Zoomex Launches Twin Stars Cup Trading Competition With up to $150,000 Prize Pool

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-20Last updated on 2026-03-20

Abstract

Zoomex has launched the "Twin Stars Cup," a global trading competition with a prize pool of up to $150,000. Running from March 17 to March 31, 2026, the event ranks participants based on their cumulative trading volume in USDT perpetual contracts. The top-ranked trader can win up to $18,000, with tiered rewards distributed across multiple leaderboard positions. The prize pool scales with the number of participants. Eligibility requires meeting minimum asset and trading volume thresholds, while institutional and API traders are excluded. Zoomex has implemented measures to ensure fairness, disqualifying participants for activities like wash trading. The competition is part of the platform's efforts to boost global user engagement.

Zoomex has officially launched the “Twin Stars Cup,” a global trading competition featuring a total prize pool of up to $150,000. The event is now live and will run from March 17 to March 31, 2026, inviting traders worldwide to compete based on trading performance across USDT perpetual contracts.

The competition is structured around a volume-based ranking system, where participants are ranked according to their cumulative trading volume during the event period. Rewards are distributed across multiple tiers, with the top-ranked participant eligible to receive up to $18,000, while additional prizes are allocated to a broad range of leaderboard positions.

According to Zoomex, the total prize pool scales with participation, starting from a base level and increasing as more users join the competition, with a maximum allocation of $150,000.

Competition Structure and Participation Requirements

The Twin Stars Cup is open to eligible platform users who meet the participation requirements. Traders must maintain a minimum net asset balance and achieve the required trading volume thresholds to qualify for leaderboard rankings and rewards.

Rankings are determined based on total trading volume in USDT perpetual contracts during the competition period. Final results will be calculated after the event concludes, with periodic leaderboard updates provided throughout the competition.

Certain categories of users, including institutional participants and API-based traders, are not eligible to participate in the event.

Tiered Rewards and Leaderboard Distribution

The competition features a tiered reward system designed to recognize performance across multiple ranking brackets.

Top positions receive the highest allocations, with decreasing reward levels distributed across extended ranking tiers. In addition to the top individual rankings, broader reward bands ensure that a wide range of participants can qualify for prize distribution based on their trading activity.

The structure is designed to encourage sustained participation throughout the competition period while maintaining a clear performance-based ranking system.

Fairness and Risk-Control Measures

Zoomex stated that the competition includes a range of risk-control and compliance measures to ensure fairness and transparency.

Participants engaging in prohibited activities including wash trading, matched trading, multi-account usage, or coordinated manipulation will be disqualified from the competition. The platform applies monitoring systems to detect abnormal trading behavior and enforce compliance with event rules.

Additionally, users must meet all eligibility conditions, including trading volume requirements and account verification criteria, to receive rewards.

Global Participation and Market Engagement

The Twin Stars Cup is designed as a global trading event, allowing participants from multiple regions to compete in a unified leaderboard environment. By structuring the competition around real trading activity, Zoomex aims to create a transparent and performance-driven trading experience.

The company noted that initiatives such as the Twin Stars Cup are part of its broader efforts to increase user engagement and provide structured trading opportunities within its ecosystem.

About Zoomex

Founded in 2021, Zoomex is a global cryptocurrency trading platform serving more than 3 million users across over 35 countries and regions. The exchange offers a wide range of trading pairs and perpetual contracts, supported by a high-performance matching engine designed for low-latency execution.

Zoomex focuses on delivering a transparent and efficient trading environment, with an emphasis on execution reliability, market accessibility, and user experience. The platform operates under multiple regulatory registrations and incorporates security measures including multi-signature wallet infrastructure and third-party audits.

More details about the Twin Stars Cup are available at:https://www.zoomex.com/en/game/twinstarscup

Disclaimer: TheNewsCrypto does not endorse any content on this page. The content depicted in this Press Release does not represent any investment advice. TheNewsCrypto recommends our readers to make decisions based on their own research. TheNewsCrypto is not accountable for any damage or loss related to content, products, or services stated in this Press Release.

TagsPress ReleaseZoomex

Related Questions

QWhat is the total prize pool for the Zoomex Twin Stars Cup trading competition?

AThe total prize pool for the Twin Stars Cup is up to $150,000.

QDuring which dates will the Twin Stars Cup trading competition take place?

AThe competition will run from March 17 to March 31, 2026.

QWhat is the primary metric used to rank participants in the competition?

AParticipants are ranked according to their cumulative trading volume in USDT perpetual contracts during the event period.

QWhich groups of users are not eligible to participate in the Twin Stars Cup?

AInstitutional participants and API-based traders are not eligible to participate in the event.

QWhat is one of the prohibited activities that will lead to disqualification from the competition?

AEngaging in wash trading, matched trading, multi-account usage, or coordinated manipulation will lead to disqualification.

Related Reads

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit12m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit12m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit32m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit32m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit40m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit40m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片