ViaBTC Outlined Criteria for Choosing a Mining Pool in a Bear Market

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-12Last updated on 2026-08-12

Abstract

In a bear market where falling prices and high network difficulty squeeze profitability, ViaBTC emphasizes that choosing a reliable mining pool is more critical than chasing promised rewards. They outline key risks and selection criteria for miners. Risks with new/small pools include non-payment of rewards due to lacking reserve funds, hidden fees (like withdrawal charges or underreporting hash rate), and vulnerable infrastructure prone to DDoS attacks. Key selection criteria are: 1. **Operational History:** Pools surviving multiple market cycles demonstrate resilience. 2. **Payout Model:** PPS+ offers predictable income by paying for each share, while PPLNS ties payouts to block discovery, transferring volatility risk to the miner. 3. **Infrastructure Security:** Geographically distributed servers and DDoS protection ensure stable uptime. 4. **Financial Tools:** Integrated wallets, auto-conversion to stablecoins, and crypto-backed loans help manage revenue within the ecosystem without selling assets at market lows. ViaBTC, operating since 2016, cites its SOC 2 Type II audit and features like zero-fee transfers to CoinEx, auto-conversion, and lending services. The core message is that on a bear market, the security and stability of established pools are essential for business survival, outweighing minor fee savings from untested platforms.

A declining price amidst high network difficulty reduces equipment profitability, and a wrong choice of platform can turn even an energy-efficient farm into a loss-making one. During such times, the reliability of a pool is more important than promised benefits, according to the ViaBTC mining pool. The company named for ForkLog the criteria to rely on when connecting hashpower.

What Risks Does a Miner Face with a New Pool

Competition between platforms intensifies in a falling market. To attract clients, small and new services offer zero or very low fees and increased bonuses. ViaBTC highlights three risks of such conditions:

  1. Non-payment of rewards. A small platform may lack a reserve fund. In case of block delays or technical failures, it is unable to pay miners what they have earned.
  2. Hidden deductions. The advertised low rate is compensated by withdrawal fees. According to ViaBTC representatives, there are also cases of underreporting a user's hashpower in pool statistics.
  3. Vulnerable infrastructure. Small services save on security and more often become targets of DDoS attacks.

What to Look For When Choosing

Track record. Platforms that have survived several growth and decline cycles have already proven their resilience in practice.

Payout model. It determines who bears the risk of failure. With PPS+, the pool pays for every accepted share regardless of whether it finds a block and adds transaction fees to the reward. The miner's income becomes predictable, but the platform's fee is higher. With PPLNS, the payout depends on whether the pool finds a block, and the income variability falls on the miner.

Infrastructure security. Servers distributed across regions and protection against network attacks provide stable ping and uptime.

Financial tools. A built-in wallet, auto-conversion of mined coins into stablecoins, and loans backed by cryptocurrency allow managing revenue within a single ecosystem without withdrawing funds.

“ViaBTC has been operating since 2016 and has been through several prolonged bear markets. In November 2025, the company underwent a SOC 2 Type II audit, which checks the operation of protection mechanisms over the long term, not just at the moment of inspection”, comment pool representatives.

By default, the service calculates rewards using the PPS+ model. Transferring funds from the pool to the CoinEx exchange is free of charge. Auto-conversion exchanges mined coins for stablecoins, and loans backed by cryptocurrency cover electricity bills without selling assets at the market bottom.

Crypto loans backed by Bitcoin: how miners obtain liquidity without selling assets

Tariffs, a list of supported coins, and a profitability calculator are available on the ViaBTC website.

“Choosing a pool in a bear market is a matter of business survival. Saving fractions of a percent on the fee of a small pool does not justify the risk of losing all daily or weekly revenue. Large, time-tested platforms provide miners with the security, stability, and technological support necessary to overcome any market downturns”, conclude ViaBTC.

Recall that mining companies have intensified the struggle for power capacity amid growing demand for data centers.

end-content

Related Questions

QWhat are the main risks for miners when joining a new mining pool on a bear market according to ViaBTC?

AAccording to ViaBTC, the main risks are: 1) Non-payment of rewards: Small pools may lack a reserve fund and fail to pay miners during block delays or technical issues. 2) Hidden deductions: Advertised low fees may be compensated by withdrawal charges or underreporting of a user's hash rate. 3) Vulnerable infrastructure: Small services often save on security and are more frequently targeted by DDoS attacks.

QWhat key criteria does ViaBTC recommend considering when choosing a mining pool?

AViaBTC recommends considering the following criteria: 1) Operational history: Pools that have survived multiple market cycles have proven their resilience. 2) Payout model: This determines who bears the risk of failure (e.g., PPS+ vs PPLNS). 3) Infrastructure security: Look for servers distributed across regions and protection against network attacks. 4) Financial tools: Integrated wallet, auto-conversion to stablecoins, and crypto-backed loans for managing revenue within one ecosystem.

