Spot Ether ETF Applications Decisions Delayed by SEC

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado a 2024-01-24Actualizado a 2024-01-25

Resumen

Grayscale and BlackRock are among the companies trying to bring spot ether ETFs to market.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission delayed an application by Grayscale Investments to convert its Ethereum trust product (ETHE) into an exchange-traded fund (ETF). One day earlier, the agency did the same regarding BlackRock's application for a similar vehicle.

The SEC has traditionally opposed spot crypto ETF products, only allowing a flurry of spot bitcoin ETFs to go live in the U.S. for the first time earlier in January. Thursday's delay of any decision on Grayscale's application is unsurprising, as is its delay of the BlackRock bid.

In the run-up to the SEC approving spot bitcoin ETF applications, issuers and exchanges began filing updated documents addressing various questions from the regulator. It's unclear whether the spot ethereum ETF applications have progressed to this stage.

However, this week's filings pose a number of questions for the general public to weigh in on, including one about whether a spot ethereum ETF might be similar to a spot bitcoin ETF.

"Do commenters agree that arguments to support the listing of Bitcoin ETPs apply equally to the Shares," the filing asked. "Are there particular features related to ETH and its ecosystem, including its proof of stake consensus mechanism and concentration of control or influence by a few individuals or entities, that raise unique concerns about ETH’s susceptibility to fraud and manipulation?"

STORY CONTINUES BELOW

Recommended for you:

Other questions focus on market manipulation, whether spot and futures markets are correlated and whether the CME futures market is of significant size – similar questions to those the SEC has asked about bitcoin when reviewing those applications.

Edited by Stephen Alpher.

Lecturas Relacionadas

On-chain Analyst: Why Are Most Zcash Transactions Still Traceable?

Title: Why Most Zcash Transactions Remain Traceable Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency launched in 2016, was designed to offer anonymity by hiding transaction details like sender, receiver, and amount using zero-knowledge proof technology (zk-SNARKs). However, in practice, a significant portion of ZEC transactions are still traceable on-chain. The key reason is Zcash's dual-address system. It features transparent addresses (t-addresses), which work like standard Bitcoin addresses with all data public, and shielded addresses (z-addresses) that encrypt transaction details. There are four transaction types with varying privacy levels: fully transparent (t→t), partially shielded (t→z and z→t), and fully private (z→z). Despite its privacy capabilities, most real-world Zcash activity involves transparent addresses, primarily because major exchanges and institutions use them for regulatory compliance. As a result, blockchain analytics platforms like Arkham can track and attribute a substantial volume of Zcash transactions. Arkham reports it has identified entities behind over $420 billion in ZEC transaction volume. Case studies highlight this traceability: the U.S. government holds seized Zcash from a dark web case, visible via its transparent wallet, and individual traders' profitable moves are trackable from purchase to exchange deposit. In conclusion, Zcash's privacy is not inherent but user-dependent. While purely shielded (z→z) transactions remain cryptographically private, the prevalence of transparent address usage makes much of the network's activity traceable. The actual privacy protection offered depends entirely on how users choose to transact.

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

On-chain Analyst: Why Are Most Zcash Transactions Still Traceable?

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

CoinQuant Introduces Trading Infrastructure for the Agent Economy

CoinQuant, an AI-powered no-code trading platform with over 15,000 users, is expanding its infrastructure to serve the emerging "agent economy." The company is introducing a unified trading intelligence architecture designed for both human traders and autonomous AI agents. This system acts as a trust layer, ensuring all trading strategies—whether human-created or AI-generated—undergo rigorous validation, backtesting, and risk analysis before live deployment. The core of the platform is an intelligence engine that combines institutional-grade backtesting, structured market data, AI optimization, and a proprietary Domain Expert system. Human traders interact via a natural language interface, while AI agents connect through APIs. Every validated strategy contributes to an anonymized aggregate intelligence layer. CoinQuant plans to launch an automated execution layer on HyperLiquid and is currently raising a $3 million Seed round to scale its product and infrastructure, including the development of HYDRA, a hierarchical multi-agent architecture. The company aims to become the foundational intelligence backbone for algorithmic trading in the agent-driven financial era.

