Valuation at $1.25 Billion Post-SPAC Listing, Securitize to Issue "True Equity" On-Chain Stocks

Odaily星球日报Published on 2025-12-19Last updated on 2025-12-19

Abstract

Securitize, a major RWA (Real World Assets) platform, plans to launch native on-chain stock products by Q1 2026. Unlike synthetic or beneficial-rights models that track prices or represent indirect claims, Securitize will issue legally recognized shares directly on-chain, with tokens representing full shareholder rights including dividends and voting. These shares will be recorded on the issuer’s official cap table. Valuing compliance and integration with traditional finance, Securitize is an SEC-registered transfer agent. It has already tokenized over $3 billion in assets, including BlackRock’s $1.7+ billion BUIDL money market fund, and works with major institutions like Apollo, KKR, and VanEck. In October, Securitize announced plans to go public via a SPAC merger with Cantor Equity Partners II at a $1.25 billion valuation (ticker: SECZ). Backed by investors such as Morgan Stanley, BlackRock, and ARK Invest, the company is positioning itself as a bridge between traditional finance and decentralized systems, emphasizing regulatory alignment and institutional adoption.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | DingDang (@XiaMiPP)

On December 17, the RWA platform Securitize announced plans to launch native on-chain stock products in the coming months, targeting the first quarter of 2026. Unlike most "stock tokenization" solutions on the market, Securitize will directly issue real, regulated shares on the blockchain, simultaneously recording them in the issuer's official share register; its tokens represent full shareholder rights, including dividends, proxy voting, and more.

On October 28 this year, Securitize disclosed that it would go public via a SPAC merger, with a post-merger valuation estimated at $1.25 billion and a stock ticker of SECZ. As a key player in the tokenized money market fund space, Securitize has partnered with traditional asset management institutions such as BlackRock, Apollo, KKR, Hamilton Lane, and VanEck, with cumulative tokenized asset scale exceeding $3 billion.

Amid the ongoing heat of the RWA narrative, Securitize, with its frequent moves, has become a market focus. Odaily Planet Daily will analyze it from a business perspective to help readers gain an in-depth understanding of the company's layout and prospects.

Native On-Chain Stocks: Not "Price Mapping," But Legally Recognized Shares

To understand the importance of Securitize's product path, it must first be placed within the overall structure of the current stock tokenization track. Most existing stock tokenization platforms can be broadly divided into two mainstream models.

The first is the synthetic model. Early examples like Mirror Protocol and Synthetix fall into this category, where tokens track stock prices through derivative structures or oracle mechanisms, providing only price exposure without involving any real shares. Such products lack shareholder rights, carry counterparty risk and pricing deviations, and are essentially derivatives rather than equity.

The second is the beneficial interest model. For example, MSX typically involves the platform or a third-party custodian holding the real shares (usually 1:1 backed), issuing tokens that represent beneficial interests or claims to these shares. Holders gain economic exposure (e.g., price movements, possibly dividend pass-through) but are not direct legal owners; the official share register records the custodian, not the token holder.

Different from these two paths, Securitize is attempting a third model—the native on-chain stock model. What Securitize plans to issue will be shares recognized in law as real stock, issued natively directly on the blockchain, and simultaneously recorded in the issuing company's official share register. Token holders possess full shareholder rights, including dividends, proxy voting, etc. More crucially, Securitize itself, as an SEC-registered transfer agent, ensures that token holders are the direct legal owners, not holding indirectly via an intermediary or SPV. In other words, this type of asset is neither a price tracker nor an IOU" from a custodian.

However, it is undeniable that the complexity of the native on-chain stock model is significantly higher than that of synthetic or beneficial interest schemes. It must not only solve the problems of on-chain issuance and instant settlement but also simultaneously comply with a series of traditional financial rules such as securities regulation, corporate law, and transfer agent systems, achieving seamless integration with existing financial infrastructure. In practical terms, this means higher compliance costs, longer advancement cycles, and each step being exposed to regulatory and institutional friction.

In contrast, the advantages of synthetic or beneficial interest schemes are obvious: faster implementation, lighter structure, lower cost, and easier achievement of 24/7 trading and DeFi compatibility. The path chosen by Securitize aims not to "circumvent regulation" but to attempt, within the system, to truly eliminate the long-standing structural gap between the traditional financial system and the on-chain system.

It is under this choice that Securitize's position in the RWA track becomes clearer.

Securitize is Becoming One of the "Standard Answers" for RWA Infrastructure

Securitize was founded in November 2017 by Carlos Domingo and Jamie Finn, headquartered in San Francisco, California, USA. The company focuses on using blockchain technology to transform traditional financial assets (such as stocks, funds, bonds, private equity, etc.) into compliant digital securities.

