。然而，逆回购余额的下降（$ 1.5 万亿）和财政赤字的上升（$ 1.8 万亿）仍然远远落后于股票市值的上涨（$ 5.5 万亿），甚至还没考虑到信贷市场的表现以及加密货币市场戏剧性的增长（+$ 0.7 万亿）。目前，除了 EPS/经济前景/估值倍数扩张等自然增长因素之外，我们还没有满意的答案，无论如何，这确实是一次值得载入史册的历史性反弹，让我们尽情地享受这段时光。

SignalPlus宏观分析特别版：势不可挡

您可在 ChatGPT 4.0 的 Plugin Store 搜索 SignalPlus ，获取实时加密资讯。如果想即时收到我们的更新，欢迎关注我们的推特账号@SignalPlus_Web3 ，或者加入我们的微信群（添加小助手微信：SignalPlus 123）、Telegram 群以及 Discord 社群，和更多朋友一起交流互动。

SignalPlus Official Website：https://www.signalplus.com

Lecturas Relacionadas

Commerce Ministry's Latest Export Controls Target 10 US Companies: Three Market-Moving Threads Explained

China's Ministry of Commerce placed 10 U.S. entities, including MP Materials, USA Rare Earth, Red Cat Holdings, and Teal Drones, on an export control list, banning the export of dual-use items. This move is seen as part of an ongoing countermeasure in the rare earth sector. The analysis suggests the primary impact is on U.S. companies within the **military, drone, and rare earth** sectors, aiming to restrict their access to critical Chinese materials and technology. For the Chinese market, the event is interpreted as reinforcing the **strategic value and pricing power** of domestic rare earth suppliers. However, the potential stock market reactions are nuanced: 1. **Chinese Rare Earth Upstream:** Companies like Northern Rare Earth are near yearly highs, indicating this event's "beneficiary" logic is largely priced in. It may confirm the trend but is unlikely to be a new major catalyst. 2. **Chinese Rare Earth Mid/Downstream & Drones:** Sectors like magnetic materials (e.g., Da Di Bear, Zhenghai Magnetic) and military drones (e.g., China Aerospace) are relatively undervalued. While the drone listing highlights sectoral competition, it doesn't directly translate to new orders for Chinese firms. 3. **Impact on Listed U.S. Companies:** The effect on stocks like MP Materials is ambiguous. While Chinese restrictions pose a challenge, these companies are also core to U.S. supply chain security efforts and may receive increased government support, potentially offsetting negative impacts. Their pre-announcement stock prices did not indicate panic selling. In summary, the export controls strengthen China's position in the global rare earth supply chain but have uneven effects across related stock market segments, with upstream Chinese gains likely priced in and downstream/drone sectors receiving more indirect, sentiment-driven attention. The outcome for the targeted U.S. stocks depends on the balance between restriction impacts and potential compensatory U.S. policy support.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Commerce Ministry's Latest Export Controls Target 10 US Companies: Three Market-Moving Threads Explained

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Loss Exceeds $7.5 Million: Analysis of the Honeypot Attack Targeting MEV Bot and Tracking of Stolen Funds

On June 21, Jaredfromsubway.eth, one of Ethereum's most active MEV bots, suffered a sophisticated honeypot attack, losing over $7.5 million in crypto assets. Attackers deployed a complex contract system, including a coordinator, trigger, and fake token/pair contracts, to exploit the bot's arbitrage logic. The core attack trick involved baiting the bot with transactions: small trades appeared normal and consumed token approvals, while larger trades preserved these approvals by using fake swaps. This left the bot with large, unused approvals for assets like USDC, USDT, and WETH. The attacker then drained these approvals in a final step. The stolen funds—$2.87M USDC, $2.04M USDT, and 1,474 WETH—were consolidated and partially laundered through Tornado Cash. This incident highlights that MEV bots must not rely solely on simulated profits for security. Extra caution is required with unfamiliar contracts or custom wrappers in arbitrage paths, and post-transaction allowance checks are strongly recommended.

marsbitHace 34 min(s)

Loss Exceeds $7.5 Million: Analysis of the Honeypot Attack Targeting MEV Bot and Tracking of Stolen Funds

marsbitHace 34 min(s)

Channel Dividends Are Dwindling, What Can DeFi Protocols Rely on to Resist Giants' Harvesting?

