When Will Pepe Overtake Shiba Inu? Expert Lays Out New Timeline

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-05Last updated on 2026-01-05

Abstract

A crypto analyst known as Y00thereum projects that the meme coin PEPE will surpass Shiba Inu (SHIB) in market capitalization by or before April 20, 2026. This forecast is based on PEPE’s recent strong performance, having surged over 60% in a week, while SHIB only gained 22%. Despite this, PEPE’s market cap remains significantly lower—around $2.9 billion compared to SHIB’s $5.32 billion at the time of analysis. For PEPE to flip SHIB, it would need to increase by approximately 76.55% from its current price. Previous predictions of a PEPE takeover in earlier market cycles did not come to pass.

A crypto analyst has issued a projection for the meme coin market, arguing that PEPE will overtake Shiba Inu’s market capitalization. The forecast comes as the meme sector enters 2026 with renewed price action following a steep downturn during 2025.

The resurgence has fueled a meme coin rally lifting major assets. PEPE surged more than 60% over the past week while Shiba Inu lagged with only 22% gains during the same timeframe. This performance gap has prompted speculation about a potential market cap flip.

Analyst sets April 20 target for PEPE overtake

Pseudonymous crypto analyst Y00thereum highlighted PEPE’s standout performance and argued the token could flip SHIB by April 20 or earlier. The projection was accompanied by a screenshot comparing market capitalizations of both tokens.

The frog meme coin remains smaller than SHIB by market value despite recent explosive price performance. At the time of Y00thereum’s analysis, SHIB commanded a market cap of $5.32 billion while PEPE sat closer to $2.92 billion. The projection calculated that the coin would need to climb to around $0.00001266, an increase of roughly 1.8x, to match SHIB’s valuation.

Both tokens have pulled back from levels at the time of analysis. PEPE’s market cap stands at approximately $2.9 billion with a unit price of $0.0000069.

At these levels, PEPE must rally roughly 76.55% to close the gap. Y00thereum suggests this could occur on or before April 20, 2026.

Previous forecasts failed to materialize

This marks another prediction that PEPE could overtake SHIB in the meme coin sector. In 2024, BecauseBitcoin CEO Max Schwartzman predicted PEPE would flip SHIB during the 2024/2025 cycle. He argued both tokens would serve as alpha and beta assets of the season.

Pepetoshi Nakamoto warned Shiba Inu risked losing its second-place ranking. His data suggested the frog meme coin was only 69% away from achieving this milestone at that time. These forecasts have not materialized.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the analyst, by when does he predict that PEPE will overtake Shiba Inu's market cap?

AThe analyst, Y00thereum, predicts that PEPE will overtake Shiba Inu's market capitalization by April 20, 2026, or even earlier.

QWhat was the market capitalization of PEPE and SHIB at the time of the analyst's initial comparison?

AAt the time of the analyst's initial comparison, SHIB had a market cap of $5.32 billion, while PEPE's market cap was approximately $2.92 billion.

QWhat percentage gain does PEPE need to achieve from its current price of $0.0000069 to match SHIB's valuation?

AFrom its current price of $0.0000069, PEPE needs to rally roughly 76.55% to close the market cap gap and match SHIB's valuation.

QWhich previous prediction about PEPE flipping SHIB is mentioned as having failed to materialize?

AThe article mentions that a 2024 prediction by BecauseBitcoin CEO Max Schwartzman, who forecasted that PEPE would flip SHIB during the 2024/2025 cycle, failed to materialize.

QWhat was the stated performance difference between PEPE and SHIB over the past week mentioned in the article?

AOver the past week, PEPE surged more than 60%, while Shiba Inu lagged with gains of only 22% during the same timeframe.

Related Reads

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报42m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报42m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News59m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News59m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1h ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MEME (MEME) are presented below.

活动图片