Wall Street Expert Warns of 35% Stock Crash Amid US-Iran War

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-09Last updated on 2026-03-09

Abstract

Wall Street expert Ed Yardeni has raised his prediction for a U.S. stock market crash to 35% for the rest of the year, up from an initial 20% forecast. This revision comes amid escalating tensions in the U.S.-Iran war, which has driven oil prices above $100 a barrel. Yardeni also reduced the odds of a market rally influenced by investor enthusiasm to just 5%. The conflict has caused investors to push back expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts to September, with some betting no cuts will occur in 2026 due to slower economic growth and rising inflation. Additionally, crypto-related stocks are falling, with some firms, like Bitcoin miner Core Scientific, pivoting strategies and selling assets amid the uncertainty.

Ed Yardeni, an expert from Wall Street, has predicted another 35% crash in U.S. stocks, comprising crypto-associated equities. This comes at the time of surging tensions between the U.S. and Iran as the war carries on to surge.

The expert predicted the chances of a stock market crash to 35% for the rest of the year. In the beginning it showed about a 20% fall, but he has now changed his views, seeing the market sentiment.

Meanwhile, he cut the odds of a rally influence more by investor enthusiasm that said fundamentals to only 5% from 20%. This comes amid the escalating U.S.-Iran war and worsening with time. Two days earlier, President Trump threatened to keep hitting the Middle Eastern country at the time of the refusal to retreat by the country.

The Bet on Slashing Rates

The new predictions of Yarden come as oil prices increase over $100 a barrel. A lot of experts are now predicting an elongated conflict in the area that could send energy costs even higher, which could crash crypto stocks further.

At the same time, investors pushed back anticipations for the upcoming Fed rate slash to September. Before the war initiated, traders had completely priced in a move by July. Some of them are also betting the Fed may not slash rates at all in 2026. This comes at the time of slower economic growth and increasing inflation.

In the morning of March 9, Iran named its new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, the son of Ali Khamenei, who was assassinated by the U.S. This indicated the desire of the government for continuity as Iran witnesses more attacks from the US and Israel nine days into the war.

A lot of crypto-associated firms have started to pivot from their strategies at the time of tensions. For example, Bitcoin miner Core Scientific sold some BTC as it moved to an AI-aimed structure. This witnessed its CORZ crypto stock crash at the time.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Ethena (ENA) Price Squeezed Between $0.119 and $0.095: Is a Breakout or Breakdown Next?

TagsIranStockwall street

Related Reads

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit1h ago

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit1h ago

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手1h ago

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手1h ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit3h ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片