币股风向标丨Strategy上周投入2.55亿美元增持3273枚BTC;Bitmine资产总额达133亿美元,持有超507万枚ETH(4月28日)

marsbitPublicado a 2026-04-28Actualizado a 2026-04-28

编者按:美伊冲突仍在继续僵持,但如我们上周所说,传统金融市场已经开始冲高:日韩股市纷纷创下历史新高;美股市场龙头股英伟达再次站上 5 万亿美元市值上方,纳指、标普 500 等指数则保持冲高姿态。另外,美联储新任主席凯文·沃什能否顺利上任成为资本市场定价的下一个焦点事件。至于加密美股市场,在并无直接利好刺激下,本周延续普跌态势,建议仍然只做少部分龙头股抄底或短期反弹博弈。

以下为 Odaily 星球日报总结整理的上周币股市场信息,所有美股数据皆来自msx.com。

美股迎来 IPO 流动性大考,美联储新任主席政策立场备受质疑

近一周的焦点事件集中在美联储新任主席凯文·沃什的听证会以及由 SpaceX 带动的本年度关于美股 IPO 热潮影响下的市场流动性考验。

分析:SpaceX、OpenAI 与 Anthropic 上市吸金或冲击 BTC 及加密市场流动性

SpaceX 已于本月早些时候向美国 SEC 秘密递交 S-1 文件,计划以约 1.75 万亿美元估值进行 IPO,募资规模高达 750 亿美元,若按预期于 6 月上市,将超过沙特阿美 2019 年 290 亿美元募资纪录,成为史上最大规模 IPO。与此同时,OpenAI 与 Anthropic 也分别计划于今年下半年上市,三家公司预计合计吸引超过 2400 亿美元资金。

市场分析认为,这些超级 IPO 可能显著抽离风险资产流动性,而加密市场正处于同一资金池中。由于比特币、以太坊等主流加密资产近年与纳斯达克及美股风险偏好高度联动,大量资金转向认购科技巨头 IPO,可能削弱对 BTC、ETH 及山寨币的买盘支撑。分析人士指出,Coinbase 于 2021 年上市当天恰逢比特币阶段性顶部,此次 SpaceX IPO 或再次成为加密市场的重要流动性拐点。

沃什听证会高能:否认向特朗普承诺降息、怒批美联储迷失、被骂“提线木偶”

特朗普钦点的美联储主席人选沃什,在确认听证会上火力全开:拒答特朗普是否输掉大选,被沃伦怒斥“提线木偶”;反手炮轰美联储“迷失方向、搞政治”;还多次否认向总统承诺低利率。素有“美联储传声筒”之称的 Nick Timiraos 撰文称马萨诸塞州民主党参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦(Elizabeth Warren)在开场陈述中将沃什同时定性为特朗普的“提线木偶”和机会主义者,但沃伦的论点是一个连陈述可能令提名自己的总统不悦的简单事实都不敢的美联储主席,在关键时刻是不会站出来对抗那位总统的。这一主题贯穿了整场听证会,民主党人多次回到这一点上。

沃什还表示,美联储需要“根本性政策改革”,包括新的通胀框架、新的工具以及新的信息传递方式。虽然沃什回避特朗普对美联储的公开攻击,但多次向两党参议员否认特朗普曾就利率寻求任何承诺。“总统从未要求我预先决定、承诺、确定或决定任何利率决策,在我们的任何一次讨论中都没有,我也绝不会同意这样做。”

高盛:美联储换帅不会带来快速降息

高盛经济学家大卫·梅里克在给客户的一份报告中表示,凯文·沃什出任美联储主席的路径已清晰可见,但领导层的变动可能不会在未来几个月立即改变美联储的政策立场。他指出:“当联邦公开市场委员会存在分歧时,新任主席可能无法像鲍威尔那样有力地推动降息。”且不论沃什的影响力,新主席对降息的热情可能并不会比鲍威尔高多少,尤其是在中东战争不确定性仍然很高的情况下。不过,高盛仍认为年底前会有宽松政策出台,维持此前预测,即美联储将在 9 月和 12 月分别降息 25 个基点。

一周币股上市公司动态更新

BTC 财库上市公司代表性企业

Strategy 2.55 亿美元领跑但势头骤减:增持额暴降 90%,全球多家储备公司小幅跟进购买

根据 SoSoValue 数据,截至美东时间 2026 年 4 月 27 日早上八点,上周全球上市公司(不包含挖矿公司)配置比特币的单周总净买入为 2.60 亿美元,相比上周减少 89.8%。

Strategy(原 MicroStrategy) 宣布投入 2.55 亿美元(相比上周减少 90%),以 77,906 美元的价格购买 3,273 枚比特币,总持仓达到 818,334 枚。

日本上市公司 Metaplanet 上周未购买比特币。

此外,另有 3 家公司上周购买比特币。日本时尚服装品牌 ANAP 于 4 月 21 日投入 77 万美元,以$84,239.7 的价格增持 9.1785 枚比特币, 总持仓达到 1,431.9716 枚; 英国比特币公司 The Smarter Web Company 于 4 月 24 日宣布投入 339 万美元,以$77,071 的价格购买 44 枚比特币,总持仓达到 2,750 枚;法国比特币公司于 4 月 27 日宣布投入 46 万美元,以$77,151 的价格购买 6 枚比特币,总持仓达到 2,943 枚。

