Web3 手抄报:本周不容错过的行业热点及爆款

foresightnewsPublicado a 2023-12-22Actualizado a 2023-12-23

Resumen

Solana 上 Meme 狂欢,Web3 + AI 赛道、铭文版图全景盘点。

Foresight News 带你速览本周热门话题与推荐内容:


01 年度热搜榜

《年终盘点|一览 2023 年加密行业热搜榜》

02 Web3 + AI 赛道全览

《Web3 + AI 赛道全景盘点:130 多个项目,还有哪些未被发掘的宝藏?》

03 铭文版图

《「卖水人」生态逐步成型,一文总览铭文基础设施版图》

04 Solana 浪潮

《Solana Meme 浪潮下,哪些猫猫狗狗成为了社区明星?》

《Solana 流动性质押格局:Jito 与 Marinade 谁是王者?》

《Solana 联合创始人:解析 Solana 的终极架构》

05 Arweave 分叉风波

《Arweave 陷分叉风波,创始人炮轰存储解决方案 Irys》

06 行业思考

《美国加密货币信徒都聚集在哪些区域?》

《美国 OFAC 长臂管辖对以太坊网络有何影响?》

《重新审视应用层:反身性时代终将结束》

《Rollup 扩展方案新解,Taiko 的 BBR 如何重塑以太坊与 L2?》


01 年度热搜榜


「变量」,是 2023 年热词们的最大公约数,这可能会在 2024 甚至更远的未来,掀起更大的涟漪。我们统计了本年度 Foresight News 的用户搜索结果,同时对相同概念的大小写进行了合并处理,就此整理出了 2023 年度热搜榜单。推荐文章:


年终盘点|一览 2023 年加密行业热搜榜

今年年度热搜榜上的具体项目类热词占比过半,达 14 个,「香港」、「空投」、「RWA」、「NFT」、「ETF」、「AI」等大类话题又占据 6 个。
纵观今年的热词,最明显的特征有两个,一是不少热词都成为贯穿全年的长线话题:譬如香港、AI 以及 ORDI 为代表的铭文赛道,另一个就是诸如 ETF、ORDI 等都成为了影响行业的新变量,可能会在 2024 年甚至更远的未来掀起更大的涟漪。


02 Web3 + AI 赛道全览


2022 年 11 月底,GPT-3.5 的发布引爆全球,也让大多数 Crypto 从业者思考将 AI 与 Web3 结合的可能。过去一年,Web3 + AI 概念成为一时潮流,「区块链解决生产关系问题,AI 解决生产力问题」成为一种共识。Foresight News 对 Web3 + AI 赛道进行全景盘点,推荐文章:


Web3 + AI 赛道全景盘点:130 多个项目,还有哪些未被发掘的宝藏?

据笔者不完全统计,目前行业至少有 140 个 Web3 + AI 概念项目,已发币的项目共有 84 个,还有部分将于明年发行代币。这 140 个项目覆盖了基础设施、数据、预测市场、计算与算力、教育、DeFi & 跨链、安全、NFT & 游戏 & 元宇宙、搜索引擎、社交 & 创作者经济、AI 聊天机器人、DID & 消息传递、治理、医疗、交易机器人等诸多方向。其中,基础设施类项目多达 29 个,NFT & 游戏 & 元宇宙类项目有 26 个,数据、计算、AI 聊天机器人类项目也均在 10 个以上。
值得注意的是,笔者发现大多数 Web3 + AI 概念项目基本面良好,团队踏实做事与运营,不乏知名 VC 投资,譬如 a16z Crytpo、Jump Crypto、Hashed、DWF Labs、Foresight Ventures、HashKey Capital、Binance Labs、CoinFund、IOSG Ventures、SNZ、Variant、1kx、Bankless、Hash Global、Animoca Brands、Coinbase Ventures、Galaxy Digital、红杉、GSR、Dragonfly 等等。在 CoinFund 眼中,AI 是明年增长最快的领域,Messari 则强烈看好 AI 与加密货币的结合。


03 铭文版图


伴随着比特币铭文赛道的持续大火,手动参与链上新铭文项目迅速被卷成了一片红海。推荐文章:


「卖水人」生态逐步成型,一文总览铭文基础设施版图

铭文基础设施相关的项目涵盖了钱包、跨链、交易市场、铸造工具、数据 & 查询等赛道,本文统计了近 30 个项目(不完全统计),与大家一同分享、找寻铭文基础设施中可能潜藏的下一个 MetaMask、Uniswap、LayerZero 等各赛道明星项目。


04 Solana 浪潮


Solana 生态的 Meme 热潮正在席卷整个 Crypto 市场,Solana 联合创始人 toly 在 Breakpoint 峰会明牌推荐的 Meme 「傻龙」 Silly Dragon 近两天时间里急涨 6 倍。除了 Silly Dragon,Solana 上还有哪些热度较高的 Meme 项目?推荐文章:


Solana Meme 浪潮下,哪些猫猫狗狗成为了社区明星?

dogwifhat(WIF):根据官方网站描述,「dogwifhat 可不仅仅是一只带着帽子的狗,也是进步的象征,是那些敢于超前思考的人的风向标。」
Leia the Cat(LEIA):以 Solana 联合创始人 Raj Gokal 的猫 Leia 命名。LEIA 总量 100 亿枚,购买或出售时会自动销毁 1% 的税费,从而实现通货紧缩模型。
Pop Cat(POPCAT):就是那些让你眼前一亮的视频,其中使用一只名叫 Oatmeal 的猫的照片,并将猫咪的嘴巴 PS 成一个大大的「O」形状,简直是太可爱了。
KnobCoin(KNOB):其实就是 BONK 倒过来拼写的,没有 Pre-Seed,没有预启动,流动性代币被永久销毁。
melon(MELON):是一只带着西瓜帽的狗,推特粉丝数只有 282 个,不过已有 2199 个持有者。
FLIPPUR:是酷到爆炸的海豚,嘴里叼着一支烟,散发着酷劲十足的气场。
Chonky(CHONKY):是一只留着口水的肥猫。
Peepo(PEEP):没有预售,团队没有接受任何代币分配,80% 的供应量空投给活跃的 Solana 钱包和社区。


12 月 7 日的 Jito 空投点燃了 Solana DeFi 生态。这篇文章将重新审视 Solana 流动性质押理论,并将 Jito 与 Marinade 的数据进行对比。推荐文章:


Solana 流动性质押格局:Jito 与 Marinade 谁是王者?

一些估算表明,超过 10,000 人通过 Jito 空投赚取了 10-20 万美元。虽然有人指出估值存在泡沫,但这是创造财富的一项令人难以置信的壮举,我们认为这一点还没有得到足够的讨论:加密货币对早期用户的奖励比历史上任何行业都多。
更不用说,我们很高兴看到一个强大的竞争对手进入 Solana 的流动质押领域。我们相信这场比赛对两支球队来说都是好事。竞争有利于创新,也有利于 Solana 网络的健康、安全和去中心化。
话虽如此,现在我们的工作是弄清楚为什么市场对 Jito 的定价是 Marinade 的 7.7 倍。


Solana 联合创始人兼 CEO Anatoly Yakovenko 发文详解了 Solana 的整体架构,Foresight News 对此文进行了翻译。推荐文章:


Solana 联合创始人:解析 Solana 的终极架构

主要权衡在于为用户状态提供服务的全节点缺乏确认的签名,以确认其提供状态与核准的其余部分完全一致。状态的唯一权威解释应该保持不变,即使每个交易在分类帐中按顺序重播。任何性能优化都不应改变结果。因此,一旦分叉被最终确定,就只剩下正确的状态可以计算,只要运行时实现没有错误。
旨在可靠提供状态的节点应该运行多台机器和客户端,如果状态执行中出现差异,它们应该停止操作。这本质上是运营商今天应该做的事情,因为仅仅依赖于网络的其余部分引入了正直的大多数假设。
用户还可以签署断言 BankHash 或触发中止的交易。只有在计算的确切 BankHash 与由 RPC 提供者提供给用户的 BankHash 完全相同时,网络的其余部分才会执行这些交易。