TheNewsCryptoHace 50 min(s)

CoinQuant Introduces Trading Infrastructure for the Agent Economy

TheNewsCryptoHace 50 min(s)

From Power Infrastructure to Token Economy: The 'Seven-Layer Cake' of the AI Industry Chain

From Power Grid to Token Economy: The AI Industry's "Seven-Layer Cake" The AI industry is shifting from a "model-centric" paradigm focused on massive training to a "token-centric" industrial era driven by inference demand. This new phase revolves around the production, distribution, scheduling, and consumption of tokens—the units of computation used by AI agents for every interaction and task. The article proposes a "seven-layer cake" framework for the AI economy: 1. **Power**: The foundational energy source, with competition shifting to securing stable, low-cost electricity. 2. **AIDC (AI Data Centers)**: Large-scale "Token factories." A trend toward smaller, modular, and regionally deployed AI Factories is emerging for efficiency and proximity to users. 3. **GPU**: The core production hardware for tokens. While NVIDIA dominates, competition exists from AMD, ASIC makers, and Chinese chipmakers, with a growing focus on inference efficiency. 4. **LLMs**: The "engines" that generate tokens. The competition is evolving beyond model size to prioritize factors like token cost, inference efficiency, and operational synergy with infrastructure. 5. **Token Distribution**: The "grid" that allocates and rents out compute resources, led by cloud giants and specialized AI-native platforms. 6. **Token Optimization & Intelligent Scheduling**: The critical "brain" layer that intelligently routes tasks (e.g., to local, cloud, or edge models) for optimal cost, latency, and privacy—maximizing the value of each token. 7. **AI Agents & Models**: The end consumers of tokens. The vision involves billions of AI agents working and interacting concurrently, consuming vast amounts of tokens. Currently, the industry faces fragmentation and inefficiencies between these layers. The true "mass adoption era" of AI will begin only when this seven-layer infrastructure is fully integrated and operates as a cohesive, intelligent network—transforming AI from a software tool into a global industrial system spanning energy, hardware, and compute logistics.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

From Power Infrastructure to Token Economy: The 'Seven-Layer Cake' of the AI Industry Chain

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Semiconductors up 78% annually, software down 12% annually: The 'Liquidity Siphon' is playing out within tech stocks

Semiconductor ETFs like SOXX have surged 78.5% year-to-date, while software ETFs like IGV have dropped 12.5%, creating a record performance gap exceeding 90 percentage points. This reflects a major "liquidity suction" within tech stocks, with capital flooding into semiconductors as software faces selling pressure. Driving the semiconductor boom are staggering capital expenditure plans from hyperscalers like Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta, whose combined 2026 capex is projected near $700 billion. This fuels demand for chips, with companies like SanDisk (up 426%), Intel (up 222%), and Micron (up 154%) leading the S&P 500. In contrast, major software firms like Microsoft, Adobe, and Salesforce are all down over 17% year-to-date. The software sector faces a dual challenge: capital is being redirected to semiconductors, and the rise of AI agents like Claude Code threatens traditional SaaS business models, triggering a narrative of AI displacement. Key unanswered questions remain: How long can hyperscalers sustain their massive capex, given potential free cash flow pressures? And will capital eventually rotate back into the deeply oversold software sector? While some analysts warn of a potential semiconductor bubble akin to the dot-com era, the sector's powerful momentum continues, making market timing exceptionally difficult.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Semiconductors up 78% annually, software down 12% annually: The 'Liquidity Siphon' is playing out within tech stocks

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

What Are The 1% Cardano Investors Doing? Crypto Pundit Breaks It Down

Despite market volatility and Cardano's price dropping below $0.25, analysis reveals significant activity from the top 1% of ADA investors. Crypto pundit Cheeky Crypto notes that while retail investors capitulate, wealthy whales are aggressively accumulating ADA, likely anticipating overlooked institutional infrastructure developments. This coincides with strong network growth: Total Value Locked (TVL) has risen roughly 42% since mid-September 2025, and weekly DEX volume is up nearly 40%. Furthermore, the Cardano network recently achieved a new milestone, surpassing 121 million lifetime transactions, indicating sustained investor confidence and increasing network activity.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

What Are The 1% Cardano Investors Doing? Crypto Pundit Breaks It Down

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros