Will ETH See Fund Inflows Again? Sharplink and BitMine Make It onto the Russell Index List

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-25Last updated on 2026-05-25

Abstract

Two Ethereum (ETH)-related public companies, Sharplink (SBET) and BitMine (BMNR), will be added to the U.S. Russell Indexes on June 29, 2026. SBET is confirmed for the Russell 2000 and Russell 3000, while BMNR is on the preliminary list for the Russell 3000 and has a high chance of entering the Russell 1000. This inclusion acts as an "automatic shopping list" for massive passive investment funds like ETFs and pension plans, compelling them to buy these stocks to match the index composition. Consequently, millions of mainstream investors who do not directly trade crypto will automatically gain exposure to these Ethereum-linked equities through their index funds. This move channels significant passive capital—trillions of dollars track these indexes—into SBET and BMNR, integrating Ethereum-related investment opportunities into traditional financial portfolios. While the funds buy the companies' stocks, not ETH directly, this is expected to provide short-term price support for the stocks and increase their liquidity and institutional ownership. Over the long term, it could also indirectly incentivize the companies to acquire more ETH.

Author: Lanhu Notes

Two publicly listed companies related to Ethereum (ETH)—Sharplink (SBET) and BitMine (BMNR)—will officially be added to the U.S. Russell Indexes at the market open on June 29, 2026.

The current situation is:

  • SBET (Sharplink) is confirmed to join the Russell 2000 (small-cap index) and the Russell 3000.
  • BMNR (BitMine) is on the preliminary list and is expected to join the Russell 3000, with a high probability of also entering the Russell 1000 (large-cap index).

How to understand this?

Imagine the U.S. has a massive passive investment "automatic shopping system"—such as passive index funds, ETFs, pension funds, 401k plans, etc.

They don't pick stocks themselves; instead, they automatically buy exactly which companies and in what proportions are listed in the Russell Indexes.

SBET and BMNR being added to these lists is equivalent to:

Opening the "floodgates of passive capital" for SBET and BMNR, allowing millions of ordinary investors who don't trade cryptocurrencies or understand Ethereum to automatically hold them. This effectively pushes Ethereum opportunities into the mainstream channels of traditional finance.

Specifically,

The amount of capital tracking the Russell 2000 and Russell 3000 globally is enormous (on the scale of trillions of dollars).

Once officially included, these funds must purchase the corresponding stocks to match the index.

Previously, only investors actively researching crypto would buy these stocks.

Now, after entering the index, the money from mainstream investors (including a large number of retail and institutional investors) who "don't bother picking stocks and only buy index funds" will also automatically flow into SBET and BMNR.

This naturally integrates Ethereum-related investment opportunities into mainstream U.S. traditional financial portfolios.

The buying by passive funds creates real demand, especially around the inclusion生效 date, often providing short-term support for the stock price (the so-called "index inclusion effect").

In the long term, it also enhances stock liquidity and institutional ownership (for many established companies, passive ownership can reach 20-25% or more).

It's important to note that passive funds are buying SBET and BMNR stocks, not ETH. To match the index, funds must buy these two stocks; they won't go directly to an exchange to buy ETH. However, this will indirectly encourage the companies to buy more ETH.

Related Questions

QWhich two Ethereum-related public companies are set to be added to the US Russell indexes, and when does the addition take effect?

AThe two companies are Sharplink (SBET) and BitMine (BMNR). They are scheduled to be officially added to the Russell indexes at the US market open on June 29, 2026.

QWhat is the significance of a company being added to the Russell indexes in terms of capital inflows?

AInclusion in the Russell indexes opens the 'floodgates of passive capital.' Passive investment vehicles like index funds, ETFs, and pension funds that track these indexes are mandated to automatically buy the stock, channeling billions from mainstream traditional investors who may not otherwise invest in crypto-related assets into these companies.

QInto which specific Russell indexes are Sharplink (SBET) and BitMine (BMNR) being added?

ASharplink (SBET) is confirmed for addition to the Russell 2000 and Russell 3000 indexes. BitMine (BMNR) is on the preliminary list for the Russell 3000 and has a high probability of also entering the Russell 1000 index.

QDoes the direct purchase of these companies' stock by passive funds equate to a direct purchase of Ethereum (ETH)?

