WeChat Agent Issues a 'Heroic Summons,' Half of the Internet Responds

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-09Last updated on 2026-06-09

Abstract

WeChat AI Agent is on the horizon. The WeChat Open Platform has issued a guide for developers, offering them ways to integrate into the WeChat AI ecosystem. This will enable mini-programs to be discovered and invoked by the AI. Meituan has already announced its integration, allowing users to access services like food delivery through WeChat AI. Other platforms like Ctrip and Tongcheng have followed suit. Furthermore, WeChat is collaborating with major smartphone manufacturers to enable their native AI assistants to perform actions within WeChat, such as initiating calls or sending messages, through a controlled protocol called Agent-to-Agent (A2A). Reports indicate the WeChat AI Agent will be accessible by swiping right on the main interface. It aims to understand user intent within the rich context of chats, groups, and past interactions, then automatically call upon relevant mini-programs to complete tasks like ordering coffee or booking restaurants. This positions it as a potential "super app" with direct access to WeChat's vast ecosystem of services, social connections, and payment systems. Technically, this is a complex endeavor. It requires advanced natural language understanding, a "world model" to predict interactions within mini-programs (UI-Oceanus), multi-model orchestration for cost efficiency, and careful coordination with millions of third-party service providers. Tencent's development follows a "Co-Design" approach, where product teams and the Hunyuan model t...

The WeChat Agent is really coming.

WeChat Open Platform released a piece of content about guidelines for WeChat AI developers.

The guidelines state that, in order to provide users with a more intelligent interactive experience and help users more agilely discover and use Mini Program services, WeChat Open Platform provides developers with the capability to easily access the WeChat AI ecosystem, while fully respecting developers' rights and autonomous choices.

After access, Mini Programs will have the opportunity to be recommended and called by WeChat AI. Mini Programs that have not completed access will be unable to be called by WeChat AI.

The platform provides two access modes. Automatic mode: authorize the platform to read the Mini Program source code during review, requiring no additional development investment. Development mode: developers can independently and personally develop based on their Mini Program's business characteristics.

On the same day, Meituan officially announced it was the first to access the WeChat AI ecosystem. As a pilot team, Meituan had previously jointly developed and tested access with the WeChat team. In the future, users will be able to call Meituan Waimai and other local life services through WeChat AI.

Life service platforms like Ctrip and Tongcheng also announced access to WeChat one after another.

A few days earlier, Tencent Customer Service stated that WeChat was cooperating with mobile phone manufacturers like Huawei, Xiaomi, Honor, OPPO, and vivo to launch A2A Assistant capabilities, and several manufacturers have already completed access.

Users can initiate WeChat audio/video calls or send messages to specific friends through the corresponding mobile phone system's AI assistant.

This isn't the first news about WeChat AI. As early as March this year, foreign media reported that Tencent was advancing a highly confidential AI Agent project within WeChat.

On June 2nd, foreign media released news that Tencent was testing a prototype of a built-in WeChat AI Agent, with the compliance review process potentially starting as soon as this month. On the day the report was published, Tencent's stock price closed up 10.5%, with its market value increasing by over HKD 300 billion in a single day, marking the largest single-day gain since January 2021.

WeChat AI might just be Tencent's ultimate answer for the second half of the AI era.

01

The Contours of WeChat AI

According to sources who have seen early demonstrations, users can swipe right on the WeChat main interface to bring up the AI Agent's conversation window. After users input commands, the Agent will automatically call Mini Programs within the WeChat ecosystem to complete tasks like screening, ordering, and booking.

For example, if you say "Help me order a cup of coffee under 30 yuan, not too sweet, that I can pick up nearby," the Agent will automatically call Mini Programs within WeChat to help you filter coffee shops, match taste and price, and even complete the ordering process.

Just from the description, it doesn't seem much different from AI chatbots like Doubao and Qianwen.

But the special thing here is that WeChat AI has command and control authority over the entire WeChat ecosystem.

Tencent clearly stated in its 2025 annual report that the goal is to build next-generation Agentic services within the WeChat ecosystem, connecting Mini Programs, content, social, and payment capabilities. As of March 31, 2026, the combined MAU of Weixin and WeChat reached 1.432 billion.

This means that once WeChat AI goes live, for better or worse, it is destined to be a super app.

There are millions of Mini Programs within WeChat, covering daily life scenarios like ride-hailing, food delivery, ticket booking, and grocery shopping. Almost all major domestic internet services have a Mini Program entry within this ecosystem.

The core capability of WeChat AI is enabling AI to call the service and transactional capabilities within these Mini Programs, completing the full closed loop from cognition to decision-making to execution.

So how will it do it?

First is understanding user intent. When a user says "Help me book a restaurant," it means something completely different in a family group chat versus a work group chat.

