7*24

Hot topic

Market

Activities

Bitcoin's Difficulty Adjustment Explained: How the Network Punishes Itself Every Two Weeks The Rule Nobody Votes On Bitcoin has no manager setting mining difficulty with its math, hard-coded into the 

Bitcoin's Difficulty Adjustment Explained: How the Network Punishes Itself Every Two Weeks
The Rule Nobody Votes On

Bitcoin has no manager setting mining difficulty with its math, hard-coded into the protocol such that every 2,016 blocks, the network compares how long that batch of blocks actually took to mine against the 20,160-minute (two-week) target implied by the 10-minute-per-block design.

If miners found those blocks faster than schedule, difficulty rises for the next stretch. If they found them slower, difficulty falls. Nodes calculate the new value independently from the same block timestamps, so there’s nothing to negotiate (i.e., a node that disagreed with the math would simply be on a different chain).

#Up or Down? Put Your Market Intuition to the Test! #HTX Refer And Earn  #Discuss Hot Assets , Enter the Lucky Draw 

Bitcoin's Difficulty Adjustment Explained: How the

World Cup Predictions: 100,000 USDT Daily

💀 Market fear is real with 99 projects failing in 2026 — $YFI could feel the squeeze. This market uncertainty puts $YFI on shaky ground. I'm watching for a breakdown below $2,090, potentially testing 

Last Monday began with a somewhat expected leg down that drove bitcoin south from $65,000 to $63,750. However, the asset reacted well, defended that support level, and jumped by two grand by the end o

Last Monday began with a somewhat expected leg down that drove bitcoin south from $65,000 to $63,750. However, the asset reacted well, defended that support level, and jumped by two grand by the end of the day. Tuesday was even better in terms of gains, as the cryptocurrency jumped to roughly $67,000 on some exchanges to mark a monthly high.

After gaining over $3,000 in just over 24 hours, BTC was primed for a correction given the overall market landscape. It started to lose value gradually and dropped below $65,000 on Thursday. It initiated another breakout attempt on Friday, but it was stopped at $65,750. The subsequent rejection drove it south by $2,000.

The bulls finally intervened and didn’t allow another leg down. Instead, BTC showed some resilience around that level and remained at around $64,000 on Saturday and climbed to $64,500 later that day after Trump ordered the US military to stand down while waiting for the resumed talks between Iran and Oman.BTC Defends $64K

For now, BTC stands above $64,000, with its market cap returning to $1.290 trillion on CG. Its dominance over the alts has risen to almost 57%.



HTX  Creation Challenge — Post and Win 1,500U 💥

2026 World Cup Posting Challenge on HTX Square

HTX Invites You to Share 600K USDT in Gift Packs

BTC Defends $64K

$PSG BUYERS FIRM AT SUPPORT – BREAKOUT SETUP ALIVE! 🟢 Entry: 0.521 – 0.523 ⚡ Stop Loss: 0.516 ⚠️ Target: 0.530 🚀 Target: 0.536 🚀 Target: 0.542 🚀 📊 The bid is stacked at the 0.521 zone, and sellers hav

HTX Creation Challenge — Post and Win 1,500U 💥Discuss Hot Assets , Enter the Lucky DrawHTX Refer And Earn The $25 million Bitcoin glitch hiding inside Wall Street’s clearinghouses Six regulated paths 

Discuss Hot Assets , Enter the Lucky Draw

The $25 million Bitcoin glitch hiding inside Wall Street’s clearinghouses

Six regulated paths offer Bitcoin exposure, yet new research reveals pricing gaps that can reach $25 million.

A May study found IBIT options and matched CME futures carried an average 2.58-point annualized financing gap.

02The gap matters because two trades on the same Bitcoin exposure can tie up different amounts of cash in separate margin systems.

03Cross-margining exists, but it often depends on account structure, leaving the pricing gap unresolved for most investors.
Two Wall Street trading desks can hold economically similar exposure to Bitcoin and still pay materially different amounts to keep that exposure open. That's not because one desk made a better market call, but because the regulated products carrying the positions are inside collateral systems that don't always recognize them as parts of the same hedge.

One desk can reconstruct a forward Bitcoin position from matching calls and puts on BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), while another can obtain comparable price exposure through a cash-settled CME Bitcoin futures contract with a similar maturity.

While the economic risk is closely related, the financing cost isn't.

A May 2026 study by Purdue University professor Mindy Mallory compared 386 matched observations and found that the annualized carry embedded in CME Bitcoin futures exceeded the fee-adjusted carry reconstructed from IBIT options by an average of 2.581 percentage points, with a median difference of 2.521 points.

Applied purely as an illustration, a 2.581-point annualized difference on a $1 billion position would correspond to approximately $25.81 million over a full year, although the paper doesn't describe the wedge as a fixed fee and found that it varied substantially across dates, occasionally reversing direction entirely.



