XRP volume surges to $3.6B as Ripple expands Asia strategy

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-26Last updated on 2026-03-26

Abstract

Ripple's expansion in Singapore, including broader regulatory approval from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and participation in the BLOOM initiative, has brought XRP back into focus. The company is piloting programmable trade settlement using the XRP Ledger and RLUSD to improve cross-border trade efficiency. Market reaction was swift, with XRP's trading volume surging to $3.6 billion and its price rising to $1.42. While this signals strong bullish interest, the long-term impact depends on whether these regulated initiatives translate into sustained real-world utility and transaction demand.

Ripple [XRP] is back in the spotlight, and this time the narrative centers on utility. Ripple’s Singapore expansion, its MAS-linked pilot, and the market’s fast reaction pushed XRP into the market’s discourse. Therefore, the question is simple: is this just another headline pop or the start of something more enduring?

Ripple expands its regulated footprint in Singapore

Ripple had already secured broader approval from the Monetary Authority of Singapore to expand payment activities under its Major Payment Institution license. That gave the firm more room to offer token-based settlement services and related payment rails in a market that had become central to its Asia-Pacific strategy.

This mattered because Singapore was not handing out credibility for free. Ripple’s local entity gained wider permissions to serve banks, fintechs, and crypto firms using XRP, RLUSD, and similar rails. However, that was more than a licensing update. It pushed Ripple further into a market that still took rules seriously.

Ripple has been in Singapore since 2017, and no other region has grown as quickly for the firm. Singapore wasn’t just a backdrop; it became one of Ripple’s most important proving grounds, a place where the company could advance real utility.

XRP Ledger and RLUSD in cross-border trade flows

The bigger shift came through MAS’s BLOOM initiative. Ripple joined the program with Unloq to pilot programmable trade settlement using Unloq’s SC+ infrastructure, Ripple’s technology, the XRP Ledger, and RLUSD.

The pilot targeted one of finance’s toughest challenges: cross‐border trade settlement, which for years has remained slow, fragmented, and painfully inefficient. Under this model, payments were released only after pre-agreed commercial conditions were met, such as shipment verification.

Therefore, this was not another vague blockchain promise. It tested whether digital settlement assets could actually reduce friction and improve trade finance access, especially for SMEs. In particular, that gave XRP’s utility case something it often lacked: a real-world framework with rules attached.

Could Singapore become a real utility catalyst?

The market reacted quickly, and it did not do so quietly. XRP’s volume surged from $2.1 billion to $3.6 billion, at press time, while the price recovered from $1.38 to $1.42 as traders responded to the developments.

Source: CoinMarketCap

Rising volume alongside climbing prices signaled strong bullish participation Still, attention alone meant nothing.

XRP had seen excitement before, and much of it died fast. Looking ahead, Singapore could become a real utility catalyst, but failure to do so would mean this move would end up as just another temporary spike.


Final Summary

  • Ripple’s Singapore push gave XRP a harder, more credible utility narrative than the market usually gets.
  • The real test now lies in whether regulated pilots turn into sustained transaction demand.

Related Questions

QWhat was the main reason for XRP's trading volume surge to $3.6 billion?

AXRP's trading volume surged due to Ripple's expansion in Singapore, including its broader approval from the Monetary Authority of Singapore and participation in the MAS's BLOOM initiative for programmable trade settlement.

QHow did Ripple's Major Payment Institution license in Singapore benefit the company?

AThe license gave Ripple broader permissions to offer token-based settlement services and payment rails, allowing it to serve banks, fintechs, and crypto firms using XRP and RLUSD in the Singapore market.

QWhat specific problem does the MAS BLOOM initiative pilot program aim to solve?

AThe pilot program aims to address the challenges of cross-border trade settlement, which has been slow, fragmented, and inefficient, by using programmable payments that are triggered only after pre-agreed commercial conditions are met.

QWhat was the price movement of XRP following the news about Ripple's Singapore expansion?

AThe price of XRP recovered from $1.38 to $1.42 as traders responded to the developments in Ripple's Singapore strategy.

QWhy is Singapore considered a critical market for Ripple's Asia-Pacific strategy?

ASingapore is Ripple's fastest-growing region since 2017 and serves as a key proving ground for advancing real utility, thanks to its regulatory clarity and strategic importance in the Asia-Pacific region.