Who is participating, who can make the final decision, what's the budget, what are the dietary restrictions, what step is the task at—these are all contextual factors the Agent needs to understand. The difficulty lies in the fact that tasks within WeChat naturally span time; a family group discussion about summer vacation might intermittently last for several days.

Then there's tool calling.

The Agent needs to take action, use "Search" to look up information, use Mini Programs to complete queries and price comparisons, use WeChat Pay to complete transactions, and use Service Notifications to give feedback to users.

According to QuestMobile's "2026 Panoramic Ecological Traffic Spring Report," Mini Programs' DAU has exceeded 900 million, covering several hundred verticals.

The toolbox is big enough now; the question is, can WeChat AI use it effectively?

Tencent revealed some technical details in a paper published on March 18th. The WeChat team developed UI-Oceanus, a world model specifically designed for the Mini Program ecosystem. Its purpose is to predict the outcomes of operations. The Agent finds a button, but what happens when it clicks? Where will the page jump to? What window will pop up? Will the payment process initiate?

Humans have intuition about these things when operating apps; the Agent lacks this intuition, so it must learn from data.

Game AI learns "how the character will move when this key is pressed"; the Mini Program world model learns "how the page will change when this button is clicked."

Training directly in real Mini Program environments is too slow and unstable, so UI-Oceanus automatically simulates operations and page changes, generating 5 million samples. This allows the Agent to learn how to operate Mini Programs in a virtual environment before migrating to real scenarios.

Then there's the cost issue. If each scenario triggers inference at an entry point with 1.4 billion MAU, the cost is astronomical. Tencent needs to balance using smaller models for basic tasks and calling stronger models for complex tasks. This multi-model scheduling capability must both ensure effectiveness and control costs.

Finally, there's ecosystem coordination.

There are too many Mini Programs in WeChat—service quality, interface stability, merchant cooperation, payment processes, recommendation ranking, benefit distribution—each item alone could be discussed at length.

For the AI Agent to handle tasks for users, it must actually succeed, not just promise smoothly and then get lost halfway through ordering.

So WeChat AI is actually a very complex engineering project; it must face a variety of complex scenarios. It also needs to understand natural language, call Mini Programs, handle payments, manage context, and coordinate the ecosystem.

The contours of WeChat AI are clear; it's just that this product will be much larger than we imagine.

02

Why WeChat is Best Suited to Host this Agent

The richer the context, the better AI can understand your true intent, and the more accurate the decisions it makes.

And WeChat just happens to be Tencent's largest context container.

WeChat has relationship chains. The social relationships, chat histories, and group conversations of its 1.4 billion users are all context. WeChat has Mini Programs. The millions of Mini Programs covering service scenarios are also context.

WeChat has payments. Users' spending habits, payment records, transaction preferences—these are also context.

WeChat has content. Official accounts, Channels, information flow in Moments—these are similarly context.

Recently, Tencent launched many AI products, such as Yuanbao, ima, WorkBuddy, and Marvis, which may seem independent. In reality, they are all accumulating capabilities for WeChat AI.

Behind this is an internal Tencent mechanism called Co-Design.

Simply put, Co-Design means product teams and model teams design and optimize together.

The traditional approach is for the model team to train the model first, then hand it off to the product team to use. The product team finds problems, gives feedback, and the model team adjusts.

This process is slow, and often results in situations where "the model is strong but the product is not user-friendly."

The Co-Design approach is different. The Yuanbao team tells the Hunyuan team how users actually ask questions and what problems they encounter in real scenarios. The Hunyuan team optimizes specific model capabilities based on this real feedback.

After optimization, the Yuanbao team immediately tests it, discovers new issues, and the cycle continues.

This process is bidirectional and synchronous. Products provide real data and feedback to models; models provide stronger capabilities to products.

Why is this effective? Because the most essential difference between the LLM era and past AI is generalization.

Before LLMs, building a translation product only required preparing translation data; building a Go program only required preparing Go data.

But today is different. Even if you just want to build a Coding Agent, you still need the model to have chatting, searching, instruction-following, and reasoning abilities. So ultimately, it becomes a very complex interdisciplinary problem.

The Co-Design between Tencent and Yuanbao is precisely to give the Hunyuan model strong chatting and searching abilities. Such abilities can then be migrated to other products like ima and WorkBuddy. The abilities trained by one product can make other products better.

Specifically, Yuanbao handles real-world Prompt distribution. The questions users ask in Yuanbao are relatively vague, maybe just one or two sentences, with constant follow-ups.

The multi-turn dialogue and intent understanding abilities trained from these scenarios can be directly migrated to WeChat AI's contextual understanding when handling group chat tasks.

WorkBuddy accumulates data from office collaboration scenarios.