As the era of channel-driven growth ends, major tech giants like Coinbase, Stripe, and Kraken are vertically integrating by acquiring or building core infrastructure, capturing profits from underlying protocols. For instance, Coinbase leverages its Base blockchain to earn sequencing fees from protocols like Morpho, while Stripe acquired Bridge to internalize stablecoin yields, and Kraken bought NinjaTrader for derivatives licenses. This trend creates a power imbalance: entities controlling distribution channels can extract value from open-source DeFi protocols. However, protocols are developing a defense through multi-chain expansion. Examples like Morpho (with significant TVL on Ethereum and Base) and Uniswap (dominant across many chains) show that by deploying across multiple blockchains, protocols reduce dependency on any single chain operator, making them costly and risky to replace. The article argues that the future landscape will be shaped by the race between institutional vertical integration and protocol horizontal, multi-chain scaling. Protocols that embed themselves deeply across ecosystems and become indispensable due to high switching costs are most likely to survive and thrive amidst this consolidation.

Foresight NewsHace 52 min(s)

Channel Dividends Are Dwindling, What Can DeFi Protocols Rely on to Resist Giants' Harvesting?

Foresight NewsHace 52 min(s)

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

Uniswap v4's Hook mechanism is a major innovation, enabling custom logic injection into liquidity pool lifecycle events like swaps and liquidity provisioning. This transforms the AMM into programmable infrastructure, shifting the security model from protocol-level to pool-level, as each pool's safety now depends on its bound Hook contract. The core architecture revolves around the singleton PoolManager contract, which manages all pools via a flash accounting system. State changes are tracked in transient storage and must be settled by the end of a transaction. Hook contracts are permanently bound to pools via a PoolKey, with their permissions encoded directly into their address via specific low-order bits. This design introduces unique security considerations and challenges for future upgrades. Key vulnerabilities and best practices identified include: - **Access Control Gaps:** Early versions of the BaseHook abstract contract only protect `unlockCallback()`, leaving other lifecycle functions (`beforeSwap`, `afterSwap`, etc.) exposed unless explicitly secured by developers. - **Unrestricted Pool Binding:** The `initialize()` function does not validate if a Hook "consents" to a new pool. Hooks must implement their own whitelisting in `beforeInitialize` to prevent unauthorized pool creation. - **Async/Custom Curve Hooks:** These high-risk Hooks can completely replace Uniswap's swap logic. Their security depends entirely on their own implementation, as they operate outside the native protocol's pricing safeguards. - **Delta Accounting Risks:** The system ensures final balance (NonzeroDeltaCount == 0) but cannot guarantee the *correctness* of intermediate delta states, which attackers could manipulate. - **Token Confusion:** Protocols must implement semantic validation for tokens in user-created markets, not just interface checks, to prevent cross-market confusion attacks. The article emphasizes that Hook auditing requires a "sub-protocol" approach due to extended interaction chains, highlighting a significant shift in security methodology for the v4 ecosystem.

marsbitHace 59 min(s)

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

marsbitHace 59 min(s)

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

Alibaba Executive Chairman Joe Tsai recently outlined the company's comprehensive AI strategy in a public discussion. He believes AI represents a massive opportunity, estimating its potential economic impact at up to $50 trillion, stemming from the automation of human intelligence and productivity. Tsai detailed Alibaba's four-layer investment approach across the AI stack: starting from the chip level, moving to cloud infrastructure (Alibaba Cloud), then the model layer with its open-source Qwen model, and finally applications within its vast digital ecosystem (e-commerce, logistics, etc.). The company avoids the energy layer due to China's efficient infrastructure. This broad strategy is designed to ensure Alibaba captures value regardless of where it ultimately concentrates in the AI value chain. He dismissed concerns about an AI investment bubble, pointing to the enormous $50 trillion opportunity. While acknowledging U.S. cloud giants' higher capital expenditure, he argued Chinese firms, including Alibaba (funded by its cash-generative e-commerce core), need to invest more in AI infrastructure. A key theme was technological sovereignty. Tsai positioned open-source models like Qwen as a solution for companies, especially in Europe, seeking independence from proprietary U.S. models and greater data privacy control. He contrasted this with the trend of U.S. giants keeping their models closed-source. Tsai highlighted Alibaba's collaborations with European manufacturers like Bosch and Siemens, using AI for design and quality control. He concluded with an optimistic vision of AI agents enhancing productivity, ultimately freeing up human time for leisure, family, and experiences like live entertainment.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros