美股已回血,比特币还差一半

比推Publicado a 2023-05-29Actualizado a 2023-05-29

Resumen

在这个美股加息周期的尾声,美股已经几乎要完全收复美联储加息这一年来所失去的失地,成功回血。其中,纳斯达克指数已经突破2022.3.17的高度(14298 > 14118),标普500还差一点点(4205 接近 4411)。

隔夜比特币仍在26.5k-27k之间踟蹰。美众议院议长麦卡锡说,现在还不能就解决美债危机和拜登总统达成协议。不过,他又说,相信在6月5日前应该一定行。(关于“6月5日”,请参阅刘教链2023.5.27文章《美债死期推迟》)

在这个美股加息周期的尾声,美股已经几乎要完全收复美联储加息这一年来所失去的失地,成功回血。其中,纳斯达克指数已经突破2022.3.17的高度(14298 > 14118),标普500还差一点点(4205 接近 4411)。(2022.3.17是美联储加息靴子落地之日,参阅刘教链2022.3.17文章《美联储加息落地,比特币先跌后涨》)

图:纳斯达克指数

图:标普500指数

而比特币呢,还差得远。27k,距离40k,再涨个50%差不多能够得到。

图:比特币

虽然比特币在进入2023年以后奋勇争先,从17-18k的绝望之谷旱地拔葱,一骑绝尘,站上了27-30k的高地。但是,无可奈何花落去,2022年LUNA/UST的暴雷和FTX的暴雷实在是太伤了。灰飞烟灭的资金难再来,伤痛的记忆一时难抚平,何日再唱“似曾相识燕归来”,犹未可知。

这是个好事。

显然,比特币和美股脱钩,复又与黄金的相关性增强,显示出比特币绝非美股的影子资产,而是有自己的独特性格的。

图:比特币与黄金和美股的相关性(30天皮尔森系数)

从30天皮尔森系数走势图看,自进入5月份以来,比特币和美股的相关系数就一路走低,由正转负,进入了负相关的区间。有趣的是,和黄金的相关性开始也是和美股一样下降,但是到了下半月又开始上升,继续走高了。

在这个短周期上,美股跌,比特币跌,美股涨回血了,比特币还差一半,是不是有点儿“比特币就像美股的山寨币”的感觉?但是,和真正的山寨币不同,比特币总是会在一次次的价格冲击中,突破美股的约束和人们的想象,向下一个里程碑,进发。

此谓之积累的好时光。

不知晦朔的朝菌、不知春秋的蟪蛄,与以五百岁为春的冥灵、以八千岁为秋的大椿,看到的世界,是全然不同的。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Coinbase Vice President: The Wars Over Cryptocurrency Regulation Are Over

Coinbase's new Vice President, Ryan VanGrak, declared that regulatory wars in the cryptocurrency sector are over. Since taking office on July 9, 2026, he has shifted the company's approach from litigation and sanctions to focusing on growth and innovation. The industry can now concentrate on development rather than fighting for its right to exist. He highlighted that the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act), which aims to establish a clear federal regulatory framework dividing oversight between the SEC and CFTC, has gained significant momentum. This framework is intended to provide proper supervision, investor protection, and maintain U.S. leadership in digital assets. VanGrak's appointment marks a strategic shift from a "wartime" to a "peacetime" advisor, replacing former Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal, who oversaw major litigation, including a dismissed 2023 SEC lawsuit. With his background at Citadel Securities and the SEC, VanGrak brings deep regulatory and institutional finance expertise as Coinbase expands beyond a simple exchange into a broader financial services provider, offering stocks, futures, prediction markets, and AI tools. For investors, bipartisan support for crypto legislation like the CLARITY Act represents a major shift from the enforcement-focused environment of 2023-2024. Lawmakers are now focused on *how* to regulate crypto, not *if* it should exist. However, risks remain, as the bill's passage is not yet guaranteed.

cryptonews.ruHace 26 min(s)

Coinbase Vice President: The Wars Over Cryptocurrency Regulation Are Over

cryptonews.ruHace 26 min(s)

Deep Dive into FWA: An Intriguing Experiment Turning NFTs into "On-Chain Gachapon"

