Milady乱象整理:马斯克发梗图暴涨、LADYS早期进场者又被黑单

链新Publicado a 2023-05-12Actualizado a 2023-05-12

Resumen

马斯克在5 月10 日晚间接近12 点时推文发布NFT 专案「Milady Maker」的图片。 NFTGO数据显示,这导致Milady 交易量暴涨1,805%,24 小时交易量超过8,000 ETH,成交量也上升1,185%。

NFT 专案「Milady Maker」因马斯克发梗图,交易量、地板价皆大幅上涨,相关代币「LADYS」也受益上涨,而先前早期进场PEPE 却被列为黑名单的交易员,他的地址这次也买了「LADYS」,又再次被团队黑单。

马斯克发Milady 梗图,NFT 地板价创新高

马斯克在5 月10 日晚间接近12 点时推文发布NFT 专案「Milady Maker」的图片。

NFTGO数据显示,这导致Milady 交易量暴涨1,805%,24 小时交易量超过8,000 ETH,成交量也上升1,185%。

24 小时涨幅48.22%。

pic.twitter.com/4s6HwnCY74

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 10, 2023

Milady 是Remilia Collective 早在2021 年推出的NFT 专案,由艺术家Charlotte Fang所设计。

Milady 价格一直踌躇不前,2022 年5 月曾短暂突破1 ETH后便无起色,但今年1 月起再次站上1 ETH,在马斯克发文前日,价格也来到将近4 ETH。

而在马斯克助攻下,Milady 截稿前地板价约5.33 ETH。

甚至远高于许多NFT 蓝筹专案。

迷因代币Milady (LADYS) 涨超20 倍

迷因币LADYS 也因为马斯克推文而受益,自发文起截至目前涨幅2,269%,凌晨四点时涨幅甚至超过5,000%。

不过LADYS 这波上涨引发许多争议,包括争议风投DWF Labs 的早期进场、LADYS 获利地址又被合约部署者锁定,似乎满满的内幕。

(详述DWF Labs 争议行为:半年多笔千万美元等级投资,谜样机构DWF Labs回应仍遭质疑)

LADYS|15分线

迷样机构DWF Labs 5/9 进场LADYS

链上分析师@EmberCN指出DWF Labs 在5 月9 日即花费13.5 ETH (约2.5 万美元) 买进LADYS,当时还浮亏5,000 美元。

根据DWF Labs地址,这家机构在今天还不断加仓LADYS (再投入40 ETH),也买进了Milady #8277,截稿前持有的LADYS 价值已来到193 万美元。

继PEPE 之后,同位早期进场者又被LADYS 黑单

此前报导,一地址在PEPE 上架Uniswap 不久后随即以0.013 ETH购入2.5 兆枚PEPE (目前价值400 万美元),但8 分钟后就遭到合约部署者将地址列为黑名单。

(社群对此事的臆测: 800万美元PEPE地址遭开发者列入黑名单,代币将永久锁定)

神奇的是,此地址0x…54534 也早在3 天前就以0.1 ETH 买进了1,053,249 LADYS。

而他又再次被LADYS 的合约部署者黑单,目前持有价值429 万美元的PEPE、959 万美元的LADYS。

黑名单喊话LADYS:留23% 给我,其它捐掉

地址0x…54534 于链上留言向LADYS 团队表示,自己的代币是在上架后公开购买的,呼吁别像PEPE 团队将其黑单,这样做相当中心化。

若将其解除黑单,0x…54534 表示会将失而复得的代币执行以下操作:

38% LADYS 近行销毁,减少供应量。

39% 由Milady 社群自行选择慈善机构进行捐赠。

23% 留在原地址,作为Milady 社群对0x…54534「Ape in」技术的认可,也能当作无故被PEPE 黑名单的安慰补偿。

LADYS 团队也回覆表示:

对于黑名单一事我们已经有了结论,针对你的钱包也与PEPE 商讨中,后续能在Blockscan chat 讨论吗?

截稿前,双方尚未有更进一步讨论。

黑单者链上留言

Lecturas Relacionadas

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

In June 2026, the Bank of Japan raised its policy rate to 1%, marking its first hike to this level since 1995. While this rate remains low compared to global peers like the US and Europe, the move signals a profound shift for a nation that has been a global source of ultra-cheap funding for decades. Japan's long-standing near-zero or negative interest rates had facilitated massive "yen carry trades," where international investors borrowed low-cost yen to invest in higher-yielding assets worldwide, such as US tech stocks and emerging market bonds. This made Japan a critical, often overlooked, source of global liquidity. Japan's ultra-loose policy stemmed from structural challenges post-1990s asset bubble: aging demographics, chronic low inflation/deflation, and high public debt. Recent shifts, including sustained wage growth (exceeding 5% in recent years) and inflation consistently above the 2% target, have created a "wage-price spiral" possibility, prompting the policy normalization. The global market's concern lies not in the absolute rate but in the potential unwinding of the yen carry trade. As Japanese borrowing costs rise, the economics of these leveraged global investments change, potentially triggering deleveraging and capital outflows from risk assets. Market anxiety focuses on the end of a thirty-year consensus that Japan would perpetually provide cheap funding. Ultimately, the global impact will depend on the interplay with US monetary policy. While Japan is tightening, the significant interest rate differential with the US remains. The key future dynamic is whether simultaneous Japanese hikes and eventual US rate cuts will narrow this gap, forcing a major recalibration of global capital flows and asset pricing built on an era of abundant, cheap yen liquidity.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

