When Tether No Longer Clings to the Dollar...

比推Published on 2025-12-09Last updated on 2025-12-09

Abstract

Tether, the issuer of the world's largest stablecoin USDT, is shifting its reserve strategy in anticipation of lower interest rates. While its business model thrived during high-rate periods—earning billions from U.S. Treasury holdings—future Fed rate cuts could reduce its interest income significantly. To adapt, Tether has diversified into gold (over 100 tons) and Bitcoin (over 90,000 BTC), which together make up 12-13% of its reserves. These assets historically perform well in low-rate, high-liquidity environments, potentially offsetting lost Treasury yield. However, rating agencies like S&P have expressed concern, downgrading Tether’s stability rating due to increased exposure to volatile assets like Bitcoin and reduced transparency. The key challenge remains maintaining USDT’s dollar peg while navigating this new macroeconomic phase.

Author: Prathik Desai

Original Title: Gold, Bills, Thrills

Compiled and Edited by: BitpushNews


When I think of stablecoins, I often see them merely as a bridge between the US dollar and the blockchain, nothing more. They can be powerful infrastructure components, silently supporting the operation of on-chain products in ways that are often easily overlooked.

As a business model, stablecoin issuers have direct revenue, which is tied to the interest rates published by the US Federal Reserve. The higher the interest rates, the more income the US Treasury bonds backing their stablecoin circulation bring to the issuers.

However, in recent years, the world's largest stablecoin issuer by circulation has adjusted its reserve strategy to better adapt to the macroeconomic environment.

In this quantitative analysis, I will explore why and how Tether (Tether) is partially replacing its massive interest-earning engine with gold and Bitcoin to cope with the upcoming shift in the interest rate cycle.

Let's begin.

The US Treasury Machine

A glance at Tether's US Treasury reserves reveals how it became a profit machine during periods of high interest rates.

Over the past few years, USDT holders earned 0%, while Tether earned about 5% on approximately $1 trillion in US Treasury bonds.

Even with average interest rates relatively low for most of 2025, around 4.25%, as of September 30, 2025, Tether reported a net profit of over $10 billion for the year. In contrast, the second-largest stablecoin issuer, Circle, reported a net loss of $202 million for the same period.

For most of the past three years, Tether's business model perfectly aligned with the macroeconomic backdrop. The Federal Reserve maintained interest rates between 4.5% and 5.5%, and Tether held over $1 trillion in US bonds, with each percentage point of yield bringing in approximately $1 billion in annual revenue.

While most cryptocurrency companies struggled with operational losses, Tether accumulated tens of billions in surplus simply by going long on short-term government debt.

But what happens when the interest rate cycle turns, and rate cuts are expected in the coming years?

The Interest Rate Cycle Problem

CME FedWatch data shows that by December 2026, there is over a 75% probability that the federal funds rate will drop from the current 3.75-4% range to between 2.75-3% and 3.25-3.50%. This is already a significant drop from the 5% level that Tether relied on for profits in 2024.

Lower interest rates could compress the interest income Tether earns from its US Treasury holdings.

A one-percentage-point drop in overall US economic liquidity could reduce Tether's annual income by at least $15 billion. This exceeds 10% of its annualized net profit for 2025.

So, how will Tether protect its profitability in this world? After Jerome Powell's term ends in 2026, a new Fed Chair is more likely to follow the expectations of US President Donald Trump for more significant and faster rate cuts.

It is at this point that Tether's reserve strategy diverges most significantly from any other stablecoin issuer.

Diversification Strategy

Between September 2021 and October 2022, Tether reduced its reliance on commercial paper (unsecured short-term debt instruments issued by large corporations) by over 99%. From over $30 billion in September 2021, it was cut to almost zero.

It replaced these assets with US-backed Treasury bonds to increase transparency for investors.

During the same period, Tether's US Treasury reserves grew from less than $25 billion to $40 billion.

Between Q3 2023 and Q3 2025, the composition of Tether's reserve assets changed, incorporating asset classes rarely seen on the balance sheets of other stablecoin issuers.

As of September 2025, Tether had accumulated approximately over 100 tons of gold, valued at around $13 billion. It also held over 90,000 BTC, worth nearly $10 billion. Together, these account for about 12-13% of its reserves.

In contrast, its competitor Circle held only 74 Bitcoin, worth about $8 million.

Why the Shift Now?

The increase in gold and Bitcoin allocations coincided with the period when the forward rate curve no longer predicted rate hikes.

In response to rising inflation, interest rates jumped from less than 1% to over 5% between May 2022 and August 2023. During this time, maximizing income by investing in US Treasuries made economic sense. But once interest rates peaked in 2023 and no further hikes were expected, Tether saw it as the right moment to start preparing for the turn in the interest rate cycle.

Why Choose Gold and Bitcoin When Yields Fall?

