Where Will DeFi Go Next?

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-12Last updated on 2026-01-12

Abstract

The DeFi sector has approached its previous all-time high in Total Value Locked (TVL), reaching $225 billion in late 2025, yet growth has stagnated with only a 10% increase over four years. This indicates that the current user base—largely crypto-native—may have reached saturation. The next phase of growth must come from attracting mainstream users. Stablecoins have seen significant expansion, with USDT and USDC surpassing $260 billion in combined market cap, exceeding the entire DeFi TVL. The rise of yield-bearing stablecoins and Real-World Assets (RWA), now over $20 billion, reflects strong demand for on-chain yield. However, these products remain largely confined to crypto-savvy users. Compared to the fintech sector, which manages over $2 trillion in customer assets, DeFi remains a niche. To break through, DeFi must prioritize simple, secure, and收益-focused products that appeal to ordinary users, rather than complex financial structures or speculative mechanisms. Embedded DeFi integrations within fintech apps could help bridge this gap, but consumer-facing protocols that simplify access to yield will be key to capturing the next wave of adoption.

Editor's Note: DeFi is once again approaching its historical high but has failed to break through significantly, revealing not a lack of products but a bottleneck in user growth. The expansion of stablecoins, yield-bearing stablecoins, and RWA indicates that the demand for moving funds on-chain and earning yields remains strong, yet it has not been truly brought to the mass market.

This article argues that the next step for DeFi lies not in more complex structures or speculative designs, but in simple, secure, yield-focused products, along with user-friendly access and distribution methods for ordinary users. Only when DeFi begins to target fintech users, rather than solely serving crypto-native audiences, can a new growth cycle truly begin.

Below is the original text:

Current Situation

In 2025, DeFi's total value locked (TVL) reached a new historical high, but it did not significantly exceed the peak of 2021. As the market gradually cools, a question worth revisiting is: where will the next wave of capital and users come from?

Driven by DeFi Summer, TVL climbed to $204 billion by the end of 2021. Subsequently, following the collapse of events like FTX and the market entering a bear phase, the capital scale declined steadily. Later, DeFi struggled to recover, reaching $225 billion in October 2025. However, a mere 10% growth over four years can hardly be considered explosive. The earliest participants in DeFi—primarily crypto-native users and traders—may have nearly reached the "ceiling."

The proximity of these two peaks is indeed cause for caution, but it does not yet constitute a "survival crisis." The current user base—though highly engaged and loyal—is not large enough to propel DeFi to the next level on its own.

To achieve a breakthrough, DeFi needs to reach a larger audience. The good news is that such an audience does exist—it is still on the sidelines, waiting to be properly "onboarded" with the right tools and products.

A Glimmer of Hope

Over the past year, the stablecoin market has been one of the biggest beneficiaries. The amount of USD on-chain has reached a historical high, more than ever before. USDT and USDC have continued to grow steadily, with their combined market capitalization exceeding $260 billion—meaning that the scale of stablecoins alone is already larger than the entire DeFi market.

Even without parabolic growth in DeFi, people continue to mint stablecoins, indicating that the demand for moving funds on-chain remains strong. At the same time, an increasing number of users are beginning to access the yields provided by DeFi, and the growth in this area points to where the next breakthrough may come from.

The rise of yield-bearing stablecoins and RWA (real-world assets) further confirms this trend. According to @stablewatchHQ data, the scale of yield-bearing stablecoins has exceeded $20 billion, with products like sUSDS and sUSDe gaining significant adoption over the past year or so. Parallel to yield-bearing stablecoins, RWA has also made progress on-chain: these products, backed by traditional assets such as treasury bonds, offer real yields and are growing rapidly.

The problem is that they currently primarily cater to crypto-native users and large on-chain holders. As long as this remains the case, their potential will be underestimated. If they can be productized and packaged in a way that is more accessible to everyday users, yield-bearing stablecoins and RWA present enormous opportunities in the mass market.

Retail Has Not Yet Arrived

To understand the scale of this opportunity, it is helpful to compare DeFi with fintech. Currently, the entire DeFi TVL is approximately $164 billion. In contrast, global mobile fintech apps manage over $2 trillion in customer assets; the top 100 neobanks alone have assets totaling $2.4 trillion. By comparison, DeFi is currently almost a negligible fraction.

The notion that "if you build it, they will come" can only drive limited growth. If DeFi wants to continue expanding, it must compete for the ordinary users that have made fintech so vast.

In 2025, the success of protocols like Aave, Ethena, and Pendle has demonstrated a strong demand for yield among market participants. They were the highlights of the year, attracting significant capital and attention. If such products can be delivered to the masses in a clear, understandable, and low-barrier manner, the potential encompasses (literally) trillions of dollars in capital and tens of millions of potential users.

The Path Forward

The real test for DeFi in the coming year is whether it can make yield opportunities easily and safely accessible to ordinary people. Growth will not come from more complex financial structures, the 100th liquidity mining pool, the 100th perpetual futures DEX, or the millionth airdrop. Growth will come from simple, reliable products—built on decentralized protocols—that solve real problems for ordinary people. And yield should be center stage (ahem, Aave App, ahem).

Today, hundreds of millions of people use banking and fintech apps daily, already accustomed to managing their funds on their phones. If DeFi can capture even a small share of this, it will be enough to trigger a new wave of growth, and it will not once again stall at the $200 billion TVL level.

Embedded DeFi will play a crucial role in this—fintech companies and neobanks integrating on-chain yield capabilities directly into their products. But teams should not stop there. The protocols that are truly consumer-facing and at the forefront will capture the greatest upside; those that continue to optimize only for crypto-native users will ultimately be competing for a pie that may no longer be expanding.

DeFi will win.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason DeFi has not experienced explosive growth despite reaching a new TVL high in 2025?

AThe main reason is that DeFi has primarily served crypto-native users and traders, who are nearing their 'ceiling,' and has failed to attract a broader audience of ordinary users.

QWhat evidence suggests that there is still strong demand for moving funds on-chain?

AThe stablecoin market has reached a new all-time high, with USDT and USDC combined市值 exceeding $260 billion, which is larger than the entire DeFi market.

QWhat types of products have shown significant growth and adoption in the past year, indicating potential for broader appeal?

AYield-bearing stablecoins (like sUSDS and sUSDe) and Real World Assets (RWA) have seen substantial growth, offering real yields and attracting significant adoption.

QHow does the size of DeFi's TVL compare to the assets managed by fintech applications and neobanks?

ADeFi's TVL is about $164 billion, while global mobile fintech apps manage over $2 trillion in customer assets, and the top 100 neobanks alone hold $2.4 trillion in assets, making DeFi a negligible fraction in comparison.

QWhat is the key challenge for DeFi to achieve its next growth cycle and attract mainstream users?

AThe key challenge is to create simple, secure, and收益-focused products that are easy for ordinary users to understand and use, rather than developing complex financial structures or relying solely on crypto-native optimizations.

Related Reads

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Polymarket, a leading prediction market platform, is facing significant technical challenges as its growth outpaces its current infrastructure on Polygon. Users are experiencing laggy transactions, unresponsive orders, and delayed confirmations, severely impacting the trading experience. In response, DeFi Engineering VP Josh Stevens outlined a comprehensive engineering overhaul. The plan includes reducing on-chain data delays, fixing order cancellation issues, rebuilding the central limit order book (CLOB), improving website performance, and developing a unified SDK and API. A major revelation was the ongoing "chain migration," indicating a potential move away from Polygon. The core issue is that Polymarket has evolved from a simple prediction market into a high-frequency trading platform, making Polygon's limitations—such as block space, gas fees, and block time—a ceiling for further growth. The migration is not just a simple chain switch but a fundamental rebuild of its trading system to support more complex products like perpetual contracts (Perps). This announcement has sparked competition among chains like Solana, Sui, and Algorand, all vying to host Polymarket. For Polygon, losing this key application, which contributes significantly to its gas fee revenue, would be a major setback. The real test for Polymarket is no longer attracting users but proving it can provide a stable, reliable trading environment that retains them.

Odaily星球日报30m ago

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Odaily星球日报30m ago

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

The author, Alex Xu, explains his decision to significantly reduce his Bitcoin holdings (from full to ~30% of his portfolio) during the current bull cycle, citing a lowered long-term outlook for BTC's price appreciation in the next cycle. He outlines six key reasons for this reduced expectation: 1. **Diminished Growth Drivers:** The narrative of exponential user adoption has largely played out with institutional ETF adoption. The next major growth phase—adoption by sovereign national reserves or central banks—seems unlikely in the near future. 2. **Personal Opportunity Cost:** More attractive investment opportunities have emerged in other assets, such as undervalued companies. 3. **Industry-Wide Contraction:** The broader crypto industry is struggling, with most Web3 business models (SocialFi, GameFi, DePIN) failing. This overall萧条 (depression) reduces the fundamental demand and consensus for Bitcoin. 4. **Strain on Major Buyer:** MicroStrategy, a major corporate buyer of BTC, faces rising financing expenses for its debt, which could slow its purchasing rate and create significant marginal pressure on the market. 5. **Increased Competition from Gold:** The emergence of "tokenized gold" has closed the functional gap (portability, divisibility) between physical gold and Bitcoin, offering a strong competitor in the non-sovereign store-of-value space. 6. **Security Budget Concerns:** The block reward halving continues to exacerbate the long-standing issue of funding Bitcoin's network security, with new fee source explorations like Ordinals and L2s largely failing. The author's decision to hold a significant (though reduced) position reflects a cautious, not bearish, outlook. He remains open to increasing his exposure if the fundamental reasons for his skepticism change or if new positive catalysts emerge.

marsbit1h ago

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

marsbit1h ago

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

Iran has announced a comprehensive plan to assert control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. The proposed measures include requiring all vessels to obtain Iranian permission for passage, imposing fees for security, environmental protection, and navigation management—preferably paid in Iranian rials—and absolutely banning Israeli ships. Vessels from countries deemed hostile by Iran’s top security bodies may also be barred. Analysts suggest Iran’s motives are multifaceted: increasing pressure on the U.S. and Israel by leveraging control over oil transit to influence global prices and inflation; creating a new revenue stream, potentially exceeding $7.7 billion annually, to counter Western sanctions and support postwar reconstruction; and using transit permissions as bargaining chips in future negotiations, notably with the U.S. However, the plan faces significant practical and diplomatic challenges. Enforcing comprehensive interception and fee collection in the busy waterway, patrolled by international military forces, would be difficult. The U.S. has already countering with a blockade of Iranian ports and threats to intercept any ship paying fees, potentially strangling Iran’s oil exports and fee revenue. Broad international opposition, led by European and Gulf states, and legal controversies further complicate implementation. The proposal may ultimately serve more as a negotiating tactic than a feasible policy, with its execution remaining highly uncertain.

marsbit2h ago

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片