Strike CEO forced out after JPMorgan raises ‘fraudulent activities’ concern

ambcryptoPublicado a 2025-11-25Actualizado a 2025-11-25

Key Takeaways 

What triggered the latest crypto debanking controversy?

Strike CEO revealed that JPMorgan Chase blocked his account and restricted customer deposits into Strike. 

How did the community react? 

The community slammed JPMorgan. But the bank had not issued any statement on the issue as of the time of writing. 


Crypto debanking is back in the headlines, this time throwing JPMorgan Chase under scrutiny.  

Jack Mallers, CEO of Strike, a U.S.-based Bitcoin [BTC]-focused payment platform, decried that JPMorgan kicked him out of the bank. 

He added that the bank blocked some customers from depositing with Strike, claiming that the firm was involved in “known fraudulent activities.”

JPMorgan

Source: X

Senator Lummis slams JPMorgan

Reacting to the alleged banking restriction, pro-Bitcoin Senator Cynthia Lummis slammed JPMorgan’s actions. She warned that such debanking would push digital assets overseas and added

“Operation Chokepoint 2.0 regrettably lives on. It’s past time we put it to rest to make America the digital asset capital of the world.”

The systematic and targeted crypto debanking was widespread during the Biden era, a phenomenon the industry dubbed “Chokepoint 2.0.” 

Many U.S. banks viewed crypto firms and investors as reputational risks due to the prevailing political climate and regulatory pressure at the time. 

When the tides shifted after the pro-crypto Trump administration took office in 2025, a formal inquiry was quickly established to address the issue.

By August, President Donald Trump signed an executive order advocating for fair banking to remedy the situation. The Fed and other regulators were ordered to remove “reputational risk” and others as part of the solution. 

The White House, at that time, added that the digital assets industry has been the target of “unfair debanking initiatives.” 

Unfortunately, three months after the order, the same issue is surfacing again.

Divided opinions on crypto risks

Supporters of the JPMorgan move, such as Steve Hanke, claimed that $28 billion has been laundered by criminal rings through cryptocurrency since 2024.  

However, John Deaton, a former U.S. Senate aspirant, clapped back, noting that JPMorgan has paid $40 billion in fines for illicit activity since 2000. He added, 

“Since 2000 JPMorgan alone has paid $40 billion in fines for illicit activity – significantly less than the total fined all crypto companies.”

Interestingly, in August, even President Trump claimed that JPMorgan and Bank of America rejected his deposits. According to him, this supported his belief that the debanking was due to politics. 

That being said, it remains to be seen whether the friction between the crypto industry and banks will be fully resolved.

Share

Lecturas Relacionadas

Bajando las expectativas para el próximo ciclo alcista de BTC

**Resumen del artículo: "Bajar las expectativas para el próximo ciclo alcista de BTC" por Alex Xu** El autor, que tenía a Bitcoin como su mayor activo, ha reducido progresivamente su exposición durante el actual ciclo alcista: eliminó el apalancamiento a 70k y redujo su posición de un 100% a un 30% entre 100k-120k. Recientemente, vendió más a 78k-79k, argumentando una revisión a la baja de las expectativas para el próximo máximo alcista. Las razones principales son: 1. **Narrativa de adopción agotada:** El impulso de adopción masiva (de minorista a institucional vía ETFs) parece agotado. El siguiente paso, la adopción por bancos centrales o fondos soberanos importantes, se ve muy difícil a corto plazo. 2. **Coste de oportunidad:** El autor ha identificado otras oportunidades de inversión en empresas atractivas. 3. **Contracción del ecosistema crypto:** La mayoría de modelos de negocio Web3 (SocialFi, GameFi, DePIN) no han funcionado. Solo DeFi genera valor, pero se contrae por la falta de activos nativos de calidad, lo que reduce la base de usuarios y holders de BTC. 4. **Problemas del mayor comprador:** MicroStrategy, el mayor tenedor corporativo, enfrenta un coste de financiación creciente (11.5% para su préstamo perpetuo), lo que podría ralentizar su ritmo de compra y ejercer presión vendedora. 5. **Competencia del oro tokenizado:** El oro tokenizado ha cerrado la brecha en portabilidad y divisibilidad, erosionando la ventaja competitiva de BTC como "oro digital". 6. **Problema de seguridad:** La reducción de la recompensa por minado (halving) amenaza la seguridad de la red, ya que las nuevas fuentes de ingresos por fees (como las inscripciones) no han podido dar solución. Conclusión: El autor mantiene una posición significativa en BTC y espera que suba, pero es menos optimista sobre su potencial alcista. Vender en la reciente subida fue una decisión táctica. Si sus razones para ser bajista se invalidan, estaría abierto a recomprar, aceptando si se equivoca y el precio sube.

marsbit04/27 02:49

Bajando las expectativas para el próximo ciclo alcista de BTC

marsbit04/27 02:49

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片