05 Arweave 分叉风波


永续存储协议 Arweave 陷入分叉风波,其存储解决方案 Irys ( 前身为 Bundlr Network) 正在考虑分叉 Arweave,不再维护生态数据集,并将重置代币供应。Arweave 创始人 Sam Williams 发文指责 Irys 这种做法是出于贪婪,选择上述「反社会分叉」。推荐文章:


Arweave 陷分叉风波,创始人炮轰存储解决方案 Irys

出于贪婪,Irys 正在考虑放弃数据集,重置代币供应,以分叉 Arweave。
网络中有一个名为协议演进(protocol evolution)的既定机制,可以完成安全的分叉和网络升级,但 Irys 似乎对此置若罔闻
网站上有一个全新的、100% 免费、100% 兼容 Irys 的捆绑程序。只需替换当前的 Irys 节点 URL 即可使用,这就彻底解决了 Arweave 用户的问题。
鉴于这种情况,ar.io network 决定将 Irys 捆绑程序从 Arweave 主网关的受信任程序集中移除。这将导致在用户数据可用之前出现严重延迟。


06 行业思考


美国加密货币信徒都聚集在哪些区域?

根据间接证据,如果你所在的社区出现在加密货币热力图上,那么你周围可能都是年轻、富有或从事软件开发的纳税人。
毫不奇怪的是,加利福尼亚州比特币或其他加密货币拥有者密集的地区数量处于领先地位。但在各州排名中,华盛顿州超越了加利福尼亚州。
值得注意的是:在美国中西部地区,数字投机相对不受欢迎。在高收入纳税人中,华盛顿州和西弗吉尼亚州对加密货币的接受程度存在 13 倍的差异。
这些爆料是政府长达十年的打击加密资产恶作剧的结果。美国国税局确信代币所有者未能报告资本收益,因此要求 Coinbase 和 Kraken 等交易所披露其客户信息。美国司法部因洗钱违规行为对币安处以 40 亿美元的罚款。联邦政府曾多次渗透看似匿名的区块链交易踪迹,以找回被盗的代币或获取其他犯罪证据,例如毒品交易。


美国 OFAC 长臂管辖对以太坊网络有何影响?

美国最大的加密货币交易所 Coinbase 正在公开处理涉及 Tornado Cash 的以太坊交易,Tornado Cash 是一项区块链基础设施,但它去年因向朝鲜提供混币服务而受到美国政府的制裁。根据 Tornado 提醒,过去两周 Coinbase 已验证了 686 笔与 Tornado 相关的交易。


重新审视应用层:反身性时代终将结束

时至今日,区块链已经具有很强的反身性。加密经济与现实世界之间存在围墙,除了投机之外,加密货币很难吸引现实世界。过去的牛市,比如 2020 年至 2021 年的 DeFi 繁荣,都是由投机推动的。新的加密原生代币和协议的爆炸式增长引发了反身性上涨:投机推动了活动,从而推动了更多的投机。


2023 年 12 月 13 日,以太坊创始人 Vitalik Buterin 参加了由 Taiko 主办的「Multi-proofs for rollups」 Twitter Space 活动,与 OP Labs 研究员 proto.eth、Taiko 联创兼 CTO Brecht Devos 一起围绕 Rollup 设计、multi-proofs 等话题进行了讨论。其中 Vitalik 等嘉宾专门提到 Taiko 在几个月前推出的新 Rollup 设计方案「Based Booster Rollup」(BBR),就其提供的全新解决方案与愿景可能进行了深度探讨。推荐文章:


Rollup 扩展方案新解,Taiko 的 BBR 如何重塑以太坊与 L2?

BBR 也有潜力解决所有当前 rollup 面临(和产生)的碎片化问题,同时无需失去 L1 排序和所有随之而来的好处。它通过在 boosted 网络中的所有 L2 之间添加原子跨 rollup 交易,可以提供所有必要的功能,以实现最初设想的「在一个地方」(in one place)扩展以太坊。

Lecturas Relacionadas

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手Hace 12 min(s)

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手Hace 12 min(s)

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight NewsHace 58 min(s)

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight NewsHace 58 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片