A Deep Dive into FWA: The “On-Chain Gacha” Experiment for NFTs Fake World Assets (FWA), created by TokenWorks, introduces an innovative “NFT gacha machine” fully operating on-chain. Users can deposit eligible NFTs paired with ETH (called Backing) to create a Position, acting as a prize pool. Others can then pay a uniform Acquisition Price for a chance to win a random NFT from the pool. The core mechanism features a reverse probability system: Positions with lower Backing have a higher chance of being selected, serving as common prizes, while high-Backing Positions are rare “jackpots.” The acquisition price is calculated based on the harmonic mean of all Backings, keeping entry costs low. When a Position is won, the purchaser must choose: keep the NFT or accept the Standing Bid (85% of the Backing, claimable in ETH or $FWA tokens), returning the NFT to the original depositor. The protocol involves two main roles. Depositors provide liquidity (NFT + ETH), earning a share of fees from each draw, distributed equally per active Position, plus potential $FWA rewards. Purchasers pay to spin the gacha, receiving $FWA rewards for participation. A special “Crown” reward goes to the Position with the highest Backing. The $FWA token has a fixed supply and is initially obtainable only through protocol participation (depositing or purchasing), with external buying disabled early on to reduce sell pressure. Its value is supported by a built-in buy pressure: when purchasers opt for the $FWA settlement on a Standing Bid, the protocol uses the backing ETH to buy $FWA from the market. Revenue for the protocol comes from a 1% fee on each draw, a 1% settlement fee when an NFT is kept, and the 15% discount from Standing Bid settlements (currently allocated to the protocol). The design cleverly blends Uniswap-style liquidity provision, gacha mechanics, and tokenomics to create a novel, self-regulating marketplace for NFT liquidity and engagement.

marsbitHace 40 min(s)

Deep Dive into FWA: An Intriguing Experiment Turning NFTs into "On-Chain Gachapon"

marsbitHace 40 min(s)

10,000 Scientists Get 1 Year of Free Access: OpenAI Brings the Scientific Research Pipeline into ChatGPT

OpenAI has launched the "ChatGPT for Academic Researchers" program, offering free one-year access to its flagship models for 100,000 university researchers globally, with 10,000 spots available this summer. Selected institutions include prestigious centers like ENS Paris and the IAS at Princeton. The initiative provides an integrated research workspace within ChatGPT, bundling tools like ChatGPT, ChatGPT Work, and Codex, along with expanded Deep Research capabilities, higher usage limits, and specialized tools for life sciences. The suite connects to platforms like Zotero and GitHub, aiming to streamline the entire research workflow from literature review and coding to data analysis and manuscript drafting. OpenAI notes that about 1.3 million people already use ChatGPT weekly for advanced science and math. The program targets building long-term user dependency by embedding these tools into daily research habits. However, access comes with limitations: it does not include API credits or model weights, and eligibility is restricted to verified academic researchers from supported countries. This approach contrasts with Anthropic's "AI for Science" program, which offers API credits but not an integrated workspace. Both companies emphasize preventing misuse by withholding model weights, a point of contention for AI researchers seeking transparency. The core strategy remains clear: provide a powerful, integrated environment to foster user reliance ahead of the post-free period.

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

10,000 Scientists Get 1 Year of Free Access: OpenAI Brings the Scientific Research Pipeline into ChatGPT

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

What's Going On with Gigadevice? Major Shareholder Cashes Out 44 Billion, Then Announces 20 Billion Buyback

Gigadevice Innovation, a leading Chinese memory chip company, has executed a controversial financial maneuver. The company's controlling shareholder and chairman, Zhu Yiming, sold approximately 44 billion RMB worth of his shares between early May and mid-June 2026, capitalizing on a soaring stock price that peaked at 846.66 RMB on June 29th. Following a subsequent stock crash—plummeting to around 350 RMB in 22 trading days and erasing over 330 billion RMB in market value—Zhu announced a combined "market rescue" plan on July 29th. This plan includes his personal commitment to buy back at least 1 billion RMB in shares and a company proposal to repurchase 1 to 2 billion RMB worth of stock. This sequence of high-selling followed by a low-buying plan has confused and unsettled many of the company's 240,000 retail investors. The stock's dramatic decline was attributed to several factors: the successful IPO of its sister company, Changxin Technologies, which ended Gigadevice's status as a primary investment proxy for the domestic memory sector; a Morgan Stanley report warning of a potential peak in the memory chip cycle; and a severe loss of market confidence triggered by the chairman's massive sell-off. While the sell-off was procedurally compliant, its timing has been criticized. The company's fundamentals appear strong, with preliminary H1 2026 results showing revenue up 177% year-on-year to 11.5 billion RMB and net profit skyrocketing 1099% to 6.9 billion RMB, driven by a boom in memory chips and MCU demand. However, a significant portion (2.05 billion RMB) of this profit came from non-recurring gains like securities investment, and the memory industry is notoriously cyclical. Analysts highlight the company's role in the domestic substitution of niche DRAM and NOR Flash memory, with some maintaining bullish price targets. Yet, the recent events underscore key risks: its fabless model creates dependency on foundries like Changxin, and the chairman's actions have raised serious questions about management's alignment with minority shareholders. The promised buybacks cannot commence until December 13th due to a mandatory six-month cooling-off period following an insider sale, leaving the stock vulnerable in the interim.

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

What's Going On with Gigadevice? Major Shareholder Cashes Out 44 Billion, Then Announces 20 Billion Buyback

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片