It understands the semantics of corporate scenarios like document structures, meeting minutes, and task assignments. These abilities can let WeChat AI know how to extract key information and identify decision points when handling tasks.

ima builds up search capabilities. It trains the model on how to transform vague query intent into precise search strategies, and how to filter effective information from massive results. These abilities can let WeChat AI perform a round of information screening and intent clarification before calling Mini Programs, so it won't waste time and tokens calling all possible Mini Programs, but will only call the few that are useful.

Marvis trains task decomposition and tool scheduling abilities.

Marvis breaks down user instructions into multiple subtasks, scheduling different Agents to manipulate files, systems, and applications. This set of task orchestration and multi-Agent collaboration abilities can let WeChat AI know how to string together Mini Program calls, payment processes, and message notifications when facing cross-scenario tasks like "Help me order coffee and then notify my colleague."

These products provide different data, but this data can diffuse and migrate between each other, forming a network-like system. The data trained by one product can, through pre-training and post-training generalization mechanisms, improve the performance of another product.

WeChat AI is now at the center of an AI network.

It doesn't need to start from scratch; it can directly call these already-verified capabilities.

More importantly, WeChat itself is a complete ecosystem. It has relationship chains, Mini Programs, the transaction closed loop of WeChat Pay, and the content ecosystem of Official Accounts and Channels. These are things other Agent products lack.

03

How Big is WeChat AI's Stage?

All of this is currently implemented through A2A.

A2A stands for Agent-to-Agent.

It is an open protocol that specifies how AI agents from different manufacturers communicate, call each other's capabilities, and ensure security. The counterpart is the GUIAgent route, which involves letting AI recognize interfaces by "screen reading" like a human and then operate WeChat through "simulated clicks."

Tencent chose A2A over GUI, a decision based on deep consideration.

During Tencent's Q1 earnings call in May, an analyst asked Tencent President Martin Lau, "How do you view the long-term potential or potential disruption from operating system-level agents, including those from iOS, Android, or mobile phone manufacturers?"

Martin Lau replied, "From an operating system perspective, there are a few different things mixed in here. There are true operating systems, like iOS and Android, and then there are applications that try to pretend to be operating systems. If you are an operating system like iOS or Android, you want to ensure the ecosystem is well-protected and carefully curated, and give applications reasonable permissions. You can have an agent that tries to serve users, but you need permission from different applications. Otherwise, as an operating system, you are essentially preying on different applications, which is not the best way to manage an operating system."

Martin Lau meant that using an operating system's Agent to control applications is possible, but it cannot be done without the application's authorization; otherwise, it is preying on the application.

Put more bluntly, Tencent does not accept GUI agents, only A2A.

Over the past two years, mobile phone manufacturers tried using GUI to externally integrate with WeChat.

Honor's YOYO promoted "sending a WeChat red packet with one sentence." Xiaomi's smart home products featured "Xiao Ai automatically connecting WeChat calls." When you tell your phone "Send a 10-yuan red packet to XX," the AI assistant executes in the background: unlock, click the WeChat icon, search for XX, click the plus sign, click red packet, input 10, initiate payment.

This behavior was quickly banned by WeChat.

In April 2025, WeChat Security Center issued an announcement prohibiting third-party tools from bypassing WeChat's security technical measures to illegally obtain or utilize WeChat end-user data.

ByteDance's Doubao Phone met the same fate.

In December 2025, the Doubao Phone Assistant technical preview was released, with the core selling point being "AI directly operates across apps." Soon, many users reported their WeChat accounts being forced offline, with system prompts about abnormal login environments. Tencent stated this triggered WeChat's existing security risk control policies.

Regarding WeChat AI, Honor was the first brand to complete WeChat A2A adaptation. Currently, some Honor models already support this feature. Users can wake up YOYO and directly give voice commands, such as sending WeChat messages, making WeChat voice calls, or video calls.

A Tencent insider commented that any mobile phone agent that cannot call WeChat is not a true system-level Agent. Tencent will definitely open this door; it's just a matter of time.

WeChat is willing to allow mobile phone manufacturers' Agents limited ability to call WeChat capabilities through controlled protocols like A2A, but will not allow external Agents to enter WeChat via screen reading and simulated clicking.

This shows that, ultimately, Tencent still wants to control the calling rights and rule-setting authority for the WeChat ecosystem.

Speaking of Doubao, this leads to another question: Will WeChat AI charge fees?

Doubao has 345 million MAU, and recently there were rumors it would start charging for some features. WeChat has 1.4 billion MAU; the pressure is only greater.

Moreover, WeChat AI has to serve so many people; if every scenario triggers inference, the cost will be astronomical.

The previously reported Tencent plan to invest 10 billion in DeepSeek can be explained as securing model supply and a cost base.

Tencent's self-developed Hunyuan large model needs technical allies, and the WeChat ecosystem needs low-cost inference capabilities even more. DeepSeek's low-cost training approach恰好 aligns with the needs of massive user scenarios like WeChat AI.