Related Reads

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

**From Survival to Accelerated Growth: Zcash Founder Details the 3-Year Rise** Three years ago, Zcash (ZEC) was a struggling pioneer in privacy technology, with a price near $30, low shielded supply (11%), and a community mired in governance disputes. Today, ZEC trades around $600, with over 31% of its supply (~$3B) in user-controlled shielded pools. This transformation resulted from breaking key constraints. First, **governance shackles were removed**. The old model guaranteed funding to two entities (ECC and ZF) regardless of performance, creating a monopoly. In 2024, ECC rejected further direct funding, forcing a change. The NU6 upgrade ended direct funding, allocating 8% to community grants and 12% to a protocol-controlled treasury for retroactive rewards, expiring in 2028 unless renewed by overwhelming consensus. The entities also relinquished their trademark-based veto power, freeing community governance. Second, the **product focus shifted** from pure cryptography to user growth. Previously, engineering excelled at privacy tech but failed to attract users. In early 2024, the team (later ZODL) pivoted to building products users wanted, like the Zodl wallet (default privacy, hardware support, cross-asset swaps). This drove shielded supply to grow over 400% in ZEC terms, with 86.5% of recent transactions being shielded, representing real user adoption. Third, the **narrative evolved** from the limiting "privacy coin" label to "unstoppable private money." This clarified Zcash's value proposition: a Bitcoin-like monetary policy with verifiable private payments via advanced cryptography. This structural narrative—protocol (Zcash), asset (ZEC), gateway (Zodl)—enabled broader exchange listings, institutional interest, and ETF filings. Finally, **organizational constraints were broken**. In early 2026, the ECC team left its non-profit structure after disputes over control, forming Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL). ZODL raised $25M from top VCs (Paradigm, a16z, etc.), gaining the capital and agility of a startup to scale consumer products. Current metrics show strong momentum: social discussion volume for ZEC surged 15,245% in a year, with 81% positive sentiment. The focus is now on enhancing user experience (Zodl wallet), scalability (Tachyon project targeting Visa-level throughput with 25-second blocks), and post-quantum security (quantum-recoverable wallets coming soon). Zcash is positioned to become faster, more usable, scalable, and quantum-resistant.

marsbit2m ago

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

marsbit2m ago

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

**Summary:** This companion piece reframes the five TradFi-on-crypto exchange architectures, previously classified by "architectural fingerprint," through the lens of counterparty risk. The core question is: whose balance sheet bears the loss first in a stress scenario, and has it historically done so? Each of the five models corresponds to a distinct risk holder with its own documented failure modes. * **Model 1 (Stablecoin-Settled CEX Perpetuals):** Risk is held by the stablecoin issuer (e.g., reserve composition, bank connectivity) and the CEX's own book. History includes Tether's banking disconnections (2017) and reserve misrepresentations (CFTC 2021 Order). * **Model 2 (CFD Brokers):** Risk resides on the broker's balance sheet (B-book model). Regulatory differences (e.g., ESMA's mandatory negative balance protection vs. Mauritius FSC's lack thereof) define loss allocation rules, as seen in the 2015 SNB event (Alpari UK insolvency). * **Model 3 (Off-Chain Custody & Transfer Agent Chain):** Risk lies with the off-chain custodian/platform. User asset recovery depends on Terms of Use and corporate structure, exemplified by the Celsius bankruptcy ruling (2023) where Earn Account assets were deemed property of the estate. * **Model 4 (DEX Perpetual Protocols):** No single balance sheet bears risk. Loss absorption relies on a protocol's insurance fund and Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism, as demonstrated in the GMX V1 (2022) and dYdX v3 YFI (2023) incidents. * **Model 5 (Regulated CCP - DCM-DCO-FCM):** The most institutionalized model concentrates risk in the Central Counterparty (CCP). However, history shows CCPs can employ non-standard tools under extreme stress, such as mass trade cancellation (LME Nickel, 2022) or enabling negative price settlements (CME WTI, 2020). The report argues that regulatory choices and counterparty risk structures are co-extensive, not in an upstream-downstream relationship. It concludes with five separate observation checklists (not predictions) for monitoring the structural vulnerabilities of each risk model.

