Will MYX set new all-time lows after the $1.81 rejection? Data shows…

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-23Last updated on 2026-02-23

Abstract

A recent analysis of MYX Finance (MYX) highlights a bearish outlook following a failed attempt to sustain momentum. After a brief rally to $1.81, the token experienced significant buyer exhaustion, closing the same session at just $1.02. This rejection has led to sellers taking control, with the loss of the $1 support level indicating potential further declines. Technical analysis suggests that, without nearby long-term support, MYX could potentially fall as low as $0.15. In the short term, any bounce to the $0.80-$0.85 range is viewed as a selling opportunity. Both long and short-term expectations remain bearish.

In a recent AMBCrypto report, the down-only price action of MYX Finance [MYX] was highlighted. A short-term bullish divergence was noted, and a bounce to $1.5 was expected at that time.

MYX bulls were able to drive the bounce as high as $1.81. In doing so, a local bottom at $0.80 was formed. This level was retested as support once again in recent hours of trading.

AMBCrypto reported that $3 and $5 were the major longer-term swing resistances overhead. MYX bulls need to overturn these levels to establish an uptrend. As things stand, the altcoin looks more likely to set new lows than reclaim the overhead supply zones.

MYX buyer exhaustion explained

The 1-day timeframe’s price action illustrated the extremely tough job bulls have on their hands.

On Friday, the 20th of February, the rally rose as high as $1.816, but it lasted only a few hours. The daily session close was at $1.02, a far way from the highs.

It was classic buyer exhaustion.

An upward candle on high volume hunted down the imbalances and short liquidations overhead, as an earlier report warned it might. Short-term buyer enthusiasm and forced short liquidations can only keep the rally going for so long.

Since then, sellers have seized control emphatically.

In August 2025, MYX rallied swiftly from $0.15 to $2.5. Towards the end of that month, the price came back to the psychological $1 level to test it as support.

Therefore, now that this level was ceded to the bears, there was no long-term support nearby. It might seem dramatic to say that $0.15 was the next target, but technical analysis showed that this outcome is possible.

On the 1-hour chart, the imbalance between $0.75-$0.85 was a short-term target. A bounce to this area would likely present a selling opportunity. The OBV was making new lows and the MACD formed another bearish crossover.

Overall, the long and short-term expectations remained bearish for MYX.


Final Summary

  • The failure to rclaim $1 as support meant that MYX could fall as far south as $0.15.
  • In the short-term, a bounce to $0.80-$0.85 should be considered a selling opportunity.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Related Questions

QWhat was the expected bounce level for MYX Finance according to the previous AMBCrypto report?

AA bounce to $1.5 was expected.

QWhat was the major longer-term swing resistance level that MYX bulls need to overcome to establish an uptrend?

A$3 and $5 were the major longer-term swing resistances overhead.

QWhat does the article identify as the classic sign of buyer exhaustion on February 20th?

AThe price rallied to a high of $1.816 but the daily session closed far from the highs at $1.02, which was a classic sign of buyer exhaustion.

QAccording to the technical analysis, what is the potential long-term downside target for MYX after it lost the $1 support level?

AThe potential long-term downside target is $0.15.

QWhat short-term price area does the article suggest would present a selling opportunity for MYX?

AA bounce to the $0.80-$0.85 area would present a selling opportunity.

Related Reads

Why Hasn't the U.S. Seen the Rise of 'Huabei' or 'Jiebei'?

The article explores why the U.S. lacks large-scale consumer credit products like China's "Huabei" and "Jiebei," despite having a developed financial sector. Key reasons include: 1. **Structural Barriers**: A fragmented federal and state regulatory system, reinforced by post-2008 reforms like the Dodd-Frank Act, raises compliance costs and protects traditional banks, stifling fintech innovation. 2. **Credit Card Dominance**: Credit cards, used by 70-80% of adults, form a $1.28 trillion debt market with high APRs (avg. 22.3%). This system cross-subsidizes users who pay in full with those carrying balances, creating a predatory yet entrenched ecosystem. 3. **Data Privacy Laws**: Strict regulations (e.g., FCRA, CCPA) prevent tech giants from leveraging behavioral data for credit scoring, unlike in China where such data fuels fintech models. 4. **Capital Market Disincentives**: Wall Street penalizes tech firms entering finance due to lower valuations associated with heavy regulation and risk, as seen in Apple’s failure with Apple Card. 5. **Banking Oligopoly**: Major banks control consumer lending, leveraging lobbying power and consumer habits to maintain high-cost credit, while alternatives like payday loans (400% APR) or "unbanked" services remain niche or exploitative. Ultimately, regulatory, structural, and corporate interests collectively block the emergence of accessible, low-cost digital lending in the U.S.

Odaily星球日报28m ago

Why Hasn't the U.S. Seen the Rise of 'Huabei' or 'Jiebei'?

Odaily星球日报28m ago

More and More 'Model Supermarkets' Are Opening: ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent Compete to Integrate

Chinese tech giants like ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent are accelerating the rollout of integrated AI model subscription services—dubbed “model supermarkets”—to provide developers with bundled access to multiple leading domestic large language models (LLMs). ByteDance’s Volcengine recently upgraded its "Coding Plan" by adding newer models like GLM-5.1, Minimax M2.7, and Kimi k2.6, allowing subscribers to use various top models under a single monthly fee starting at ¥40. However, user feedback reveals significant issues, including rapid consumption of usage limits (e.g., hitting caps within hours), frequent server errors (like HTTP 429), and slow response times during peak hours. Complaints about misleading deduction rates—where calls to advanced models consume more quota—are also common. The trend is industry-wide: Alibaba, Tencent, and Baidu have all launched similar multi-model coding plans. While these platforms reduce trial costs for developers, they also expose challenges in balancing affordability with service quality and computational stability. Amid this shift, independent AI companies like Zhipu, MiniMax, and Moonlight Face (Kimi) are developing strategies to avoid becoming mere “pipes” in this ecosystem—focusing on vertical applications, autonomous agents, and long-context models to retain competitiveness. Analysts suggest that, while platform aggregation may pressure model firms in the short term, specialized and vertical AI capabilities will remain differentiated in the long run.

marsbit31m ago

More and More 'Model Supermarkets' Are Opening: ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent Compete to Integrate

marsbit31m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片