Web3 gaming shifts to sustainability as confidence returns: BGA

cointelegraphPublished on 2025-12-12Last updated on 2025-12-12

Abstract

The blockchain gaming sector is shifting toward sustainable economics and showing improved sentiment, according to the Blockchain Game Alliance (BGA). In its annual report, the BGA noted the industry is moving beyond speculative origins toward a product-led future. A survey of over 500 professionals revealed optimism rebounded to 65.8%, with a focus shifting from token economics to sustainable revenue models. Growth is now driven by high-quality games, resilient revenue models, and scalable payment infrastructure. The sector faced significant challenges, with annual funding dropping from $4 billion in 2021 to $293 million in 2025, leading to studio closures and a failure rate of 80-93% for Web3 games. However, factors like clearer U.S. regulations and the adoption of stablecoins are aiding recovery. Stablecoins enable fast, low-cost, borderless transactions without crypto volatility. Nearly 30% of respondents cited high-quality game launches as crucial for growth, with industry leaders emphasizing that real adoption is now taking hold.

The blockchain gaming sector is shifting to more sustainable economics and has improved sentiment and market maturity as it recalibrates its outlook, reported the Blockchain Game Alliance (BGA).

The Web3 gaming advocacy group said in its annual state of the industry report released on Wednesday that the sector is “moving beyond its speculative origins toward a more operationally disciplined, product-led future.”

In a survey of over 500 global blockchain gaming professionals, the level of optimism rebounded to 65.8% from its 2024 lows, with the focus shifting from token economics to sustainable revenue models.

“The clearest indicator of the industry’s broader transition lies in its reorientation toward sustainable economics.”

Growth is now anchored in delivering high-quality games, resilient revenue models, and payment infrastructure to support real-world commerce at scale, the report noted.

Clearer regulations are positive for the industry, said survey respondents. Source: BGA

A tough period for Web3 gaming

Blockchain and Web3 gaming have shifted from peak euphoria in 2021, driven by a play-to-earn explosion and speculative capital, to a low point in 2024, following the collapse of P2E models, a decline in confidence, and a drying up of funding, with studios closing and reputations being damaged.

Related: Investors target ‘fun-first’ crypto games as funding jumps 94% in July

Annual funding dropped dramatically to $293 million in 2025, down from $4 billion in 2021, forcing teams toward leaner, bootstrap-focused operations. Top-tier venture firms paused all new Web3 gaming investments, and project token prices collapsed more than 90% from cycle peaks.

Between 80% and 93% of Web3 games failed, with average lifespans of only months and studios that raised millions couldn’t sustain operations without continuous capital injections.

On the path to recovery

Several developments were cited as contributing factors to the recovery of the beleaguered sector, including regulatory shifts and the growing popularity of stablecoins.

Animoca Brands co-founder Yat Siu said recent crypto-friendly shifts in US regulations mean that companies no longer need to rely on setting up nonprofit foundations when planning token launches.

The BGA said that stablecoins were transformative for Web3 games, they gave gamers “fast, low-cost, borderless transactions without the volatility associated with other crypto assets.”

Additionally, nearly 30% of survey respondents cited high-quality game launches as the most important factor for industry growth.

Immutable’s vice president of global sales, Andrew Sorokovsky, said that “despite the negative headlines, blockchain gaming is now one of crypto’s most proven sectors — where quality projects are thriving and real adoption is taking hold.”

Magazine: XRP’s ‘now or never’ moment, Kalshi taps Solana: Hodler’s Digest

Related Reads

CLARITY Act: Banking Trade Groups Push For Yield Agreement Revision – Details

US banking trade groups are urging revisions to the stablecoin yield compromise in the upcoming CLARITY Act ahead of a key committee markup. The Act currently aims to ban all passive, deposit-like interest on stablecoins to prevent competition with traditional bank savings, while allowing rewards tied to active uses like staking or transactions. In a letter, groups including the American Banking Association and Bank Policy Institute proposed stricter language to eliminate perceived loopholes for passive yield and prevent deposit flight from banks. However, these efforts are reportedly viewed as minor by some lawmakers. The Senate Banking Committee is scheduled to mark up the bill on May 14, a critical step before it can advance through Congress.

bitcoinist9h ago

CLARITY Act: Banking Trade Groups Push For Yield Agreement Revision – Details

bitcoinist9h ago

This Finance CEO Picks Solana Instead Of Bitcoin — Here’s Why

Finance CEO Raoul Pal prefers Solana over Bitcoin, citing its high throughput and low transaction costs as better suited for the future crypto-AI era. He believes Solana is ideal for machine-to-machine microtransactions and AI-driven DeFi activity, predicting AI agents will soon dominate DeFi users. While Bitcoin serves as a store of value, Pal sees higher growth in networks built for mass, automated transactions. This view was highlighted at Consensus 2026, where AI integration and crypto infrastructure were key themes.

bitcoinist10h ago

This Finance CEO Picks Solana Instead Of Bitcoin — Here’s Why

bitcoinist10h ago

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit10h ago

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit10h ago

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit12h ago

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit12h ago

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit12h ago

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit12h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片