Gold tends to perform well when US Treasury yields fall. This is driven by expectations of rising inflation and the reduced opportunity cost of holding gold instead of low-yielding US Treasuries.

We saw this happen this year; when the Fed cut rates by 50 basis points, gold prices rose over 30% between August and November.

Even during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the Fed cut rates by 1.5 percentage points to inject liquidity into the economy, gold prices rose 40% in the subsequent five months.

Bitcoin has recently exhibited similar macro behavior. As monetary policy eases and liquidity expands, Bitcoin typically reacts like a high-beta asset.

Therefore, while a high-interest-rate environment allows for income through US Treasuries, allocating to Bitcoin and gold can provide potential upside in a low-interest-rate environment.

This allows Tether to book unrealized gains and even realize some profits by selling gold or Bitcoin from its vault, particularly during phases when interest rates are low and income is squeezed.

However, not everyone approves of the increased exposure to gold and Bitcoin on Tether's balance sheet.

The Peg Problem

Although US Treasuries still account for 63% of Tether's reserves, the increased exposure to riskier assets like Bitcoin and unsecured loans has raised concerns among rating agencies.

Two weeks ago, S&P Global Ratings reassessed Tether's ability to maintain the USDT peg to the US dollar from Tier 4 (Constrained) to Tier 5 (Weak). It noted the increased exposure to corporate bonds, precious metals, Bitcoin, and secured loans in its reserves.

The agency pointed out that these assets account for almost 24% of the total reserves. More troubling for the agency is that, although US Treasuries still back most of the reserves, the USDT issuer provides limited transparency and disclosure regarding the composition of these riskier asset classes.

Furthermore, there are concerns about undermining the peg of the USDT token to the US dollar.

S&P stated in its report: "Bitcoin now accounts for about 5.6% of USDT's circulation, exceeding the 3.9% over-collateralization margin, indicating that the reserves can no longer fully absorb the impact of its value decline. Therefore, a decline in Bitcoin's value combined with a decline in the value of other high-risk assets could reduce reserve coverage and lead to USDT being undercollateralized."

On one hand, Tether's shift in reserve strategy seems a reasonable measure to cope with the upcoming low-interest-rate environment. When rate cuts come—and they will—this $13 billion profit engine will struggle to sustain itself. The upside potential of the held gold and Bitcoin could help offset some of the income loss.

On the other hand, this shift has also rightly made rating agencies nervous. The primary task of a stablecoin issuer is to protect its peg to the underlying currency (in this case, the US dollar). Everything else, including the revenue it generates, its reserve diversification strategy, and the unrealized gains it can obtain, becomes secondary. If the peg fails, the business collapses.

When circulating tokens are backed by volatile assets, the risk profile of the peg changes. A sufficiently large impairment of Bitcoin—which we have been experiencing over the past two months—would not necessarily break the USDT peg but would narrow the buffer between the two.

Tether's story will unfold with the upcoming monetary policy easing. This week's rate cut decision will be the first indicator to measure this stablecoin giant's ability to defend its peg and signal its future trajectory.

Let's wait and see.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7594373

Related Questions

QWhy has Tether started diversifying its reserves to include assets like gold and Bitcoin?

ATether is diversifying its reserves to prepare for the upcoming shift in the interest rate cycle. As the Federal Reserve is expected to lower interest rates, the yield on U.S. Treasuries will decrease, compressing Tether's interest income. Gold and Bitcoin have historically performed well in low-rate environments, offering potential upside to offset this income loss.

QWhat is the current composition of Tether's reserves, and how does it differ from its competitor Circle?

AAs of September 2025, Tether's reserves consist of approximately 63% U.S. Treasuries, over 100 tons of gold (worth ~$13B), and over 90,000 BTC (worth ~$10B). In contrast, its competitor Circle holds only 74 Bitcoin, worth $8 million, showing a vastly different and more conservative strategy.

QWhat concerns have rating agencies like S&P Global raised about Tether's new reserve strategy?

AS&P Global Ratings downgraded its assessment of Tether's ability to maintain the USDT peg from 'constrained' to 'weak.' The agency is concerned about the increased exposure to higher-risk asset classes like corporate bonds, precious metals, Bitcoin, and secured loans, which now make up nearly 24% of its reserves. It also cited limited transparency and the risk that a drop in Bitcoin's value could reduce reserve coverage and lead to USDT being undercollateralized.

QHow did Tether's business model perform during the period of high interest rates?

ADuring the high-interest-rate period, Tether's business model was extremely profitable. It held over $1 trillion in U.S. Treasuries and earned a yield of around 5%. Even with lower average rates of about 4.25% for much of 2025, Tether reported a net profit exceeding $10 billion for the first nine months of the year, far outperforming competitors like Circle, which reported a net loss.

QHow do gold and Bitcoin typically behave in a low interest rate environment, and why is this beneficial for Tether?