Metaplanet 已发行 80 亿日元(约 5,000 万美元)的零利息债券,用于购买比特币。

截至发稿,统计中的全球上市公司(不含挖矿公司)合计持有比特币总量为 1,084,909 枚,相比上周增长 0.3%,当前市场价值约为 843.4 亿美元,占比特币流通市值的 5.4%。

Metaplanet 发行价值 80 亿日元零息债券用于增持比特币

上周,日本比特币财库公司 Metaplanet 宣布发行价值 80 亿日元的零息普通债券,用于进一步购买比特币。

DDC 年度财报:比特币持仓达 2383 枚并推出 AI 财库智能平台

美股上市公司 DDC Enterprise 上周发布 2025 财年业绩报告,全年营收达 3920 万美元,同比增长 4.6%,创历史新高;截至 2026 年 4 月 21 日持有约 2383 枚比特币,价值约 1.82 亿美元,跻身全球上市公司比特币持仓前 30。DDC 还宣布推出人工智能驱动的财库智能平台“DDC Treasury Intelligence Platform”,用于优化比特币资金管理与资本配置。

ETH 财库上市公司代表性企业

Bitmine 资产总额达 133 亿美元,持有超 507 万枚 ETH 占供应量 4.21%

截至 2026 年 4 月 26 日,Bitmine 加密货币持仓、现金及投资总额达 133 亿美元。目前持有 5,078,386 枚 ETH,价值约 120.3 亿美元,占 ETH 总供应量的 4.21%。此外,持仓还包括 200 枚比特币、2 亿美元 Beast Industries 股权、9100 万美元 Eightco Holdings 股权以及 9.4 亿美元现金。

Bitmine 目前已质押 3,701,589 枚 ETH,按 2369 美元价格计算,价值约 88 亿美元。其年化质押收益率达 3.033%,预计年收益为 3.63 亿美元。Bitmine 已于 2026 年 4 月 9 日从纽约证券交易所美国分所转至纽约证券交易所挂牌上市。

此外,上周以太坊基金会通过 OTC 方式向 Bitmine 出售了 10000 枚 ETH,均价为 2387 美元。

山寨币财库上市公司代表性企业

Eightco 披露 WLD 持有量增至超 2.83 亿枚,ETH 持仓量维持在 11068 枚

纳斯达克上市公司 Eightco Holdings(ORBS)上周发布持仓情况更新,披露持有资产总价值增至 3.36 亿美元,包括:283452700 枚 Worldcoin(WLD)、11,068 枚 ETH、对 OpenAI 的 9000 万美元投资、对 Beast Industries 的 2500 万美元投资,以及持有价值 1.18 亿美元的现金和稳定币。Eightco Holdings 表示,持有的 WLD 代币价值在公司总资产的占比为 23%,对 OpenAI 的投资占公司总资产降至 27%,对 Beast Industries 的投资占公司总资产的 7%。

AVAX One 公布 Q1 业绩:持有约 1400 万枚 AVAX,收入环比翻倍

纳斯达克上市 AVAX 财库公司 AVAX One 上周公布 2026 年一季度初步业绩,受益于 Avalanche 质押收益及比特币挖矿业务增长,季度收入环比翻倍至约 240 万美元。公司资产配置方面,现持有约 1400 万枚 AVAX,超 90% 处于质押状态。同时,AVAX One 已签署意向书,拟在加拿大阿尔伯塔省建设 10MW Tier 3 级 AI/HPC 数据中心,项目预计 2027 年一季度投运,将依托低成本天然气电力资源,以 “加密资产收益 + 算力基础设施” 推进 AI 与数字资产双轮战略。公司同步新增 220 台比特币矿机,算力提升至超 200 PH/s。

美股上市公司 Aurelion 披露持有 33318 枚 Tether Gold,其中 1 万枚已质押

纳斯达克上市公司 Aurelion 上周披露目前持有 33318 枚 Tether Gold(XAUT),按照 4 月 23 日 4719.15 美元/盎司价格计算,其持仓价值超 1.57 亿美元,此外该公司还披露已将 1 万枚 XAUT 质押,使黄金代币从单纯储备资产转变为可产生收益的抵押资产,另外 23318 枚 XAUT 处于未质押状态。

Tron Inc 上周增持 154494 枚 TRX 代币

Tron Inc 在 X 平台发文表示,公司日前以平均价格 0.3236 美元增持 154494 枚 TRX 代币,TRX 持仓至逾 6.93 亿枚。公司旨在继续增加 Tron DAT 库存,以提升长期股东价值。

Criptos en tendencia

Lecturas Relacionadas

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar 4

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar 4 (4) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar 4 (4) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu 4 (4)Después de comprar tu 4 (4), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear 4 (4)Tradear fácilmente con 4 (4) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

761 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.10.20Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar 4

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de 4 (4).

活动图片