ANo, it does not. Passive funds buying SBET and BMNR stock is a direct purchase of the company's equity to match the index composition. It is not a direct purchase of Ethereum (ETH) on cryptocurrency exchanges. However, the article suggests this capital inflow could indirectly encourage the companies themselves to acquire more ETH.

QWhat are the potential market effects, both short-term and long-term, of a stock's inclusion in a major index like the Russell?

AShort-term, inclusion often creates buying pressure around the effective date, providing price support (the 'index inclusion effect'). Long-term, it increases the stock's liquidity and raises its institutional ownership percentage, as passive funds typically hold their positions, with mature companies often having 20-25%+ passive ownership.

Related Reads

Standing in the Light: A Comprehensive Guide to the Optical Module and CPO Supply Chain

"Standing in the Light: Understanding the Optical Module and CPO Industry Chain" This article analyzes the critical role of optical communication technology, specifically optical modules and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO), as the "nervous system" for modern AI data centers. With exponential growth in AI computational demands (e.g., NVIDIA's Vera Rubin architecture), traditional electrical interconnects using copper cables face severe bottlenecks in bandwidth, power consumption, and signal integrity over distance. The core function of an optical module is to act as a "translator," converting electrical signals from chips into optical signals for transmission over fiber (and vice-versa). Key internal components include lasers, modulators, photodetectors, drivers, and DSP chips. The industry is currently transitioning from 800G to 1.6T modules. However, the future lies in CPO. This next-generation technology integrates the optical engine directly with the switch ASIC/XPU on the same package substrate, drastically reducing power consumption (by ~3.5x according to NVIDIA), overcoming bandwidth density limits, and minimizing signal attenuation compared to traditional pluggable modules. Key challenges for CPO include advanced packaging capacity (dominated by TSMC), thermal management, repairability, and standardization. The article details the broader technology landscape, including Near-Packaged Optics (NPO, a pragmatic intermediate step), Linear-drive Pluggable Optics (LPO), Optical I/O (OIO for chip-level integration), and Optical Circuit Switches (OCS). A comprehensive CPO industry chain is mapped, highlighting shifting power dynamics: * **Architecture Definers:** NVIDIA, Broadcom, and Marvell now hold greater influence. * **Advanced Packaging & Manufacturing:** TSMC is central; Fabrinet is a key EMS player. * **Lasers ("The Heart"):** A strategic bottleneck. EML lasers are led by Lumentum and Coherent (both receiving major NVIDIA investments). CW lasers, favored for CPO/silicon photonics, see strong Chinese players like Source Photonics and Sicoya. * **Silicon Photonics Chips:** The mainstream path for CPO engines, with key players like Broadcom, Intel, Marvell, and China's Accelink. * **Fiber Connectivity Components:** A major new, high-growth market created by CPO, including Fiber Array Units (FAU), Polarization-Maintaining Fiber (PMF), and MPO connectors. Companies like Tianfu Communication and US Conec are leaders. * **Fiber & Cable:** Experiencing a super-cycle (e.g., Corning, Yangtze Optical Fiber). * **PCB/Substrates:** Requiring advanced materials (e.g., Shengyi Tech). * **DSP & SerDes:** Functions are integrated into switch ASICs in the CPO era (e.g., Broadcom, Astera Labs). * **Optical Module Makers:** Transitioning from standalone module suppliers to providers of optical engines and NPO/LPO solutions while riding the current pluggable boom (e.g., Zhongji Innolight, Eoptolink). The investment timeline is segmented: Short-term (2026-2027) features the "last feast" for pluggable modules and CPO's initial rollout. Medium-term (2027-2029) will see CPO expand and NPO peak. Long-term (2029-2032+) involves CPO/OIO penetration into intra-rack scaling. In conclusion, optical interconnects are fundamental to AI infrastructure. The competitive landscape sees US firms leading in architecture and high-end chips, TSMC in advanced packaging, and Chinese firms holding strong positions in modules, connectivity components, CW lasers, and fiber/cable. The future belongs to companies that can navigate the technological shift from "selling shovels" (modules) to "building highways" (CPO/OIO infrastructure).

marsbit11m ago

Standing in the Light: A Comprehensive Guide to the Optical Module and CPO Supply Chain

marsbit11m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片