AGold tends to perform well when U.S. Treasury yields fall, as it is driven by expectations of rising inflation and a lower opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets. Bitcoin often acts as a high-beta asset, reacting positively to expansionary monetary policy and increased liquidity. This potential for price appreciation allows Tether to book unrealized gains or realize profits by selling these assets, helping to offset the squeezed income from lower-yielding Treasuries.

Related Reads

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

The Bank of Japan (BOJ) kept its benchmark interest rate at 1% on July 31, as widely expected, following a June hike to a 31-year high. The decision passed with an 8-1 vote, with board member Hajime Takata again dissenting in favor of a hike to 1.25%. Despite holding rates steady, the BOJ signaled a hawkish tilt, warning that underlying inflation is likely to accelerate and exceed 2% from the latter half of the fiscal year. While it slightly lowered its core inflation forecast for FY2026, officials expressed stronger confidence that an overshoot will occur later, driven by yen weakness, corporate pricing behavior, and lingering energy shock effects. Markets were focused on the BOJ's forward guidance. Analysts noted the central bank appeared to balance short-term caution with a long-term warning of tighter policy. Governor Kazuo Ueda faces the challenge of reconciling a government reluctant to tighten further with bond markets already pricing in additional hikes, with the timing of the next move debated. Adding complexity, the BOJ reportedly intervened in currency markets hours before the rate decision, buying yen to support the currency which had fallen to 40-year lows against the dollar. Yen weakness stems from the wide U.S.-Japan interest rate gap, high fuel prices, and market skepticism about the pace of BOJ policy normalization. The yield on Japan's 10-year government bonds fell to 2.8%, indicating investor expectations for future monetary tightening.

cryptonews.ru6m ago

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

cryptonews.ru6m ago

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

This article argues that the SK H力士 2x Leveraged ETF (7709) is fundamentally a negative expected value (EV) product, rather than simply a "double SK H力士" investment. Its core issue stems from its daily rebalancing mechanism to maintain a 2x leverage target. After a price move, the fund must buy more after a rise or sell after a fall to readjust its leverage, creating a systematic pattern of buying high and selling low. This introduces a "delay loss": it always reacts to past price changes, missing potential gains from adjusting earlier during an uptrend and suffering greater losses from adjusting later during a downtrend. While more frequent intraday rebalancing would improve returns in strong, smooth trending markets by reinvesting profits or cutting losses sooner, it also dramatically increases volatility drag (frictional losses) during choppy, oscillating markets due to more frequent high-buy/low-sell trades. The author draws a parallel to an option seller who delta hedges (short gamma), which involves similar "buy high, sell low" dynamic hedging. However, unlike an option seller who receives upfront premium (IV and theta) as compensation for this risk, the leveraged ETF investor receives no such compensation. Instead, they bear all the path-dependent volatility decay, plus additional costs like swap/derivatives financing, management fees, and trading slippage. Thus, the product's return profile can be framed as: 2x directional return minus realized variance drag minus financing costs minus derivatives costs minus management fees minus transaction costs. For the investor to profit, SK H力士's price must not only rise significantly but do so in a strong, sustained, and smooth trend to overcome these inherent structural costs. High volatility and frequent price reversals are particularly damaging. The article also notes that while the ETF has no explicit liquidation line like perpetual futures, avoiding a sudden "blow-up," its net asset value can still decay towards zero over time through this combination of volatility drag and fees. For experienced traders, directly managing leverage via perpetual contracts may offer more control and potentially lower costs than this packaged, mechanistic product.

marsbit13m ago

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

marsbit13m ago

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

The article discusses the growing debate over whether TradeXYZ, which dominates Hyperliquid's HIP-3 market with over 90% of its volume, might break away to build its own independent trading platform. This possibility is fueled by TradeXYZ's immense market influence and the common industry trend of successful projects seeking more control and profit capture. Key arguments for a potential split include TradeXYZ's overwhelming contribution to Hyperliquid's metrics and the financial incentive to retain all transaction fees, as it currently splits them 50/50 with Hyperliquid. The piece draws parallels to other cases, like Anthropic's "Claude Code" competing with its former partner Cursor, suggesting "betrayal" can occur when business leverage shifts. However, strong counterarguments suggest a split is unlikely or would be detrimental. TradeXYZ relies on Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure and its platform as a primary user acquisition channel. Building a comparable system would be challenging. Furthermore, the founders of both projects share a history of trust and mutual admiration. The analysis concludes that a separation would likely be a lose-lose scenario: Hyperliquid would lose a major growth narrative and trading volume, while TradeXYZ would face technical hurdles, user migration issues, and reputational damage, potentially allowing competitors to seize market share. The most rational path is seen as continued collaboration, with TradeXYZ potentially negotiating better terms while leveraging Hyperliquid's established strengths.

marsbit23m ago

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

marsbit23m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片