You Should Still Believe in Crypto

marsbitPublished on 2025-12-13Last updated on 2025-12-13

Abstract

The article "You Should Still Believe in Crypto" addresses the growing sense of burnout and disillusionment within the cryptocurrency industry, sparked by a post from Aevo co-founder Ken Chan titled "I Wasted 8 Years of My Life in Crypto." It acknowledges the collective fatigue many feel due to the industry's fast-paced, often speculative nature, where narratives shift rapidly, and projects frequently fail or disappear. However, the piece argues that the core value of crypto remains vital. It references Nic Carter’s response, highlighting crypto’s potential to create a more robust monetary system, encode business logic via smart contracts, establish true digital property rights, improve capital market efficiency, and enhance global financial inclusion. The article revisits Bitcoin’s origin as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system born from the 2008 financial crisis, emphasizing its purpose as a trustless, decentralized alternative to traditional finance. It points to real-world adoption in high-inflation countries like Argentina and Turkey, where Bitcoin and stablecoins serve as essential financial tools, and notes increasing institutional embrace from firms like BlackRock and Fidelity. Finally, it draws a parallel to the early internet era, arguing that despite chaos, failed projects, and speculative excess, the crypto industry—like the internet—is laying foundational groundwork for future technological and financial evolution. The conclusion is a call to persevere,...

Author: BlockBeats

If you've been in the crypto industry for the past few years, you must have felt that growing sense of "burnout."

Last weekend, the lengthy post by Aevo co-founder Ken Chan undoubtedly struck a chord with many. He used an extreme title—"I Wasted 8 Years of My Life in the Crypto Industry."

This isn't just one person's state; it's the collective exhaustion of the industry. Ken wrote the truth many dare not admit: in the crypto industry, it's really easy to lose your sense of time.

It's Not All Unfounded

You might have stayed up late for airdrops, watched the charts for listings, chased narratives by buying high and selling low, researched a new protocol all night, or participated in countless hours of unpaid labor for community governance. From romantic libertarianism, to on-chain autonomy experiments, to today's runaway frenzy of memes, perpetuals, and gambling-themed tracks—all of this is enough to make one wonder: are we really participating in a technological revolution, or are we just working for an infinitely greedy casino?

Practitioners' doubts are not because they are not steadfast enough, but because of the crypto industry's own brutal structure: narrative life cycles are shorter than product life cycles; hype outweighs fundamentals; speculation moves far faster than building; hero worship coexists with collective suspicion; the end for many projects is not failure, but disappearance.

We must be honest: Ken's feelings are something many have experienced. And these doubts are not unfounded.

The weight of the question, "What are we really坚持ing for?" might be far heavier than "Will the price of Bitcoin go up?"

So when we say "we believe in crypto," what exactly are we believing in? Are we believing in project teams? No. Are we believing in some celebrity KOL? Of course not. Are we believing in一个个 narratives? That's even less likely.

Many suddenly realize: the one thing they have truly believed in all along likely boils down to this: what we are still坚持ing and believing in is the meaning of crypto for this world.

Therefore, shortly after Ken's article went viral, Nic Carter, co-founder of Castle Island Ventures, wrote another response article—"I Don't Regret Spending Eight Years in Crypto."

What is the meaning of crypto for this world? Nic Carter gave his five points: making the monetary system sounder, encoding business logic with smart contracts, making digital property rights real, improving capital market efficiency, and expanding global financial inclusion.

Don't Forget Why We Started

Whenever the industry falls into chaos, perhaps we can reread the Bitcoin whitepaper.

A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System—that's the first sentence of the whitepaper.

2008, financial crisis, banks failing, Lehman Brothers collapsing. Financiers and politicians made the whole world pay for their risks and mistakes.

Bitcoin was born not to create wealth, but to answer a question: "Can we build a monetary system that does not rely on any centralized institution?"

For the first time in history, humanity possessed a currency that required trust in no one. It is the world's only truly不属于 any country, company, or individual's financial system. You can criticize ETH, criticize Solana, criticize all L2s, criticize all DEXs, but few criticize Bitcoin, because its original intention has never changed.

Any Web2 company can close your account tomorrow; but no one can stop you from sending a Bitcoin tomorrow. There will always be people who dislike it, distrust it, even attack it, but no one can change it.

Water does not contend, yet it benefits all things.

Global inflation normalization, soaring sovereign debt, asset scarcity after long-term declining risk-free rates, financial repression, lack of privacy... The existence of these problems means the vision of the crypto industry is not outdated but more urgent. As Nic Carter said: "I have never seen a technology that can push capital market infrastructure upgrades more than crypto."

Why This Is Not a Failed Industry

Ken said he wasted eight years. But did we really waste our青春?

In countries with hyperinflation like Argentina, Turkey, and Venezuela, BTC and stablecoins have become the de facto "shadow financial system"; hundreds of millions of people unable to access the banking system have owned global digital assets for the first time; humanity possesses a globally accessible asset it can truly control for the first time; international payments no longer need banks for the first time; billions of people can access the same financial system for the first time; financial infrastructure begins to脱离 national borders; an asset not reliant on violence and power begins to be recognized globally...

