Weekly Funding Roundup | 7 Projects Secured Funding, Total Amount Reaches $332 Million (Jan 5 - Jan 11)

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-13Last updated on 2026-01-13

Abstract

According to incomplete statistics from Odaily, between January 5 and January 11, 2025, seven blockchain-related funding rounds were disclosed globally, raising a total of $332 million. This marks a significant increase compared to the previous week. The largest single funding round was secured by stablecoin company Rain, which raised $250 million at a $1.95 billion valuation, led by ICONIQ. AI data exchange platform Protege followed with a $30 million Series A round led by a16z. Other notable raises include a $30 million strategic investment for Web3 gaming platform RuneSoul, a $15 million round for Bitcoin protocol Babylon with participation from a16z Crypto, and a funding round of over $10 million for RWA infrastructure provider TBook. Additionally, HabitTrade raised nearly $10 million for its regulated brokerage infrastructure, KOLECT raised $1.2 million in a pre-seed round, and digital payment infrastructure PhotonPay raised tens of millions in a Series B round. The funds are primarily allocated for global expansion, platform development, regulatory compliance, and advancing blockchain-based financial infrastructure.

According to incomplete statistics from Odaily Planet Daily, from January 5 to January 11, 2025, a total of 7 funding events were disclosed in the global blockchain field, showing a slight increase compared to the 4 events from the previous week; the total funding amount reached $332 million, a significant increase from the $27.7 million of the previous week. Funding activities have returned to normal this week.

The largest single funding round this week was the stablecoin company Rain announcing a $250 million funding round at a valuation of $1.95 billion; followed by the AI data exchange platform Protege announcing the completion of a $30 million Series A funding round.

Below are the specific funding events (Note: 1. Sorted by the announced amount; 2. * indicates "traditional" companies with partial business involving blockchain):

Stablecoin company Rain raised $250 million at a $1.95 billion valuation, led by ICONIQ

On January 9, stablecoin company Rain announced the completion of a $250 million funding round at a valuation of $1.95 billion, led by ICONIQ, with participation from Sapphire Ventures, Dragonfly, Bessemer, Lightspeed, and Galaxy Ventures, among others. To date, the company's total funding has exceeded $338 million. Rain helps clients launch stablecoin cards on the Visa network. The company plans to use this capital to expand its presence in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa markets, and will also use the funds to help adapt to the rapidly changing global regulatory environment.

AI data exchange platform Protege completes $30 million Series A funding round, led by a16z

On January 8, AI data exchange platform Protege announced the completion of a $30 million Series A funding round, led by a16z, with participation from Footwork, CRV, Bloomberg Beta, and others. To date, the company's total funding has reached $65 million. Protege supports AI optimization through authorized aggregated datasets, data cleaning, anonymization, and formatting for training/evaluation, and helps data suppliers obtain revenue sharing.

RuneSoul completes $30 million strategic funding, fully transitioning to a Web3 game aggregation launch platform

On December 31, the Web3 gaming ecosystem project RuneSoul officially announced the completion of a $30 million strategic funding round. It is reported that this round of funding will be specifically used for the platform's underlying architecture reconstruction and brand strategy upgrade, marking RuneSoul's official transition from a GameFi gaming project to a Web3 game aggregation launch platform (Aggregator & Launchpad).

RuneSoul will be committed to building a one-stop, full-link service system from asset issuance, user growth, incentive mechanisms, on-chain data analysis to final settlement, aiming to become the "Steam + Publishing Middle Office" in the Web3 field.

Babylon completes $15 million funding round, with participation from a16z Crypto

On January 7, the Bitcoin ecosystem decentralized protocol Babylon announced the completion of a $15 million funding round, with participation from a16z Crypto. Specific valuation data has not been disclosed. It is reported that Babylon's competitors are centralized service providers such as Coinbase, Kraken, and Tether. It is expected to integrate its technology with the lending protocol Aave in the second quarter of this year. The company currently has over 40 employees.

RWA distribution infrastructure TBook raises over $10 million in total funding, led by SevenX Ventures

On January 9, RWA distribution infrastructure TBook announced the completion of a new funding round, led by SevenX Ventures, with participation from KuCoin Ventures, Mask Network, HT Capital, VistaLabs, Blofin, Bonfire Union, LYVC, GoPlus, and others. The company stated that its total funding has exceeded $10 million. It is currently building an embedded RWA liquidity layer, aiming to connect asset issuers with qualified users.

HabitTrade completes nearly $10 million Series A funding round, led by Newborn Town Inc.

On January 8, HabitTrade announced on the X platform the completion of a nearly $10 million Series A funding round. This round was led by Newborn Town Inc., with participation from Bright Venture Capital, StableStock, and other investors. This funding marks HabitTrade's entry into the next stage from infrastructure construction to scaling expansion. HabitTrade will use the funds to expand its regulated brokerage infrastructure globally and accelerate the integration of traditional capital markets with on-chain finance.

KOLECT completes $1.2 million Pre-Seed funding, led by Amber Group's amber.ac

On January 10, the trading strategy platform KOLECT announced the recent completion of a $1.2 million Pre-Seed funding round. The round was led by Amber Group's Web3 accelerator program amber.ac, with follow-on investment from Wonder Capital Group and GC Capital.

Digital finance and payment infrastructure PhotonPay completes tens of millions of dollars in Series B funding, led by IDG Capital

On January 9, digital finance and payment infrastructure PhotonPay announced the completion of a Series B funding round of tens of millions of dollars, led by IDG Capital, with participation from Gaoling Ventures (GL Ventures), Enlight Capital, Lightspeed Faction, and Shoplazza. The new funds will support its deployment of blockchain-driven next-generation payment infrastructure, using smart contracts to reshape the automation and transparency of global settlements and reduce transaction friction and circulation costs, while enhancing AML (Anti-Money Laundering) and anti-fraud systems.

Related Questions

QWhich company raised the largest single funding amount this week and what was the amount?

AThe stablecoin company Rain raised the largest single funding amount this week, securing $250 million.

QWhat was the total funding amount raised in the blockchain sector for the week of January 5th to January 11th?

AThe total funding raised was $332 million.

QWhich AI data exchange platform completed a Series A round this week and who was the lead investor?

AThe AI data exchange platform Protege completed a $30 million Series A round led by a16z.

QWhat is the new strategic direction for the Web3 gaming project RuneSoul after its funding?

ARuneSoul is transitioning from a GameFi project to a Web3 game aggregator and launchpad platform.

QWhich company, focused on RWA distribution infrastructure, announced its total funding has exceeded $10 million?

ATBook, an RWA distribution infrastructure company, announced its total funding has exceeded $10 million.

Related Reads

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit1h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit1h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit1h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit1h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit2h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit2h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit3h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片