QHow does the PPS+ payout model differ from PPLNS according to the article?

AIn the PPS+ model, the pool pays for every accepted share regardless of whether it finds a block and adds transaction fees to the reward. This makes the miner's income predictable, but the pool's commission is higher. In the PPLNS model, the payout depends on whether the pool finds a block, shifting the income variability risk onto the miner.

QWhat specific financial tools does ViaBTC offer to miners to help them manage revenue?

AViaBTC offers an integrated wallet, auto-conversion of mined coins into stablecoins, and crypto-backed loans. These tools allow miners to manage their earnings within the ViaBTC ecosystem without withdrawing funds, enabling them to cover expenses like electricity bills without selling assets during a market downturn.

QWhat is ViaBTC's argument for choosing a large, established mining pool over a smaller one during a bear market?

AViaBTC argues that on a bear market, the choice of a mining pool is a matter of business survival. Saving a fraction of a percent on fees from a small pool does not justify the risk of losing all daily or weekly revenue. Large, time-tested platforms provide miners with the security, stability, and technological support necessary to weather any market downturn.

Related Reads

Wall Street Begins to Question Tech Giants' AI Narrative

Wall Street Questions the AI Narrative of Tech Giants Wall Street is shifting its focus from the hype surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) to a rigorous financial reality check. Following strong earnings reports from companies like Google and a massive $500 billion financing initiative from Nvidia for AI infrastructure, the market reaction has been mixed and skeptical. The core concern revolves around the massive capital expenditure (CapEx) required for AI development—building data centers and acquiring chips—and whether future cash flows can justify these upfront costs. Investors are now scrutinizing free cash flow (FCF), which measures the cash left after operational expenses and capital investments. A negative FCF, as seen recently with Alphabet (Google's parent company), signals heavy immediate spending, even if profits are growing. The divergent stock reactions highlight this new scrutiny. Microsoft's stock surged after its earnings, supported by strong operating cash flow, growing cloud revenue (Azure), and a large backlog of committed business. In contrast, Alphabet's stock fell despite profit growth because its capital spending caused FCF to turn negative for the first time. Similarly, Nvidia's announcement of a $500 billion financing platform, while potentially expanding its market, raised questions about whether AI build-out has become too expensive for tech companies to fund internally. Analysts are moving beyond simply asking if there is AI demand—which cloud revenue growth confirms—to deeper questions: the speed at which AI investments translate into revenue, profit, and ultimately, cash returns. The market is evaluating the "return on invested capital" (ROIC) over the long term, considering factors like rapid chip obsolescence, energy costs, and future competition. In summary, Wall Street's AI narrative is evolving from grand vision to a detailed financial and operational examination. The key question is no longer if AI is transformative, but whether companies can generate cash returns fast enough to outpace the immense costs of building it. Free cash flow has become a critical first filter in this reassessment.

marsbit17m ago

Wall Street Begins to Question Tech Giants' AI Narrative

marsbit17m ago

An Unexpected Player Enters the Lithography Machine Arena

In the spring of 2026, Elon Musk unveiled the TeraFab chip manufacturing plan, aiming to meet the immense computing power needs of SpaceX and Tesla. He subsequently signaled a move into the photolithography machine market, with speculation centering on a Free Electron Laser (FEL) approach to challenge the dominance of traditional EUV technology. Currently, ASML, utilizing Laser-Produced Plasma (LPP) EUV光源, holds a near-monopoly. However, LPP faces bottlenecks in energy conversion efficiency, tin debris contamination, and a power ceiling. In contrast, FEL technology, pursued by companies like xLight (where former Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger serves as executive chairman), offers a different path. It generates EUV light by accelerating electrons, potentially providing higher power without plasma conversion and its associated contamination, targeting the sub-13.5nm "beyond-EUV" wavelength range. The photolithography landscape shows three main trajectories: ASML's incremental evolution (like High-NA EUV),光源革新 like FEL targeting ASML's core component, and non-EUV alternatives like Nanoimprint Lithography (NIL) or Electron Beam Lithography (EBL). While ASML remains the dominant player with strong financials and产能 expansion plans, new entrants are challenging the status quo. xLight claims its FEL could boost productivity by 50-100%. Other paths include Substrate's particle-accelerator-based X-ray lithography and Chinese research into LPP alternatives. Musk's TeraFab is a high-stakes bet that FEL can move from lab to fab, that "plug-and-play"光源 replacement can circumvent ASML's ecosystem, and that massive future compute demand justifies a new supply chain. His public endorsement of FEL signifies that the photolithography business is no longer ASML's game alone.

marsbit17m ago

An Unexpected Player Enters the Lithography Machine Arena

marsbit17m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片