For a country with high inflation, a stable, non-depreciating currency is like a Noah's Ark, which is why stablecoins account for 61.8% of crypto trading volume in Argentina. For freelancers with overseas business, digital nomads, and the wealthy class, USDT is their digital dollar.

Compared to hiding dollars under the mattress or risking black market currency exchange, clicking a mouse to convert pesos into USDT seems more elegant and safe.

Whether it's cash transaction by a street vendor or a USDT transfer by the elite, it is essentially a distrust of national credit and a protection of private property. In a country with high taxes, low welfare, and constantly depreciating currency, every "grey transaction" is a反抗 against institutional plunder.

For a hundred years, the Rose Palace in Buenos Aires has changed hands batch after batch, and the peso has been废弃了一张又一张. But the common people, relying on underground transactions and grey wisdom, have硬是 found a way out in a dead end.

Almost all of the world's top 20 funds have established Web3 departments; TradFi institutions continue to pour in (BlackRock, Fidelity, CME); national digital currency systems use Bitcoin as a reference; digital asset ETFs across the US are刷新 new records for capital inflows; in just 15 years, Bitcoin has jumped into the top ten global assets...

Even with bubbles, speculation, chaos, and scams, some facts have already occurred. These changes have somewhat tangibly changed the world. And we are standing in an industry that will continue to change the global financial structure.

Have We Really Left Nothing Behind?

Many will still ask: "If 15 years from now, all these chains are gone, projects are gone, protocols are replaced by more advanced infrastructure. Then what we are doing now, isn't it still wasting our青春?"

Look at another industry: the 2000 internet bubble burst, NASDAQ plummeted 78%; in 1995 Amazon was called "a website selling books"; in 1998 Google was considered "not as good as Yahoo"; in 2006 social networks were seen as "teenage rebellion."

The early internet was full of: thousands of dead startups; completely vanished innovations;大量 investments lost; tens of thousands of people thought they had wasted their青春.

Early BBS, portals, dial-up internet, paid email—almost none exist today, 90% of the first-generation mobile internet products did not survive. But they were by no means a "waste"; they constituted the soil for the mobile era.

The infrastructure they created: browsers, TCP/IP, early servers, compilers,它们成就了: Facebook, Google, Apple, the entire foundation of mobile internet, cloud computing, and AI. The history of social networks is a constantly破碎 cycle, just as TikTok today is built upon countless dead social networks.

Each generation replaces the previous one, but no generation is in vain.

No industry's journey is clean, linear, clear, correct, or has clear answers. All foundational tech industries experience chaos, bubbles, trial and error, misunderstanding, until they change the world.

The crypto industry is the same.

The technological revolution of the crypto industry has never been accomplished by a single generation. Everything we do, even if ETH is replaced by other chains in the future, L2s are rewritten by new architectures, the DEXs we use today all disappear, will absolutely not be in vain.

Because we provide the foundational soil, the trial and error, the parameters, the social experiments, the path dependence, the experience and samples absorbed by the future. Not the final outcome itself.

Moreover, you are not alone in坚持ing.

Around the world, there are still millions of developers, researchers, fund managers, node operators, builders, and traders pushing this era slowly forward. We are with you.

——Written for those who remain on this path.

Related Questions

QWhat is the core reason for the author's belief in the crypto industry despite widespread fatigue and skepticism?

AThe author believes in the fundamental value and transformative potential of crypto for the world, such as creating a more robust monetary system, enabling smart contracts for business logic, making digital property rights real, improving capital market efficiency, and expanding global financial inclusion, rather than in specific projects, influencers, or narratives.

QAccording to the article, what was the original purpose of Bitcoin's creation as stated in its whitepaper?

ABitcoin was created to establish a peer-to-peer electronic cash system that does not rely on any centralized institutions, in response to the 2008 financial crisis, aiming to answer the question: 'Can we build a monetary system that does not depend on any centralized institution?'

QHow does the article argue that the crypto industry has already made a tangible impact on the global financial system?

AThe article points out that crypto has become a 'shadow financial system' in high-inflation countries like Argentina and Turkey, provided billions of unbanked people with access to global digital assets, enabled international payments without banks, and attracted major traditional financial institutions like BlackRock and Fidelity, with Bitcoin now ranking among the top ten global financial assets.

QWhat comparison does the article draw between the crypto industry and the early internet era?

AThe article compares the crypto industry to the early internet era, noting that both experienced chaos, bubbles, failed projects, and skepticism, but early internet's 'waste'—like BBS, portals, and dial-up—formed the foundational soil for future advancements like Facebook, Google, and AI, suggesting that crypto's current experiments and failures are similarly paving the way for future financial infrastructure.

QWhy does the author assert that efforts in the crypto industry are not in vain, even if current technologies and projects become obsolete?

AThe author argues that the crypto industry's contributions provide foundational soil, experimentation, parameters, social experiments, and path dependencies that will be absorbed as experience and samples for future advancements, meaning that even if current chains, protocols, or DEXs disappear, they are not wasted but part of a necessary iterative process in technological revolution.

Related Reads

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit10h ago

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit10h ago

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit12h ago

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit12h ago

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit12h ago

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit12h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片