Report Recap: MRVL Optical AI Boom - Why High Valuation Led Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst to Stay Neutral? Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore maintained an "Equal-weight" (Neutral) rating on Marvell Technology (MRVL) on May 28, raising the price target from $172 to $195, below the trading price. This stance comes despite Marvell reporting a record quarter and significantly raising its full-year outlook (FY27 revenue ~$11.5B, up ~40%). Moore's neutral view is based on valuation. The $195 target implies ~40x CY2027 P/E. He contrasts MRVL with NVDA: both trade near ~$200, but Nvidia's forward EPS is more than double Marvell's. For MRVL's valuation to hold, it needs consistent earnings upgrades, proof of networking market share gains, or certainty on large-scale custom AI chip shipments—none of which are confirmed yet. Growth is driven by two pillars: **1) Optical Interconnect** (the faster runner): Moore raised FY27 growth expectations to >70%, with the optical module product line nearing a $1B annualized run rate. **2) Custom AI Chips** (the climber): Confidence in FY28 is growing, but a major new customer project only ramps in FY28, with no current revenue visibility. Key risks are the underperforming Storage, Enterprise, and legacy Networking segments. Moore acknowledges the real AI opportunity but believes the current price already reflects it. For the stock to work from here, investors need to see the optical business hit its targets, custom chips ramp as planned, and a recovery in the weaker business units.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

**Summary: Retrospective and Outlook on the AI Computing Wave - A Framework for Capital Rotation** Based on a presentation by investor qinbaFrank, this analysis reviews the AI computing market trajectory since 2023 and outlines a forward-looking framework. **Key Phases and Market Debates:** The AI bull market progressed through three major debates: 1) The necessity of massive capital expenditure (late 2023). 2) The sustainability of tech giants' spending (early 2024-early 2025). 3) Potential overestimation of compute needs (early 2025). Consensus solidified in late 2025 as model capabilities and utility demonstrably improved. **Core Thesis: Penetration Rate Drives Commercialization.** Unlike the 2000 dot-com bubble, the current AI wave benefits from mature digital infrastructure, enabling faster adoption. The critical threshold is 10% penetration; surpassing it (with recent enterprise intent surveys showing ~18%) indicates entry into a rapid growth "golden period" where user scale and willingness to pay increase simultaneously. **AI vs. Internet: A Fundamental Difference.** While the internet enhanced connection efficiency, AI directly substitutes human cognition and labor. Once AI performance exceeds the "societal average" human level, its commercial value scales exponentially as payment shifts from human labor costs to AI service fees. **Investment Logic Evolution in the Compute Chain.** The focus has expanded from GPUs to a systemic re-rating of the entire hardware stack: storage/HBM, CPUs, interconnects, power, and advanced packaging. The framework is: **short-term "scarcity pricing," mid-term "upgrade pricing" (e.g., optical interconnects, power networks), and long-term "Physical AI" pricing** (edge computing, robotics). **Market Focus Shift and Adjustment Framework.** The market is transitioning from "hardware scarcity" to "commercialization validation." The ultimate anchor for the narrative is sustained high growth in model providers' Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) and cloud business revenue, which justifies continued capital expenditure. Adjustments are categorized into three levels: * **L1 (Minor):** Driven by valuation compression or macro noise (e.g., single CPI print). Fundamentals intact. * **L2 (Moderate):** Triggered by significant macro events requiring risk repricing. Requires new data for confidence restoration. * **L3 (Major):** Involves a reset of the core industrial narrative or macro regime (e.g., AI commercialization growth stalling). The **crucial dividing line** is whether AI commercialization growth slows. Without a slowdown, pullbacks are likely L1/L2 "repricing" events. A genuine growth deceleration would signal an L2/L3 narrative reset. **Conclusion: A Foundational Civilizational Leap.** AI represents a foundational upgrade to "intelligence" itself—akin to humanity mastering fire—rather than a single-point industrial revolution. This底层能力跃迁 (underlying capability leap) will spawn successive waves of innovation (Agent, robotics, industry workflow重构). The journey will be波浪式的 (wavelike), driven by cycles of scarcity, technological upgrades, and远期兑现 (long-term realization).

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片