On June 2nd, Tencent also announced that the call prices for the DeepSeek-V4 series on the Tencent Cloud platform would be fully aligned with DeepSeek's official prices, with users bearing no cloud platform premium.

All these clues hint that Tencent wants to deeply bind with DeepSeek, and the WeChat Agent is likely the first answer after this binding.

Use small models for basic tasks—low cost, fast speed. Call strong models for complex tasks—good effect, high accuracy. This multi-model scheduling capability must both ensure effectiveness and control costs.

As a WeChat user, if WeChat AI can truly succeed in completing a task in one go, I am willing to pay for this capability.

For example, helping me book a flight ticket, find a restaurant, or remind me who this person is who has been lying in my Moments friend list for so long without any chat history. I think these features are very valuable.

More importantly, WeChat AI faces not only individual users but also enterprise users. Enterprise automation, intelligent customer service, intelligent marketing—these scenarios have stronger demand for AI and higher willingness to pay.

WeChat AI's stage is actually very large. How large exactly? The answer is, as large as the WeChat ecosystem is, that's how large WeChat AI's stage is.

Tencent's Chief AI Scientist and Head of the Hunyuan Large Model, Yao Shunyu, gave a longer-term judgment at the Tencent Cloud AI Industry Application Conference on June 5th.

He believes AI is a long-term game, not a short-term window. He criticized the "make money quickly and retire in two years" mentality of some Silicon Valley practitioners, emphasizing that the current state is like "PCs in the 1970s," and new product opportunities will continuously emerge in the future.

This judgment恰恰 explains why Tencent is willing to invest such high costs in WeChat AI. Yao Shunyu specifically emphasized that "practical value is greater than leaderboard value." He believes AI methodology is already highly mature; the real difficulty lies in finding "good problems" to solve, not pursuing numbers on leaderboards.

WeChat AI aims to solve precisely such "good problems."

How to let these 1.4 billion users feel the value brought by AI in their daily lives.

There's no flashy technique or leaderboard chasing here. Only by solving this good problem can Tencent truly enter the second half of the AI era.

This article is from the WeChat public account "直面AI" (ID: faceaibang), author: Miao Zheng, editor: Wang Jing

Related Questions

QWhat are the two access modes provided by WeChat's open platform for developers to integrate their mini-programs into the WeChat AI ecosystem?

AThe WeChat open platform provides two access modes: Automatic Mode, where the platform is authorized to review and read the mini-program source code during submission without additional development effort; and Development Mode, where developers can customize and develop based on the specific characteristics of their mini-program business.

QWhat is A2A, and why did Tencent choose this approach over GUI Agent for its WeChat AI?

AA2A stands for Agent-to-Agent. It is an open protocol that specifies how AI agents from different manufacturers communicate, call each other's capabilities, and ensure security. Tencent chose A2A over the GUI Agent approach (which relies on screen reading and simulated clicks) to maintain control over the WeChat ecosystem's call permissions and rule-making authority, preventing external agents from accessing WeChat without proper authorization, which Tencent views as 'plundering' applications.

QWhat is the UI-Oceanus model developed by the WeChat team, and what is its purpose?

AUI-Oceanus is a world model specifically designed for the mini-program ecosystem by the WeChat team. Its purpose is to predict the outcomes of operations within mini-programs. It learns from data to understand what happens when a button is clicked—such as page navigation, pop-up windows, or payment process initiation—allowing the AI agent to operate mini-programs effectively in a simulated environment before deploying in real scenarios.

QHow does Tencent's internal Co-Design mechanism contribute to the development of WeChat AI?

ATencent's Co-Design mechanism involves close collaboration between product teams and model teams. Product teams like Yuanbao provide real-world user data and feedback from specific scenarios (e.g., vague queries, multi-turn conversations). The model team (e.g., Hunyuan) uses this feedback to optimize the AI model's capabilities. These improved capabilities are then tested and refined iteratively. This process allows capabilities developed for one product (like chat and search from Yuanbao) to be migrated and enhance other products, including WeChat AI, creating a network of shared, validated AI abilities.

QAccording to the article, what is considered the 'ultimate answer' for Tencent in the second half of the AI era, and what is its potential scale?

AAccording to the article, WeChat AI is considered the potential 'ultimate answer' for Tencent in the second half of the AI era. Its potential scale is described as being as large as the entire WeChat ecosystem itself, which includes its 1.432 billion monthly active users, millions of mini-programs covering daily life services, social relationships, payment systems, and content platforms like Official Accounts and Channels.

Related Reads

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbit18m ago

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbit18m ago

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbit25m ago

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbit25m ago

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手28m ago

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手28m ago

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手44m ago

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手44m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片