This positioning directly determines Securitize's partners and business form. Securitize's most well-known case is providing tokenization services for BlackRock's BUIDL money market fund. To date, the fund's size has exceeded $1.7 billion, making it the largest tokenized money fund product in the current RWA market.

In addition, Securitize has partnered with several traditional asset management institutions including Apollo, KKR, Hamilton Lane, and VanEck. Official data shows that its cumulative tokenized asset scale has surpassed $3 billion. If the early stages of RWA were more about "conceptual feasibility," then Securitize's business has begun to enter the verification stage of "institutional feasibility."

This "bridge-type" positioning is also clearly reflected in Securitize's financing and shareholder structure.

Public information shows that Securitize has raised approximately $122 million to $147 million through multiple rounds of private equity financing. Early investors mostly came from the crypto industry itself, including Coinbase, Ripple, etc. As the RWA narrative gradually clarified, its shareholder structure also changed significantly, with traditional financial giants such as Morgan Stanley and BlackRock entering one after another. The number of investors exceeds 50, and it has also received significant holdings from Cathie Wood's ARK Invest.

This process from "crypto circle recognition" to "Wall Street endorsement" is not accidental but a natural result of its business path and institutional choices.

Under This Logic, Moving Towards the Capital Market is Not Surprising

On October 28, Securitize announced that it would go public through a merger with special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) Cantor Equity Partners II, Inc. After the transaction is completed, the company's valuation is expected to reach $1.25 billion, and it plans to trade under the ticker symbol SECZ.

Cantor Equity Partners II, Inc. (NSDQ:CEPT) is sponsored by a company under financial services giant Cantor Fitzgerald, with its head being Brandon Lutnick, son of the U.S. Secretary of Commerce. Notably, Twenty One, the third-largest bitcoin reserve company, also went public by merging with another SPAC under Cantor Fitzgerald, showing the group's continued layout in the crypto asset field.

To support the listing and public market operations, Securitize has also simultaneously strengthened its compliance and governance capabilities, announcing the appointment of former PayPal digital asset legal head Jerome Roche as General Counsel, preparing for future continuous reporting and regulatory communication on Nasdaq.

Conclusion

Returning to Securitize itself, as a leading project in the RWA track, the market's earliest expectation for it might have been just when it would issue a token. But judging from today's progress, this expectation itself might just be the inertial thinking of the crypto market.

What Securitize is ultimately moving towards is not a narrative stage centered around a token, but the larger structure formed by the capital market and regulatory system. But this choice itself is not surprising. Because from the beginning, the role it has played has been closer to a bridge connecting TradFi and DeFi.

In this sense, Securitize's development path may reflect the profound transformation the RWA narrative is undergoing, moving from imagination to reality, from concept to institution. How far this path can go depends not only on the expansion speed of a certain company but also on whether the traditional financial system is truly willing to reserve a realistic space for "native on-chain assets."

Related Questions

QWhat is the key difference between Securitize's planned on-chain stock product and existing stock tokenization models?

ASecuritize's native on-chain stock represents a direct, legally recognized share of equity issued natively on the blockchain and recorded on the issuer's official cap table, granting holders full shareholder rights like dividends and voting. This differs from synthetic models (which are just price-tracking derivatives) and beneficial interest models (where a custodian holds the real stock and issues an IOU token).

QWhat major traditional asset management firms has Securitize partnered with for its tokenization services?

ASecuritize has partnered with major traditional asset managers including BlackRock, Apollo, KKR, Hamilton Lane, and VanEck.

QHow is Securitize planning to become a publicly traded company and what is its expected valuation?

ASecuritize is planning to go public through a merger with a Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) called Cantor Equity Partners II, Inc. The combined company is expected to have a valuation of $1.25 billion and trade under the ticker symbol SECZ.

QWhat is the total value of assets that Securitize has tokenized so far, and what is its most prominent product?

ASecuritize has cumulatively tokenized over $3 billion in assets. Its most prominent product is the tokenized BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund (BUIDL), which is the largest tokenized money market fund in the RWA market with over $1.7 billion in assets.

QWhat regulatory and infrastructure challenges does the native on-chain stock model face compared to other tokenization approaches?

AThe native on-chain stock model faces higher complexity and compliance costs because it must satisfy securities regulations, corporate law, and transfer agent requirements, and integrate with existing financial infrastructure. This is more challenging than synthetic or beneficial interest models, which are faster to launch, cheaper, and more easily compatible with DeFi but do not provide direct legal ownership.

Related Reads

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit24m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit24m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit43m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit43m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit52m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit52m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片