Will MYX set new all-time lows after the $1.81 rejection? Data shows…

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-23Last updated on 2026-02-23

Abstract

A recent analysis of MYX Finance (MYX) highlights a bearish outlook following a failed attempt to sustain momentum. After a brief rally to $1.81, the token experienced significant buyer exhaustion, closing the same session at just $1.02. This rejection has led to sellers taking control, with the loss of the $1 support level indicating potential further declines. Technical analysis suggests that, without nearby long-term support, MYX could potentially fall as low as $0.15. In the short term, any bounce to the $0.80-$0.85 range is viewed as a selling opportunity. Both long and short-term expectations remain bearish.

In a recent AMBCrypto report, the down-only price action of MYX Finance [MYX] was highlighted. A short-term bullish divergence was noted, and a bounce to $1.5 was expected at that time.

MYX bulls were able to drive the bounce as high as $1.81. In doing so, a local bottom at $0.80 was formed. This level was retested as support once again in recent hours of trading.

AMBCrypto reported that $3 and $5 were the major longer-term swing resistances overhead. MYX bulls need to overturn these levels to establish an uptrend. As things stand, the altcoin looks more likely to set new lows than reclaim the overhead supply zones.

MYX buyer exhaustion explained

The 1-day timeframe’s price action illustrated the extremely tough job bulls have on their hands.

On Friday, the 20th of February, the rally rose as high as $1.816, but it lasted only a few hours. The daily session close was at $1.02, a far way from the highs.

It was classic buyer exhaustion.

An upward candle on high volume hunted down the imbalances and short liquidations overhead, as an earlier report warned it might. Short-term buyer enthusiasm and forced short liquidations can only keep the rally going for so long.

Since then, sellers have seized control emphatically.

In August 2025, MYX rallied swiftly from $0.15 to $2.5. Towards the end of that month, the price came back to the psychological $1 level to test it as support.

Therefore, now that this level was ceded to the bears, there was no long-term support nearby. It might seem dramatic to say that $0.15 was the next target, but technical analysis showed that this outcome is possible.

On the 1-hour chart, the imbalance between $0.75-$0.85 was a short-term target. A bounce to this area would likely present a selling opportunity. The OBV was making new lows and the MACD formed another bearish crossover.

Overall, the long and short-term expectations remained bearish for MYX.


Final Summary

  • The failure to rclaim $1 as support meant that MYX could fall as far south as $0.15.
  • In the short-term, a bounce to $0.80-$0.85 should be considered a selling opportunity.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Related Questions

QWhat was the expected bounce level for MYX Finance according to the previous AMBCrypto report?

AA bounce to $1.5 was expected.

QWhat was the major longer-term swing resistance level that MYX bulls need to overcome to establish an uptrend?

A$3 and $5 were the major longer-term swing resistances overhead.

QWhat does the article identify as the classic sign of buyer exhaustion on February 20th?

AThe price rallied to a high of $1.816 but the daily session closed far from the highs at $1.02, which was a classic sign of buyer exhaustion.

QAccording to the technical analysis, what is the potential long-term downside target for MYX after it lost the $1 support level?

AThe potential long-term downside target is $0.15.

QWhat short-term price area does the article suggest would present a selling opportunity for MYX?

AA bounce to the $0.80-$0.85 area would present a selling opportunity.

Related Reads

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit33m ago

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit33m ago

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

On June 15th, shares of Zhipu AI surged dramatically on the Hong Kong stock market, peaking at a 47.6% gain before closing 32.82% higher. This sharp increase was directly triggered by two recent industry events. On June 12th, Anthropic announced it was suspending global access to its latest flagship models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5, to comply with a U.S. government export control order. The next day, Zhipu AI announced it would open access to its latest open-source flagship model, GLM-5.2, under the permissive MIT license. The Anthropic incident highlighted a critical issue beyond raw model capability: the risk of sudden, unpredictable loss of access to advanced AI models, especially for developers and enterprises deeply integrated with them. This has shifted industry and market focus toward factors like stability, sustainable access, and controllability. Zhipu's move, promoting "frontier intelligence for all," positions its openly available model as a reliable and accessible alternative. The GLM-5.2 model emphasizes "Long Horizon Task" capabilities with a 1M context window, targeting complex, multi-step coding and engineering workflows where maintaining context is crucial. Analysts note this event exposes the risk of dependency on closed-source models subject to single jurisdictional controls, potentially accelerating a shift toward domestic base models and localized deployments. The market's reaction signals a new valuation dimension in AI: providers who can offer stable, long-term, and sustainably accessible AI capabilities are gaining strategic importance.

marsbit57m ago

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

marsbit57m ago

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

In May 2026, Alipay announced over 300 million AI payment transactions. Shortly after, WeChat opened its mini-programs for AI integration, sparking controversy by requiring developer source code access. This highlights their diverging approaches to AI integration. Alipay is testing "Project Treasure," an optional AI-native interface replacing traditional app grids with a conversational window. Users can command complex tasks (e.g., "book a ride and order coffee") handled end-to-end by AI. This shift follows an abandoned standalone AI app, focusing instead on enhancing its existing user base. For unmodified mini-programs, Alipay's AI uses "screen-reading" to simulate user interactions, bypassing the need for developer overhaul. It also introduced "Token Pay" for micro-transactions and "AI Wallets" for autonomous agent spending. WeChat, prioritizing its core social function, is taking an embedded approach. Its AI agent will operate within existing contexts like group chats and official accounts, assisting without a separate interface. To enable this, WeChat offers developers two paths: granting source code access for direct AI control ("Automatic Mode") or manually encapsulating services into standardized "Skills." Both place significant burden on developers. Key differences emerge in handling legacy services: WeChat demands developer cooperation (code or labor), while Alipay's screen-reading offers immediate, if potentially less stable, compatibility. Alipay's 3 billion AI transactions demonstrate user acceptance of AI-driven commercial actions. The divergent strategies may reshape mini-program ecosystems—Alipay passively "AI-fying" services, WeChat potentially favoring resource-rich developers—and set competing technical standards. Ultimately, the competition centers on where users entrust the command to "help me get things done."

marsbit58m ago

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

marsbit58m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片