marsbit19m ago

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

marsbit19m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is XRP 2.0

XRP 2.0: A New Frontier in the Cryptocurrency Landscape Introduction to XRP 2.0 In the ever-evolving realm of cryptocurrency, new projects continuously emerge, vying for attention and adoption. One such promising initiative is XRP 2.0, a novel cryptocurrency project designed to leverage advanced blockchain technology and robust encryption methodologies. While the name draws parallels with Ripple’s XRP, it’s crucial to note that XRP 2.0 operates independently, focusing on enhancing transaction security, privacy, and scalability. As the digital financial landscape increasingly embraces decentralized solutions, XRP 2.0 aims to contribute meaningfully to web3 and the overall expansion of crypto projects. What is XRP 2.0? At its core, XRP 2.0 is a cryptocurrency project that aims to create a secure and decentralized digital currency ecosystem. Its foundational technology integrates sophisticated blockchain principles with cutting-edge encryption techniques. The overarching goal of XRP 2.0 is to establish itself as a reliable and efficient platform enabling swift transaction execution while prioritizing enhanced privacy protections for its users. The project is promoted as a solution to many limitations faced by existing cryptocurrencies, proposing a system that can handle a higher volume of transactions with improved speed and privacy. This versatility positions XRP 2.0 as a significant contender in a marketplace riddled with various digital currencies. Who is the Creator of XRP 2.0? The identity of the creator behind XRP 2.0 has been flagged as ‘Wilbur.’ However, comprehensive details regarding Wilbur or their associated entity remain elusive. The anonymity of many cryptocurrency creators is not an uncommon phenomenon in the industry, often designed to maintain a degree of privacy and security. Who are the Investors of XRP 2.0? As of now, specific information related to the investment foundations or organizations supporting XRP 2.0 is not publicly available. In the cryptocurrency sector, the backing by reputed investors can significantly influence a project's credibility and success, yet the transparency regarding the financial supporters of XRP 2.0 has not been established. How Does XRP 2.0 Work? XRP 2.0 stands out by employing a combination of blockchain technology and advanced encryption algorithms that ensures secure and decentralized transactions. Its innovative structure includes unique features designed to foster user engagement and broaden functionalities beyond conventional cryptocurrency transactions. Among these features, XRP 2.0 incorporates AI-powered capabilities, such as text-to-image and text-to-speech functionalities. These additions are designed to enhance the interactive experience for users, promoting broader applicability across various sectors. By bridging technological advancements with user-centered design, XRP 2.0 aims to capture the attention of a diverse range of individuals and enterprises looking to integrate cryptocurrency solutions into their operational frameworks. Timeline of XRP 2.0 Understanding XRP 2.0 requires examining the milestones that have defined its journey thus far: July 23, 2023: XRP 2.0 is introduced as a novel cryptocurrency project, aiming to revolutionize secure and decentralized transaction capabilities in the blockchain domain. September 8, 2023: The launching of another project, XRP20, occurs, marking the emergence of an ERC-20 token on the Ethereum blockchain that remains unrelated to XRP 2.0. November 13, 2023: The XRP Ledger undergoes a significant update with the release of rippled server software version 2.0.0. It is essential to note that this development is disconnected from the XRP 2.0 cryptocurrency project. Key Points About XRP 2.0 To distill the essence of XRP 2.0, several critical factors emerge: Unique Features: The inclusion of features like AI-powered text-to-image and text-to-speech further diversifies the potential applications of XRP 2.0. Blockchain Technology: The framework utilizes advanced blockchain mechanisms and encryption protocols, ensuring a secure and decentralized environment for transactions. Scalability and Privacy: XRP 2.0 prioritizes enhanced privacy protections in transaction processes and the scalability necessary to accommodate a growing user base. No Affiliation with Ripple: Importantly, despite its name, XRP 2.0 does not have any allegiance or collaboration with Ripple’s XRP, distinguishing its operational framework and objectives within the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Conclusion XRP 2.0 represents an ambitious venture into the cryptocurrency sphere, aiming to offer a combination of security, privacy, and efficiency in digital transactions. By integrating sophisticated technologies and user-friendly features, the project sets out to broaden the horizons of what cryptocurrency can achieve in today's digital economy. While the anonymity of its creator and lack of disclosed investors might raise questions for some, XRP 2.0's focus on advanced functionalities and decentralisation enhances its appeal amidst an increasingly crowded crypto market. As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, XRP 2.0 may yet emerge as a pivotal player in the expansion of secure and scalable blockchain solutions.

941 Total ViewsPublished 2024.04.01Updated 2024.12.03

What is XRP 2.0

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of XRP (XRP) are presented below.

活动图片