The $25 million Bitcoin glitch hiding inside Wall

HTX Refer And Earn 

Ethereum Price Uptick May Be More Than a Fluke 🚀 Ethereum has been witnessing a short-term uptick in onchain activity. This could be a sign that the market is finally waking up to the project's potent

🦈 $TUT SUPPORT HELD – SWEEP AND RALLY SCENARIO IN PLAY 💥 Entry: 0.01475 – 0.01490 ⚡ Target 1: 0.01530 🚀 Target 2: 0.01580 🚀 Target 3: 0.01650 🚀 Stop Loss: 0.01420 ⚠️ 📌 This demand cluster at 0.01475–0

ARKM chatter is bullish but low-engagement, highlighting Arkham’s on-chain intel utility and AI narrative. On Jul 14, Arkham data cited US gov moved $288M seized BTC/ETH. July updates added Prediction

Up or Down? Put Your Market Intuition to the Test!HTX Refer And Earn World Cup Predictions: 100,000 USDT Daily Crypto market’s bull run isn’t here yet, but here’s what must change! The crypto market h

Up or Down? Put Your Market Intuition to the Test!

Crypto market’s bull run isn’t here yet, but here’s what must change!

The crypto market hasn’t recovered since the bear market began right after the largest liquidation event in its history on 10th October 2025. On that day, over $19 billion were simply wiped out.

Since then, the market has swung through highs and lows, sparking concern over whether the bulls or the bears have the upper hand.

The market now sits at another of those turning points, just after Bitcoin [BTC] cleared the $65,000-resistance and several altcoins printed local highs.



Crypto market’s bull run isn’t here yet, but here’

Dark clouds are gathering over $SCRT as the bulls' grip starts to slip, and I'm bracing for impact. $SCRT - SHORT🔴 Entry: 0.02202 SL: 0.02244 TP1: 0.02181 TP2: 0.0216 TP3: 0.02139 The trend structure 

Burwick Law and Wolf Popper LLP file a federal class action against the creators of Solana-based meme coin launchpad Pump.fun. The law firms filed the class action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) on behalf of crypto investors impacted by Pump.fun activities. Pump.fun Accused of Displaying Offensive Content In the complaint filed yesterday, the lead plaintiff, Kendall Carnahan, accused the creators of Pump.fun of exploiting users. Violation of Securities Laws Additionally, the class action alleged that Pump.fun creators violated federal securities laws by offering and selling unregistered securities offerings. In particular, the complaint labeled Peanut the Squirrel (PNUT) as a security offered and sold on Pump.fun. Based on the PNUT’s securities tag, the complaint alleged that the token issuers failed to register it with the SEC. Furthermore, it accused Pump.fun creators of using tactics similar to Ponzi to generate over $500 million in fees from users. The plaintiff contended that Pump.fun leveraged internet culture to promote the adoption of volatile and unregistered securities tokens.

Burwick Law and Wolf Popper LLP file a federal class action against the creators of Solana-based meme coin launchpad Pump.fun.&nbsp; The law firms filed the class action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) on behalf of crypto investors impacted by Pump.fun activities.&nbsp; Pump.fun Accused of Displaying Offensive Content&nbsp; In the complaint filed yesterday, the lead plaintiff, Kendall Carnahan, accused the creators of Pump.fun of exploiting users.&nbsp;<img src="https://d1x7dwosqaosdj.cloudfront.net/images/2025-01/bc50bc77857f46d79cecb42376204f42.jpeg" alt="The-Cry-2024-09-12T183125247.png" style="margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; width: 329px; height: auto;" /> Violation of Securities Laws Additionally, the class action alleged that Pump.fun creators violated federal securities laws by offering and selling unregistered securities offerings. In particular, the complaint labeled Peanut the Squirrel (PNUT) as a security offered and sold on Pump.fun.&nbsp; Based on the PNUT’s securities tag, the complaint alleged that the token issuers failed to register it with the SEC.&nbsp; Furthermore, it accused Pump.fun creators of using tactics similar to Ponzi to generate over $500 million in fees from users. The plaintiff contended that Pump.fun leveraged internet culture to promote the adoption of volatile and unregistered securities tokens.&nbsp;

Burwick Law and Wolf Popper LLP file a federal cla

Tariffs Crash Crypto

Share Your Thoughts on Popular Assets in March

BTC price hits a new high of $120,000! 

Santa Claus Rally

The Federal Reserve announced a rate cut

After six years of pie-in-the-sky fundraising, 90% of funds used to replenish cash flow: The illusion and reality of L'CI Technology's silicon carbide "industrialization"｜TMTPost Deep Dive

Burwick Law and Wolf Popper LLP file a federal cla

Todos los comentarios0Lo más recientePopular

Temas populares